Skip to main content
Log in

Dental Angle class asymmetry and temporomandibular disorders

Asymmetrie der Dentalen Angle-Klasseund Temporomandibuläre Erkrankungen

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between the presence of asymmetric molar or canine Angle classes on the two sides and the presence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD).

Materials and methods

Participants to the study were divided into two groups: TMD group (90 patients) or a control group (58 patients). In the TMD group, clinical assessment for TMD was performed according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) guidelines by the same two trained examiners. In both groups, all subjects underwent an assessment of dental occlusion, focusing on the assessment of bilateral canine and molar Angle class relationship. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Padova, and each participant gave written consent to take part in the investigation.

Results

TMJ pain was diagnosed in 58, disk displacement in 96, arthrosis in 17, and muscle pain in 46 individuals. Molar Angle class was symmetrical in 86 individuals and asymmetrical in 62 subjects. Molar Angle class was not correlated with any of the TMD diagnoses. Canine Angle class was correlated with TMJ arthrosis. Correlation values with the other TMD diagnoses were low and were not significant.

Conclusions

It can be suggested that an association between dental Angle class asymmetry and TMDs does not exist and that the role of dental asymmetries as a factor correlated with the presence of TMD signs and symptoms is minimal.

Zusammenfassung

Ziele

Untersucht werden sollte, ob zwischen Asymmetrien der Angle Klasse im Bereich der Molaren und Eckzähne und einer temporomandibulären Dysfunktion („temporomandibular joint dysfunction“, TMD) ein Zusammenhang besteht.

Material und Methoden

Die Studienteilnehmer wurden in 2 Gruppen eingeteilt: in eine TMD- (90 Patienten) und eine Kontrollgruppe (58 Patienten). In der TMD-Gruppe wurde die klinische TMD-Evaluierung von 2 ausgebildeten Untersuchern leitlinienkonform erhoben (Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, RDC/TMD). Alle Teilnehmenden beider Gruppen unterzogen sich einem Assessment der dentalen Okklusion mit besonderem Fokus auf der Angle-Klasse-Beziehung von Molaren und Eckzähnen auf beiden Seiten. Das Studienprotokoll war von der Ethikkommission der Universität Padua durchgesehen und akzeptiert worden, und jeder Teilnehmende hatte schriftlich sein Einverständnis zur Teilnahme an der Studie erteilt.

Ergebnisse

Schmerzen im Bereich des Temporomandibulargelenks (“temporomandibular joint”, TMJ) wurde bei 58 Patienten diagnostiziert, eine Diskusverlagerungg bei 96, eine Arthrose bei 17 und Muskelschmerzen bei 46. Die Angle-Klasse im Bereich der Molaren war symmetrisch bei 86, asymmetrisch bei 62 Studienteilnehmern. Es bestand keine Korrelation zwischen der Angle-Klasse im Bereich der Molaren und einer der TMD-Diagnosen. Die Angle-Klasse im Bereich der Eckzähne korrelierte mit einer Arthrose im Temporomandibularglenk. Die Korrelationen mit den anderen TMD-Diagnosen waren niedrig und statistisch nicht signifikant.

Schlussfolgerungen

Es kann davon ausgegangen werden, dass zwischen einer dentalen Angle-Klasse-Asymmetrie und den temporomandibulären Dysfunktionen keine Assoziation besteht und dass die Bedeutung dentaler Asymmetrien als Hinweisen auf oder als Symptom einer TMD minimal ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG (1994) Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod 64(2):89–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang FH, Chen KC, Shiau YY (1997) The importance of determination of jaw position in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for adult patients. Dent Clin North Am 41(1):49–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costen JB (1934) A syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms dependent upon disturbed function of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 43:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Ippolito S, Ursini R, Giuliante L, Deli R (2014) Correlations between mandibular asymmetries and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Int Orthod. 12:222–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fushima K, Inui M, Sato S (1999) Dental asymmetry in temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 26:752–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greene CS, Obrez A (2015) Treating temporomandibular disorders with permanent mandibular repositioning: is it medically necessary? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 119:489–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ireland AJ, Cunningham SJ, Petrie A, Cobourne MT, Acharya P, Sandy JR, Hunt NP (2014) An index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN). J Orthod. 41:77–83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishizaki K, Suzuki K, Mito T, Tanak EM, Sato S (2010) Morphologic, functional, and occlusal characterization of mandibular lateral displacement malocclusion. Am J Orthod Denotfac Orthop 137:454.e1-e9

  9. Kahn J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Ross ME, Murphy WC (1999) Prevalence of dental occlusal variables and intraarticular temporomandibular disorders: molar relationship, lateral guidance, and nonworking side contacts. J Prosthet Dent 82:410–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klasser GD, Greene CS (2009) The changing field of temporomandibular disorders: what dentists need to know. J Can Dent Assoc 75:49–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landi N, Manfredini D, Tognini F, Romagnoli M, Bosco M (2004) Quantification of the relative risk of multiple occlusal variables for muscle disorders of the stomatognathic system. J Prosthet Dent 92(2):190–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L, Lobbezoo F (2011) Correlation of RDC/TMD axis I diagnoses and axis II pain-related disability. A multicenter study. Clin Oral Investig 15:749–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Manfredini D, Bucci MB, Montagna F, Guarda-Nardini L (2011) Temporomandibular disorders assessment: medicolegal considerations in the evidence-based era. J Oral Rehabil 38:101–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F (2010) Relationship between bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of literature from 1998 to 2008. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010(109):e26–e50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manfredini D, Peretta R, Guarda-Nardini L, Ferronato G (2010) Predictive value of combined clinically diagnosed bruxism and occlusal features for TMJ pain. Cranio. 28:105–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manfredini D, Perinetti G, Guarda-Nardini L (2014) Dental malocclusion is not related to temporomandibular joint clicking: a logistic regression analysis in a patient population. Angle Orthod 84:310–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manfredini D, Perinetti G, Stellini E, Di Leonardo B, Guarda-Nardini L (2015) Prevalence of static and dynamic dental malocclusion features in subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients: Implications for the epidemiology of the TMD-occlusion association. Quintessence Int 46:341–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Manfredini D, Stellini E, Gracco A, Lombardo L, Nardini LG, Siciliani G (2015) Orthodontics is temporomandibular disorders-neutral. Angle orthod (Epub ahead of print)

  19. Manfredini D, Visscher C, Guarda-Nardini L, Lobbezoo F (2012) Occlusal factors are not related with self-reported bruxism. J Orofac Pain. 26:163–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McNemar Q (1962) Psychological statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Okeson JP (2015) Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion, 7th edn. CV Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinho T, Pacheco JJ, Salazar F (2014) Treatment of an asymmetric malocclusion: a case report. Aust Orthod J. 30:72–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pullinger A (2013) Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships. J Oral Rehabil 40:296–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA (2000) Quantification and validation of predictive values of occlusal variables in temporomandibular disorders using a multifactorial analysis. J Prosthet Dent 83:66–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reid KI, Greene CS (2013) Diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders: an ethical analysis of current practices. J Oral Rehabil 40:546–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP et al (2014) International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 28:6–27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shroff B, Siegel SM (1998) Treatment of patients with asymmetries using asymmetric mechanics. Semin Orthod. 4:165–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Slavicek R (2011) Relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular disorders: implications for the gnathologist. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.139(1):10, 12, 14 passim

  29. Suvinen ti, kemppainen P, Könönen M, Dworkin SF (2005) Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular pain disorders: towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain 9:613–33

  30. Türp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR (2008) Dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehabil 35:446–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Türp JC, Schindler H (2012) The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: epidemiological and etiological considerations. J Oral Rehabil 39:502–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Steenbergen E, Nanda R (1995) Biomechanics of orthodontic correction of dental asymmetries. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107(6):618–24

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Lombardo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

D Manfredini, L. Lombardo, and G. Siciliani state that they have no conflicting interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

D. Manfredini, L. Lombardo: Degree in dentistry, Assistant Professor; G. Siciliani: Degree in Medicine, Chairman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manfredini, D., Lombardo, L. & Siciliani, G. Dental Angle class asymmetry and temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Orthop 78, 253–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0079-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0079-4

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation