Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovative technique for the closure of rectovaginal fistula using Surgisis™ mesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the efficacy of Surgisis mesh for closure of rectovaginal fistulas. Prospective data were collected from two centres.

Methods

All patients with a rectovaginal fistula who underwent definitive surgery using Surgisis mesh were prospectively enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria included a rectovaginal fistula in the lower two-thirds of the rectovaginal septum. Surgery was performed with a standardized technique including combined transrectal and transvaginal excision of the rectovaginal fistula with transvaginal placement of the mesh. Success was defined as closure of both internal and external (perianal and vaginal) openings, absence of drainage without further intervention, and no abscess formation.

Results

Over a period of 16 months, a total of 21 mesh procedures were performed in two centres. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (18–59 years). Of the 21 patients, 18 (86%) had recurrent rectovaginal fistula, and the mean number of prior attempts was 2.3 (0–8). The majority of patients (nine) had Crohn’s disease-associated fistula, followed by six with iatrogenic fistula, two with radiation-induced fistula, two with obstetric injuryinduced fistula, and two with idiopathic fistula. The mesh procedure was performed under faecal diversion in eight patients (38%). The mean operative time was 38 min; no intraoperative morbidity occurred. Patients were discharged from hospital on day 4. After a mean follow-up of 12 months (range, 3–18 months), the overall success rate after primary mesh procedure was 71% (15/21; 6 patients had failure or recurrence). All patients with failure or recurrence were reoperated upon. Out of these six patients who were reoperated upon, four had definite healing (75%). Among the eight patients who had faecal diversion, four (50%) had reversal of their stoma.

Conclusion

The preliminary success rate for this innovative technique using Surgisis mesh for the closure of rectovaginal fistulas is promising. Further studies are needed to assess the definite role of this novel technique in comparison to traditional surgical procedures

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pye PK, Dada T, Duthie G et al (2004) Surgisis™ mesh: a novel approach to repair of a recurrent rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1554–1556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis CN (2008) Outcomes after repair of rectovaginal fistulas using bioprosthetics. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1084–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saclarides TJ (2002) Rectovaginal fistula. Surg Clin North Am 82:1261–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scott NA, Nair A, Hughes LE (1992) Anovaginal and rectovaginal fistula in patients with Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 79:1379–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy C, Tremaine WJ (2002) Management of internal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8:106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fry RD, Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ et al (1989) Techniques and results in the management of anal and perianal Crohn’s disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168:42–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lichtenstein GR (2000) Treatment of fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 119:1132–1147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenwald JC, Hoexter B (1978) Repair of rectovaginal fistulas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146:443–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen JL, Stricker JW, Schoetz DJ et al (1989) Rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 32:825–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crim RW, Fazio VW, Laveri IC (1990) Rectal advancement flap repair in Crohn’s disease. Factors predictive of failure. Dis Colon Rectum 33:P3

    Google Scholar 

  11. Makowiec F, Jehle EC, Becker HD et al (1999) Clinical course after transanal advancement flap repair of perianal fistula in patients with Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 82:603–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hull TL, Fazio VW (1997) Surgical approaches to low anovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Am J Surg 173:95–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI et al (1993) Endorectal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas. Surgery 114:682–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonoda T, Hull T, Piedmonte MR et al (2002) Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1622–1628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmerman DD, Gosselink MP, Briel JW et al (2002) The outcome of transanal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal fistulas is not improved by an additional labial fat transposition. Tech Coloproctol 6:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O et al (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1616–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sher ME, Bauer JJ, Gelernt I (1991) Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease: transvaginal approach. Dis Colon Rectum 34:641–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berman IR (1991) Sleeve advancement anorectoplasty for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 34:1032–1037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW (1998) Advancement sleeve flaps for treatment of severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 85:1695–1698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simmang CL, Lacey SW, Huber PJ (1998) Rectal sleeve advancement: repair of rectovaginal fistula associated with anorectal stricture in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 41:787–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Joo JS, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ et al (1998) Endorectal advancement flap in perianal Crohn’s disease. Am Surg 64:147–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Onodera H, Nagayama S, Kohmoto I et al (2003) Novel surgical repair with bilateral gluteus muscle patching for intractable rectovaginal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 7:198–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chitrathara K, Namratha D, Francis V et al (2001) Spontaneous rectovaginal fistula and repair using bulbocavernosus muscle flap. Tech Coloproctol 5:47–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heyen F, Winslet MC, Andrews H et al (1989) Vaginal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 32:379–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Devesa JM, Devesa M, Velasco GR et al (2007) Benign rectovaginal fistulas: management and results of a personal series. Tech Coloproctol 11:128–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Andreani SM, Dang HH, Grondona P et al (2007) Rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2215–2222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hannaway CD, Hull TL (2008) Current considerations in the management of rectovaginal fistula from Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 10:747–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shelton AA, Welton ML (2006) Transperineal repair of persistent rectovaginal fistulas using an acellular cadaveric dermal graft (AlloDerm). Dis Colon Rectum 49:1454–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moore RD, Miklos JR, Kohli N (2004) Rectovaginal fistula repair using a porcine dermal graft. Obstet Gynecol 104:1165–1167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Koperen PJ, Bemelman WA, Bossuyt PM et al (2008) The anal fistula plug versus the mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of anorectal fistula (PLUG trial). BMC Surg 8:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Walfisch A, Zilberstein T, Walfisch S (2004) Rectovaginal septal repair: case presentations and introduction of a modified reconstruction technique. Tech Coloproctol 8:192–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fürst A, Schmidbauer C, Swol-Ben J et al (2008) Gracilis transposition for repair of recurrent anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruiz D, Bashankaev B, Speranaza J et al (2008) Graciloplasty for rectourethral, rectovaginal and rectovesical fistulas: technique overview, pitfalls and complications. Tech Coloproctol 12:277–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Schwandner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwandner, O., Fuerst, A., Kunstreich, K. et al. Innovative technique for the closure of rectovaginal fistula using Surgisis™ mesh. Tech Coloproctol 13, 135–140 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0470-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0470-x

Key words

Navigation