Population Ecology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 79–90 | Cite as

From individual interactions to population dynamics: individual resource partitioning simulation exposes the causes of nonlinear intra-specific competition

Original Article

Abstract

Intra-specific competition defines the relationship between population density and the performance of individual organisms (R-function). Observation of this relationship in nature shows it to be frequently nonlinear, and it has been argued, on intuitive grounds, that this nonlinearity is due to the type of competition (scramble or contest) being expressed. Here, we use an individual-based simulation model to investigate the effects of three resource partitioning schemes, representing different types of competition, on the form of the R-function. Results indicate that all resource partitioning schemes can give rise to concave or convex functions depending on the balance between maximum individual birth rate, maintenance cost, and demand for resources. Given high growth rates and maintenance costs, contest competitors tend to exhibit less concavity than scramblers. Therefore, population stability can be strongly affected by the strategy of resource partitioning. Life histories and environmental conditions that encourage the homogeneous distribution of resources among individuals lead to complex and unstable dynamics. Stable dynamics is fostered by heterogeneous resource distribution, which could result from such things as social hierarchies, individual and environmental variability, and large, indivisible resource packets.

Keywords

Density regulation Growth function Maintenance cost Resource demand 

References

  1. Łomnicki A, Sedziwy S (1988) Resource partitioning and population stability under exploitation competition. J Theor Biol 132:119–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Łomnicki A, Sedziwy S (1989) Do individual-differences in resource intakes without monopolization cause population stability and persistence? J Theor Biol 136:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellows TS (1981) The descriptive properties of some models for density dependence. J Anim Ecol 50:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berryman AA (1999) Principles of population dynamics and their application. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Berryman A, Lima M (2006) Deciphering the effects of climate on animal populations: diagnostic analysis provides new interpretation of Soay sheep dynamics. Am Nat 168:784–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berryman AA, Michalski J, Gutierrez AP, Artiditi R (1995) Logistic theory of food web dynamics. Ecology 76:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. HM Stationary Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjørnstad ON, Hansen TF (1994) Individual variation and population dynamics. Oikos 69:167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brännström Å, Sumpter DJT (2005) The role of competition and clustering in population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2065–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burkey TV, Stenseth NC (1994) Population dynamics of territorial species in seasonal and patchy environments. Oikos 69:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnett T (1958) Dispersal of an insect parasite over a small plot. Can Entomol 90:279–283Google Scholar
  13. Dennis B, Desharnais RA, Cushing JM, Henson SM, Costantino RF (2001) Estimating chaos and complex dynamics in an insect population. Ecol Monogr 71:277–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eskola TM, Geritz SAH (2007) On the mechanistic derivation of discrete-time population models by varying within-season patterns of reproduction and aggression. B Math Biol 69:329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujita H, Utida F (1952) The effect of population density on the growth of an animal population. Res Popul Ecol 1:1–14 (in Japanese, translated into English in: Ecology 34:488–498)Google Scholar
  16. Geritz SAH, Kisdi E (2004) On the mechanistic underpinning of discrete-time population models with complex dynamics. J Theor Biol 228:261–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Getz WM (1996) A hypothesis regarding the abruptness of density dependence and the growth rate of populations. Ecology 77:2014–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilpin ME, Ayala FJ (1973) Global models of growth and competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3590–3593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ginzburg LR, Colyvan M (2003) Ecological orbits: how planets move and populations grow. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassell MP (1975) Density-dependence in single-species populations. J Anim Ecol 44:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassell MP, Lawton JH, May RM (1976) Patterns of dynamical behaviour in single species populations. J Anim Ecol 45:471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansson A, Sumpter DJT (2003) From local interactions to population dynamics in site-based models of ecology. Theor Popul Biol 64:497–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johst K, Brandl R (1997) The effect of dispersal on local population dynamics. Ecol Model 104:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johst K, Doebeli M, Brandl R (1999) Evolution of complex dynamics in spatially structured populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1147–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. May RM (1974) Biological populations with non-overlapping generations: stable points, stable cycles, and chaos. Science 186:645–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maynard-Smith J, Slatkin M (1973) The stability of predator–prey systems. Ecology 54:384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelder JA (1961) The fitting of a generalization of the logistic curve. Biometrics 17:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholson AJ (1954) An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust J Zool 2:9–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricker WE (1954) Stock and recruitment. J Fish Res Bd Can 11:559–623Google Scholar
  31. Royama T (1977) Population persistence and density dependence. Ecol Monogr 47:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Royama T (1992) Analytical population dynamics. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoener TW (1973) Population growth regulated by intraspecific competition for energy or time: Some simple representations. Theor Popul Biol 4:56–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Travis JMJ (2003) Neighbourhood size, dispersal distance and the complex dynamics of the spatial Ricker model. Popul Ecol 45:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turchin P (2003) Evolution in population dynamics. Nature 424:257–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Turchin P, Taylor AD (1992) Complex dynamics in ecological time series. Ecology 73:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uchmanski 0J (2000) Resource partitioning among competing individuals and population persistence: an individual-based model. Ecol Model 131:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecological ModellingUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Departments of Entomology and Natural Resource SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  3. 3.Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ecologia & BiodiversidadPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations