Skip to main content
Log in

Neighbourhood size, dispersal distance and the complex dynamics of the spatial Ricker model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

Amongst the most frequently made assumptions in simple population models are that individuals interact equally with every other individual and that dispersal occurs with equal likelihood to any location. This is especially true for models of a single population (as opposed to a patchy population or metapopulation). For many species of animals and probably for all plant species these assumptions are unlikely to hold true. Here one much-studied population model—the Ricker model—is reformulated such that interactions occur only between individuals located within a certain distance of each other and dispersal distance is finite. Two alternative reformulations are presented. Results demonstrate that both limiting the interaction neighbourhood and reducing dispersal distance tend to stabilise the global population dynamics, although the extent to which this occurs depends upon the reformulation used. Spatial pattern formation is a feature of the simulated population. At lower intrinsic rates of growth (r) these patterns tend to be static, while for higher r, they are dynamic. Both the stabilisation of global dynamics and spatial pattern formation are well-described features of metapopulation models. Here, similar effects are shown to occur on a single contiguous patch of habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–c
Fig. 3a–d
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berec L (2002) Techniques of spatially explicit individual-based models: construction, simulation and mean-field analysis. Ecol Model 150:55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biging GS, Dobbertin W (1992) A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal growth of individual conifer trees. For Sci 38:695–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM, Pacala SW (1997) Using moment equations to understand stochastically driven spatial pattern formation in ecological systems. Theor Popul Biol 52179–197

  • Bolker BM, Pacala SW (1999) Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am Nat 157:217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM, Pacala SW, Levin SA (2000) Moment methods for ecological processes in continuous space. In: Dieckmann U, Law R, Metz JAJ (eds) The Geometry of ecological interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 388–411

  • Costantino RF, Desharnais RA, Cushing JM, Dennis B (1997) Chaotic dynamics in an insect population. Science 275:389–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Czaran T (1998) Spatiotemporal models of population and community dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Dennis B, Desharnais RA, Cushing JM, Costantino RF (1995) Nonlinear demographic dynamics: mathematical models, statistical methods and biological experiments. Ecol Monogr 65:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellner S, Turchin P (1995) Chaos in a noisy world: new methods and evidence from time series analysis. Am Nat 145:343–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ, Grenfell BT (1993) The continuing quest for chaos. Trends Ecol Evol 8:43–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Hassell MP, Lawton JH, May RM (1976) Patterns of dynamical behaviour in single species populations. J Anim Ecol 42:471–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Comins HN, May RM (1991) Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353:255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Comins HN, May RM (1994) Species co-existence and self-organizing spatial dynamics. Nature 370:290–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A, Hom CL, Ellner S, Turchin P, Godfray HCJ (1993) Chaos in ecology: Is mother nature a strange attractor? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggi S, Joshi A (2001) Incorporating spatial variation in density enhances the stability of simple population dynamics models. J Theor Biol 209:249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Law R, Dieckmann U (2000) A dynamical system for neighbourhoods in plant communities. Ecology 81:2137–2148

    Google Scholar 

  • Law R, Murrell DJ, Dieckmann U (2002) On population growth in space and time: the spatial logistic equation. Ecology 84:252–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda HN, Ogita A, Sasaki A, Sato K (1992) Statistical mechanics of population: the lattice Lotka-Volterra model. Prog Theor Phys 88:1035–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1974) Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations: stable points, stable cycles and chaos. Science 186:645–647

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert MG, Kot M, Lewis MA (1995) Dispersal and pattern-formation in a discrete-time predator-prey model. Theor Popul Biol 48:7–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW (1986) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. 2. Multi-species models of annuals. Theor Popul Biol 29:262–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW (1987) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. III. Models with spatial heterogeneity in the physical environment. Theor Popul Biol 31:359–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW, Silander JA Jr (1985) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. I. Single-species models of annuals. Am Nat 125:385–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker WE (1958) Handbook of computations for biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Vancouver

  • Rohde K, Rohde PP (2001) Fuzzy chaos: reduced chaos in the combined dynamics of several independently chaotic populations. Am Nat 158:553–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares P, Tome M (1999) Distance-dependent competition measures for eucalyptus plantations in Portugal. Ann For Sci 56:307–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC, Bjǿrnstad ON, Saitoh T (1996) A gradient from stable to cyclic populations of Clethrionomys rufocanus in Hokkaido, Japan. Proc R Soc London B 263:1117–1126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WR, Pomerantz MJ, Gilpin ME (1980). Chaos, asymmetric growth and group selection for dynamical stability. Ecology 61:1312–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis JMJ, Dytham C (1999) Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proc R Soc London B 266:1837–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P, Taylor AD (1992) Complex dynamics in ecological time series. Ecology 73:289–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MH, Kot M, Neubert MG (2002) Integrodifference equations, Allee effects, and invasions. J Math Biol 44:150–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson WG, Harrison SP, Hastings A, McCann K (1999) Exploring stable pattern formation in models of tussock moth populations. J Anim Ecol 68:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Calvin Dytham, David Murrell and Will Wilson are thanked for commenting on a previous version of the manuscript. I am very grateful to Nils Koesters and Rachel Atkinson for useful discussion and criticism. Two anonymous referees provided some very constructive criticism that helped to greatly improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. J. Travis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Travis, J.M.J. Neighbourhood size, dispersal distance and the complex dynamics of the spatial Ricker model. Popul Ecol 45, 227–237 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0161-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0161-9

Keywords

Navigation