Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

D-dimer predicts postoperative recurrence and prognosis in patients with liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer is common, and its incidence is increasing throughout the world. The liver is a major metastatic site, and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has a poor prognosis. Although liver resection is the most effective therapy for CRLM, postoperative recurrence is common. Thus, prognostic markers for CRLM are greatly needed. D-dimer, a fibrin cleavage product, has been shown to be related to colorectal tumor progression, and is also associated with malignant progression and recurrence in various cancers. Therefore, we evaluated the value of D-dimer in predicting the prognosis in CRLM.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 90 cases of resected CRLM to determine the correlation between D-dimer and patient survival. The cut-off value for D-dimer levels was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Significant differences occurred in the recurrence group with higher D-dimer levels (P = 0.00736*), while the optimal cut-off value was 0.6 µg/mL. High D-dimer levels (≥ 0.6 µg/mL) were associated with poor recurrence-free survival (RFS; P = 0.0000841*) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.00615*). In the multivariate analysis, D-dimer correlated with CRLM prognosis and independently predicted RFS (P = 0.0179*).

Conclusion

High D-dimer levels were associated with poor RFS and CSS. D-dimer was an independent prognostic factor of RFS. Therefore, D-dimer may help predict recurrence and prognosis in patients with CRLM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CRLM:

Colorectal liver metastasis

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

VTE:

Venous thrombosis

NLR:

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio

mGPS:

Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

CSS:

Cancer-specific survival

CTCs:

Circulating tumor cells

References

  1. Akgul O, Cetinkaya E, Ersoz S et al (2014) Role of surgery in colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 20(20):6113–6122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McNally SJ, Parks RW (2013) Surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Dig Surg 30(4–6):337–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL et al (2006) Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer 94(7):982–999

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL et al (1999) Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 230(3):309–318 (discussion 318–321)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagashima I, Takada T, Adachi M et al (2006) Proposal of criteria to select candidates with colorectal liver metastases for hepatic resection: comparison of our scoring system to the positive number of risk factors. World J Gastroenterol 12(39):6305–6309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pulivarthi S, Gurram MK (2014) Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update. N Am J Med Sci 6(10):491–499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Motavaf E, Sunesen KG, Stender MT et al (2014) Prognostic value of preoperative D-dimer and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients undergoing intended curative resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(11):1427–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto M, Yoshinaga K, Matsuyama A et al (2012) Plasma D-dimer level as a mortality predictor in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Oncology 83(1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou YX, Yang ZM, Feng J et al (2013) High plasma D-dimer level is associated with decreased survival in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 34(6):3701–3704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma X, Li Y, Zhang J et al (2014) Prognostic role of D-dimer in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 35(3):2103–2109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoury JD, Adcock DM, Chan F et al (2010) Increases in quantitative D-dimer levels correlate with progressive disease better than circulating tumor cell counts in patients with refractory prostate cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 134(6):964–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Go SI, Lee MJ, Lee WS et al (2015) D-dimer can serve as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for metastatic gastric cancer treated by chemotherapy. Med (Baltimore) 94(30):e951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zacharski LR, Wojtukiewicz MZ, Costantini V et al (1992) Pathways of coagulation/fibrinolysis activation in malignancy. Semin Thromb Hemost 18(1):104–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caine GJ, Lip GY, Stonelake PS et al (2004) Platelet activation, coagulation and angiogenesis in breast and prostate carcinoma. Thromb Haemost 92(1):185–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mytnik M, Stasko J (2011) D-dimer, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, prothrombin fragments and protein C—role in prothrombotic state of colorectal cancer. Neoplasma 58(3):235–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards CM, Warren J, Armstrong L et al (1993) D-dimer: a useful marker of disease stage in surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 80(11):1404–1405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilic M, Yoldas O, Keskek M et al (2008) Prognostic value of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10(3):238–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu G, Zhang YL, Huang W (2004) Relationship between plasma D-dimer levels and clinicopathologic parameters in resectable colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 10(6):922–923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blackwell K, Hurwitz H, Lieberman G et al (2004) Circulating D-dimer levels are better predictors of overall survival and disease progression than carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 101(1):77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oya M, Akiyama Y, Yanagida T et al (1998) Plasma D-dimer level in patients with colorectal cancer: its role as a tumor marker. Surg Today 28(4):373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mochizuki S, Yoshino T, Kojima T et al (2010) Therapeutic significance of a D-dimer cut-off level of > 3 microg/ml in colorectal cancer patients treated with standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(10):933–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beppu T, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K et al (2012) A nomogram predicting disease-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with hepatic resection: multicenter data collection as a Project Study for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19(1):72–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Inanc M, Er O, Karaca H et al (2013) D-dimer is a marker of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J BUON 18(2):391–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu L, Liu B, Zhao Y et al (2014) High levels of D-dimer correlated with disease status and poor prognosis of inoperable metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. J Cancer Res Ther 10(Suppl):246–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tomimaru Y, Yano M, Takachi K et al (2008) Correlation between pretherapeutic d-dimer levels and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 21(4):281–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dirix LY, Vermeulen PB, Pawinski A et al (1997) Elevated levels of the angiogenic cytokines basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in sera of cancer patients. Br J Cancer 76(2):238–243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakamoto Y, Miyamoto Y, Beppu T et al (2015) Post-chemotherapeutic CEA and CA19-9 are prognostic factors in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with hepatic resection after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 35(4):2359–2368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang D, Yu M, Xu T et al (2013) Predictive value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in diagnosis of colorectal liver metastasis in Chinese population. Hepatogastroenterology 60(126):1297–1301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Loupakis F, Yang D, Yau L et al (2015) Primary tumor location as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(3):pii: dju427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen H, Yang J, Huang Q et al (2015) Different treatment strategies and molecular features between right-sided and left-sided colon cancers. World J Gastroenterol 21(21):6470–6478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirwan CC, Clarke AC, Howell SJ et al (2016) PO-31—circulating tumour cells and hypercoagulability: a lethal relationship in metastatic breast cancer. Thromb Res 140(Suppl 1):S188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Seeberg LT, Brunborg C, Waage A et al (2017) Survival impact of primary tumor lymph node status and circulating tumor cells in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 24(8):2113–2121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao R, Cai Z, Li S et al (2017) Expression and clinical relevance of epithelial and mesenchymal markers in circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 8(6):9293–9302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tieken C, Versteeg HH (2016) Anticoagulants versus cancer. Thromb Res 140(Suppl 1):S148–S153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Klerk CP, Smorenburg SM, Otten HM et al (2005) The effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2130–2135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. van Doormaal FF, Di Nisio M, Otten HM et al (2011) Randomized trial of the effect of the low molecular weight heparin nadroparin on survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(15):2071–2076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin CE et al (2010) Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Lancet 376(9754):1741–1750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Yukie Saito, Ms. Tomoko Yano, Ms. Tomoko Ubukata, and Ms. Yuki Saka for their excellent assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 143 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, A., Araki, K., Harimoto, N. et al. D-dimer predicts postoperative recurrence and prognosis in patients with liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23, 689–697 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1271-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1271-x

Keywords

Navigation