Abstract
China’s national carbon trading market follows the “prudent start, easy before difficult” industry inclusion principle, evaluating industries’ carbon reduction effects under carbon trading policy can not only help to review the policy implementation outcomes, but also suggest early market entry preparation for industries with significant reduction effect. However, few relevant studies have been found. This paper evaluates policy’s the overall and industries’ carbon reduction effect, analyses the effect influencing factors, and tests the robustness of the results from several aspects. The results show that: (1) From the overall perspective, it shows a lag in the effect at the beginning of the policy implementation. The policy produces a significant effect in the second year of implementation, and maintains a good emission reduction effect after 5 years. (2) From the industries’ perspective, the mining industry achieves a significant carbon emission reduction effect in the first year of policy implementation, and the emission reduction trend is good. The manufacturing, construction and electric also have significant carbon reduction performance. While the transportation does not perform well in emission reduction during the experimental period. (3) There are different relationships between economic development factors and carbon emissions of various industries. Mining, manufacturing, and wholesale are all inverted "N" shape, while electric and construction are in inverted “U” shape; industrial structural adjustment and technological progress has significant positive effects on carbon emission reduction of the industries. This paper can provide some reference value for the improvement of carbon trading policy, the allocation of industry carbon allowances and the decision of future industry inclusion in the national carbon emission trading market, and can also provide theoretical and practical experience for the emerging carbon market in developing countries.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolat CK, Soytas U, Akinoglu B, Nazlioglu S (2023) Is there a macroeconomic carbon rebound effect in EU ETS? Energy Econ 125:106879
Cai J, Luo D, Xiao S (2024) Analysis of the lmpact of carbon emission trading on carbon emissions in Pilot districts: carbon emission volume and efficiency perspectives. Syst Eng-Theor Pract, 1–34
Chen D, Liao H, Tan H (2022) Study on the emission reduction effect and mechanism of China’s carbon trading policy. J Technol Econ 41:106–119
Commission C.s.N.D.a.R (2016) Reply to Proposal No. 0750 (No. 055 in the category of resources and environment) of the fourth session of the 12th national committee of the Chinese people's political consultative conference
Dai L, Ma Q, Hou Y (2022) Analysis of the current status of carbon emissions based on the IPCC inventory methodology. China Market. https://doi.org/10.13939/j.cnki.zgsc.2022.19.016
Di Foggia G, Beccarello M, Arrigo U (2024) Assessment of the european emissions trading system’s impact on sustainable development. Sustainability 16:223
Fan D, Wang W-G, Liang P-F (2017) Analysis of the performance of carbon emissions trading right in China––the evaluation based on the difference-in-difference model. China Environ Sci 37:2383–2392
Feng R, Lin PA, Hou CX, Jia SS (2022) Study of the effect of China’s emissions trading scheme on promoting regional industrial carbon emission reduction. Front Environ Sci 10:947925
Feng X, Zhao Y, Yan R (2024) Does carbon emission trading policy has emission reduction effect?—an empirical study based on quasi-natural experiment method. J Environ Manag 351:119791
Gao S, Wang C (2021) How to design emission trading scheme to promote corporate low-carbon technological innovation: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 298:126712
Guan DB, Shan YL, Liu Z, He KB (2016) Performance assessment and outlook of China’s emission-trading scheme. Engineering 2:398–401
Guo MY, Chen SL, Zhang J, Meng J (2022a) Environment Kuznets Curve in transport sector?s Carbon emission: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 371:133504
Guo QQ, Su ZF, Chiao CS (2022b) Carbon emissions trading policy, carbon finance, and carbon emissions reduction: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Econ Chang Restruct 55:1445–1480
Kaya Y (1989) Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. In: Intergovernmental panel on climate change/response strategies working group, May
Krištić IR, Šimurina J (2021) The effectiveness of the market-based environmental policy mix in the European Union. Panoeconomicus 68:717–744
Li L (2021) Evaluation of the effectiveness of national low-carbon pilot policies––analysis based on the multi-time pointdouble difference method. Coal Econ Res 41:38–43
Li Z, Wang J (2021) Spatial emission reduction effects of China’s carbon emissions trading:quasi-natural experiments and policy spillovers. China Popul Resour Environ 31:26–36
Li X, Zhang N, Song P (2022a) Research on energy saving and emission reduction effect and mechanism of carbon emission trading system: empirical evidence based on synthetic control method. Mod Financ Econ J Tianjin Univ Financ Econ 42:96–113
Li Z-G, Wang J, Zhao Y-C (2022b) The synergistic emission reduction effect of carbon emissions trading: internal mechanism and China’s experience. Syst Eng 40:1–12
Liang Q, Pan X, He W (2023) Mechanisms, pathways and countermeasures of carbon market lmpact on urban green development. Urban Dev Stud 30:104–112
Liao WI, Dong XK, Weng M, Chen X (2020) Economic effect of market-oriented environmental regulation: carbon emission trading, green lnnovation and green economic growth. China Soft Sci 6:159–173
Liu Z, Sun H (2021) Assessing the impact of emissions trading scheme on low-carbon technological innovation: evidence from China. Environ Impact Assess Rev 89:106589
Liu CM, Sun Z, Zhang J (2019) Research on the effect of carbon emission reduction policy in China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. China Popul Resourc Environ 29:49–58
Liu LL, Feng TT, Kong JJ (2023) Can carbon trading policy and local public expenditures synergize to promote carbon emission reduction in the power industry? Resour Conserv Recycl 188:106659
Lund P (2007) Impacts of EU carbon emission trade directive on energy-intensive industries—indicative micro-economic analyses. Ecol Econ 63:799–806
Lv MC, Bai MY (2021) Evaluation of China’s carbon emission trading policy from corporate innovation. Financ Res Lett 39:101565
Narassimhan E, Gallagher KS, Koester S, Alejo JR (2018) Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems. Clim Policy 18:967–991
Purcel A-A (2023) Environmental protection expenditures and EU ETS: evidence from Romania. Financ Res Lett 58:104418
Rontard B, Hernandez HR (2022) Political construction of carbon pricing: experience from New Zealand emissions trading scheme. Environ Dev 43:100727
Springer C, Evans S, Lin J, Roland-Holst D (2019) Low carbon growth in China: the role of emissions trading in a transitioning economy. Appl Energy 235:1118–1125
Tian P, Mao B, Tong R, Zhang H, Zhou Q (2023) Analysis of carbon emission level and intensity of China’s transportation industry and different transportation modes. Clim Chang Res 19:347–356
Wang Y, Wang Y (2019) Feasibility and optimal pathway of China’s double targets for carbon reduction––the perspective of energy structure optimization. China Environ Sci 39:4444–4455
Wang K, Lu M, Wang Q (2020) lmpact of Covid-19 on China’s CO emissions. J Beijing Inst Technol (soc Sci Ed) 22:11–16
Wang XX, Huang JL, Liu HD (2022) Can China’s carbon trading policy help achieve carbon neutrality?-A study of policy effects from the five-sphere integrated plan perspective. J Environ Manag 305:114357
Wu R, Tan Z, Lin B (2023) Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China’s iron and steel industry. Energy 277:127743
Xu J, Cui J (2020) Low-carbon cities and firms’ green technological lnnovation. China Ind Econ 12:178–196
Xu W, Sun L (2023) Market-lncentive environmental regulation and energy consumption structure transformation. J Quant Technol Econ 40:133–155
Xuan D, Ma XW, Shang YP (2020) Can China’s policy of carbon emission trading promote carbon emission reduction? J Clean Prod 270:122383
Zhang H-J, Duan M-S (2021) Evaluation of the carbon emission reduction effect of China’s pilot ETSs: analysis based on the data of energy intensive industrial sub-sectors oy province. Clim Chang Res 17:579–589
Zhang X, Jia K (2023) Carbon emission reduction effect and policy mechanism in China’s carbon trading pilot: from the perspective of market institutional characteristics. J Hainan Univ (humanit Soc Sci) 41:108–117
Zhang YJ, Wei YM (2010) An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy 87:1804–1814
Zhang X, Zheng X (2024) Does carbon emission trading policy induce financialization of non-financial firms? Evidence from China. Energy Econ 131:107316
Zhang C, Wang QW, Shi D, Li PF, Cai WH (2016) Scenario-based potential effects of carbon trading in China: an integrated approach. Appl Energy 182:177–190
Zhang HJ, Duan MS, Deng Z (2019a) Have China’s pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions?- The evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level. J Clean Prod 234:912–924
Zhang WJ, Zhang N, Yu YN (2019b) Carbon mitigation effects and potential cost savings from carbon emissions trading in China’s regional industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:1–11
Zhang HR, Zhang RX, Li GM, Li W, Choi Y (2020a) Has China’s emission trading system achieved the development of a low-carbon economy in high-emission industrial subsectors? Sustainability 12:5370
Zhang W, Li J, Li GX, Guo SC (2020b) Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China. Energy 196:117117
Zhang YF, Li S, Luo TY, Gao J (2020c) The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China. J Clean Prod 265:121843
Zhang SL, Wu ZH, Wang Y, Hao Y (2021) Fostering green development with green finance: an empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China. J Environ Manag 296:113159
Zhao F, Lu L (2022) An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve from the perspective of environmental governance. Stat Decis 38:174–178
Zheng Y, Zhang B (2023) The impact of carbon market on city greening: quasi-experimental evidence from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 193:106960
Zhou D, Liang X, Zhou Y, Tang K (2020) Does emission trading boost carbon productivity? Evidence from China’s pilot emission trading scheme. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:5522
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China,72171081
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lihui Zhang proposed concept of the article, overall inspection Jing Luo contributed to main manuscript writing, data collecting, model building and result analyzing. Zhongqun Wu contributed to supervising. Yifei Li contributed to formatting and grammar checking. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Luo, J., Wu, Z. et al. Study on the effectiveness and influencing factors of china’s carbon emissions trading policy from industries’ perspective. Clean Techn Environ Policy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02817-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02817-y