Abstract
Background
Cognitive impairment can seriously affect the quality of life of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. Although numerous studies showed that N200, P300 latency and amplitude are correlated with cognitive functions, there is a sufficient amount of controversial results. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of N200, P300 latency and amplitude data of event-related potential (ERP) in PD.
Methods
We systematically searched on PubMed and Web of Science for PD-related ERP studies published before December 2021. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimates of N200 and P300 components were compared among PD patients, PD dementia (PDD) patients, PD non-dementia (PDND) patient, and healthy control (HC).
Results
Our meta-analysis showed prolonged N200 latency at the Fz, Cz electrode sites, prolonged P300 latency at the Fz sites in PD patients, compared to HC; prolonged N200 latency at the Cz, Pz electrode sites in PDND patients, compared to HC; prolonged P300 latency at the Cz site in PDD patients, compared to PDND patients; and reduced P300 amplitude at the Fz electrode site in PDND patients, compared to HC.
Conclusions
N200 and P300 component may be potential electrophysiological biomarkers of early cognitive impairment in PD patients. Future studies are needed to confirm this conclusion. Estimates of N200 and P300 component can be a valuable support for clinicians in diagnosis of early cognitive impairment in PD patients due to the simplicity and non-invasiveness of the procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data were included with supplementary table 1.
References
Levine CB, Fahrbach KR, Siderowf AD, Estok RP, Ludensky VM, Ross SD (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of the literature. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 57:1–4
Chaudhuri KR (2016) Progression and biomarkers for Parkinson disease: merging motor with nonmotor symptoms. Neurology 87(2):128–129
Helfrich RF, Knight RT (2019) Cognitive neurophysiology: event-related potentials. Handb Clin Neurol 160:543–558
Woodman GF (2010) A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(8):2031–2046
Georgiev D, Lange F, Seer C, Kopp B, Jahanshahi M (2016) Movement-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 127(6):2509–2519
Philipova D, Gatchev G, Vladova T, Georgiev D (1997) Event-related potentials in parkinsonian patients under auditory discrimination tasks. Int J Psychophysiol 27(1):69–78
Weber J, Abeln V, Steichele K, Foitschik T, Stuckenschneider T. (2021) Inefficient resource allocation is associated with reduced alpha activity in parietal regions in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurosci 53(4):1225–37
Yilmaz FT, Özkaynak SS, Barçin E (2017) Contribution of auditory P300 test to the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Neurol Sci 38(12):2103–9
Hu P, Cao R, Fang J, Yang Q, Liu T, Yu F et al (2021) Alterations in event-related potential responses to empathy for pain in Parkinson’s disease on and off medication. Clin Neurophysiol 132(4):914–921
Solís-Vivanco R, Rodríguez-Violante M, Rodríguez-Agudelo Y, Schilmann A, Rodríguez-Ortiz U, Ricardo-Garcell J (2015) The P3a wave: a reliable neurophysiological measure of Parkinson’s disease duration and severity. Clin Neurophysiol 126(11):2142–2149
Suvorov N, Krylov I, Voilokova N (1999) Voluntary movements and event-related potentials in Parkinsonians (stages 1–2). Int J Psychophysiol 31(2):95–110
Wang L, Kuroiwa Y, Kamitani T (1999) Visual event-related potential changes at two different tasks in nondemented Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 164(2):139–147
Pekkonen E, Jousmäki V, Reinikainen K, Partanen J (1995) Automatic auditory discrimination is impaired in Parkinson’s disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 95(1):47–52
Stanzione P, Semprini R, Pierantozzi M, Santilli AM, Fadda L, Traversa R et al (1998) Age and stage dependency of P300 latency alterations in non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients without therapy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108(1):80–91
Antal A, Dibó G, Kéri S, Gábor K, Janka Z, Vécsei L et al (2000) P300 component of visual event-related potentials distinguishes patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease from patients with essential tremor. J Neural Transm (Vienna, Austria : 1996) 107(7):787–797
Bocquillon P, Bourriez JL, Palmero-Soler E, Destée A, Defebvre L, Derambure P et al (2012) Role of basal ganglia circuits in resisting interference by distracters: a swLORETA study. PLoS One 7(3):e34239
Özmüş G, Yerlikaya D, Gökçeoğlu A, EmekSavaş DD, Çakmur R, DönmezÇolakoğlu B et al (2017) Demonstration of early cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease with visual P300 responses. Noro Psikiyatr Ars 54(1):21–27
Pauletti C, Mannarelli D, Locuratolo N, Currà A, Marinelli L, Fattapposta F (2019) Central fatigue and attentional processing in Parkinson’s disease: an event-related potentials study. Clin Neurophysiol 130(5):692–700
Gaudreault PO, Gagnon JF, Montplaisir J, Vendette M, Postuma RB, Gagnon K et al (2013) Abnormal occipital event-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease with concomitant REM sleep behavior disorder. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 19(2):212–217
Wang L, Kuroiwa Y, Li M, Kamitani T, Wang J, Takahashi T et al (2000) The correlation between P300 alterations and regional cerebral blood flow in non-demented Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett 282(3):133–136
Ebmeier KP, Potter DD, Cochrane RH, Crawford JR, Stewart L, Calder SA et al (1992) Event related potentials, reaction time, and cognitive performance in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Biol Psychol 33(1):73–89
Wang L, Kuroiwa Y, Kamitani T, Li M, Takahashi T, Suzuki Y et al (2000) Visual event-related potentials in progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, striatonigral degeneration, and Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 247(5):356–363
Antal A, Pfeiffer R, Bodis-Wollner I (1996) Simultaneously evoked primary and cognitive visual evoked potentials distinguish younger and older patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 103(8–9):1053–1067
Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S (2005) Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 43(6):967–975
Wang L, Kuroiwa Y, Kamitani T, Takahashi T, Suzuki Y, Hasegawa O (1999) Effect of interstimulus interval on visual P300 in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67(4):497–503
Filipović S, Kostić VS, Sternić N, Marinković Z, Ocić G (1990) Auditory event-related potentials in different types of dementia. Eur Neurol 30(4):189–193
Tachibana H, Toda L, Sugita M (1992) Actively and passively evoked P3 latency of event-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 111(2):134–142
Matsui H, Nishinaka K, Oda M, Kubori T, Udaka F (2007) Auditory event-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease: prominent correlation with attention. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13(7):394–398
Beste C, Dziobek I, Hielscher H, Willemssen R, Falkenstein M (2009) Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci 29(4):855–860
Miller IN, Neargarder S, Risi MM, Cronin-Golomb A (2013) Frontal and posterior subtypes of neuropsychological deficit in Parkinson’s disease. Behav Neurosci 127(2):175–183
Goldman JG, Weis H, Stebbins G, Bernard B, Goetz CG (2012) Clinical differences among mild cognitive impairment subtypes in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 27(9):1129–1136
Kalbe E, Rehberg SP, Heber I, Kronenbuerger M, Schulz JB, Storch A et al (2016) Subtypes of mild cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease: evidence from the LANDSCAPE study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87(10):1099–1105
Pfeiffer HC, Løkkegaard A, Zoetmulder M, Friberg L, Werdelin L (2014) Cognitive impairment in early-stage non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients. Acta Neurol Scand 129(5):307–318
Williams-Gray CH, Evans JR, Goris A, Foltynie T, Ban M, Robbins TW et al (2009) The distinct cognitive syndromes of Parkinson’s disease: 5 year follow-up of the CamPaIGN cohort. Brain 132(Pt 11):2958–2969
Pal A, Pegwal N, Kaur S, Mehta N, Behari M, Sharma R (2018) Deficit in specific cognitive domains associated with dementia in Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci 57:116–120
Patel SH, Azzam PN (2005) Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the Event-Related Potential. Int J Med Sci 2(4):147–154
Bennys K, Portet F, Touchon J, Rondouin G (2007) Diagnostic value of event-related evoked potentials N200 and P300 subcomponents in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Neurophysiol 24(5):405–412
Dong G, Zhou H, Zhao X (2010) Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neurosci Lett 485(2):138–142
Magliero A, Bashore TR, Coles MG, Donchin E (1984) On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology 21(2):171–186
Fjell AM, Walhovd KB (2001) P300 and neuropsychological tests as measures of aging: scalp topography and cognitive changes. Brain Topogr 14(1):25–40
Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E (1977) Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197(4305):792–795
Kramer AF, Strayer DL (1988) Assessing the development of automatic processing: an application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biol Psychol 26(1–3):231–267
Kramer AF, Wickens CD, Donchin E (1983) An analysis of the processing requirements of a complex perceptual-motor task. Hum Factors 25(6):597–621
Polich J (1986) P300 development from auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology 23(5):590–597
Tokic K, Titlic M, Beganovic-Petrovic A, Suljic E, Romac R, Silic S (2016) P300 wave changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Med Arch (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) 70(6):453–456
Toda K, Tachibana H, Sugita M, Konishi K (1993) P300 and reaction time in Parkinson’s disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 6(3):131–136
Piccirilli M, D’Alessandro P, Finali G, Piccinin GL, Agostini L (1989) Frontal lobe dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: prognostic value for dementia? Eur Neurol 29(2):71–76
Taylor AE, Saint-Cyr JA, Lang AE (1990) Memory and learning in early Parkinson’s disease: evidence for a “frontal lobe syndrome.” Brain Cogn 13(2):211–232
Bès A, Güell A, Fabre N, Dupui P, Victor G, Géraud G (1983) Cerebral blood flow studied by Xenon-133 inhalation technique in parkinsonism: loss of hyperfrontal pattern. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 3(1):33–37
Scatton B, Javoy-Agid F, Rouquier L, Dubois B, Agid Y (1983) Reduction of cortical dopamine, noradrenaline, serotonin and their metabolites in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res 275(2):321–328
Gaspar P, Duyckaerts C, Alvarez C, Javoy-Agid F, Berger B (1991) Alterations of dopaminergic and noradrenergic innervations in motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 30(3):365–374
Stern Y, Mayeux R, Côté L (1984) Reaction time and vigilance in Parkinson’s disease Possible role of altered norepinephrine metabolism. Arch Neurol 41(10):1086–1089
Hs L, Sb D (2012) Cognitive dysfunction and depression in Parkinson’s disease: what can be learned from rodent models? Eur J Neurosci 35(12):1894–1907
Khomenko IG, Pronina MV, Kataeva GV, Kropotov JD, Irishina YA, Susin DS (2020) Combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and event-related potentials study of the cognitive impairment mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci 72:335–341
Picco A, Morbelli S, Piccardo A, Arnaldi D, Girtler N, Brugnolo A et al (2015) Brain (18)F-DOPA PET and cognition in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(7):1062–1070
Tanaka H, Koenig T, Pascual-Marqui RD, Hirata K, Kochi K, Lehmann D (2000) Event-related potential and EEG measures in Parkinson’s disease without and with dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 11(1):39–45
Hansch EC, Syndulko K, Cohen SN, Goldberg ZI, Potvin AR, Tourtellotte WW (1982) Cognition in Parkinson disease: an event-related potential perspective. Ann Neurol 11(6):599–607
Folstein JR, Van Petten C (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45(1):152–170
Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3(1):17–26
Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER (1965) Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150(3700):1187–1188
Picton TW (1992) The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 9(4):456–479
Seer C, Lange F, Georgiev D, Jahanshahi M, Kopp B (2016) Event-related potentials and cognition in Parkinson’s disease: an integrative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 71:691–714
Polich J, Corey-Bloom J (2005) Alzheimer’s disease and P300: review and evaluation of task and modality. Curr Alzheimer Res 2(5):515–525
Litvan I, Aarsland D, Adler CH, Goldman JG, Kulisevsky J, Mollenhauer B et al (2011) MDS Task Force on mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: critical review of PD-MCI. Mov Disord 26(10):1814–1824
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81901108).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hui Xu was in charge of article inclusion and had the major responsibility for data analysis and manuscript writing. Lihua Gu contributed to the design and plan of the present study, supervised the project, and provided funding. Shiyao Zhang was in charge of article inclusion and data collection. Yuchen Wu was in charge of article inclusion and data collection. Xiaojin Wei was in charge of data analysis. Caiyan Wang was in charge of data analysis. Yuhan Xu contributed to data analysis. Yijing Guo contributed to the design and plan of the present study and supervised the project and manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
None.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The present study is a meta-analysis, which did not involve human participants and/or animals.
Informed consent
The present study is a meta-analysis. Thus, informed consent is not applicable for the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, H., Gu, L., Zhang, S. et al. N200 and P300 component changes in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 43, 6719–6730 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06348-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06348-6