Skip to main content
Log in

Scenarios for integrated river catchment and coastal zone management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Water Framework Directive requires EU Member States to introduce water quality objectives for all water bodies, including coastal waters. Measures will have to be introduced if these objectives are not met, given predictions based on current trends. In this context, the estimation of future fluxes of nutrients and contaminants in the catchment, and the evaluation of policies to improve water quality in coastal zones are an essential part of river basin management plans. This paper investigates the use of scenarios for integrated catchment/coastal zone management in the Humber Estuary in the U.K. The context of this ongoing research is a European research project which aims to assist the implementation of integrated catchment and coastal zone management by analysing the response of the coastal sea to changes in fluxes of nutrients and contaminants from the catchments. The example of the Humber illustrates how scenarios focusing on water quality improvement can provide a useful tool to investigate future fluxes and evaluate policy options for a more integrated coastal/catchment management strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Coastal waters are defined in the Directive as extending seaward one nautical mile

  2. Available from http://www.defra.gov.uk/esg/work_htm/publications/cs/farmstats_web/default.htm

  3. “Mitigation banks” or “land banks” usually involve the recreation or restoration of extensive areas of habitats, ahead of habitat displacement, to compensate for future losses through development or other causes.

  4. A recent RSPB study (Pilcher et al. 2002) identified 2 858 ha with potential for intertidal habitat creation within the Humber Estuary.

References

  • A.E.A. Technology (1999) Guidelines for defining and documenting data on costs of possible environmental protection measures. European Environment Agency, 29th March 1999.

  • Beaumont, N.J. (2000) The Assimilative Capacity of the Humber Estuary for Copper: An Interdisciplinary Study. UEA Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, B. de and Bosch, P. (1995) The greenhouse effect: an example of the prevention cost approach. Second meting of the London group on national accounts and the environment, Washington, March 15–17, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbridge, P. (2001) Sustainability and Human Use of Coastal Systems. LOICZ newsletter 21:3-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, R., Ledoux, L., Turner, K., Jickells, T., Andrews, J., and Davies, H. (2003) The Humber Catchment and its Coastal Area: from UK to European perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 314–316, pp 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, S., and Ledoux, L. (2000) Mitigation banking: potential applications in the UK. Environmental and Waste Management 3(4), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (2000a) Modern Ports: A UK Policy. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.

  • DETR (2000b) Transport Statistics: Maritime Statistics: United Kingdom 2000. Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions.

  • Edwards, A. M. C., Freestone, R. J., and Crockett, C. P. (1997) River management in the Humber catchment. Science of the Total Environment 194, 235–246.

  • Environment Agency (1999) The Humber Estuary, State of the Environment 1998.

  • European Environment Agency (2000) Cloudy crystal balls: An assessment of recent European and global scenario studies and models. Env. Issues series No. 17, EEA, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin, G.C., Raskin, P. (1998) Windows on the future: global scenarios and sustainability. Environment 40(3): 7–11, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, L. and van Loben Sels, C. (1997) When pollution prevention meets the bottom line. Environmental Science and Technology 31:418–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gren, I.-M., Turner, R. K. and Wulff, F. (2000) Managing a sea: the ecological economics of the Baltic, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A. (1998) Which World? Scenarios for the 21st century. Global Destinies, Regional Choices. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, UK.

  • Harremöes, P. and Turner, R.K. (2001) Methods for integrated assessment, Regional Environmental Change, 2:57–65.

  • Jarvie H. P., Neal C., and Robson A. J. (1997) The geography of the Humber catchment. Science of the Total Environment 194:87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C., Krutilla, K., Boyd, R. (1996) Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: an evaluation of policy alternatives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30:95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassler, P. (1995) Scenarios for world energy: barricades or new frontiers? Long Range Planning 28(b): 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kram, T., Schol, E., Stoffer, A., Rothengatter, W., Guhnemann, A., Sorensen, M.M., Stouge, A., Suter, S., Walter, F. (1995) External costs of transport and internalisation. Synthesis report on topic A: External costs of transport. Report to the European Commission ECN-C-95–080

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux, L., Crooks, S., Jordan, A., Turner, K. (2000) Implementing EU Biodiversity Policy: UK experiences. Land Use Policy 17(4): 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lise, W. and van der Veeren, R. J. H. M. (2001) Cost-effective nutrient emission reductions in the Rgine river basin, D-01/02, Instituut voor Milueuvraagstukken, Vrije Universtteit Amsterdam.

  • Longfield, S.A., and Macklin, M.G. (1999) The influence of recent environmental change on flooding and sediment fluxes in the Yorkshire Ouse basin. Hydrological Processes 13, 1051-1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, I., Jordan, A., Hulme, M., Turner, R.K., O’Riordan, T. (2000a) A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part I, Global Environmental Change 10:57–68.

  • Lorenzoni, I., Jordan, A., O’Riordan, T., Turner, R.K., Hulme, M. (2000b) A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part II, Global Environmental Change 10:145–155.

  • Mance, G, Brown, V.M., Yates J. (1984) Proposed Environmental Quality Standards for List II substances in water : Copper. Water Research Council Technical Report 210. August 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Maya, R.S. and Fenhann, J. (1994) Methodological lessons and results from UNEP GHG abatement costing studies. Energy Policy 22 (11): 955–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middelkoop, H., Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M.B.A, Kwadijk, J.C.J., and van Deursen, W.P.A. (2000) Development of Perspective-based scenarios for global change assessment for water management in the lower Rhine delta. UNESCO-WOTRO International Working Conference, ‘Water for Society’, November 2000, IHE Delft

  • Miles, I. (1981) Scenario analysis: identifying ideologies and issues. In: Methods for Development Planning: Scenarios, Models and Micro-studies. UNESCO Press, Paris, France, pp. 31–54.

  • Millward, G. E. and Glegg, G. A. (1997) Fluxes and retention of trace metals in the Humber Estuary. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 44:97–105.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murby, P. (2001) The Causes, Extent and Implications of Intertidal Change—A regional view from eastern England. Ph.D thesis. University of Hull.

  • Neal, C., and Davies, H., (in press). Water quality fluxes for eastern UK rivers entering the North Sea: a summary of information from the Land-Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS). Science of the Total Environment.

  • OECD (1993) OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews. A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment. OECD, Paris.

  • Office for National Statistics. (2002) Census 2001: First results on population for England and Wales, pp. 61. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Science and Technology (OST) (1999) Environmental futures. Report for the UK’s National Technology Foresight Programme, Department of Trade and Industry, DTI/Pub 4015/lk 3 99 NP, URN 99 647, UK.

  • Ozelkan, E. C. and Duckstein, L. (1996) Analysing Water Resources Alternatives and Handling Criteria by Multi Criterion Decision Techniques, Journal of Environmental Management, 48(1):69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M. (ed.) (2000) Assessment of Potential Effects and Adaptations for Climate Change in Europe: The Europe Acacia Project, Jackson Institute, University of East Anglia, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M., Carter. T. (1998) Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, UK .

  • Pilcher, R., Burston, P., Davis, R. (2002) Seas of Change. The potential area for inter-tidal habitat creation around the coast of mainland Britain. A report by the RSPB.

  • Postma, T. J. B. M. and Liebl, F. (2004) How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, in press.

  • Riege-Wcislo, W. and Heinze, A. (1996) The construction of abatement cost curves. Methodological steps and empirical experiences. German Environmental Economic Accounting (GEEA), Federal Statistical Office, Federal Republic of Germany.

  • Romero, C. and Rehman, T. (1987) Natural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision-making techniques: a review, European Review of Agricultural economics, 14:61–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somlyody, L. (1997) Use of optimization models in river basin water quality planning, Water Science and Technology, 36(5):209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.K., Adger, W.N., Lorenzoni, I. (1998) Towards integrated modelling and analysis in coastal zones: principles and practices. LOICZ Reports and Studies N0 11, IGBP/LOICZ, Texel, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J. and Adger, W.N. (eds.) (2001) Economics of Coastal and Water Resources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Kluwer, Dodrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.K., Lorenzoni, I., Beaumont, N., Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., and McDonald, A.L. (1998) Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing environmental and socio-economic changes in the UK coast. Geographical Journal 164:269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Veeren, R. J. H. M. and Lorenz, C. M. (2002) Integrated economic-ecological analysis and evaluation of management strategies on nutrient abatement in the Rhine basin, Journal of Environmental Management, 66(4):361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenborn, M., King, K., Boyd, R., Johnson, C. and Marlowe, I. (1997) Towards guidelines for data collection on costs of possible environmental protection measures – technical report. European Environment Agency. National Environmental Technology Centre. Report number – AEAT – 1836/RHOD/20325001/ISSUE1 Restricted – commercial

  • Wenzel, V. (2001) Integrated assessment and multicriteria analysis, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 26(7–8):541–545.

  • Wickborn, G. (1996) Avoidance Cost Curves for NOx. London group meeting on environmental accounting. Third meeting, Stockholm, May 28–31 1996.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Programme (project No EVK1-CT-2000–00044). The authors are grateful to Tony Edwards and an anonymous reviewer for useful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Ledoux.

Additional information

SI: Pirrone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ledoux, L., Beaumont, N., Cave, R. et al. Scenarios for integrated river catchment and coastal zone management. Reg Environ Change 5, 82–96 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0079-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0079-6

Keywords

Navigation