Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is photobiomodulation (PBM) effective for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the current scientific data regarding the effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) as an alternative method for pain control. A systematic review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of PBM as treatment for DH. A complete literature search was performed up to October 2016. Searches were conducted using Boolean operators and MeSH terms. References of all selected full-text articles and related reviews were scanned. A total of 280 articles were identified (241 articles were excluded by the title and abstract). Of the 39 articles selected for analysis, 36 were excluded because they presented one or more exclusion criteria. Therefore, three articles were qualified for inclusion in this systematic review. PBM may not lead to adverse effects provided that adequately controlled parameters are followed when treating DH. More consistent studies should be conducted in order to adequately observe the advantageous therapeutic effect of PBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R (1997) Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 24:808–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity (2003) Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 69:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CL, Parolia A, Pau A, de Moraes Porto ICC (2015) Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of desensitizing agents in dentine tubule occlusion using scanning electron microscopy. Aust Dent J 60:650–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. West NX, Sanz M, Lussi A, Bartlett D, Bouchard P, Bourgeois D (2013) Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a European population-based cross-sectional study. J Dent 41:841–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scaramucci T, de Almeida Anfe TE, da Silva Ferreira S, Frias AC, Sobral MA (2014) Investigation of the prevalence, clinical features, and risk factors of dentin hypersensitivity in a selected Brazilian population. Clin Oral Investig 18:651–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshizaki KT, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Sobral MA, Aranha AC, Mendes FM, Scaramucci T (2017) Clinical features and factors associated with non-carious cervical lesions and dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 44:112–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Addy M, Urquhat E (1992) Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, aetiology and clinical management. Dent Update 19:410–412

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brannstrom M, Jonhson G, Nordenvall KJ (1979) Transmission and control of dentinal pain: resin impregnation of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 19:692–698

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ling TY, Gillam DG (1996) The effectiveness of desensitizing agents for the treatment of cervical dentine sensitivity (CDS)—a review. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr 44:5–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Porto I, Andrade A, Montes M (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci 51:323–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammad A, Masoumeh M (2013) Effectiveness of lasers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Lasers Med Sci 4:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matsumoto K, Funai H, Shirasuka T, Wakabayashi H (1985) Effects of Nd:YAG caser in treatmemt of cervical hypersensitive dentine. Jpn J Conserv Dent 28:760–765

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palazon MT, Scaramucci T, Aranha AC, Prates RA, Lachowski KM, Hanashiro FS, Youssef MN (2013) Immediate and short-term effects of in-office desensitizing treatments for dentinal tubule occlusion. Photomed Laser Surg 31:274–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K (2000) Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol 27:715–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Naylor F, Aranha AC, Eduardo CP, Arana-Chavez VE, Sobral MA (2006) Micromorphological analysis of dentinal structure after irradiation with Nd:YAG laser and immersion in acidic beverages. Photomed Laser Surg 24:745–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gholami GA, Fekrazad R, Esmaiel-Nejad A, Kalhori KA (2011) An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er;Cr:YSGG, Nd:YAG, CO2 and diode lasers on dentineal tubules: a scanning electron microscope in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 29:115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aranha A, Eduardo CP (2012) Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers on dentine hypersensitivity. Short-term clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci 27:813–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aranha AC, Pimenta LA, Marchi GM (2009) Clinical evaluation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Oral Res 23:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corona SA, Nascimento TN, Catirse AB, Lizarelli RF, Dinelli W, Palma-Dibb RG (2003) Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 30:1183–1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dantas EM, Amorim FK, Nóbrega FJ, Dantas PM, Vasconcelos RG, Queiroz LM (2016) Clinical efficacy of fluoride varnish and low-level laser radiation in treating dentin hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J 27:79–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wakabayashi H, Hamba M, Matsumoto K, Tachibana H (1993) Effect of irradiation by semiconductor laser on responses evoked in trigeminal caudal neurons by tooth pulp stimulation. Lasers Surg Med 13:605–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karu T (1989) Photobiology of low-power laser effects. Health Phys 56:691–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferreira AN, Silveira L, Genovese WJ, de Araújo VC, Frigo L, de Mesquita RA, Guedes E (2006) Effect of GaAIAs laser on reactional dentinogenesis induction in human teeth. Photomed Laser Surg 24:358–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tengrungsun T, Sangkla W (2008) Comparative study in desensitizing efficacy using the GaAlAs laser and dentin bonding agent. J Dent 36:392–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Orhan K, Aksoy U, Can-Karabulut DC, Kalender A (2011) Low-level laser therapy of dentin hypersensitivity: a short-term clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 26:591–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ladalardo TC, Pinheiro A, Campos RA, Brugnera Júnior A, Zanin F, Albernaz PL, Weckx LL (2004) Laser therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J 15:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Benetti AR, Franco EB, Franco EJ, Pereira JC (2004) Laser therapy for dentin hypersensitivity: a critical appraisal. J Oral Laser Appl 4:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  28. Higgins JP, Green S eds (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Accessed on 4/1/2013 at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org

  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lopes AO, Eduardo CP, Aranha AC (2015) Clinical evaluation of low-power laser and a desensitizing agent on dentin hypersensitivity. Lasers Med Sci 30:823–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vieira AH, Passos VF, de Assis JS, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL (2009) Clinical evaluation of a 3% potassium oxalate gel and a GaAlAs laser for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg 27:807–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin PY, Cheng YW, Chu CY, Chien KL, Lin CP, Tu YK (2013) In-office treatment for dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 40:53–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. He S, Wang Y, Li X, Hu D (2011) Effectiveness of laser therapy and topical desensitising agents in treating dentine hypersensitivity: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 38:348–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cunha-Cruz J, Wataha JC, Zhou L, Manning W, Trantow M, Bettendorf MM, Heaton LJ, Berg J (2010) Treating dentin hypersensitivity: therapeutic choices made by dentists of the northwest PRECEDENT network. J Am Dent Assoc 141:1097–1105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Gatto R, Monaco A (2011) Effectiveness of laser in dentinal hypersensitivity treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 37:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jokstad A (2012) The effectiveness of lasers to reduce dentinal hypersensitivity remains unclear. J Evid Based Dent Pract 3(Suppl):231–232

    Google Scholar 

  39. West NX, Addy M, Jackson RJ, Ridge DB (1997) Dentine hypersensitivity and the placebo response. A comparison of the effect of strontium acetate, potassium nitrate and fluoride toothpastes. J Clin Periodontol 24:209–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, Gatto R, Monaco A (2013) Lasers for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 92:492–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry (LELO) from the Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of USP and FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Cecilia Corrêa Aranha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding information

This manuscript was not financed by any development agency.

Ethical approval

This research does not involve human participants and/or animals that would necessarily demand informed consent documents or approval of the Local Ethics Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machado, A.C., Viana, Í.E.L., Farias-Neto, A.M. et al. Is photobiomodulation (PBM) effective for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review. Lasers Med Sci 33, 745–753 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2403-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2403-7

Keywords

Navigation