Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with a rectocele often suffer from such symptoms as obstructed defaecation, urine or stool incontinence and pain. The aim of this study was to assess other concomitant pelvic floor disorders and their influence on pelvic function.

Methods

Included in the study were 37 female patients with a significant rectocele and defaecation disorder. Medical history and symptoms were analysed in terms of validated functional scores. All patients underwent open magnetic resonance defaecography (MRD) in a sitting position. Imaging was analysed for the presence and size of the rectocele, intussusception and other pelvic floor disorders.

Results

Patients with a higher body mass index tended to have a larger rectocele, whereas age and vaginal birth did not correlate with the size of the rectocele. In 67.5% of the patients with a previously diagnosed recto cele, an intussusception was diagnosed on MRD. This group suffered from significantly worse urine incontinence (p=0.023) and from accessory enteroceles 64%, compared with 17% (p=0.013) for those with a simple rectocele. Patients with higher grade intussusception suffered more frequently from incontinence than from constipation.

Conclusion

Patients with a symptomatic rectocele frequently have other pelvic floor disorders that significantly influence the pattern of symptoms. Knowledge of all the afflictions is essential for determining the optimal treatment for each individual patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S et al. (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98:646–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietz HP, Korda A (2005) Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:505–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubner M, Hetzer F, Weishaupt D et al. (2006) A prospective comparison between clinical outcome and open-configuration magnetic resonance defecography findings before and after surgery for symptomatic rectocele. Colorectal Dis 8:605–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz HP, Schierlitz L (2005) Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth - myth or reality? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:3–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz HP, Clarke B (2005) Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:391–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I et al. (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirst GR, Hughes RJ, Morgan AR et al. (2005) The role of rectocele repair in targeted patients with obstructed defaecation. Colorectal Dis 7:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H et al. (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:369–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollak J, Davila GW (2003) Rectocele repair: the gynecologic approach. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 16:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis CN (2005) Treatment of obstructed defecation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 18:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cruikshank SH (1987) Preventing posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1433–1440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swift SE, Pound T, Dias JK (2001) Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:187–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2007) Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110:625–632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ et al. (2007) Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:664–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Scott SM et al. (2005) Rectal intussusception: a study of rectal biomechanics and visceroperception. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1578–1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pescatori M, Quondamcarlo C (1999) A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 14:245–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Delemarre JB, Kruyt RH, Doornbos J et al. (1994) Anterior rectocele: assessment with radiographic defecography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Dis Colon Rectum 37:249–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanley J, Capewell A, Hagen S (2001) Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women. BMJ 322:1096–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al. (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Solopova AE, Hetzer FH, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2008) MR defecography: prospective comparison of two rectal enema compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W118–W124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steiner RA, Healy JC (1998) Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: magnetic resonance imaging and laparoscopic treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10:295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE et al. (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS, Benson JT (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S et al. (2002) Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics 22:817–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Reference index. R foundation for statistical computing

  27. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE et al. (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223:501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R et al. (1999) Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor T, Smith AN, Fulton M (1990) Effects of hysterectomy on bowel and bladder function. Int J Colorectal Dis 5:228–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Forsgren C, Zetterstrom J, Lopez A et al. (2007) Effects of hysterectomy on bowel function: a three-year, prospective cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1139–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Montella JM, Morrill MY (2005) Effectiveness of the McCall culdeplasty in maintaining support after vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarlos D, Brandner S, Kots L et al. (2008) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome — a prospective study with 101 cases. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1415–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The role of childbirth in the aetiology of rectocele. BJOG 113:264–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM, Wexner SD et al. (2007) Anorectal three-dimensional endosonography and anal manometry in assessing anterior rectocele in women: a new pathogenesis concept and the basic surgical principle. Colorectal Dis 9:80–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Naumann G, Kölbl H (2002) Diagnostic and therapy of cystocele, rectocele and vaginal prolapse. Urologe B 163:1510–1512

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brusciano L, Limongelli P, del Genio G et al. (2007) Useful parameters helping proctologists to identify patients with defaecatory disorders that may be treated with pelvic floor rehabilitation. Tech Coloproctol 11:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson JR, Chen AH, Pettit PD, Bridges MD (2002) Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1494–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vermeulen J, Lange JF, Sikkenk AC, van der Harst E (2005) Anterolateral rectopexy for correction of rectoceles leads to good anatomical but poor functional results Tech Coloproctol 9:35–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Erkan J, Haciyanli N, Yildirim M et al. (2005) Intussusception in adults: an unusual and challenging condition for surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:452–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Altman D, Lopez A, Kierkegaard J et al. (2005) Assessment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: comparison of physical findings to cystodefecoperitoneography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti D’Urso A (2006) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram’. Colorectal Dis 8:785–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G et al. (2004) New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:359–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al. (2008) Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:186–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hetzer FH, Beck J, Marlovits M et al. (2007) Stapled transanal rectal resection with contour Transtar. Eur J Surg 39:97

    Google Scholar 

  47. Williams NS, Dvorkin LS, Giordano P et al. (2005) EXternal Pelvic REctal SuSpension (Express procedure) for rectal intussusception, with and without rectocele repair. Br J Surg 92:598–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P et al. (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tensionfree vaginal mesh (Prolift technique) — a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:743–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Dindo D, Weishaupt D, Lehmann K et al. (2008) Clinical and morphologic correlation after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1768–1774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA et al. (1999) Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 45 [Suppl 2]:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE et al. (1989) Defaecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA (2001) Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 30:199–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W (1995) Relationships between defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time in constipated patients. Gut 36:907–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleshman JW, Kodner IJ, Fry RD (1989) Internal intussusception of the rectum: a changing perspective. Neth J Surg 41:145–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM et al. (2004) Open-magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 6:45–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi JS, Hwang YH, Salum MR et al. (2001) Outcome and management of patients with large rectoanal intussusception. Am J Gastroenterol 96:740–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dvorkin LS, Knowles CH, Scott SM et al. (2005) Rectal intussusception: characterisation and symptomatology. Br J Surg 48:824–831

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C et al. (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams NS, Dvorkin LS, Giordano P et al. (2005) External pelvic rectal suspension (the Express procedure) for rectal intussusception, with and without rectocele repair — development of a new procedure. Br J Surg 92:598–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstr. 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    T. Steffen, U. Beutner & F. H. Hetzer

  2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistr. 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    R. Hausammann & D. Weishaupt

Authors
  1. R. Hausammann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Steffen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Weishaupt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. U. Beutner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. H. Hetzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. H. Hetzer.

Additional information

Contributions of authors: H.R.: Literature search, conception S.T.: Conception, writing W.D., H.F.: Conception, MR analysis B.U.: Statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hausammann, R., Steffen, T., Weishaupt, D. et al. Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?. Tech Coloproctol 13, 17–26 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0454-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0454-x

Key words

Search

Navigation