Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Network meta-analysis of the desensitizing effects of lasers in patients with dentine hypersensitivity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This network meta-analysis compares different lasers, placebo, and no treatment in terms of their effects on dentine hypersensitivity (DH) immediately after treatment and over the long term (1 month).

Methods

A systematic electronic literature search of four databases and a manual search were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining different laser treatments for the treatment of DH. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed to analyze the desensitization effect immediately after treatment and over the long term. The risk of bias was assessed based on the Cochrane guidelines and funnel plots. The quality of the evidence, statistical heterogeneity, inconsistencies, and ranking probability were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 11 RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis; 11 and 9 of these studies analyzed immediate and long-term effects, respectively. All four types of laser had a better desensitizing effect than controls immediately after treatment and over the long term, but there were no significant differences among the four different lasers. There was a significant placebo effect immediately after treatment. The laser with the highest probability of being the most effective treatment for DH was Er,Cr:YSGG immediately after treatment and over the long term (73% and 47%, respectively).

Conclusions

All four types of laser had significantly better effects than no treatment on DH immediately after treatment and in the long term, but there were no significant differences among the four lasers. In addition, there was a significant placebo effect, supporting the importance of including a placebo group in future studies. Furthermore, Er,Cr:YSGG may be the most effective laser for the treatment of DH immediately and over the long term.

Clinical relevance

This study used network meta-analyses to compare different lasers, placebo, and no treatment over different time periods, which is to provide guidance for selecting an appropriate laser treatment in patients with DH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R (1997) Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 24(11):808–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Robin O, Gillam DG (2006) Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 137(7):990–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Addy M, Mostafa P, Newcombe RG (1987) Dentine hypersensitivity: the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque. J Dent 15(6):242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corona SA, Nascimento TN, Catirse AB, Lizarelli RF, Dinelli W, Palma-Dibb RG (2010) Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 30(12):1183–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brannstrom M, Astrom A (1972) The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 22(2):219–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. (2003) Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 69 (4):221–226

  7. Walters PA (2005) Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 6(2):107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yilmaz HG, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Bayindir H, Aykac Y (2011) Clinical evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG and GaAlAs laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent 39(3):249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dilsiz A, Canakci V, Ozdemir A, Kaya Y (2009) Clinical evaluation of Nd:YAG and 685-nm diode laser therapy for desensitization of teeth with gingival recession. Photomed Laser Surg 27(6):843–848. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2395

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P (2012) Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers on dentine hypersensitivity. Short-term clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 27(4):813–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0988-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yilmaz HG, Bayindir H (2014) Clinical and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: short-term, randomised, controlled study. J Oral Rehabil 41(5):392–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ipci SD, Cakar G, Kuru B, Yilmaz S (2009) Clinical evaluation of lasers and sodium fluoride gel in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg 27(1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K (2000) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 27(10):715–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aranha AC, Pimenta LA, Marchi GM (2009) Clinical evaluation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Oral Res 23(3):333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de-Melo MA, Passos VF, Alves JJ, Barros EB, Santiago SL, Rodrigues LK (2011) The effect of diode laser irradiation on dentin as a preventive measure against dental erosion: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 26(5):615–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0865-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitters CJ, Hall A, Creanor SL, Moseley H, Gilmour WH, Strang R, Saunders WP, Orchardson R (1995) A clinical study of pulsed Nd: YAG laser-induced pulpal analgesia. J Dent 23(3):145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin PY, Cheng YW, Chu CY, Chien KL, Lin CP, Tu YK (2013) In-office treatment for dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 40(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Machado AC, Viana IEL, Farias-Neto AM, Braga MM, de Paula Eduardo C, de Freitas PM, Aranha ACC (2018) Is photobiomodulation (PBM) effective for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review. Lasers Med Sci 33(4):745–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2403-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. He S, Wang Y, Li X, Hu D (2011) Effectiveness of laser therapy and topical desensitising agents in treating dentine hypersensitivity: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 38(5):348–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02193.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, Gatto R, Monaco A (2013) Lasers for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 92(6):492–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513487212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salanti G, Higgins JP, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP (2008) Evaluation of networks of randomized trials. Stat Methods Med Res 17(3):279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280207080643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ades AE, Sculpher M, Sutton A, Abrams K, Cooper N, Welton N, Lu G (2006) Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 24(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624010-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawkins N, Scott DA, Woods BS, Thatcher N (2009) No study left behind: a network meta-analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer demonstrating the importance of considering all relevant data. Value Health 12(6):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00541.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, Boersma C, Thompson D, Larholt KM, Diaz M, Barrett A (2011) Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health 14(4):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF (2015) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA 313(16):1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.3656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stegenga B, Dijkstra PU (2007) Principles of evidence-based medicine applied to dentistry. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 114(4):155–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Higgins J (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. Wiley-Blackwell

  28. Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 5(2):S38

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vandenbroucke JP (1998) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Experts’ views are still needed. BMJ 316(7129):469–470 author reply 470-461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T, Zwinkels T, de Brock B, Hillege H (2013) ADDIS: a decision support system for evidence-based medicine. Decis Support Syst 55(2):459–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Geddes JR, Higgins JP, Churchill R, Watanabe N, Nakagawa A, Omori IM, McGuire H, Tansella M, Barbui C (2009) Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet 373(9665):746–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60046-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lier BB, Rosing CK, Aass AM, Gjermo P (2002) Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Periodontol 29(6):501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Birang R, Poursamimi J, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M (2007) Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Lasers Med Sci 22(1):21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0412-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vieira AH, Passos VF, de Assis JS, Mendonca JS, Santiago SL (2009) Clinical evaluation of a 3% potassium oxalate gel and a GaAlAs laser for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg 27(5):807–812. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dilsiz A, Aydin T, Canakci V, Gungormus M (2010) Clinical evaluation of Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and diode laser therapy for desensitization of teeth with gingival recession. Photomed Laser Surg 28(Suppl 2):S11–S17. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yilmaz HG, Cengiz E, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Leblebicioglu B (2011) Effectiveness of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dentine hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 38(4):341–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01694.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bal MV, Keskiner I, Sezer U, Acikel C, Saygun I (2015) Comparison of low level laser and arginine-calcium carbonate alone or combination in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized split-mouth clinical study. Photomed Laser Surg 33(4):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Soares ML, Porciuncula GB, Lucena MI, Gueiros LA, Leao JC, Carvalho AA (2016) Efficacy of Nd:YAG and GaAlAs lasers in comparison to 2% fluoride gel for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Gen Dent 64(6):66–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maximiano V, Machado AC, Yoshida ML, Pannuti CM, Scaramucci T, Aranha ACC (2018) Nd:YAG laser and calcium sodium phosphosilicate prophylaxis paste in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a double-blind randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 23:3331–3338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2759-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bekes K, John MT, Schaller HG, Hirsch C (2009) Oral health-related quality of life in patients seeking care for dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 36(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01901.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Asnaashari M, Moeini M (2013) Effectiveness of lasers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Lasers Med Sci 4:1):1–1):7

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jokstad A (2012) The effectiveness of lasers to reduce dentinal hypersensitivity remains unclear. J Evid Based Dent Pract 12(3 Suppl):231–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1532-3382(12)70045-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cunha-Cruz J (2011) Laser therapy for dentine hypersensitivity. Evid Based Dent 12(3):74–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ladalardo TC, Pinheiro A, Campos RA, Brugnera Junior A, Zanin F, Albernaz PL, Weckx LL (2004) Laser therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J 15(2):144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sicilia A, Cuesta-Frechoso S, Suarez A, Angulo J, Pordomingo A, De Juan P (2009) Immediate efficacy of diode laser application in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 36(8):650–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01433.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hu ML, Zheng G, Zhang YD, Yan X, Li XC, Lin H (2018) Effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentine hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 75:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Banerjee A, Hajatdoost-Sani M, Farrell S, Thompson I (2010) A clinical evaluation and comparison of bioactive glass and sodium bicarbonate air-polishing powders. J Dent 38(6):475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gillam DG, Newman HN (1993) Assessment of pain in cervical dentinal sensitivity studies. A review. J Clin Periodontol 20(6):383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ide M, Wilson RF, Ashley FP (2001) The reproducibility of methods of assessment for cervical dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 28(1):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Gatto R, Monaco A (2011) Effectiveness of laser in dentinal hypersensitivity treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 37(3):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. West NX, Addy M, Jackson RJ, Ridge DB (1997) Dentine hypersensitivity and the placebo response. A comparison of the effect of strontium acetate, potassium nitrate and fluoride toothpastes. J Clin Periodontol 24(4):209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosen EB, Donoff RB, Riedy CA (2016) U.S. dental school deans’ views on the value of patient-reported outcome measures in dentistry. J Dent Educ 80(6):721–725

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. John MT, Reissmann DR, Feuerstahler L, Waller N, Baba K, Larsson P, Celebic A, Szabo G, Rener-Sitar K (2014) Exploratory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. J Oral Rehabil 41(9):635–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. John MT (2018) Health outcomes reported by dental patients. J Evid Based Dent Pract 18(4):332–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Menglong Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 2213 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, Y., Lei, Y., Li, S. et al. Network meta-analysis of the desensitizing effects of lasers in patients with dentine hypersensitivity. Clin Oral Invest 24, 1917–1928 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03051-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03051-3

Keywords

Navigation