Skip to main content

Primary acquired spondylodiscitis shows a more severe course than spondylodiscitis following spine surgery: a single-center retrospective study of 159 cases

Abstract

Spondylodiscitis may arise primarily via hematogenous spread or direct inoculation of virulent organisms during spine surgery. To date, no comparative data investigating the differences between primary and postoperative spondylodiscitis is available. Thus, the purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate differences between these two etiologies. One hundred fifty-nine patients that were treated at our department were included in the retrospective analysis. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the etiology of spondylodiscitis: group NS, primary spondylodiscitis without prior spinal surgery; group S, spondylodiscitis following spinal surgery. Evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), laboratory values, clinical outcome, and operative or conservative management. Preoperative MRI showed higher rates of epidural and paraspinal abscess in patients with primary spondylodiscitis (p < 0.005). Vertebral bone destruction was more severe in group NS (p < 0.05). Survival rate in group S (98.2%) was higher than in group NS (87.5%, p = 0.024). The extent of the operative procedure in patients who were surgically treated (n = 116) differed between the two groups (p < 0.005). In conclusion, spondylodiscitis is a life-threatening and serious disease and requires long-term treatment. Primary spondylodiscitis is frequently associated with epidural and paraspinal abscess, vertebral bone destruction and has a higher mortality rate than postoperative spondylodiscitis. Therefore, primary spondylodiscitis shows a more severe course than spondylodiscitis following spine surgery.

Introduction

The incidence of spondylodiscitis is rising probably due to an aging population, chronic immune-compromising diseases, frequent spine procedures, and the incessant advancement of diagnostics [1]. A spondylodiscitis may arise primarily through hematogenous spread or direct inoculation of virulent organisms during spine surgery, epidural injections, nerve root block, or discography [2]. Patients suffering from spondylodiscitis have increased long-term mortality. Thus, it is a life-threatening and serious disease [3]. Due to the increasing incidence of spondylodiscitis, there is an urgent need for further investigations. To best of our knowledge, no comparative data examining potential differences between primary and postoperative spondylodiscitis is available. Thus, the purpose of the present retrospective study was to detect differences between these two etiologies in clinical features, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), outcome, and operative management.

Material and methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment for spondylodiscitis between 2010 and 2016 at our department was performed. One hundred fifty-nine patients were identified and their data were retrospectively investigated. The patients were then categorized into two groups based on the etiology of spondylodiscitis: group NS, primary spondylodiscitis without prior spinal surgery; group S, spondylodiscitis due to spinal surgery. Data were collected using the patients’ health records and MRI. MRI was read by an independent neuroradiologist, blinded to the patients’ clinical data. C-reactive protein (CRP) and complete white cell count were analyzed routinely. Patients with neurological deficits, progressive pain, or progression in MRI despite conservative treatment underwent surgical treatment. Each treatment option was accompanied by broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy or antibiotics according to the antiobiogram when available. Patients were treated with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics for a short period of time (2 to 6 weeks) followed by oral antibiotics for a total period of 3 months. After initial diagnosis, data of conservatively (cS, cNS) or surgically (sS, sNS) treated patients were analyzed separately (Fig. 1). In surgically treated patients (n = 117), the two groups were compared at the time of the initial diagnosis, the day of admission, on the third postoperative day, before discharge, and after 6 and 12 months follow-up. The surgical approach and technique was determined for each patient individually according to the present comorbidities, location, extent of infection, and bony destruction. Options used are described in Table 1. In conservatively treated patients (n = 43), the two groups were compared at the time of initial diagnosis, 3 and 14 days, and 1.5 and 3 months after initial diagnosis. Long-term follow-up was not available in conservatively treated patients, as follow-up is usually terminated as soon as CRP values normalized and clinical complaints are relieved.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart on the treatment in all patients with primary (NS) and secondary acquired spondylodiscitis (S). n number of patients, c conservatively treated, s surgically treated

Table 1 The surgical approach and method of spinal surgery in patients with primary and secondary acquired spondylodiscitis that were surgically treated

Statistical analysis

All patients with complete initial data were considered for inclusion in the retrospective analysis. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for testing for normal distribution. The unpaired Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze differences in clinical and demographic characteristics and in clinical outcome variables. Frequencies were compared by chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Spearman’s rho correlation (r) was performed to assess the relation of clinical outcome and MRI findings. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical evaluations were performed with SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0, NY: IBM Corp.). Figures were designed using GraphPad Prism (version 5.0 for Mac OS X, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com).

Results

The demographic details and patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 2. One hundred fifty-nine patients who underwent surgical and conservative treatment for spondylodiscitis have been identified at the Department of Neurosurgery. Thereby, the proportion of spondylodiscitis following surgery was 35% (group S, n = 55) versus 65% (group NS, n = 104) for primary spondylodiscitis. Altogether, 73/159 (46%) patients were female. The most common ASA score was ASA 3° in both groups (p > 0.05). Drug abuse was more common in group NS (23/104 (22%); p = 0.041). A dorsal decompression was initially performed in 67% of patients in group S. The infection was mostly located in the lumbar spine followed by the thoracic and cervical spine.

Table 2 Demographic details in all patients with primary and secondary acquired spondylodiscitis

Preoperative MRI showed higher rates of epidural and paraspinal abscess in patients with primary spondylodiscitis (p < 0.05). Vertebral bone destruction was more severe in group NS (31% less than 75% of bone left) than in group S (12% less than 75% of bone left; p = 0.020). There was no difference in disc destruction between the two groups (p > 0.523) (Fig. 2). The occurrence of an epidural abscess correlated significantly with the occurrence of a paraspinal abscess: r = +0.260, p = 0.002, but did not correlate with vertebral bone destruction (p > 0.05). A significant correlation could be shown between a paraspinal abscess and vertebral bone destruction (r = +0.168, p = 0.046). Vertebral bone destruction tends to be more severe in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection: in 25 vs. 33% of patients less than 75% of bone was left (p > 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging finding in all patients. S secondary acquired spondylodiscitis, NS primary acquired spondylodiscitis, p significance

The duration of hospital stay was longer in the patients who underwent prior surgery (15.8 ± 10 vs. 10.5 ± 9 days; p = 0.000). Survival rate in group S (98.2%) was higher than in group NS (87.5%, p = 0.024; Fig. 1). Patients with an epidural abscess tended to die more frequently than patients without: 10 vs. 5% (p > 0.05). Vertebral bone destruction correlated significantly with the rate of death: r = +0.047, p = 0.003. Thereby, the duration from the first diagnosis to death was 50.8 ± 72 days in surgically treated patients and 24.8 ± 21 days in conservatively treated patients (p > 0.05). For more details, see Fig. 1. Sepsis was detected more often in group NS (30%) than in group S (15%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.056). S. aureus presented the most common organism in intraoperative smear test and blood culture (Table 3), without significant microbiological differences between the groups (p > 0.05).

Table 3 Pathogen spectrum in intraoperative smear test and blood culture in all patients with primary and secondary acquired spondylodiscitis

In surgically treated patients (sS, sNS) significant differences were found in the extent of the operative procedure as described in Table 1 (p < 0.005), especially corpectomies were more often performed in group sNS than in group sS (p = 0.017). Duration of the first diagnosis until surgery was 15.8 ± 10 days in group sS and 15.8 ± 25 days in group sNS (p > 0.05). 64% in group sS and 67% in group sNS received primary conservative treatment before surgery (p > 0.05). Overall pain on NRS showed significant improvement after 12 months in both groups (p < 0.005), whereas NRS was rated significantly higher in group sS than in group sNS 3 months after surgery (p < 0.005) (Fig. 3). Laboratory parameters in both groups (sS, sNS) decreased significantly after surgery (p < 0.005) (Fig. 4). In conservatively treated patients (cS, cNS), differences in infection parameters could be shown after 14 days of the first diagnosis: CRP: cNS 5.1 ± 6 mg/dL vs. cS 1.4 ± 1, p = 0.08; leukocytes: cNS 7.3 U/L vs. cS 5.3±1 U/L, p = 0.044 (Fig. 4). No significant differences revealed between groups in NRS at the first diagnosis or in the follow-up visits of 3 months (p > 0.05, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Overall pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) in a surgically (sS, sNS) and b conservatively treated patients (cS, cNS). S secondary acquired spondylodiscitis, NS primary acquired spondylodiscitis, c conservatively treated, s surgically treated. ★★ƒ: differences in follow-up: p < 0.005, ★★: differences between groups: p < 0.005. a FD first diagnosis, A day of admission, 3d third postoperative day, D discharge, 3m and 12m 6m and 12 months follow-up. b FD first diagnosis, d days after the first diagnosis, m months after the first diagnosis

Fig. 4
figure 4

Inflammatory blood value in a surgically (sS, sNS) and b conservatively treated patients (cS, cNS). CRP C-reactive protein, S secondary acquired spondylodiscitis, NS primary acquired spondylodiscitis, c conservatively treated, s surgically treated. ★★ƒ: differences in follow-up: p < 0.005, ★ƒ: differences in follow-up: p < 0.05, ★: differences between groups: p < 0.05. a FD first diagnosis, A day of admission, 3d third postoperative day, D discharge, 3m and 12m 6 and 12 months follow-up. b FD first diagnosis, d days after the first diagnosis, m months after the first diagnosis

Discussion

The authors present the results of the first retrospective study investigating the differences between primary and postoperatively acquired spondylodiscitis. Survival rate was significantly higher in patients with postoperative spondylodiscitis. MRI remains the most sensitive and specific imaging modality to detect spondylodiscitis and the infection of the adjacent tissue [4]. Epidural and paraspinal abscess and vertebral bone destruction was more severe in primary spondylodiscitis. Surgical treatment accompanied by broad-spectrum antibiotics resulted in significant reduction of overall pain and inflammatory blood values 12 months after surgery. No significant pain decrease could be detected in conservatively treated patients 3 months after the first diagnosis.

Infective spondylodiscitis can result in disc destruction, pathological fractures and abscess formations. A spinal epidural abscess is an infection involving the epidural space and has a high mortality rate [5]. Once a rare diagnosis carrying a poor prognosis, its incidence is rising dramatically. The development of an epidural abscess may be associated with various risk factors, such as advanced age over 65 years, immunocompromized state, smoking or diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, intravenous drug abuse has been associated with a high prevalence of epidural abscess commonly due to hematogeneous bacterial spread [69]. Drug abuse was more common in the patients who developed a primary spondylodiscitis. This could be a fundamental reason for the higher occurrence of epidural abscess in these patients and particularly for the higher mortality rate that is closely associated to infections with abscess formation [3, 10].

An epidural abscess may be associated with significant bone destruction resulting in instability and deformity of the spine [11]. In our study group, a significant correlation could not be shown, whereas a paraspinal abscess may induce vertebral bone loss. Instability establishes a major risk factor for developing a potentially neurological impairment. Then early surgical stabilization is insistently recommended to preserve neurological function [12]. Furthermore, vertebral bone destruction was more severe in primary spondylodiscitis, whereas differences in disc destruction did not occur between the two groups [11].

The most common causative organism in spondylodiscitis is Staphylococcus aureus which is responsible for widespread bone loss and bone destruction [13, 14]. Additionally, an increased long-term mortality rate, mainly due to sepsis, is reported in adult patients suffering from Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis [14]. Thus, early surgical debridement is obtained to reduce the bacterial load and improve the antibiotic efficacy, especially in multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus infection [15]. Further causative organisms have been described and increased over the last few years, especially gram-negative bacteria. An important cause is the use of routine use of prophylactic antibiotics after spinal surgery [16]. Nevertheless, the pathogen that is responsible for spondylodiscitis can only be identified in approximately 35 to 50% of cases [17, 18]. In our retrospective series the pathogen could only be detected in 26% of blood culture and 39% of intraoperative smear test samples. This may be due to the fact that broad spectrum antibiotics have been applied in our outpatient clinics before a spondylodiscitis could be diagnosed accurately.

Surgery is indicated for neurological impairment, deformity, instability, medical intractable pain, and disease progression [19, 20]. The surgical goals are the debridement of infection, identification of pathogens, decompression of neuronal structures, and stabilization of deformed and instable segments. Depending on the location and extent of infection, various treatment options for spondylodiscitis are available. There is still controversy regarding the most adequate surgical approach [2024]. Nevertheless, fusion is recommended in discitis with involvement of endplates of the vertebral body, whereas in intraspinal empyema dorsal decompression and evacuation alone may be sufficient [20]. Significant differences occurred in the extent of operative procedures in our study group. A higher spread of infection resulted in a more aggressive surgery. Cervical and thoracal corpectomy was performed more frequently in patients with primary spondylodiscitis. A minor part of patients were treated with debridement only because spondylodiscitis with liquefaction of endplates was present in over 90% of patients. Furthermore, patients who already had surgery were presumably screened earlier for spondylodiscitis as their counterparts. This may due to the fact that these patients are followed up routinely after their surgical treatment and therefore infection may be detected earlier in the infectious cascade.

In conclusion spondylodiscitis is a life-threatening and serious disease and requires long-term treatment. Our retrospective analysis demonstrates a significantly higher mortality rate in patients with primary spondylodiscitis. Primary spondylodiscitis is frequently associated with epidural and paraspinal abscesses and vertebral bone destruction. Thus, it seems that primary spondylodiscitis shows a more severe course than spondylodiscitis following spine surgery. Nevertheless, with current standards, prospective clinical trials will be mandatory to better understand the pathogenesis of spondylodiscitis and furthermore develop evidence-based treatment recommendations for these patients.

References

  1. Tsiodras S, Falagas ME (2006) Clinical assessment and medical treatment of spine infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:38–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adam D, Papacocea T, Hornea I, Croitoru R (2014) Postoperative spondylodiscitis. A review of 24 consecutive patients. Chirurgia (Bucur) 109:90–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kehrer M, Pedersen C, Jensen TG, Hallas J, Lassen AT (2015) Increased short- and long-term mortality among patients with infectious spondylodiscitis compared with a reference population. Spine J 15:1233–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leone A, Dell'Atti C, Magarelli N, Colelli P, Balanika A, Casale R et al (2012) Imaging of spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16 Suppl 2:8–19

  5. Stratton A, Gustafson K, Thomas K, James MT (2016) Incidence and risk factors for failed medical management of spinal epidural abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 16:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith ME, Robinowitz N, Chaulk P, Johnson KE (2015) High rates of abscesses and chronic wounds in community-recruited injection drug users and associated risk factors. J Addict Med 9:87–93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel AR, Alton TB, Bransford RJ, Lee MJ, Bellabarba CB, Chapman JR (2014) Spinal epidural abscesses: risk factors, medical versus surgical management, a retrospective review of 128 cases. Spine J 14:326–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein NE (2015) Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: a review. Surg Neurol Int 6:S475–S486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Reihsaus E, Waldbaur H, Seeling W (2000) Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev 23:175–204 discussion 205

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aagaard T, Roed C, Dahl B, Obel N (2016) Long-term prognosis and causes of death after spondylodiscitis: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Infect Dis (Lond) 48:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Srinivasan D, Terman SW, Himedan M, Dugo D, La Marca F, Park P (2014) Risk factors for the development of deformity in patients with spinal infection. Neurosurg Focus 37:E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh PC, Wienecke RJ, O'Shaughnessy BA, Koski TR, Ondra SL (2004) Surgical strategies for vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscess. Neurosurg Focus 17:E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Widaa A, Claro T, Foster TJ, O'Brien FJ, Kerrigan SW (2012) Staphylococcus aureus protein A plays a critical role in mediating bone destruction and bone loss in osteomyelitis. PLoS One 7:e40586

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Aagaard T, Roed C, Larsen AR et al (2014) Long-term mortality after Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study. J Infect 69:252–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiban E, Janssen I, Wostrack M et al (2014) Spondylodiscitis by drug-multiresistant bacteria: a single-center experience of 25 cases. Spine J 14:2826–2834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Fernand R, Matz PG, North American Spine Society (2013) An evidence-based clinical guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery. Spine J 13:1387–1392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuursted K, Arpi M, Lindblad BE, Pedersen LN (2008) Broad-range PCR as a supplement to culture for detection of bacterial pathogens in patients with a clinically diagnosed spinal infection. Scand J Infect Dis 40:772–777

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhagat S, Mathieson C, Jandhyala R, Johnston R (2007) Spondylodiscitis (disc space infection) associated with negative microbiological tests: comparison of outcome of suspected disc space infections to documented non-tuberculous pyogenic discitis. Br J Neurosurg 21:473–477

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grados F, Lescure FX, Senneville E, Flipo RM, Schmit JL, Fardellone P (2007) Suggestions for managing pyogenic (non-tuberculous) discitis in adults. Joint Bone Spine 74:133–139

  20. Stüer C, Stoffel M, Hecker J, Ringel F, Meyer (2013) A staged treatment algorithm for spinal infections. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74:87–95

  21. Chen HC, Huang TL, Chen YJ, Tsou HK, Lin WC, Hung CH (2015) A minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for infectious spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and upper lumbar spine in immunocompromised patients. Biomed Res Int 2015:780451

  22. Yaldz C, Özdemir N, Yaman O, Feran HG, Tansug T, Minoglu M (2015) A retrospective study of 39 patients treated with anterior approach of thoracic and lumbar spondylodiscitis: clinical manifestations, anterior surgical treatment, and outcome. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2110

  23. Ghobrial GM, Viereck MJ, Margiotta PJ, Beygi S, Maulucci CM, Heller JE et al (2015) Surgical management in 40 consecutive patients with cervical spinal epidural abscesses: shifting toward circumferential treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E949–E953

  24. Lu ML, Niu CC, Tsai TT, Fu TS, Chen LH, Chen WJ (2015) Transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion for the treatment of infective spondylodiscitis in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 24:555–560

Download references

Acknowledgments

Open access funding provided by University of Innsbruck and Medical University of Innsbruck.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Tschugg.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study did not receive any external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

According to the local institutional review board, for this type of retrospective study, ethics approval is not required.

Informed consent

According to the local institutional review board, for this type of retrospective study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Anja Tschugg and Sara Lener contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tschugg, A., Lener, S., Hartmann, S. et al. Primary acquired spondylodiscitis shows a more severe course than spondylodiscitis following spine surgery: a single-center retrospective study of 159 cases. Neurosurg Rev 41, 141–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0829-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0829-9

Keywords

  • Postoperative spondylodiscitis
  • Primary spondylodiscitis
  • Discitis
  • Epidural abscess
  • Spinal infection