Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The randomized shortened dental arch study: temporomandibular disorder pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this multi-center, randomized controlled trial was to assess the impact of missing posterior support on the risk for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain by comparing patients with either shortened dental arches (SDA) or molar replacement by removable dental prostheses (RDP).

Methods

A sample of 215 patients with bilateral molar loss in at least one jaw was consecutively recruited in 14 prosthodontic departments of dental schools in Germany. Of the initial sample, 152 patients (mean age: 59.7 years; 53.9 % female) received randomly allocated interventions (SDA: n = 71; RDP: n = 81). Presence of TMD pain was assessed using patients’ self-reports and was verified by physical examination and by pain intensity, as the mean of current pain, worst pain, and average pain in the last 6 months, with 10-point ordinal rating scales. Assessments were performed before treatment and at follow-ups until 60 months after treatment. Impact of interventions on TMD risk and pain intensity was computed by applying logistic and linear random-intercept models.

Results

Tooth replacement (RDP) did not significantly change the risk for self-reported (odds ratio [OR]: 1.1; confidence interval [CI]: 0.4 to 3.4) or clinically verified (OR: 0.7; CI: 0.1 to 4.3) TMD pain compared to no tooth replacement (SDA). Mean characteristic pain intensity was virtually identical in both groups (Coeff: 0.01; CI: −0.30 to 0.32).

Conclusion

Retaining or preservation of an SDA is not a major risk factor for TMD pain over the course of 5 years when compared to molar replacement with RPDs.

Clinical relevance

Seemingly, missing molars do not have to be replaced in order to prevent TMD pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okeson JP (1996) Orofacial pain: guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. Quintessence, Carol Stream

    Google Scholar 

  2. NIDCR — National Institut of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Facial Pain. 2010 [updated 2010; cited 2010]; Available from: http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/DataStatistics/FindDataByTopic/FacialPain/

  3. LeResche L (1997) Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 8:291–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Kemppainen P, Kononen M, Dworkin SF (2005) Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular pain disorders: towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain 9:613–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rollman A, Visscher CM, Gorter RC, Naeije M (2012) Care seeking for orofacial pain. J Orofac Pain 26:206–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reisine ST, Fertig J, Weber J, Leder S (1989) Impact of dental conditions on patients' quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 17:7–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reissmann DR, John MT, Schierz O, Wassell RW (2007) Functional and psychosocial impact related to specific temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. J Dent 35:643–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng J, Wong MC, Lam CL (2011) Key factors associated with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in Hong Kong Chinese adults with orofacial pain. J Dent 39:564–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rollman GB, Gillespie JM (2000) The role of psychosocial factors in temporomandibular disorders. Curr Rev Pain 4:71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith SB, Maixner DW, Greenspan JD et al (2011) Potential genetic risk factors for chronic TMD: genetic associations from the OPPERA case control study. J Pain 12:T92–101

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker IM (1995) Occlusion as a causative factor in TMD. Scientific basis to occlusal therapy. N Y State Dent J 61:54–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greene CS (2001) The etiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for treatment. J Orofac Pain 15:93–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Gornbein JA (1993) A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features. J Dent Res 72:968–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper BC, International College of Cranio-Mandibular Orthopedics (2011) Temporomandibular disorders: A position paper of the International College of Cranio-Mandibular Orthopedics (ICCMO). Cranio 29:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  15. Türp JC, Schindler H (2012) The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: epidemiological and etiological considerations. J Oral Rehabil 39:502–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Costen JB (1934) A syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms dependent upon disturbed function of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 43:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Käyser AF (1981) Shortened dental arches and oral function. J Oral Rehabil 8:457–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tallents RH, Macher DJ, Kyrkanides S, Katzberg RW, Moss ME (2002) Prevalence of missing posterior teeth and intraarticular temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 87:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmitter M, Balke Z, Hassel A, Ohlmann B, Rammelsberg P (2007) The prevalence of myofascial pain and its association with occlusal factors in a threshold country non-patient population. Clin Oral Investig 11:277–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mundt T, Mack F, Schwahn C et al (2005) Gender differences in associations between occlusal support and signs of temporomandibular disorders: results of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Int J Prosthodont 18:232–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dulcic N, Panduric J, Kraljevic S, Badel T, Celic R (2003) Incidence of temporomandibular disorders at tooth loss in the supporting zones. Coll Antropol 27(Suppl 2):61–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang MQ, Xue F, He JJ, Chen JH, Chen CS, Raustia A (2009) Missing posterior teeth and risk of temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 88:942–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takayama Y, Miura E, Yuasa M, Kobayashi K, Hosoi T (2008) Comparison of occlusal condition and prevalence of bone change in the condyle of patients with and without temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Kirbschus A (2004) Association of malocclusion and functional occlusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Quintessence Int 35:211–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Boever JA, Carlsson GE, Klineberg IJ (2000) Need for occlusal therapy and prosthodontic treatment in the management of temporomandibular disorders: Part II. Tooth loss and prosthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil 27:647–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyka I, Carlsson GE, Wedel A, Kiliaridis S (2001) Dentists' perception of risks for molars without antagonists. A questionnaire study of dentists in Sweden. Swed Dent J 25:67–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luthardt RG, Marre B, Heinecke A et al (2010) The Randomized Shortened Dental Arch study (RaSDA): design and protocol. Trials 11:15

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Walter MH, Hannak W, Kern M et al (2013) The randomized shortened dental arch study: tooth loss over five years. Clin Oral Investig 17:877–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Helkimo M (1974) Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system: II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Swed Dent J 67:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walter MH, Weber A, Marre B et al (2010) The Randomized Shortened Dental Arch Study: Tooth Loss. J Dent Res 89:818–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Witter DJ, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Creugers NH, Kayser AF (1999) The shortened dental arch concept and its implications for oral health care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27:249–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanno T, Carlsson GE (2006) A review of the shortened dental arch concept focusing on the work by the Kayser/Nijmegen group. J Oral Rehabil 33:850–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dworkin SF, LeResche L (1992) Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 6:301–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Derogatis LR (1999) SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual-II for the revised version. Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2008) Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Stata Press, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  37. List T, Dworkin SF (1996) Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD centers using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 10:240–253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG et al (2013) Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil 40:2–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  40. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. John MT, Hirsch C, Reiber T, Dworkin S (2006) Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process. J Orofac Pain 20:43–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wolfart S, Muller F, Gerss J et al (2013) The randomized shortened dental arch study: oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-00013-00991-00786

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reissmann DR, John MT, Schierz O, Hirsch C (2009) An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD. Schmerz 23:618–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pandey M, Devi N, Thomas BC, Kumar SV, Krishnan R, Ramdas K (2007) Distress overlaps with anxiety and depression in patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology 16:582–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wolfart S, Marre B, Wostmann B et al (2012) The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance. J Dent Res 91:65S–71S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuboki T, Okamoto S, Suzuki H et al (1999) Quality of life assessment of bone-anchored fixed partial denture patients with unilateral mandibular distal-extension edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 82:182–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Compagnon D, Woda A (1991) Supraeruption of the unopposed maxillary first molar. J Prosthet Dent 66:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Baba K, Igarashi Y, Nishiyama A et al (2008) Patterns of missing occlusal units and oral health-related quality of life in SDA patients. J Oral Rehabil 35:621–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fueki K, Igarashi Y, Maeda Y et al (2011) Factors related to prosthetic restoration in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil 38:525–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Montero J, Bravo M, Hernandez LA, Dib A (2009) Effect of arch length on the functional well-being of dentate adults. J Oral Rehabil 36:338–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG), grant DFG WA 831/2-1 to 2-6 and grant DFG WO 677/2-1.1 to 2-2.1. We acknowledge the contribution of the following members of the RaSDA-study group: W. Reinhardt, F. Jahn (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Material Science, University of Jena), W. Gernet (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich), E.-J. Richter (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg), E. Busche (Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Witten-Herdecke University) in study design, study implementation and data collection.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Reissmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reissmann, D.R., Heydecke, G., Schierz, O. et al. The randomized shortened dental arch study: temporomandibular disorder pain. Clin Oral Invest 18, 2159–2169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1188-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1188-3

Keywords:

Navigation