Skip to main content
Log in

Success-breeds-success distributional dynamics in stochastic competitive systems

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simon (Biometrika 52:425–440, 1955) demonstrated that distributional principles are not necessarily field-specific. Several investigations across various disciplines have referred to similar types of power-law distributions, which inherently incline towards the concentration of the outcome variable. These patterns are often attributed to the so-called “success-breeds-success” (SBS) principle. The first aim of this paper is to decipher the fundamentals of this principle across various disciplines. The second aim is to create a supra-disciplinary model that is able to serve as a default analytical tool for the modelling of SBS dynamics within competitive stochastic systems, for the purpose of which we position homogeneous agents with self-preserving behaviour in competition for scarce resources. It is given that: (1) Agents are not auto-reproductive; hence the self-preservation stimulus forces them to appropriate resources; (2) appropriable resources exist in limited quantities at a given time and in a given space, and agents must compete for these scarce resources; (3) agents implicitly pursue their competitiveness in order to appropriate enough resources for their lifelong reproduction; and (4) the more resources the agent has in the present, the higher the probability of his appropriation in the future. Assuming these conditions, we ran a simulation of 25 million mutual interactions based on the binary dyadic tree for two-agent competition. Despite the perfectly competitive market conditions, the results revealed diverging accumulation trajectories. In contrast to mainstream economic models, the paper provides new perspectives on competition and suggests, in particular, that the distributional dynamics of competitive markets comprise the inequality-driving force in market economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source Own elaboration

Fig. 2

Source Own elaboration

Fig. 3

Source: Own elaboration

Fig. 4

Source Own computations

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3755745

References

  • Aghion, P., Howitt, P.W.: A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2), 323–351 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.D., Long, J.S., Krauze, T.K.: Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Am. Sociol. Rev. 47(5), 615–625 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anazawa, M.: Inequality in resource allocation and population dynamics models. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6(7), 182178 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B.W.: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, Michigan (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bask, M., Bask, M.: Cumulative (dis)advantage and the matthew effect in life-course analysis. PLoS ONE 10(11), 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverton, R.J.H., Holt, S.J.: On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations. Fisheries Investigations Series II, vol. 19. Springer, London (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M., Dabady, M., Citro, C.F.: Measuring Racial Discrimination. The National Academies Press, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghosian, B.M.: Kinetics of Wealth and the Pareto Law. Phys. Rev. E 89(4), 042804–042825 (2014a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boghosian, B.M.: Fokker-planck description of wealth dynamics and the origin of Pareto’s Law. J. Modern Phys. C 25, 1441008–1441015 (2014b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boghosian, B.M.: The Inescapable casino. Sci. Am. 321(5), 70–77 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghosian, B.M., Johnson, M., Marcq, J.A.: An H theorem for Boltzmann’s equation for the yard-sale model of asset exchange (The gini coefficient as an H-functional). J. Stat. Phys. 161(6), 1339–1350 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.S.: Analysis of Lotka’s law: the Simon-Yule approach. Inf. Process. Manag. 25, 527–544 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S.: Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. Am. J. Sociol. 76(2), 286–306 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.R., Cole, S.: Social Stratification in Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D.: Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 58(6), S327–S337 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Solla Price, D.: A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 27(5), 292–306 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Prete, T., Eirich, G.M.: Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical and empirical developments. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 32, 271–297 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, M.L., Henzi, P.S., Halliday, T.R., Barrett, L.: Success breeds success in mating male reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus). Proc. R. Soc. B – Biol. Sci. 265(1404), 1417–1421 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhout, J.: Gibrat’s law for (All) cities. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(5), 1429–1451 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., Rousseau, R.: Generalized success-breeds-success principle leading to time-dependent informetric distributions. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 46(6), 426–445 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., Rousseau, R.: Stochastic processes determined by a general success-breeds-success principle. Math. Comput. Model. 23(4), 93–104 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaig, G., Stadler, M.: Success breeds success. The dynamics of the innovation process. Empir. Econ. 19(1), 55–68 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.H., Cook, P.J.: The Winner Take All Society: How More and More Americans Compete for Ever Fewer and Bigger Prizes, Encouraging Economic Waste, Income Inequality, and an Impoverished Cultural Life. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X., Lasry, J.-M., Lions, P.-L., Moll, B.: The dynamics of inequality. Econometrica 84(6), 2071–2111 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P.A.: Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In: Stoneman, P. (ed.) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, pp. 90–131. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R.: Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A.: The advantages of being first. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(3), 473–480 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R.V.: The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Am. J. Sociol. 107(5), 1143–1178 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, M.P.: Density-dependence in single-species populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 44, 283–295 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J.C.: Cumulative advantage and success-breeds-success: The value of time pattern analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49(5), 471–476 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y., Simon, H.A.: Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Finns. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iso-Ahola, S.E., Dotson, C.O.: Psychological momentum: Why success breeds success. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 18, 19–33 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B., Sun, L., Figueiredo, D.R., Ribeiro, B., Towsley, D.: On the duration and intensity of cumulative advantage competitions. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 11, P11022 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M.: On the gibrat distribution. Econometrica 13(2), 161–170 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R.A., Varadarajan, P.R., Peterson, R.A.: First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. J. Mark. 56(4), 33–52 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohring, G.A.: Ising models of social impact: the role of cumulative advantage. J. Phys. I 6, 301–308 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maialeh, R.: Persisting inequality: a case of probabilistic drive towards divergence. Acta Oeconomica 67(2), 215–234 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maialeh, R.: Dynamic Models and Inequality: The Role of the Market Mechanism in Economic Distribution. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K.U., Maas, I., Wagner, M.: Socioeconomic conditions and social inequalities in old age. In: Baltes, P.B., Mayer, K.U. (eds.) The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100, pp. 227–255. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: The Matthew effect in science. In: Storer, N. (ed.) The Sociology of Science, pp. 439–459. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1973a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: The normative structure of science. In: Storer, N. (ed.) The Sociology of Science, pp. 267–278. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1973b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: The Matthew effect II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis 79(4), 606–623 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J.: An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2(1), 9–65 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand, A.: Cumulative advantage theory in life course research. Annu. Rev. Gerontol. Geriatr. 22, 14–30 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T.: Beetles, competition, and populations. Science 138(3548), 1369–1375 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P.: Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 94(2), 251–267 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G.: Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States. Q. J. Econ. 133(2), 553–609 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluchino, A., Biondo, A.E., Rapisarda, A.: Talent versus luck: the role of randomness in success and failure. Adv. Complex Syst. 21(03N04), 1–31 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W.E.: Stock and recruitment. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11(5), 559–623 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C.E., Wu, C.L.: Education, age, and the cumulative advantage in health. J. Health Soc. Behav. 37, 104–120 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 52, 425–440 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J.: Gibrat’s legacy. J. Econ. Lit. 35(1), 40–59 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thewissen, S., Nolan, B., Roser, M.: Incomes across the distribution. https://ourworldindata.org/incomes-across-the-distribution (2019). Accessed 24 Dec 2019

  • van de Rijt, A., Kang, S.M., Patil, A.: Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(19), 6934–6939 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O.: Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G.U.: The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G.U.: A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis. F.R.S. Phil. Trans. B 213, 21 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H.: Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. Free Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H.: Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. In: Mongardini, C., Tabboni, S. (eds.) Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology, pp. 139–162. Transaction Publishers, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to extend my special thanks to the participants of the International Atlantic Economic Society Conference which was held in October 2022 in Washington D.C. I also wish to thank Umut Ünal, Robert Jahoda, Jiri Vyhlidal and others from RILSA for their insightful comments. Finally, I am deeply obliged to the two anonymous reviewers of the study for their time and effort when reviewing the manuscript. I sincerely appreciate their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped me to improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic (IP70203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Maialeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author is the managing director of an independent public research institution (the Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs—RILSA) and has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maialeh, R. Success-breeds-success distributional dynamics in stochastic competitive systems. Qual Quant 58, 1901–1916 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01721-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01721-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation