Skip to main content
Log in

A modified JRC-JCS model and its applicability to weathered joints of granite and quartzite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shear strength of rock joints plays a key role in controlling rock mass behaviors. As the ongoing process of weathering in nature brings about intricate changes to rocks, shear behavior of rock joints is also influenced by the degree of weathering of the joint surface materials. However, efficiencies of the common and simple JRC-JCS models existing in the literature in predicting the shear strength with reference to weathering grades of rock joints does not seem to have been evaluated. In this study, a modification of the JRC-JCS model was proposed based on a total of 119 direct shear tests performed on natural, planner, unfilled and weathered (i.e. grades II and III) joints of granite and quartzite from India. Subsequently, the efficacies of the proposed criterion and three other apparently useful JRC-JCS models including Barton’s model were evaluated in estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints with reference to a particular weathering grade as well as in regard to different weathering grades considered together. For such evaluation, the peak shear strength values with reference to weathering grades of the joint surfaces obtained from the direct shear tests of this study were considered. Additionally, the peak shear strength data for weathered non-planar granitic joints (i.e. grades I, II and III) existing in the literature was also taken into account. From the statistical comparison, it became evident that the shear strength criterion proposed in this study is significantly more efficient than the other considered criteria. The apparent superiority of the proposed criterion over the three other considered JRC-JCS models could be attributed to very different types of joint surfaces investigated in this study with reference to weathering grades and rock types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANON (1995) The description and classification of weathered rocks for engineering purposes: geological society engineering group working party report. Q J Eng Geol 28:207–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR (1973) Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR (2013) Shear strength criteria for rock, rock joints, rockfill and rock masses: problems and some solutions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR, Bandis SC (1982) Effects of block size on the shear behaviour of jointed rock. 23rd US Symp on rock mechanics, Berkeley, p 739–760

  • Barton N R, Bandis SC (1990) Review of predictive capabilities of JRCJCS model in engineering practice. In: Barton N, Stephansson O (eds) Rock joints, proc. Int. Symp. On Rock Joints. Loen. Norway. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 603–610

  • Barton NR, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Celestino TB, Bortolucci AA (2009) Evaluation of rock mechanical behaviors under uniaxial compression with reference to assessed weathering grades. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Ghosh N, Das M (2012) Categorizing weathering grades of quartzitic materials and assessing Brazilian tensile strength with reference to assigned grades. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rocks. Technial Report No AFNL-TR-65-116. Albuquerque, NM. Air Force weapons laboratory

  • Ghazvinian AH, Azinfar MJ, Geranmayeh Vaneghi R (2012) Importance of tensile strength on the shear behaviour of discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI (2009) District resource Map. I. Geology & Minerals, Baleshwar, Orissa under the general technical supervision of M. M. Swami, Dy. Director General, GSI, ER, First Edition

  • http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/app/. Accessed on 23 Feb 2018

  • ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested Methods Prepared by the Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group. Kozan Ofset, Ankara, Turkey

  • ISRM (2014) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: ISRM. Springer

  • Jang BA, Kim TH, Jang HS (2010) Characterization of the three dimensional roughness of rock joints and proposal of a modified shear strength criterion. J Eng Geol 20:319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorda-Bordehore L, Herrera R (2018) Rapid field test for shear strength characterization of dacite at Cerro Rico de Potosi (Bolivia): tilt test with a Schmidt hammer and compass-clinometer. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Shou G, Huang TH, Morgan RM (1995) New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:673–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YK, Park JW, Song JJ (2014) Model for the shear behavior of rock joints under CNL and CNS conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang Y (2015) Quantitative estimation of joint roughness coefficient using statistical parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Tian Y, Liu D, Jiang Y (2017) Updates to JRC-JCS model for estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Eng Geol 228:282–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RP, Hencher SR (1986) Principles for description and classification of weathered rocks for engineering purposes. Site Investigation Practice: Assessing BS5930, Geological Society, London, Eng Geol Spec Pub 2:299–308

  • Myers NO (1962) Characterization of surface roughness. Wear 5:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozvan A, Dincer I, Acar A, Ozvan B (2014) The effects of discontinuity surface roughness on the shear strength of weathered granite joints. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:801–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha AK (1994) Crustal evolution of Singhbhum North Orissa, eastern India. Geol Soc Ind Mem 27:341

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar SN, Saha AK (1977) The present status of the Precambrian stratigraphy, tectonics and geochronology of Singhbhum-Keonjhar-Mayurbhanj region, eastern India. Ind J Earth Sci 4:37–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh HK, Basu A (2016) Shear behaviors of ‘real’ natural un-matching joints of granite with equivalent joint roughness coefficients. Eng Geol 211:120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh HK, Basu A (2018) Evaluation of existing criteria in estimating shear strength of natural rock discontinuities. Eng Geol 232:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang ZC, Wong LNY (2016) New criterion for evaluating the peak shear strength of rock joints under different contact states. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1191–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Liu Q, Ma H, Liu Q, Deng P (2018) New peak shear strength model for cement filled rock joints. Eng Geol 233:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Jiang Q, Chen N, Wei W, Feng X (2016) Laboratory investigation on shear behavior of rock joints and a new peak shear strength criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:3495–3512

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions that have helped enhance the clarity of the paper. B. K. Ram acknowledges the research fellowship from the University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India. The authors acknowledge the overall support by the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, for carrying out this investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Basu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ram, B.K., Basu, A. A modified JRC-JCS model and its applicability to weathered joints of granite and quartzite. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 6089–6099 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01531-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01531-0

Keywords

Navigation