Abstract
Context
A Conceptual DFT (CDFT) study has been carry out to analyse the coupling reactions of the simplest amine (CH3NH2), alcohol (CH3OH), and thiol (CH3SH) compounds with CO2 to form the corresponding adducts CH3NHCO2H, CH3OCO2H, and CH3SCO2H. The reaction mechanism takes place in a single step comprising two chemical events: nucleophilic attack of the non-metallic heteroatoms to CO2 followed by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT). According to our calculations, the participation of an additional nucleophilic molecule as HAT assistant entails important decreases in activation electronic energies. In such cases, the formation of a six-membered ring in the transition state (TS) reduces the angular stress with respect to the non-assisted paths, characterised by four-membered ring TSs. Through the analysis of the energy and reaction force profiles along the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC), the ratio of structural reorganisation and electronic rearrangement for both activation and relaxation energies has been computed. In addition, the analysis of the electronic chemical potential and reaction electronic flux profiles confirms that the highest electronic activity as well as their changes take place in the TS region. Finally, the distortion/interaction model using an energy decomposition scheme based on the electron density along the reaction coordinate has been carried out and the relative energy gradient (REG) method has been applied to identify the most important components associated to the barriers.
Methods
The theoretical calculation were performed with Gaussian-16 scientific program. The B3LYP-D3(BJ)/aug-cc-pVDZ level was used for optimization of the minima and TSs. IRC calculations has also been carried out connecting the TS with the associated minima. Conceptual-DFT (CDFT) calculations have been carried out with the Eyringpy program and in-house code. The distortion/interaction model along the reaction coordinate have used the decomposition scheme of Mandado et al. and the analysis of the importance of each components have been done with the relative energy gradient (REG) method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The increasing concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is one of the most important environmental challenges that science faces nowadays. A number of methodologies have been proposed to reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, including geological sequestration [1,2,3], absorption, adsorption, and membrane technologies [4]. In addition, several organic molecules are capable of react and activate CO2 as carbenes [5,6,7,8,9], phosphines [10, 11], frustrated Lewis pairs [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], eutectic solvents [22,23,24], or metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [25,26,27,28], amongst others [29, 30].
The CO2 absorption by amine solutions, specially monoethanolamine (MEA) [31,32,33,34], is frequently used industrially. Also, supported amines [34,35,36,37] and nitrogen heterocycles are capable of react with CO2 [38]. In general, this reaction processess with the formation of the carbamic acid followed in some cases by deprotonation to yield the corresponding carbamate [39,40,41].
Conceptual DFT (CDFT) provides a series of hierarchy chemical concepts that allow an analysis of the chemical reactivity directly associated with physicochemical properties of both global and local nature [42, 43]. Amongst the contributors to this methodology, Prof Toro-Labbé has shown its utility in an important number of chemical reactions [44], including the reinterpretation of the Woodward–Hoffmann rules [45], glycosylation reactions [46, 47], reactivity of hydrogenases [48], reduction of carbon dioxide [49], and expanded its application to the atomic level [50] as well as developing the theory of bond reactivity [51].
In the present article, the reactions of one or two methylamine (CH3NH2), methanol (CH3OH), and methanethiol (CH3SH) molecules with CO2 have been studied (Scheme 1). The reaction coordinates have been analysed with Conceptual DFT (CDFT) tools. In addition, the strain/interaction model [52,53,54,55] coupled with the non-covalent interactions energy decomposition analysis (EDA-NCI) [56, 57] have been analysed with the relative energy gradient (REG) method [58,59,60,61,62] to determine the most important energy contributions to the barriers.
Scheme 1. Studied reactions
Computational methods
All geometries have been fully optimised, in vacuum, with the hybrid Becke [63], three-parameter, Lee–Yang–Parr [64] density functional (B3LYP) and the Dunning basis set aug-cc-pVDZ [65]. The dispersion has been taken into account by means of the D3 method with the Becke-Johnson damping factor [66], D3(BJ). The synchronous transit-guided quasi-Newton (STQN) method [67] has been used to locate the transition states (TS). Frequency calculations have been carried out in order to verify that the modelled structures correspond to energetic minima or true TSs by the presence of none and one imaginary frequency, respectively. The intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) procedure, in which the reaction coordinate, ξ, is expressed in mass-weighted internal coordinates [68], has been used to describe the intermediate structures that connect the three stationary points: reactant, TS, and product. All calculations have been performed thanks to the facilities provided by the Gaussian16 package [69]. The natural bond orbital (NBO) theory [70] has been employed to calculate the electronic population on selected atomic centres using the NBO 3.1 program. The Eyringpy program has been used to calculate the reaction force and the components of the force in the different reaction regimes [71].
The distortion/interaction model [54, 72] has been calculated along the reaction coordinate. The energy at each point of the reaction coordinate is divided into the sum of the interaction energy (Eint) and the deformation energy (Edef) (see Eq. 1). The interaction energy is divided, using the energy decomposition scheme proposed by Mandado et al., [56] into electrostatic (Eelec), Pauli (EPauli) and polarisation (Epola) contributions (see Eq. 2). The energy decompositions were obtained using EDA-NCI software [56, 57].
The relative energy gradient (REG) method, developed by Thacker et al., [58] has been used to analyse the importance of the different components of the energy in the calculated barriers (Eq. 3). This method compares the variation of the relative energy along the reaction coordinate with the variation of the different EDA components. Linear regressions between each pair of energies provide the Pearson correlation coefficient and the slope of the regression (REG) (Eq. 4). Good Pearson correlation (Eq. 5) indicates that the energy component can explain the overall profile and the value of REG provides its importance to explain it. A detailed description of this method is provided in the original article together with some applications [58,59,60,61], including a recent one that uses the energy decomposition scheme of Mandado et al. [62]
Results and discussions
To analyse the coupling between non-metallic heteroatoms to CO2, the simplest amine, alcohol, and thiol compounds have been selected as model substrates, namely methylamine (CH3NH2), methanol (CH3OH), and methanethiol (CH3SH), respectively (Scheme 1). These substrates act as nucleophiles while CO2 acts as electrophile for a reaction path comprising the CH3XH···CO2 complex as reactant, [CH3XHCO2]‡ as TS, and the CH3X–CO2H adduct as product, where X refers to the heteroatom [X = N(H), O, or S]. In addition, the reaction where a second molecule of the nucleophile assists the reaction has been considered. The reactions with a single nucleophile molecule are denoted as non-assisted while those with two nucleophile molecules are named as assisted along the text.
Figure 1 gathers the optimised structures for the TSs in the non-assisted and assisted reactions. In the non-assisted TSs the incipient X–C is forming and the HAT directly occurs from X to the CO2 oxygen atom through a four-membered ring structure. In the assisted TSs the additional nucleophilic molecule acts as a proton bridge: the assistant molecule donates its H atom to CO2 and receives a H atom from RXH, leading to the formation of a six-membered ring with lower angular stress. At structural level, this imposes certain characteristics between some TSs and others. First, for the non-assisted cases, the heteroatom-carbon distances for the formation of the incipient X–C bond are longer than those computed for the assisted TSs, being especially remarkable for CH3OH and CH3SH, 1.62 vs. 1.58 Å and 2.15 vs. 2.02 Å, respectively, although in a less extent for CH3NH2, 1.55 vs. 1.54 Å. In other words, the incipient X–C bond formation presents interatomic distances closer to the adduct ones in the assisted TSs than in the non-assisted ones. Interestingly, a similar aspect occurs with the geometrical angle for CO2. Thus, the OCO angle in the non-assisted TSs presents lower deformations with respect to the angle in CO2 than the assisted ones, specifically 137 vs. 133º for X = N(H), 144 vs. 138º for X = O, and 142 vs. 136º for X = S. Thus, OCO angles in the assisted TSs are closer to the OCO angles observed in the product adduct RX–COOH(see details of the optimised Cartesian coordinates provided in the Supporting Information).
At energetic level, those TSs which have the participation of an additional nucleophilic molecule as HAT assistant present lower activation energies than those characterising the non-assisted route (Fig. 2). In this sense, the angular stress plays an important role during the formation of the pseudo-cycle in the TS, an effect already observed by us in previous studies when the HAT takes place with the assistance of another molecule, either the same H-donor system (this work) or different such as protic solvent molecules [47, 73].
A comprehensive analysis of the reaction mechanism throughout the entire reaction coordinate is important to understand it. The reaction force, F, defined as the negative derivative of the electronic energy, E, with respect to the reaction coordinate,ξ (Eq. (6)) can be used to analyse a reaction.
Through the representation of both E vs. ξ and F vs. ξ it can be concluded which is the energy cost for activation and reaction as well as which is the instantaneous rate of change that the energy presents along the path of minimum potential energy in the IRC. Figure 3 gathers the representation of the energy (black) and reaction force (blue) profiles vs. the reaction coordinate for the different coupling reactions between CH3NH2, CH3OH, and CH3SH with CO2 in both non-assisted and assisted cases. These charts, as well as all those presented in this study, are delimited between the same values in order to facilitate a comparative analysis for the different cases. The three critical points of the reaction coordinate ξR, ξTS, and ξP can be defined as the ones corresponding to the reactant, TS (assigned at 0 amu½ bohr in all cases), and product states. In addition, the minimum and the maximum in the reaction force also define two critical points: ξ1 and ξ2. Those points allow to partition the reaction coordinate into the so-called reactant, TS, and product regions in the ranges [ξR,ξ1], [ξ1,ξ2], and [ξ2, ξP], respectively, with ξ1 < ξTS < ξ2. In our case, these areas are separated by red lines at Fig. 3.
The studied chemical reactions R–XH···CO2 → RX–CO2H, present positive reaction electronic energies, ER, with the exception of the coupling between methylamine and CO2 with a ER computed to be –3.5 kcal mol–1. It is worth highlighting that the non-assisted reaction for the coupling between CH3SH and CO2, ER presents the higher unfavoured value of 11.2 kcal mol–1. Interestingly, activation electronic energies, Eac, exhibit important decreases when the coupling reactions take place through the formation of six-membered ring TSs, that is when the coupling is assisted. This is especially relevant for the reaction between CH3NH2 and CO2, with a decrease from 38.2 to 13.7 kcal mol–1, and in similar but slightly lower extent for CH3OH and CH3SH with decreases from 43.3 to 21.8 kcal mol–1 and 42.8 to 28.4 kcal mol–1, respectively. These decreases in activation energy give us an idea about the cost due to angular stress. It is observed that the lower the size of the nucleophilic non-metallic atom, the greater the decrease in activation energy. Specifically, electronic energy drops have been calculated in 24.5, 21.5, and 14.4 kcal mol–1 for X = N(H), O, and S, respectively. Although it is not possible to discern what part of the activation energy is due to the formation of the X–C bond and what part is due to HAT, the reaction force allows to determine what part is due to structural reorganisation and what other part is due to electronic rearrangement. To do so, the quantities W1 and W2, defined as the negative integration of the force in the ranges [ξR, ξ1] and [ξ1, ξTS], are used, respectively. See eqns. (7) and (8):
Note that
This partition of the activation energy for the forward path into works W1 plus W2, Eq. (9), delimited by the instantaneous rate of change in the energy or the decrease/increase of the reaction force profiles, yields interesting results as shown in Table 1. For all cases, it is confirmed that work for structural reorganisation of the system (W1), that is, how the system expends energy in preparing for the reactive event, slightly increases in percentage for the assisted processes with respect the non-assisted ones: the participation of an additional nucleophilic molecule as HAT assistant implies greater conformational changes until reaching the reactive intermediate at ξ1. The opposite trend occurs for the relaxation energy, that is, the energy released from the TS to the product formation, which would be the activation energy for the reverse path. In analogy with W1 and W2, the relaxation energy can be also partitioned into W3 (electronic) plus W4 (structural) [see eqns. (10) and (11)]. The percentage of the W3:W4 values for the non-assisted and assisted processes are 19:81 vs. 33:67 for CH3NH2 + CO2, 19:81 vs. 30:70 for CH3OH + CO2, and in lower extent for CH3SH + CO2 with 19:81 vs. 20:80, i.e., minimising the work associated to electronic rearrangement, W3, towards the formation of the RX–COOH adduct from the TS. As previously observed for electronic energy drops in the activation barriers, the smaller the size, the greater the basicity of the nucleophilic non-metallic atom, and the greater the percentage of electronic rearrangement, W3, for the relaxation energy.
At Fig. 4, the representation of the electronic chemical potential (black) and reaction electronic flux (blue) profiles vs. the reaction coordinate are also shown. Amongst the theoretical tools that Conceptual DFT (CDFT) offers, [43, 74] the electronic chemical potential, μ, which is equal to the negative of the electronegativity, χ, allowing to understand changes at the electronic level directly associated with physicochemical properties of the entities that are involved in each reaction. For a system with N electrons, μ is defined as the first derivative of the electronic energy, E, with respect to N when the external potential, v(r), remains constant. Given that N is a discontinuous variable, Eq. (12) shows the expression of μ in terms of the lowest unoccupied (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO), εL and εH. This expression has been obtained by application of finite differences and the Koopmans’ theorem [75] as the negative semi-sum of the first ionisation potential, I, and the electron affinity, A.
In similitude with E and F, the reaction electronic flux, J, also known in the CDFT literature by its acronym, REF, is defined as the negative derivative of the electronic chemical potential, μ, with respect to the reaction coordinate, ξ. See Eq. (13):
In all cases, we find a direct correspondence with what has been observed in the reaction force profiles. At the extremes of the so-called reactant and product zones, where structural reorganisation primally takes place giving sense to the works W1 and W4, the electronic fluxes are close to the zero regime, that is, an absence of electronic activity. In addition, the most notorious changes (appearance of minima and maxima) in the REF profiles coincide with the limits of the reaction coordinate that delimit the TS region, that is, it is found that the greatest electronic activity appears in those areas close to the saddle point. By analogy with classical thermodynamics, positive values of REF are associated with spontaneous rearrangements of the electron density, the latter being driven by bond strengthening or bond forming processes, while negative values of REF suggest non-spontaneous rearrangements of the electron density that are mainly driven by bond weakening or bond breaking processes [76]. For the case of the reaction between CH3NH2 and CO2, as illustrative example of a non-assisted process, four sections can be discriminated describing the following events: i) from ξR to ca. –3 amu½ bohr (positive REF), the approach between the N and C atoms in view of the nucleophilic attack of the former against the latter is observed, resulting in the formation of the dative N → C bond, also accompanied by the bending of the CO2 moiety; ii) from ca. –3 to –1 amu½ bohr (negative REF), a weakening of the N–H bond occurs, preparing the proton for its subsequent transfer; iii) from ca. –1 to 1 amu½ bohr, the system is immersed in the so-called TS region, observation of a maximum and a minimum at points very close to ξ1 and ξ2, respectively, associated with the breaking of the aforementioned N–H bond while the O–H bond is being reinforced/formed; iv) from ca. ξ2 to ξP, REF primally stays in a zero flux regime, that is, the system is structurally reorganising itself for the formation of the lowest energy adduct state RX–COOH. This is also observed for the case of the reaction between CH3OH and CO2, but also for CH3SH and CO2 although the weakening of the X–H bond is not as marked as in the two previous cases in the evolution of the REF. For the assisted process in the reaction between CH3NH2 and CO2, also as illustrative example, REF evolves towards positive values along the first steps of the IRC associated to the formation of the dative N → C bond, however, at critical points ξ1 and ξ2 a minimum and a maximum are observed, that is different to what has been described for the non-assisted cases. Although all these reactions take place in a single step, in the assisted processes the HAT does not occur synchronously. First the nucleophilic CH3NH2 molecule transfers a H atom to the bridging CH3NH2 molecule, i.e., during the decreasing to increasing trend around the minimum at ξ1 one N–H bond is breaking while other is forming. Secondly, the assistant CH3NH2 molecule transfers a H atom to CO2, i.e., during the increasing to decreasing trend around the minimum at ξ2 one N–H bond is breaking while one O–H bond is forming. In what concern to the electronic chemical potential, μ, it should be noted that, apart from small fluctuations along the IRC, all systems evolve towards more negative values from reactants to products. This property could be correlated with the corresponding thermodynamic quantity measuring the escaping tendency of an electron [77], therefore evolving to more spontaneous values in the studied examples. However, this interpretation is not exempt from debate within the field [78].
The distortion/interaction model in combination with the non-covalent interaction energy decomposition analysis (EDA-NCI) have been used to quantify four components of the energy (geometry distortion energy, electrostatic, Pauli repulsion, and polarisation) along the reaction. Each reaction is divided into two parts: from the pre-reactive complex to the TS and from the TS to the product. For each of these parts, the linear correlation of each energy component vs. the relative energy along the reaction coordinate provides the values of REG (slope of the correlation) for each one. Large and positive values of REG indicate that the corresponding energy component follows the same trend as the total energy along the reaction coordinate while negative values indicate that the energy component opposes to the overall energetic trend. Table 2 shows the REG values for the two parts of the reactions. With few exceptions, the REG values are larger in absolute value for each nucleophile and energy component in the assisted reactions than in the non-assisted ones.
In the first part of the reaction (from the pre-reactive complex to the TS), the dominant component is the Pauli repulsion. This result agrees with the recent publications on the importance of the Pauli repulsion in reactivity [79, 80]. In contrast, the second part of the reaction (from the TS to the adducts) is dominated by the polarisation that shows larger REG values that the absolute values of the Pauli repulsion.
Conclusions
The reactions of the addition of CO2 to methylamine (CH3NH2), methanol (CH3OH), and methanethiol (CH3SH) have been theoretically studied at DFT level. The reaction evolves in a single step with simultaneous formation of the heteroatom-carbon bond and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) from XH [X = N(H), O, S] towards one of the oxygen atoms of CO2. The presence of a second nucleophilic molecule assisting in the reactions decreases the reaction barrier due to the six-membered ring formed in the transition state (TS) in contrast to the four-membered ring in the 1:1 reactions. The reaction profiles have been analysed within the framework of the Conceptual DFT approach. Through the analysis of the energy and reaction force profiles along the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC), the ratio of structural reorganisation and electronic rearrangement for both activation and relaxation energies has been computed. In this regard, in the assisted processes, i.e., those reactions in which an additional nucleophilic molecule acts as HAT assistant/borrower, the work associated to electronic rearrangement is minimised in the formation of the RX–COOH adduct from the TS. In addition, the analysis of the electronic chemical potential and reaction electronic flux profiles confirms that the highest electronic activity as well as their changes take place in the TS region. Besides, the distortion/interaction model combined with an energy decomposition method have been used to analyse the most important contributions to these reactions. The application of the relative energy gradient (REG) method in the reaction before and after the TS shows that the Pauli repulsion energy component is dominant from the pre-reactive complex to the TS while polarisation became more important from the TS towards the formation of the adducts.
Data Availability
Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.
References
Sood A, Vyas S (2017) Carbon capture and sequestration- a review. IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci 83:012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012024
Kelemen P, Benson SM, Pilorgé H, Psarras P, Wilcox J (2019) An overview of the status and challenges of CO2 storage in minerals and geological formations. Front Clim 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2019.00009
Ajayi T, Gomes JS, Bera A (2019) A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Pet Sci 16:1028–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8
Krupadam RJ, Rayalu SS (2021) Melamine-based resins and their carbons for CO2 capture: a review. Emergent Mater 4:545–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-020-00157-3
Alkorta I, Montero-Campillo MM, Elguero J (2017) Trapping CO2 by adduct formation with Nitrogen Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHCs): a theoretical study. Chem Eur J 23:10604–10609. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201701444
Chen P, Xiong T, Pan Y, Liang Y (2022) Recent progress on N-heterocyclic Carbene Catalysts in chemical fixation of CO2. Asian J Org Chem 11:e202100738. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajoc.202100738
Del Bene JE, Alkorta I, Elguero J (2017) Carbon-Carbon Bonding between Nitrogen Heterocyclic Carbenes and CO2. J Phys Chem A 121:8136–8146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b08393
Duong HA, Tekavec TN, Arif AM, Louie J (2004) Reversible carboxylation of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Chem Commun 112–3. https://doi.org/10.1039/B311350G
Soroudi S, Kassaee MZ (2022) Capture of CO2 by novel diiodo-N, N-imidazoliumvinylidene: A theoretical quest. J Phys Org Chem 35:e4323. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.4323
Sánchez-Sanz G, Alkorta I, Elguero J, Trujillo C (2019) Sequestration of CO2 by Phosphatrane Molecules. ChemPhysChem 20:3195–3200. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900905
Alkorta I, Trujillo C, Sánchez-Sanz G, Elguero J (2018) Solvent and substituent effects on the phosphine + CO2 reaction. Inorganics 6:110. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040110
Ashley AE, O’Hare D (2012) FLP-Mediated activations and reductions of CO2 and CO. Top Curr Chem 334:191–217
Ashley AE, O’Hare D (2013) FLP-Mediated activations and reductions of CO2 and CO. In: Erker G, Stephan DW (eds) Frustrated Lewis Pairs II: Expanding the scope. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 191–217
Ferrer M, Alkorta I, Elguero J, Oliva-Enrich JM (2021) Sequestration of carbon dioxide with frustrated lewis pairs based on n-heterocycles with silane/germane groups. J Phys Chem A 125:6976–84. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c04787
Ferrer M, Alkorta I, Elguero J, Oliva-Enrich JM (2022) Use of 5,10-disubstituted dibenzoazaborines and dibenzophosphaborines as cyclic supports of fFrustrated lewis pairs for the capture of CO2. ChemPhysChem 23:e202200204. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202200204
Ferrer M, Alkorta I, Elguero J, Oliva-Enrich JM (2023) Reactivity of a model of B3P3-doped nanographene with up to three CO2 molecules. Sci Rep 13:2407. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29336-y
Ferrer M, Alkorta I, Oliva-Enrich JM, Elguero J (2023) Borane derivatives of five-membered N-heterocyclic rings as frustrated Lewis pairs: activation of CO2. Struct Chem 34:1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-023-02170-8
Bertini F, Hoffmann F, Appelt C, Uhl W, Ehlers AW, Slootweg JC et al (2013) Reactivity of dimeric P/Al-based lewis pairs toward carbon dioxide and tert -butyl isocyanate. Organometallics 32:6764–6769. https://doi.org/10.1021/om3011382
Chen L, Liu R, Yan Q (2018) Polymer meets frustrated lewis pair: second-generation co2-responsive nanosystem for sustainable CO2 conversion. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:9336–9340. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201804034
Chi JJ, Johnstone TC, Voicu D, Mehlmann P, Dielmann F, Kumacheva E et al (2017) Quantifying the efficiency of CO2 capture by Lewis pairs. Chem Sci 8:3270–3275. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC05607E
Faizan M, Pawar R (2022) Boron based intramolecular heterocyclic frustrated Lewis pairs as organocatalysts for CO2 adsorption and activation. J Comput Chem 43:1474–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26949
Pelaquim FP, Barbosa Neto AM, Dalmolin IAL, Costa, M.C.d. (2021) Gas solubility using deep eutectic solvents: review and analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 60:8607–8620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00947
Zhang Y, Ji X, Lu X (2018) Choline-based deep eutectic solvents for CO2 separation: Review and thermodynamic analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 97:436–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.007
Li X, Liu X, Deng D (2018) Solubilities and Thermodynamic Properties of CO2 in Four Azole-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents. J Chem Eng Data 63:2091–2096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00098
Benedetto G, Cleary BM, Morrell CT, Durbin CG, Brinks AL, Tietjen J et al (2023) CD-MOF-1 for CO2 Uptake: Remote and Hybrid Green Chemistry Synthesis of a Framework Material with Environmentally Conscious Applications. J Chem Educ 100:1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00922
Choe JH, Kim H, Hong CS (2021) MOF-74 type variants for CO2 capture. Mater Chem Front 5:5172–5185. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1QM00205H
Demir H, Aksu GO, Gulbalkan HC, Keskin S (2022) MOF membranes for CO2 capture: past, present and future. Carbon Capture Sci Technol 2:100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100026
Sanz-Pérez ES, Murdock CR, Didas SA, Jones CW (2016) Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air. Chem Rev 116:11840–11876. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173
d’Amore F, Bezzo F (2017) Economic optimisation of European supply chains for CO2 capture, transport and sequestration. Int J Greenh Gas Control 65:99–116
Osman AI, Hefny M, Abdel Maksoud MIA, Elgarahy AM, Rooney DW (2021) Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:797–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3
Danckwerts PV (1979) The reaction of CO2 with ethanolamines. Chem Eng Sci 34:443–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(79)85087-3
Luis P (2016) Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives. Desalination 380:93–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.004
Li Z, Wang L, Li C, Cui Y, Li S, Yang G et al (2019) Absorption of Carbon Dioxide Using Ethanolamine-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:10403–10414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00555
Cueto-Díaz EJ, Castro Muñiz A, Suárez García F, Alkorta I, Valles González MP, Mateo-Martí E (2023) Effect of Surface Organo-Silanization on SBA-15 Mesoporous Silicas in CO2 Adsorption Processes: Design, Synthesis, and Computational Studies. Ind Eng Chem Res 62:11001–11015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00475
Didas SA, Choi S, Chaikittisilp W, Jones CW (2015) Amine-Oxide Hybrid Materials for CO2 Capture from Ambient Air. Acc Chem Res 48:2680–2687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00284
Jahandar Lashaki M, Khiavi S, Sayari A (2019) Stability of amine-functionalized CO2 adsorbents: a multifaceted puzzle. Chem Soc Rev 48:3320–3405. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00877A
Hack J, Maeda N, Meier DM (2022) Review on CO2 Capture Using Amine-Functionalized Materials. ACS Omega 7:39520–39530. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03385
Ferrer M, Alkorta I, Elguero J (2024) Theoretical study of the formation of pyrazole and indazole carbamic acids. Struct Chem 35:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-024-02286-5
Salim SRS (2021) Treatment of amine wastes generated in industrial processes. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng 1092:012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1092/1/012051
Schimming V, Hoelger C-G, Buntkowsky G, Sack I, Fuhrhop J-H, Rocchetti S et al (1999) Evidence by 15N CPMAS and 15N–13C REDOR NMR for Fixation of Atmospheric CO2 by Amino Groups of Biopolymers in the Solid State. J Am Chem Soc 121:4892–4893. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja981747g
Dos A, Schimming V, Tosoni S, Limbach H-H (2008) Acid−Base Interactions and Secondary Structures of Poly-l-Lysine Probed by 15N and 13C Solid State NMR and Ab initio Model Calculations. J Phys Chem B 112:15604–15615. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806551u
Geerlings P, Chamorro E, Chattaraj PK, De Proft F, Gázquez JL, Liu S et al (2020) Conceptual density functional theory: status, prospects, issues. Theor Chem Acc 139:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-2546-7
Geerlings P, De Proft F, Langenaeker W (2003) Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Chem Rev 103:1793–1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990029p
Gutiérrez-Oliva S, Forero-Girón AC, Villegas-Escobar N, Toro-Labbé A (2022) On the mechanisms of chemical reactions. In: Conceptual density functional theory, pp 463–79
Geerlings P, Ayers PW, Toro-Labbé A, Chattaraj PK, De Proft F (2012) The Woodward-Hoffmann Rules Reinterpreted by Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Acc Chem Res 45:683–695. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200192t
Azofra LM, Alkorta I, Toro-Labbé A, Elguero J (2013) Modeling the mechanism of glycosylation reactions between ethanol, 1,2-ethanediol and methoxymethanol. PCCP 15:14026–14036. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51963E
Azofra LM, Alkorta I, Elguero J, Toro-Labbé A (2012) Mechanisms of Formation of Hemiacetals: Intrinsic Reactivity Analysis. J Phys Chem A 116:8250–8259. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp304495f
Qiu S, Azofra LM, MacFarlane DR, Sun C (2016) Why is a proton transformed into a hydride by [NiFe] hydrogenases? An intrinsic reactivity analysis based on conceptual DFT. PCCP 18:15369–15374. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP00948D
Guzmán-Angel D, Gutiérrez-Oliva S, Toro-Labbé A (2019) Hydrogenation and hydration of carbon dioxide: a detailed characterization of the reaction mechanisms based on the reaction force and reaction electronic flux analyses. J Mol Model 25:16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3891-5
Inostroza-Rivera R, Yahia-Ouahmed M, Tognetti V, Joubert L, Herrera B, Toro-Labbé A (2015) Atomic decomposition of conceptual DFT descriptors: application to proton transfer reactions. PCCP 17:17797–17808. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP01515D
Benítez FJ, Gutiérrez-Oliva S, Herrera B, Toro-Labbé A (2024) Basis electronic activity of molecular systems. A theory of bond reactivity. J Phys Chem A https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c00359
Fernández I, Bickelhaupt FM (2014) The activation strain model and molecular orbital theory: understanding and designing chemical reactions. Chem Soc Rev 43:4953–4967. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00055B
Wolters LP, Bickelhaupt FM (2015) The activation strain model and molecular orbital theory. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 5:324–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1221
Bickelhaupt FM, Houk KN (2017) Analyzing Reaction Rates with the Distortion/Interaction-Activation Strain Model. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:10070–10086. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201701486
Vermeeren P, Hamlin TA, Bickelhaupt FM (2021) Chemical reactivity from an activation strain perspective. Chem Commun 57:5880–5896. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC02042K
Mandado M, Hermida-Ramón JM (2011) Electron Density Based Partitioning Scheme of Interaction Energies. J Chem Theor Comput 7:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100730a
Ramos-Berdullas N, Pérez-Juste I, Van Alsenoy C, Mandado M (2015) Theoretical study of the adsorption of aromatic units on carbon allotropes including explicit (empirical) DFT dispersion corrections and implicitly dispersion-corrected functionals: the pyridine case. PCCP 17:575–587. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP02341B
Thacker JCR, Popelier PLA (2017) The ANANKE relative energy gradient (REG) method to automate IQA analysis over configurational change. Theor Chem Acc 136:86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-017-2113-z
Thacker JCR, Popelier PLA (2018) Fluorine gauche effect explained by electrostatic polarization instead of hyperconjugation: An Interacting Quantum Atoms (IQA) and Relative Energy Gradient (REG) Study. J Phys Chem A 122:1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11881
Orangi N, Eskandari K, Thacker JCR, Popelier PLA (2019) Directionality of halogen bonds: An Interacting Quantum Atoms (IQA) and Relative Energy Gradient (REG) Study. ChemPhysChem 20:1922–1930. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900250
Popelier PLA, Maxwell PI, Thacker JCR, Alkorta I (2019) A relative energy gradient (REG) study of the planar and perpendicular torsional energy barriers in biphenyl. Theor Chem Acc 138:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-018-2383-0
Ferrer M, Alkorta I, Elguero J, Oliva-Enrich JM (2024) Capture of CO2 by Melamine Derivatives: A DFT Study Combining the Relative Energy Gradient Method with an Interaction Energy Partitioning Scheme. J Phys Chem A 128:1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c08412
Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37:785–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
Kendall RA, Dunning TH Jr, Harrison RJ (1992) Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions. J Chem Phys 96:6796–6806. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.462569
Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L (2011) Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J Comput Chem 32:1456–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21759
Peng C, Ayala PY, Schlegel HB, Frisch MJ (1996) Using redundant internal coordinates to optimize equilibrium geometries and transition states. J Comput Chem 17:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19960115)17:1%3c49::AID-JCC5%3e3.0.CO;2-0
Gonzalez C, Schlegel HB (1990) Reaction path following in mass-weighted internal coordinates. J Phys Chem 94:5523–5527. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100377a021
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR et al (2016) Gaussian 16 Rev. A.03. Wallingford, CT
Weinhold F, Landis CR (2005) Valency and bonding: a natural bond orbital donor-acceptor perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dzib E, Quintal A, Ortiz-Chi F, Merino G (2021) Eyringpy 2.0. Cinvestav, Merida, Yucatan
Fernández I (2022) Understanding the reactivity of frustrated Lewis pairs with the help of the activation strain model–energy decomposition analysis method. Chem Commun 58:4931–4940. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC00233G
Trujillo C, Sánchez-Sanz G, Alkorta I, Elguero J (2015) Computational study of proton transfer in tautomers of 3- and 5-hydroxypyrazole assisted by water. ChemPhysChem 16:2140–2150. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201500317
Chermette H (1999) Chemical reactivity indexes in density functional theory. J Comput Chem 20:129–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19990115)20:1%3c129::AID-JCC13%3e3.0.CO;2-A
Koopmans T (1934) Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwerten zu den Einzelnen Elektronen Eines Atoms. Physica 1:104–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(34)90011-2
Cerón ML, Echegaray E, Gutiérrez-Oliva S, Herrera B, Toro-Labbé A (2011) The reaction electronic flux in chemical reactions. Sci China Chem 54:1982–1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-011-4447-z
Chakraborty D, Chattaraj PK (2021) Conceptual density functional theory based electronic structure principles. Chem Sci 12:6264–6279. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC07017C
Baerends EJ (2022) Chemical potential, derivative discontinuity, fractional electrons, jump of the Kohn-Sham potential, atoms as thermodynamic open systems, and other (mis)conceptions of the density functional theory of electrons in molecules. PCCP 24:12745–12766. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP01585D
Hamlin TA, Bickelhaupt FM, Fernández I (2021) The Pauli repulsion-lowering concept in catalysis. Acc Chem Res 54:1972–1981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00016
Fernández I, Bickelhaupt FM, Svatunek D (2023) Unraveling the Bürgi-Dunitz angle with precision: The power of a two-dimensional energy decomposition analysis. J Chem Theor Comput 19:7300–7306. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00907
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out with financial support from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PID2021-125207NB-C32). L.M.A. is a Ramón y Cajal fellow (ref. RYC2021-030994-I) and thanks MCIN/AEI and NextGeneration EU/PRTR for support.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.F. and I.A. did the calculations. L.M.A. and I.A. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Alejandro Toro-Labbé 70th Birthday Festschrift.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrer, M., Elguero, J., Alkorta, I. et al. Understanding the coupling of non-metallic heteroatoms to CO2 from a Conceptual DFT perspective. J Mol Model 30, 201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-024-05992-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-024-05992-3