Abstract
Aquifer homogeneity is usually assumed when interpreting the results of pumping and slug tests, although aquifers are essentially heterogeneous. The aim of this study is to present a method of determining the transmissivities of dual-permeability water-bearing formations based on slug tests such as the pressure-induced permeability test. A bi-exponential rate-of-rise curve is typically observed during many of these tests conducted in heterogeneous formations. The work involved analyzing curves deviating from the exponential rise recorded at the Belchatow Lignite Mine in central Poland, where a significant number of permeability tests have been conducted. In most cases, bi-exponential movement was observed in piezometers with a screen installed in layered sediments, each with a different hydraulic conductivity, or in fissured rock. The possibility to identify the flow properties of these geological formations was analyzed. For each piezometer installed in such formations, a set of two transmissivity values was calculated piecewise based on the interpretation algorithm of the pressure-induced permeability test—one value for the first (steeper) part of the obtained rate-of-rise curve, and a second value for the latter part of the curve. The results of transmissivity estimation for each piezometer are shown. The discussion presents the limitations of the interpretational method and suggests future modeling plans.
Résumé
Lors de l’interprétation de tests d’infiltration et d’essais de pompage, l’homogénéité de l’aquifère est. communément supposée, bien que les aquifères soient essentiellement hétérogènes. L’objectif de cette étude est. de présenter une méthode de détermination des transmissivités de formations aquifères à double perméabilité sur la base de tests d’infiltration, tels que des essais de perméabilité induits par des variations de pression. Une courbe avec un taux de croissance bi-exponentiel est. typiquement observée au cours de nombreux de ces essais réalisés dans des formations hétérogènes. Le travail a compris l’analyze de courbes déviant de l’augmentation exponentielle enregistrées à la mine de lignite de Belchatow en Pologne centrale, où un nombre significatif d’essais de perméabilité ont été réalisés. Dans la plupart des cas, une évolution bi-exponentielle a été observée dans les piézomètres comprenant un intervalle crépiné en face de sédiments stratifiés, chaque horizon ayant une perméabilité différente, ou dans des roches fissurées. La possibilité d’identifier les propriétés d’écoulement de ces formations géologiques a été analysée. Pour chaque piézomètre captant de telles formations, un jeu de deux valeurs de transmissivité a été calculé par tronçon sur la base de l’algorithme d’interprétation de l’essai de perméabilité par variation de pression—une valeur pour la première partie (plus pentue) de la courbe de taux de croissance obtenue et une seconde valeur pour la partie terminale de la courbe. Les résultats de l’estimation de la transmissivité pour chaque piézomètre sont présentés. La discussion présente les limites de la méthode d’interprétation et suggère de futurs projets de modélisation.
Resumen
La homogeneidad del acuífero se suele asumir cuando se interpretan los resultados de los ensayos de bombeo y “slug”, aunque los acuíferos son esencialmente heterogéneos. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar un método de determinación de transmisividades de las formaciones acuíferas de doble permeabilidad basadas en ensayos “slug”, tales como los ensayos de permeabilidad inducidos por presión. Normalmente se observa una curva de tasa de crecimiento bi-exponencial durante muchos de estos ensayos realizados en formaciones heterogéneas. El trabajo implicó el análisis de curvas que se desvían del aumento exponencial registrado en la mina de Belchatow Lignite en el centro de Polonia, donde se han realizado un número significativo de pruebas de permeabilidad. En la mayoría de los casos se observó movimiento bi-exponencial en piezómetros con una pantalla instalada en sedimentos estratificados, cada uno con una conductividad hidráulica diferente o en roca fisurada. Se analizó la posibilidad de identificar las propiedades de flujo de estas formaciones geológicas. Para cada piezómetro instalado en tales formaciones, se calculó un conjunto de dos valores de transmisividad basado en el algoritmo de interpretación de los ensayos de permeabilidad inducidos por presión—un valor para la primera parte (más pronunciada) de la curva de tasa de crecimiento obtenida y un segundo valor para la última parte de la curva. Se muestran los resultados de la estimación de la transmisividad para cada piezómetro. La discusión presenta las limitaciones del método interpretativo y sugiere futuros programas de modelado.
摘要
尽管含水层本质上是非均质的,但在解译抽水和段塞流试验结果中,通常假定含水层是均质的。本研究的目的就是介绍一种根据段塞流试验诸如压力诱导渗透性试验确定多重透水性含水地层的导水系数。在非均质地层中进行的许多这种试验基本上都观测到了双指数上升率曲线。工作涉及到分析波兰中部Belchatow 褐煤矿记载的偏离指数上升的曲线,在这里进行了大量的渗透性试验。多数情况下,通过安装在分层的沉积物中带滤水管的测压计可以观测到双指数运移,每一沉积层具有不同的水力传导率,或在裂隙岩中。分析了确定这些地层水流特性的可能性。针对安装在这样地层的 每一个测压计,根据压力诱导透水性试验的解译算法计算了一套两个导水率值—一个值是获取的上升率曲线的第一(较陡峭的)部分,一个是曲线的后半部分。显示了每个测压计的导水系数估算结果。论述展示了解译方法的局限性及提出了未来的模拟规划。
Resumo
A homogeneidade dos aquíferos é geralmente adotada ao interpretar os resultados de ensaios de bombeamento e instantâneos (slug), embora aquíferos sejam essencialmente heterogêneos. O objetivo deste estudo é apresentar um método de determinação de transmissividades de formações armazenadoras de água de permeabilidade dupla, baseado em ensaios instantâneos (slug tests), tal como o ensaio de permeabilidade de pressão induzida. Uma curva de taxa de crescimento biexponencial é tipicamente observada durante muitos desses ensaios conduzidos em formações heterogêneas. O trabalho envolveu a análise de curvas que se desviam do crescimento exponencial registradas na Mina Belchatow Lignite, na Polônia central, onde números significativos de ensaios de permeabilidade têm sido conduzidos. Na maioria dos casos, o movimento biexponencial foi observado nos piezômetros com filtro instalado em camadas de sedimentos com diferentes condutividades hidráulicas, ou em rochas fissuradas. A possibilidade de identificar as propriedades do escoamento dessas formações geológicas foi analisada. Para cada piezômetro instalado em tais formações, um conjunto de dois valores de transmissividade foi calculado definido em trechos (piecewise), baseado em um algoritmo de interpretação de ensaio de permeabilidade de pressão induzida—um valor para a primeira parte (mais inclinada) da curva da taxa de crescimento obtida, e um segundo valor para a última parte da curva. Os resultados da estimativa de transmissividade para cada piezômetro são mostrados. A discussão apresenta as limitações do método de interpretação e sugere futuros planos de modelagem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The accurate determination of hydraulic conductivity (k) and transmissivity (T) of an aquifer is a crucial part of many hydrogeological studies, especially those related to groundwater control in mining areas, vulnerability mapping and the delineation of protection zones for water intakes (Rafini et al. 2017; Renard 2005). Pumping tests performed in wells can provide the average hydraulic conductivity within the cone of depression. The calculated transmissivity, i.e. the product of hydraulic conductivity and aquifer thickness, will also be an average value.
More local values of hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity can be obtained via slug tests, which require initiating and measuring water-level fluctuations in a piezometer. In order to achieve such fluctuations, water is typically added to or removed from the piezometer. Alternatively, objects heavy enough to sink into water can be inserted. Fluctuations can also be achieved by sealing off the piezometer and inducing air pressure changes inside (Marciniak 1999, 2012). Slug tests are of great significance, since they can even be conducted in cases of aquifer contamination, when water pumping is strongly inadvisable.
The most common analytic models used to interpret slug tests were developed by Bouwer and Rice (1976), Bredehoeft and Papadopulos (1980), Cooper et al. (1965, 1967) and Hvorslev (1951). These models, however, usually assume homogeneity of the analyzed water-bearing formations, when many of them are, in fact, characterized by the presence of different systems of void space which may lead to preferential flow (Beckie and Harvey 2002; Copty et al. 2011; Pechstein et al. 2016). In such cases, qualitative deviations in the return of the water level to its initial state can be observed.
The research described here is motivated by the results of many pressure-induced permeability tests which show deviations from the exponential rise (or fall) of the water level that can be approximated by bi-exponential curves (Fig. 1). It was assumed that these curves characterize heterogeneous, dual-permeability aquifers and indicate the presence of two distinct pathways for water flow. In general, a dual-permeability aquifer can be envisioned as a special type of dual-porosity reservoirs and should be defined as a medium composed of two subdomains, in which both are responsible for water flow. Fissured-porous rock—if water flow occurs through both (the fissures and the pores)—are classified as dual-permeability reservoirs, as are layered formations with layers of highly permeable sediments (Balogun et al. 2009; Leij et al. 2012). For example, two different sand layers or a layer of sand and a layer of fissured limestone or even one consolidated but fissured porous material like sandstone can fall under the definition of a dual-permeability medium.
The paper aims to present the procedure of a piecewise estimation of two transmissivity values, whenever a bi-exponential curve is observed in dual-permeability formations during a pressure-induced permeability test. However, this procedure can easily be extrapolated to any other type of slug test, since all result in recording water level movements inside a piezometer.
Materials and methods
The pressure-induced permeability test
The pressure-induced permeability (slug) test conducted in field conditions determines the in situ hydraulic conductivity of an aquifer in the area around a piezometer (Kaczmarek et al. 2016; Marciniak 2001; Marciniak et al. 2013). The test is performed in the following manner. First, the upper part of the piezometer is sealed off using a sealing device. Simultaneously, a probe is placed inside the piezometer in the area of expected water level fluctuations. Next, air is pumped into the sealed piezometer to decrease the water level. After pumping is stopped and the water level has stabilized, the air valve of the sealing device is opened and the air inside the piezometer decompresses, leading to the free rise of the water level to its initial state. An alternate way of conducting the test is to apply suction and successively increase the water level in the piezometer. In such case, a decrease of the water level is observed after the air valve is opened. The rate at which the water returns to its initial level determines the transmissivity of the investigated aquifer.
The mathematical model of water level changes within the piezometer characterizes two possible cases: damped oscillations or aperiodic movement (Krauss 1974, 1977; Marciniak 2001, 2012). By using the model in the identification algorithms of the pressure-induced permeability test (PARAMEX-type), it is possible to calculate the transmissivity of an aquifer based on the free rise or fall of the water level that is recorded within a piezometer (Marciniak 2001). Moreover, hydraulic conductivity of the investigated aquifer can be easily determined by dividing the obtained transmissivity value by the thickness of the aquifer.
In a vast majority of cases, an aperiodic movement of the water level can be observed. The water level’s rate-of-rise or rate-of-fall as a function of time, h(t), can be described by the following exponential function:
where h 0 is the initial water level (cm) and λ < 0 (1/s) is an exponent dependent on the transmissivity.
Unusual bi-exponential water-level movement has been observed during ca. 12% of these tests. The possible causes of such movement have been analyzed thoroughly. Initially, piezometer malfunctions, i.e. leaky isolating clay seals or faulty sand packs around the piezometers, were taken into consideration. Such types of damage have been observed during many pressure-induced permeability tests but, in such cases, the initial stage of water level rise is rapid and short and the next stage is exponential.
In order to find the hydraulic connections that result in the bi-exponential behavior of the water level, several laboratory models of water flow have been investigated by Marciniak et al. (2013). Only one model called the “W-tube” allowed such behavior to be observed. This laboratory system of water flow indicates that dual-permeability conditions are required to record curves deviating from the exponential rise. Such conditions are observed in aquifers characterized by the presence of two subdomains (e.g. two layers) with different transmissivities and hydraulic conductivities, as well as a weak hydraulic connection between them.
When conducting any type of slug test in a piezometer installed in a dual-permeability aquifer, and if the screen section covers both subdomains, faster water flow should be present in the subdomain with a higher transmissivity compared to the subdomain with a lower transmissivity. Generally, higher contrast between transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity values will result in a more apparent bi-exponential water level movement.
The laboratory W-tube model of a permeability test conducted in heterogeneous aquifers
The “W-tube” is a laboratory model that was thoroughly discussed in two earlier publications (Kaczmarek et al. 2016; Marciniak et al. 2013). The model is considered to reenact the hydraulic conditions of a field pressure-induced permeability test conducted in heterogeneous, dual-permeability aquifers. It consists of three hydraulically connected columns. The two outer columns are equipped with cylindrical chambers where samples of different sands are placed. The central column, which represents a piezometer, contains a measuring probe that records the water level in this column as a function of time (Fig. 2).
The preparation of a test requires filling all three columns with water to the same level. Afterwards, by pumping air into the central column using an air compressor, the water level in the central column is displaced down and the water level in the outer columns is displaced up. Over time, the water level stabilizes, then a test is initiated when the air valve at the top of the central column is opened, causing water to return to the initial level due to its filtration through the sand samples in the outer columns.
The mathematical model of the W-tube test was formulated using a balance of forces for water flowing through the sand samples. It was assumed that the inner cross-sections of all three columns, denoted as S, are equal. S 1 and S 2 are the cross-sections of the sand samples, L 1 and L 2 denote the heights of these samples, and their hydraulic conductivities are k 1 and k 2. Initially, the water level in the central column is lower than that in the adjacent columns and serves as the reference level for the measurements of the water level h r in the central column and the levels h 1 and h 2 in the adjacent columns. The mathematical model neglects all inertial forces related to the motion of water in the columns and in the pore space of the sand samples. The interaction forces between water and the porous material are approximated according to the linear Darcy’s law. Taking into account the hydrostatic forces caused by the water columns as well as the gravitational forces and the interaction forces between water and the porous material, the following balance equations for pore water can be written (Kaczmarek 2009; Rehbinder 1992):
where ρ is the density of water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and the dh 1/dt and dh 2/dt derivatives denote the rate at which the water height changes. This rate is equal to the filtration velocities in the appropriate samples.
Due to the conservation of mass in the system, the changes of water heights in the columns for any time increment dt are given by the following relation:
It is assumed that the h 1 and h 2 values are as follows:
After some basic transformations presented by Marciniak et al. (2013), the analytical form of the solution, height h r, is obtained:
where the constant B is derived from the following formula:
and λ 1,2 equals:
Constants A 1 and A 2 are related to the geometric parameters of the analyzed sand samples: S 1, S 2, L 1, L 2 and to their hydraulic conductivities k 1 and k 2:
After making use of Eq. (8), constants B and λ 1,2 can be written in the following form:
Hence, with the solution of Eq. (5), it is possible to determine the water height in the central column as a function of time.
The results of laboratory tests performed on the W-tube were also presented in the authors’ previous publications. In Marciniak et al. (2013), the so-called direct problem is solved, i.e. bi-exponential rate-of-rise curves experimentally obtained in the W-tube for various combinations of sand samples are compared with the predictions of the mathematical model (generated in MATLAB). A root-mean-square error (RMSE) was calculated for every rate-of-rise curve and the corresponding prediction, good convergence was obtained. In Kaczmarek et al. (2016) the inverse problem is solved—a numerical optimization procedure is applied in order to jointly estimate a pair of hydraulic conductivity values based on a bi-exponential rate-of-rise curve recorded in the W-tube. In this case, the predictions of the mathematical model varied in accuracy. Relatively small percent errors between the numerically obtained hydraulic conductivity values and the values derived from constant head measurements were usually obtained for highly permeable sands. Higher errors were obtained for sands with a low permeability or in cases when the contrast in permeability between the two analyzed sand samples in a pair was small.
A piecewise exponential model for dual transmissivities in field conditions
When interpreting field pressure-induced permeability tests that result in recording bi-exponential curves, it should be assumed that the piezometer screen is in contact with two subdomains, both characterized by a distinct system of water flow, even though dual permeability is not always apparent when analyzing hydrogeological data (Fig. 3). Thin layers of sediment or zones of weathered material are frequently omitted in the lithological description of boreholes. Since it is impossible to calculate a pair of hydraulic conductivity values for the two screened subdomains if one of them is unnoticed or if their thickness is unknown, the authors propose a simplified analytic method of estimating dual transmissivity values piecewise (in two intervals).
The bi-exponential movement of the water level is approximated using two theoretical exponential curves:
and a pair of transmissivity values, T b1 and T b2, is calculated based on the interpretation algorithm of the slug test. The transmissivity of the subdomain with a higher conductivity (T b1) is calculated from the exponential curve that approximates the first (steeper) part of the bi-exponential rise of the water level – from the initial time t 0 to “breakthrough” time t b. Transmissivity of the subdomain with lower conductivity (T b2) is calculated from the exponential curve that approximates the second part of the bi-exponential movement observed during the test—from time t b to time t f, i.e. the time when water reaches its initial level). Slightly shifting time t b (altering the intervals) does not cause any significant change in the estimated T values.
Furthermore, a goodness-of-fit analysis can be performed to estimate how well the observed water level corresponds to the predictions of the model. The authors usually calculate root-mean-square errors (RMSE) and normalized root-mean-square errors (NRMSE) to assess the differences between observed and predicted data:
where h obs is the water level observed during the slug test in a piezometer, h pred is the water level estimated using the analytic method, n is the number of measurements, h max and h min are the maximum and minimum water levels achieved during the test, respectively. When estimating the goodness-of-fit, the two theoretical exponential curves are analyzed jointly to obtain one RMSE and one NRMSE value for the entire duration of a slug test (time t 0 to t f).
Study area
Pressure-induced permeability tests (PARAMEX-type) have been performed in over 1,400 piezometers in various regions of Poland. Usually, single tests are performed in a small number of piezometers, e.g. in water-intake-protection zones. The only region with a significant number of performed tests is the Belchatow Lignite Mine. In this mine, a crew of hydrogeologists routinely performs PARAMEX tests to determine the technical condition of the piezometer network (Marciniak 2001). So far, over 200 piezometers have been analyzed at the mine. Most of the them (154) are located within the Belchatow mining field, one of the two fields where opencast mining takes place; therefore, this field was chosen as the study area (Fig. 4).
The mine is located in the Kleszczow Graben (central Poland). This arc-shaped graben, developed on the Epi–Variscan platform, is 40–50 km long, 4–5 km wide, and stretches in a E–W direction (Gruszka and van Loon 2007). Its depth reaches 350 m, which makes it the deepest neotectonic graben in the Polish Lowland. The Kleszczow Graben was formed due to the movement of faults in the substratum which were reactivated during the Alpine orogeny (Gruszka 2001). The basement is represented by Jurassic and Cretaceous sediments, mainly sandstones, limestones, shales and marls. Permian rocks are solely present in a small area of the “Debina” salt dome (Gotowala and Haluszczak 2002; Haluszczak 2007). The graben is filled with Neogene (early Miocene–Pliocene) and Quaternary deposits, predominantly lignite, sands and clays. Their displacements are caused by tectonic deformations of the basement, especially near the fault zones and the salt dome. Moreover, the exploitation of lignite involves relocating vast amounts of gangue to surrounding areas, which evokes tectonic activities in the region such as earthquakes, rock displacement and rock fracturing (Widera 2016).
Results
As already mentioned, pressure-induced permeability tests were conducted in 154 piezometers located in the Belchatow mining field; however, water movement could not be achieved in all of them. In some piezometers, the water level was located at the height of the screen, preventing air compression and decompression, whereas in several other cases, the analyzed piezometers were damaged. Ultimately, rate-of-rise curves were successfully recorded in 92 piezometers. Bi-exponential water level movement was observed in 11 of these piezometers—6 of them screened Mesozoic formations (Upper Jurassic or Cretaceous), 4 others screened Paleogene sediments underlying the lignite deposit, and 1 piezometer was installed in Quaternary material (Table 1).
In all piezometers where a bi-exponential curve was recorded (Fig. 5), the screen was 5 m long. Furthermore, in most cases the lithology of the water-bearing formations surrounding the screen suggests the presence of at least two distinct pathways for water flow (Table 2). Most piezometers either screen weathered/fissured sedimentary rock layers (Mesozoic) or layers of two different unconsolidated sediments (Paleogene or Quaternary). Only in two cases—piezometers PW-424-2 and PW-354—the lithology suggests the presence of one single water-bearing formation around the screen. However, it should be noted that these piezometers and most of the other analyzed piezometers in the Belchatow field are over 200 m deep. It cannot be ruled out that thin layers and the presence of weathered or fissured zones were omitted in the lithological description of the boreholes; moreover, the Rock Quality Designation (RQD) index was not always established. Such information is available for the screen section of piezometers KT-89, KT-117-BIS and PW-420. RQD values calculated for these piezometers, ranging from 10 to 50%, indicate the presence of a weathered or completely weathered rock mass around the screen (Deere 1964; Deere et al. 1967).
The results of transmissivity estimation for each piezometer are presented in Table 3. Calculations of dual-transmissivities (T b1 and T b2) were performed in accordance with the methodology presented in section ‘A piecewise exponential model for dual transmissivities in field conditions’. Table 3 also includes “standard” transmissivity (T s) estimates from the mathematical model of the pressure-induced permeability test, i.e. from a single exponential function that treats the geological medium to be homogeneous. A comparison of transmissivity values T b1 and T b2 is also presented in Fig. 6. The distance from the diagonal line illustrates the heterogeneity of the analyzed dual-permeability formation (high T b1/T b2 ratio). Moreover, graphs showing the bi-exponential rise of the water level in four piezometers are depicted in Fig. 7, along with the best-fit exponential curves for dual and single transmissivity estimation.
Discussion
A goodness-of-fit analysis was performed for all investigated slug tests which resulted in observing bi-exponential water-level movement. Root-mean-square errors (RMSE) and normalized root-mean-square errors (NRMSE) were calculated to measure the difference between bi-exponential rate-of-rise curves recorded in the field and the adjusted exponential curves. Error values are presented in Table 4.
In all cases, relatively small RMSE and NRMSE errors are obtained for the dual-transmissivity approach, i.e. when the bi-exponential rate-of-rise curve is approximated piecewise by two exponential curves. When using one single exponential function the errors are roughly 3–8 times larger.
It should also be noticed that single transmissivity (T s) estimates fall between the two dual transmissivity values (T b1 and T b2). This is understandable, considering the fact that the T s curve is merely an “averaged” approximation of the bi-exponential movement.
Since the area of contact between each of the two subdomains and the piezometer screen is unknown, the authors could only determine dual transmissivities accurately, without determining the exact hydraulic conductivities of both subdomains near the piezometer screen. However, knowing the transmissivity values, it is possible to calculate several potential pairs of hydraulic conductivities assuming different subdomain thickness ratios (e.g. assuming that the thickness of one subdomain is in contact with 10% of the screen, whereas the other covers the remaining 90%). In such case, the k values should be calculated for each subdomain by dividing the obtained transmissivity values by the appropriate thickness (i.e. the length of the screen covered by the subdomain).
Eventually, the authors plan to expand the W-tube model and make it applicable in field conditions where the thickness of both subdomains is known. It would therefore be possible to calculate a set of hydraulic conductivities using optimization techniques, whenever a slug test results in observing bi-exponential movement of the water table.
Conclusions
During some pressure-induced permeability tests performed in the Belchatow Lignite Mine, an unusual bi-exponential type of water-level movement was observed in several piezometers. The movement clearly differs from the exponential rise usually recorded in such experiments. The location of these piezometers and the lithology of the screened formations suggest the possible presence of a dual-permeability system of water flow that may be responsible for such deviations.
Some analogies are apparent between slug tests and other methods such as the pumping test. Hydrogeological parameters of heterogeneous formations are determined during a slug test based on the shape of the experimentally recorded rate-of-rise or rate-of-fall curve, whereas during a pumping test this shape indicates a possible leakage of water from adjacent layers. When analyzing dual-permeability formations, slug tests (e.g. pressure-induced permeability tests) can be used to determine a pair of transmissivity values, even if the thickness of both subdomains responsible for water flow is unknown.
Determining hydraulic conductivities of a water-bearing formations composed of two layers of porous material is possible if the exact thickness of these layers around the piezometer screen, or the ratio of two flow paths, are known. Determining hydraulic conductivities in fissured or fissured-porous rock is more difficult, since the ratio of different flow paths in such rock is rarely examined.
The proposed piecewise method of determining transmissivity values of heterogeneous water-bearing formations is an approximate one. The limitations of the method may serve as a motivation to elaborate new mathematical models of water flow and interpretation algorithms based on slug tests. These algorithms could be implemented in field conditions, whenever a bi-exponential water level rise is observed. Such algorithms would increase the reliability of slug tests conducted in heterogeneous formations.
References
Balogun A, Kazemi H, Ozkan E, Al-Kobaisi E, Ramirez B (2009) Verification and proper use of water–oil transfer function for dual-porosity and dual-permeability reservoirs. SPE Res Eval Eng 12(2):189–199. https://doi.org/10.2118/104580-PA
Beckie R, Harvey CF (2002) What does a slug test measure: an investigation of instrument response and the effects of heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 38(12):1290. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001072
Bouwer H, Rice RC (1976) A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour Res 12(3):423–428. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00423
Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos SS (1980) A method for determining the hydraulic properties of tight formations. Water Resour Res 16(1):233–238. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i001p00233
Cooper HH Jr, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos IS, Bennett RR (1965) The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves. J Geophys Res 70(16):3915–3926. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i016p03915
Cooper HH Jr, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos IS (1967) Response of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour Res 3(1):263–269. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i001p00263
Copty NK, Trinchero P, Sanchez-Vila X (2011) Inferring spatial distribution of the radially integrated transmissivity from pumping tests in heterogeneous confined aquifers. Water Resour Res 47:W05526. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009877
Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Eng Geol 1(1):16–22
Deere DU, Hendron AJ, Patton FD, Cording EJ (1967) Design of surface and near surface constructions in rock. In: Fairhurst C (ed) Proceedings of the 8th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. AIME, New York, pp 237–302
Gotowala R, Haluszczak A (2002) The late alpine structural development of the Kleszczów graben (central Poland) as a result of a reactivation of the pre-existing regional dislocations. EGS Stephan Mueller Special Publication Series 1, European Geosciences Union, Munich, Germany, pp 137–150
Gruszka B (2001) Climatic versus tectonic factors in the formation of the glaciolacustrine succession (Bełchatow outcrop, central Poland). Glob Planet Chang 28:53–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00064-3
Gruszka B, van Loon AJ(T) (2007) Pleistocene glaciolacustrine breccias of seismic origin in an active graben (central Poland). Sediment Geol 193(1–4):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.01.009
Haluszczak A (2007) Dike-filled extensional structures in Cenozoic deposits of the Kleszczów graben (central Poland). Sediment Geol 193:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.05.013
Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time-lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bull no. 36, Waterways Experimental Station, US Army Corps of Eng., Vicksburg, MS, 50 pp
Kaczmarek M (2009) Role of inertia in falling head permeability test. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 33:1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.818
Kaczmarek M, Wolny F, Marciniak M (2016) Joint estimation of hydraulic conductivities of two sand samples in a W-tube system with a bi-exponential response. Hydrol Res 47(2):344–355. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2015.320
Krauss I (1974) Die Bestimmung der Transmissivitat von Grundwasserleitern aus dem Einschwingverhalten des Brunnen-Grundwasserleitersystems [The determination of the transmissivity of aquifers from the transient behaviour of the well-aquifer system]. J Geophys 40:381–400
Krauss I (1977) Das Einschwingverfaren: Transmissivitatsbestimmung ohne Pumpversuch [The transient process: transmissivity determination without a pumping test]. GWF-Wasser/Abwasser 118:407–410
Leij FJ, Toride N, Field MS, Sciortino A (2012) Solute transport in dual-permeability porous media. Water Resour Res 48:W04523. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011502
Marciniak M (1999) Identyfikacja parametrów hydrogeologicznych na podstawie skokowej zmiany potencjału hydraulicznego. Metoda PARAMEX) [In situ identification of the hydrogeological parameters of the aquifers and evaluation of the technical state of piezometers using sudden change in the hydraulic potential (the PARAMEX method)]. Wyd Nauk UAM, Poznan, Poland
Marciniak M (2001) Identification of hydraulic conductivity coefficient of aquifers using the PARAMEX test. In: Seiler KP, Wohnlich S (eds) New approaches characterizing groundwater flow, vol 2. XXXI Congress IAH, Munich, Germany
Marciniak M (2012) The PARAMEX test: a method of determining hydrogeological properties of groundwater recharge zone. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Association of Hydrogeologists Congress “Confronting Global Change”. Niagara Falls, Canada, September 2012
Marciniak M, Kaczmarek M, Wolny F (2013) W-tube system with bi-exponential response: a model for permeability tests in heterogeneous aquifers. J Hydrol 501:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.012
Pechstein A, Attinger S, Krieg R, Copty NK (2016) Estimating transmissivity from single-well pumping tests in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour Res 52:495–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017845
Rafini S, Chesnaux R, Ferroud A (2017) A numerical investigation of pumping-test responses from contiguous aquifers. Hydrogeol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1560-x
Rehbinder G (1992) Measurement of the relaxation time in the Darcy flow. Transport Porous Med 8(3):263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00618545
Renard P (2005) The future of hydraulic tests. Hydrogeol J 13:259–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0406-5
Widera M (2016) Characteristics and origin of deformation structures within lignite seams: a case study from polish opencast mines. Geol Q 60(1):179–189
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (NCN Grant No. 0697/B/P01/2010/39).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wolny, F., Marciniak, M. & Kaczmarek, M. A method for the estimation of dual transmissivities from slug tests. Hydrogeol J 26, 407–416 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1682-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1682-1