Skip to main content
Log in

Endogenous-like orienting of visual attention in rats

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the orienting of visual attention in rats using a 3-hole nose-poke task analogous to Posner, Information processing in cognition: the Loyola Symposium, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, (1980) covert attention task for humans. The effects of non-predictive (50% valid and 50% invalid) and predictive (80% valid and 20% invalid) peripheral visual cues on reaction times and response accuracy to a target stimulus, using Stimuli-Onset Asynchronies (SOAs) varying between 200 and 1,200 ms, were investigated. The results showed shorter reaction times in valid trials relative to invalid trials for both subjects trained in the non-predictive and predictive conditions, particularly when the SOAs were 200 and 400 ms. However, the magnitude of this validity effect was significantly greater for subjects exposed to predictive cues, when the SOA was 800 ms. Subjects exposed to invalid predictive cues exhibited an increase in omission errors relative to subjects exposed to invalid non-predictive cues. In contrast, valid cues reduced the proportion of omission errors for subjects trained in the predictive condition relative to subjects trained in the non-predictive condition. These results are congruent with those usually reported for humans and indicate that, in addition to the exogenous capture of attention promoted by both predictive and non-predictive peripheral cues, rats exposed to predictive cues engaged an additional slower process equivalent to human’s endogenous orienting of attention. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an endogenous-like process of covert orienting of visual attention in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azevedo EL, Squella SA, Ribeiro-do-Valle LE (2001) The early facilitatory effect of a peripheral spatially noninformative prime stimulus depends on target stimulus features. Braz J Med Biol Res 34(6):803–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomeo P, Decaix C, Siéroff E (2007) The phenomenology of endogenous orienting. Conscious Cogn 16(1):144–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger A, Henik A, Rafal R (2005) Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. J Exp Psychol Gen 134(2):207–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman EM, Brown VJ, Kertzman C, Schwarz U, Robinson DL (1993) Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context. J Neurophysiol 70(1):431–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell PJ (1995) Overt orienting in the rat: parametric studies of cued detection of visual targets. Behav Neurosci 109(6):1095–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC (1992) Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(4):1030–1044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides J (1980) Towards a model of the mind’s eye’s movement. Can J Psychol 34(2):103–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides J (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In: Long JB, Baddeley AD (eds) Attention and performance ix, vol IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonides J (1983) Further toward a model of the mind’s eye’s movement. BPS 21(4):247–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Juola JF, Koshino H, Warner CB, McMickell M, Peterson M (2000) Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults. Am J Psychol 113(2):159–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Vecera SP (2002) Attention. In: Pashler H, Yantis S (eds) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology, vol 1. Sensation and Perception. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 235–286

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PA (1997) Orienting attention without awareness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23(1):168–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller HJ, Findlay JM (1988) The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychol (Amst) 69(2):129–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller HJ, Humphreys GW (1991) Luminance-increment detection: capacity-limited or not? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17(1):107–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller HJ, Rabbitt PM (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2):315–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JM, Brown VJ (2000) Anticipatory errors after unilateral lesions of the subthalamic nucleus in the rat: evidence for a failure of response inhibition. Behav Neurosci 114(1):150–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JM, McAlonan K, Robb WGK, Brown VJ (2000) Cholinergic neurotransmission influences covert orientation of visuospatial attention in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 150(1):112–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32(1):3–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance X, vol 10. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 531–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Snyder CRR (1975) Attention and cognitive control. In: Solso RL (ed) Information processing in cognition: the Loyola Symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 55–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Ogden WC (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In: Pick HL, Saltzman IJ (eds) Modes of perceiving and processing information. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 137–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinzmetal W, McCool C, Park S (2005) Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Gen 134(1):73–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner AL, Mittleman G (1996) Visuospatial attention in the rat and posterior parietal cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res 79(1–2):69–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward NM, Brown VJ (1996) Covert orienting of attention in the rat and the role of striatal dopamine. J Neurosci 16(9):3082–3088

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward NM, Brown VJ (1997) Deficits in response initiation, but not attention, following excitotoxic lesions of posterior parietal cortex in the rat. Brain Res 775(1–2):81–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward NM, Sharkey J, Marston HM, Brown VJ (1998) Simple and choice reaction-time performance following occlusion of the anterior cerebral arteries in the rat. Exp Brain Res 123(3):269–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner CB, Juola JF, Koshino H (1990) Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention. Percept Psychophys 48(3):243–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weese GD, Phillips JM, Brown VJ (1999) Attentional orienting is impaired by unilateral lesions of the thalamic reticular nucleus in the rat. J Neurosci 19(22):10135–10139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RD, Richard CM (2000) Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing. Vision Res 40(17):2351–2358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank three anonymous reviewers and Dr. Bárbara K.A. Onishi for criticisms and comments that helped to improve an early version of the present study. This research was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Ensino Superior (CAPES), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilberto Fernando Xavier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marote, C.F.O., Xavier, G.F. Endogenous-like orienting of visual attention in rats. Anim Cogn 14, 535–544 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0388-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0388-3

Keywords

Navigation