Abstract
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most common complications that affect patients after periodontal therapy. So far, many investigators have successfully used different types of laser on DH treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effect of Nd:YAG laser and Er:YAG laser on human teeth desensitization. A group of nine patients with a total of 63 chronic hypersensitive teeth were selected. Each one of them should at least have three hypersensitive teeth. These teeth were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1, Nd:YAG laser (1 W, 15 Hz, 60 s, two times); group 2, Er:YAG laser (100 mJ, 3 Hz, 60 s, two times); and group 3 serves as control group without any treatment. Assessment of pain was performed by a visual analysing scale (VAS) after stimulation of sensitive tooth by using the sharp tip of an explorer. This test was performed before treatment, immediately after that and at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals after treatment by one blinded examiner. Analysis of VAS score between the three groups at the time of treatment did not show any significant difference (p = 0.506). However, by using repeated-measurement analysis of variance test, significant differences were seen in the three groups between before-treatment VAS score and after treatment (p < 0.0005). This statistically significant difference in the control group demonstrated a placebo effect. However, the effect of using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers was stronger than this placebo effect, so that after removing the effect of the placebo, differences immediately after, 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment between all three groups still were statistically highly significant (p < 0.0005). Compared to the Er:YAG laser group, using Nd:YAG laser resulted in a significant reduction of VAS score at each follow-up examination (p < 0.0005). Although using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in desensitization of hypersensitive teeth showed a placebo effect limited to a short time, results of this study demonstrated that both of these lasers have an acceptable therapeutic effect. The observed effects seemed to last for at least 6 months. It was concluded that Nd:YAG laser is more effective than Er:YAG laser in reduction of patients’ pain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rees JS, Addy M (2002) A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 29:997–1003
Klokkevol PR, Carranza FA, Takei HH (2002) General principles of periodontal surgery. In: Newman M, Takei H, Carranza FA (eds) Carranza’s clinical periodontology. WB Sanders, Philadelphia, pp 725–736
Bergenholtz G, Hasselgren G (2003) Endodontics and periodontics. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP (eds) Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry, 4th ed. Blackwell Munksgard, Copenhagen, pp 318–351
Jacobson PL, Gretchen B (2001) Clinical dentine hypersensitivity: understanding the causes and prescribing a treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2:1–8
Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Matsumoto K (2000) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 27:715–721
Lier BB, Rosing CK, Aass AM, Gjermo P (2002) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Periodontol 29:501–506
Schwarz F, Arweiler N, George T, Reich E (2002) Desensitizing effects of an Er:YAG laser of hypersensitive dentine. J Clin Periodontol 29:211–215
Ide M, Wilson RF, Ashley FP (2001) The reproducibility of methods of assessment for cervical dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 28:16–22
Gillam GD, Newman HN (1993) Assessment of pain in cervical dentinal sensitivity studies. A review. J Clin Periodontol 20:383–394
Gutknecht N, Moritz A, Dercks HW, Lampert F (1997) Treatment of hypersensitive teeth using neodymium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet lasers: a comparison of the use of various settings in an in vivo study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 15(4):171–174
Harper PR, Midda M (1992) Nd:YAG laser treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Br Dent J 172:13–16
Matsumoto K, Funai H, Shirasuka T, Wakabayashi H (1985) Effects of Nd:YAG laser in treatment of cervical hypersensitive dentine. Japanese J Conserv Dent 28:760–765
Gelsky SC, White JM, Pruthi VK (1993) The effectiveness of the Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of dental hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 59(4):377–378, 383–6
Lan WH, Liu HC, Lin CP (1999) The combined occluding effect of sodium fluoride varnish and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules. J Endod 25:424–426
Lan WH, Lee BS, Liu HC, Lin CP (2004) Morphologic study of Nd:YAG laser usage in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod 30:131–134
Yonaya K, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K (1999) Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity by various methods using pulsed Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17:205–210
Theodoro LH, Hypek P, Bachman L, Garcia VG, Sampaio J (2003) Effect of Er:YAG and diode laser irradiation on the root surface: morphologic and thermal analysis. J Periodontal 74:838–843
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birang, R., Poursamimi, J., Gutknecht, N. et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment. Lasers Med Sci 22, 21–24 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0412-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0412-z