Spectroscopic investigations of a semi-synthetic [FeFe] hydrogenase with propane di-selenol as bridging ligand in the binuclear subsite: comparison to the wild type and propane di-thiol variants

  • C. Sommer
  • S. Rumpel
  • S. Roy
  • C. Farès
  • V. Artero
  • M. Fontecave
  • E. Reijerse
  • W. Lubitz
Open Access
Original Paper


[FeFe] Hydrogenases catalyze the reversible conversion of H2 into electrons and protons. Their catalytic site, the H-cluster, contains a generic [4Fe–4S]H cluster coupled to a [2Fe]H subsite [Fe2(ADT)(CO)3(CN)2]2−, ADT = µ(SCH2)2NH. Heterologously expressed [FeFe] hydrogenases (apo-hydrogenase) lack the [2Fe]H unit, but this can be incorporated through artificial maturation with a synthetic precursor [Fe2(ADT)(CO)4(CN)2]2−. Maturation with a [2Fe] complex in which the essential ADT amine moiety has been replaced by CH2 (PDT = propane-dithiolate) results in a low activity enzyme with structural and spectroscopic properties similar to those of the native enzyme, but with simplified redox behavior. Here, we study the effect of sulfur-to-selenium (S-to-Se) substitution in the bridging PDT ligand incorporated in the [FeFe] hydrogenase HydA1 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using magnetic resonance (EPR, NMR), FTIR and spectroelectrochemistry. The resulting HydA1-PDSe enzyme shows the same redox behavior as the parent HydA1-PDT. In addition, a state is observed in which extraneous CO is bound to the open coordination site of the [2Fe]H unit. This state was previously observed only in the native enzyme HydA1-ADT and not in HydA1-PDT. The spectroscopic features and redox behavior of HydA1-PDSe, resulting from maturation with [Fe2(PDSe)(CO)4(CN)2]2−, are discussed in terms of spin and charge density shifts and provide interesting insight into the electronic structure of the H-cluster. We also studied the effect of S-to-Se substitution in the [4Fe–4S] subcluster. The reduced form of HydA1 containing only the [4Fe–4Se]H cluster shows a characteristic S = 7/2 spin state which converts back into the S = 1/2 spin state upon maturation with a [2Fe]–PDT/ADT complex.


[FeFe] Hydrogenase Chalcogenic substitution Nuclear magnetic resonance Electron paramagnetic resonance FTIR spectroelectrochemistry 



Methyl viologen


Nuclear magnetic resonance


Electron paramagnetic resonance


Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Bridging ligands


Aza-propane-dithiolate (µ(SCH2)2NH)


Aza-propane-diselenate (µ(SeCH2)2NH)


Propane-dithiolate (µ(SCH2)2CH2)


Propane-diselenate (µ(SeCH2)2CH2)

Synthetic precursors


[2Fe] = Fe2(CO)4(CN)2



CrHydA1 containing only the [4Fe–4S/Se]H subsite


CrHydA1 maturated with [2Fe]-ADT or [2Fe]-PDT


Chlamydomonas reinhardtii



Fe2(CO)3(CN)2ADT/ADSe/PDT/PDSe, subsite of [FeFe] hydrogenase


The reversible heterolytic splitting of hydrogen into protons and electrons is one of the most fundamental reactions in chemistry. In nature, hydrogen is part of the energy metabolism of several single cellular organisms which are spread over all three domains of life [1, 2]. [FeFe] Hydrogenases catalyze the conversion of protons and electrons into hydrogen in a very efficient way with turnover frequencies over 10,000 H2/s [3, 4]. The active site in these enzymes, the so-called H-cluster, consists of a generic [4Fe–4S]H cluster linked to a binuclear iron complex [2Fe]H carrying 3 CO and 2 CN ligands as well as a bridging aza-propane-dithiolate (ADT) ligand (see Fig. 1) that serves as proton relay of the protein’s proton transport pathway [5]. Often, additional [4Fe–4S] clusters are present that form an electron transport chain connecting the H-cluster with the protein surface where redox partners of the enzyme can bind.
Fig. 1

The native active site of [FeFe] hydrogenase and applied modifications. The iron atoms are labeled as proximal (Fep) and distal (Fed) with respect to their position to the [4Fe–4S]H cluster. Left: native H-cluster that consists of the [4Fe–4S]H cluster and [2Fe]H-ADT subsite. Right: modified H-cluster with [2Fe]H-PDT or [2Fe]H-PDSe. Additionally bridging sulfides in the cubane cluster (here marked with X) can be exchanged to Se

The small hydrogenase from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii HydA1 is used as prototype for [FeFe] hydrogenases, since it contains only the H-cluster and can be overexpressed in Escherichia coli [6] with high yields [7]. However, since the host organism lacks the maturation factors that built the [2Fe]H subsite, the resulting enzyme (called apo-HydA1) only contains the [4Fe–4S]H cluster and is inactive in hydrogen conversion. Through artificial maturation using a synthetic precursor of the [2Fe]H subsite, the active enzyme can be obtained [8, 9]. This process can be conveniently followed using FTIR spectroscopy, since the CO and CN stretches of the H-cluster are found in a frequency range that does not overlap with the strong protein amide bands [10]. The use of synthetic precursors of the [2Fe]H subsite opens the possibility of introducing modified complexes into the enzyme and label these with different nuclear isotopes [11, 12, 13]. In addition, the generic [4Fe–4S]H cluster can be modified through classical reconstitution [7, 14].

Native HydA1 shows a variety of redox states. The [2Fe]H site can be reduced [Fep(I) Fed(I)] or oxidized [Fep(I) Fed(II)]. Likewise, the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster can be present in reduced (1 +) or oxidized (2 +) forms. Additionally, the bridgehead amino group can be protonated (NH2+) or unprotonated (NH) [15]. It is assumed that, for the doubly reduced state of the H-cluster, transfer of an NH2+ proton to the distal iron Fed affords a terminal hydride that upon reprotonation forms H2 [16, 17, 18].

The enzyme is inhibited by external CO, which binds to the open coordination site at Fed. This additional donor ligand has a strong effect on the electronic structure of the H-cluster as observed by EPR and FTIR [19]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the redox and catalytic behavior of the active enzyme in various organisms is sensitive to pH [15] and the presence of accessory [4Fe–4S] clusters [20]. To affect and possibly improve the activity and oxygen resistance of [FeFe] hydrogenases, the bridging ADT ligand in the [2Fe]H subsite has been extensively modified through artificial maturation with appropriate synthetic precursors [21, 22]. However, these attempts did not lead to improved enzymatic properties (activity, O2 resistance) but did provide useful insight into the structure/function relations of the H-cluster. By substituting the bridgehead amino group to a methylene group, using the [2Fe]-PDT precursor, the [2Fe]H subsite is locked into the mixed valence [Fep(I)Fed(II)] configuration reducing the number of accessible redox states in HydA1-PDT to two: Hox and Hred. These species are represented as \(\left[ { 4 {\text{Fe}} - 4 {\text{S}}} \right]_{\text{H}}^{{ 2 { + }}}\)–[Fep(I)Fed(II)] and \(\left[ { 4 {\text{Fe}} - 4 {\text{S}}} \right]_{\text{H}}^{ + }\)–[Fep(I)Fed(II)], respectively [23]. The spectroscopic signatures (FTIR/EPR) of these states are virtually identical to the corresponding states in the native enzyme, suggesting a very similar electronic and geometric structure. Interestingly, despite the structural similarities with the native enzyme [24], in HydA1-PDT, binding of extrinsic CO to the open coordination site has not been observed.

Inspired by selenium’s role in oxidative protection in [NiFeSe] hydrogenases [25], variants of the H-cluster were recently reported in which the sulfurs in both [4Fe–4S]H and [2Fe]H subclusters were changed to selenium. The atomic mass of Se is more than twice that of sulfur. It has a ≈ 15% increased atomic radius and forms more polarized bonds based on its stronger metallic character compared to sulfur. It has been shown that [4Fe–4Se]H reconstituted HydA1-ADT does not show any decrease in activity nor does it change the vibrational characteristics of the CO and CN ligands [7]. A S-to-Se substitution of both thiol groups in the [2Fe]H subsite generates an enzyme which shows similar activity but is less stable under laboratory conditions [22].

To study the effect of S-to-Se substitutions on the electronic structure of the H-cluster, we turned to the more stable HydA1-PDSe enzyme, produced via maturation of apo-HydA1 with the [2Fe]-PDSe precursor. HydA1-PDSe, in analogy to HydA1-PDT, shows a stable Hox and a singly reduced Hred state. However, in contrast to HydA1-PDT, HydA1-PDSe reacts with CO and forms a Hox–CO state. Since the structural properties of HydA1-PDSe are expected to be very similar to those of the native enzyme as is the case for the HydA1-PDT variant, HydA1-PDSe was used to study the effect of S-to-Se exchange on the electronic structure of the H-cluster, using FTIR spectroelectrochemistry, EPR and NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR spectroscopy under ambient conditions (liquid solution) has recently been introduced as a technique to study the hydrogenase active site [26]. For these enzymes 1H NMR is very useful, since the active site with its reactants as well as the surrounding protein can be studied simultaneously with atomic (nuclear) resolution under near physiological conditions. NMR has frequently been used as a tool to study paramagnetic iron–sulfur proteins [27, 28] to resolve the electron distribution and the magnetic couplings; for unknown systems it can help to identify the cluster type [29].

We have also studied S-to-Se substitution in the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster using the unmaturated apoenzyme. This substitution often leads to high spin multiplicity in the reduced state of the cluster and is well documented for ferredoxins [30, 31, 32, 33].

Materials and methods

Synthesis of active site mimics

All reactions were carried out under an inert atmosphere of argon using standard Schlenk and vacuum-line techniques. Solvents were freshly distilled under argon using appropriate drying agents and the distilled solvents were degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles. FTIR spectra of the complexes were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum-100 spectrometer via a thin film solution using a stainless steel sealed liquid spectrophotometer cell with CaF2 windows. [Fe2(µ(SeCH2)2CH2)(CO)6] was synthesized according to literature procedure [34].

(Et4N)2[Fe2(µ(SeCH2)2CH2) (CO)4(CN)2]

To a solution of Fe2[(µ(SeCH2)2CH2)(CO)6] (0.146 g, 0.3 mmol) in acetonitrile (15 mL), tetraethylammonium cyanide (0.105 g, 0.62 mmol) was added under positive argon flow. After stirring at room temperature for 3 h, the reaction mixture was cannula filtered to a Schlenk flask and the red solution was concentrated to approximately 7 mL. This solution was layered with diethyl ether (20 mL) and cooled to 253 K to yield (Et4N)2[Fe2(µ(SeCH2)2CH2) (CO)4(CN)2] as a dark red solid. IR (CH3CN, cm−1): 2075 (CN), 1955, 1918, 1879 (CO).

(Et4N)2[Fe2(µ(SeCH2)2CH2) (CO)4(C15N)2]

A solution of KC15N (0.016 g, 0.24 mmol) in methanol (5 mL) was added dropwise via a cannula to a solution of [Fe2(µ(SeCH2)2CH2)(CO)6] (0.045 g, 0.1 mmol) in acetonitrile (5 mL). After stirring the reaction mixture for 30 min at room temperature, a solution of [Et4N]Br (0.05 g, 0.24 mmol) in acetonitrile (4 mL) was added, and the dark red solution was stirred for 3 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a dark red oily solid. This residue was redissolved in acetonitrile (5 mL) and filtered via cannula to give a dark red filtrate. This solution was layered with diethyl ether (15 mL) and cooled to 253 K to produce (Et4N)2[Fe2(µ(SeCH2)2CH2)(CO)4(C15N)2] as a dark red solid (0.028 g, 25%). IR (CH3CN, cm−1): 2044 (C15N), 1956, 1917, 1879 (CO).

Protein purification and maturation

Apo-HydA1 protein expression and maturation are based on a slightly modified previously published protocol [8, 35]. The pH was adjusted prior to induction of the protein expression and the purification was performed without any dithionite. As selection antibiotic, 30 mg/L kanamycin was used. For maturation the apoprotein was diluted to 350 µM in 0.1 M Tris/HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 8.0, and a threefold excess of [2Fe]-PDSe/-PDT dissolved in DMSO was added and incubated for 1 h. For maturation of [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1 with [2Fe]-PDT/-PDSe, a temperature of 310–311 K and an incubation time of 2–3 h was used. Unbound complexes were removed by a desalting column (PD-10, GE Healthcare) and the maturated proteins were concentrated (Merck Millipore, Amicon Ultra-15, 30 kDa).

Substitution of [4Fe–4S]H with [4Fe–4Se]H through reconstitution

All steps for cluster reconstitution were performed anaerobically. [4Fe–4S]H apo-HydA1 was unfolded with 6 M guanidinium chloride buffer (0.1 M Tris/HCl, 20 mM disodium EDTA, pH 7.5) to extract the bound cubane cluster. To remove the chaotropic agent, the sample was desalted three times over a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare). While removing the chaotropic agent, apo-HydA1 refolds in the used 0.1 M Tris/HCl, 0.15 M NaCl pH 8.0 buffer. The protein was prepared for the new cluster assembly by reduction with 5 mM dithiothreitol. After reduction, a 12- to 16-fold excess of FeCl3 was added followed after 10 min by the same excess of reduced NaSe2 into the continuously stirred solution. After incubation for 90 min at room temperature, the solution was dark brown and the reconstitution was stopped. After two consecutive desalting steps, the [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1 was concentrated and used for further applications.

H2 oxidation assay

The hydrogen oxidation assay was performed based on methyl viologen (MV) reduction under strictly anaerobic conditions as previously described [35]. The photometric assay (578 nm) was performed with 100 µg HydA1-PDT/-PDSe in a reaction volume of 1 mL with hydrogen saturated 100 mM K x H y PO4, 10 mM MV, pH 6.8 buffer. The slope was determined and the activities were calculated based on an extinction coefficient for the MV radical of 9780 M−1 cm−1.

H2 production

Hydrogen production was examined analogous to Winkler et al. [36] using gas chromatography. In a 2 mL gas-tight vial, 400 µL reaction volume containing 10 µg HydA1-PDT/-PDSe, 300 mM K x H y PO4 pH 6.8, 10 mM MV and 100 mM sodium dithionite (NaDT) was flushed with argon for 5 min. The samples were incubated at 310 K for 20 min. A gas chromatogram of 300 µL headspace was recorded at 313 K with an RT-MSieve 5 Å column. Given are the mean values with standard deviations calculated from three measurements per sample in triplicate.

FTIR spectroscopy and FTIR spectroelectrochemistry

Transmission FTIR spectra were obtained using a Vertex 80v FTIR spectrometer from Bruker Optics with an N2 cooled mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector. All sample preparations were performed under strict anaerobic conditions. Samples were immobilized between CaF2 windows and measured in a continuously purged sample chamber. Spectra were recorded with 20 kHz velocity in double-sided forward backward mode with phase resolution of 16, zero filling factor of 2 and Blackman–Harris three-term apodization. Final data processing was performed using home-written scripts in the Matlab® programming environment. FTIR spectroelectrochemistry was carried out as previously described, but without use of redox mediators [15]. Spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS 66v/s spectrometer with N2 cooled MCT detector with an aperture of 2.5–3 mm and thermostated sample (278 K). An equilibration time of 40–60 min was used between the two applied potentials (Autolab PGSTAT101; NOVA software).

Sample preparation and NMR spectroscopy

For proton NMR spectroscopy, samples were maturated as described and then three times rebuffered to a low salt D2O buffer (25 mM K x H y PO4, pD 6.8) and subsequently concentrated up to 2.5 mM. Finally, the required redox states were titrated with NaDT or thionine acetate and monitored by FTIR spectroscopy. All NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker AVANCE 600 spectrometer equipped with a cryogenic TCI probehead. The 1D spectra were recorded with 2048 scans, a relaxation delay of 0.2 s and a spectral width of 200 ppm. Spectra were processed and analyzed using Topspin 2.1 and Mnova 10.0.2.

EPR spectroscopy

X-band CW-EPR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Elexsys 500 EPR spectrometer equipped with a standard TE102 rectangular resonator and an Oxford ESR900 helium flow cryostat.

Pulse echo detected EPR spectra were obtained using a Bruker Elexsys 580 X-band pulsed EPR spectrometer. Samples were accommodated in a Bruker MD5 dielectric resonator inserted into an Oxford CF935 helium flow cryostat. Q-band Echo detected experiments were conducted on a Bruker Elexsys 580 Q-band pulsed EPR spectrometer using a homebuilt Q-band resonator [37]. Low temperatures were reached using a closed cycle Helium cryostat from Cryogenic Ltd [38].

Results and discussion

For all artificial enzymes, no catalytic activity for hydrogen production or oxidation was observed (see fig. S1). This is surprising since HydA1-ADSe was reported to be fully active [22]. Therefore, it was anticipated that HydA1-PDSe would at least show an activity similar to that of HydA1-PDT. However, since for the PDT variant of [FeFe] hydrogenases the amine function is lacking, another proton shuttle should be in operation to explain its residual activity. It is speculated that the coordinating bridging thiols, similar to the situation in [NiFe] hydrogenases [1], can temporarily store the proton associated with the hydride. For the PDSe variant, this mechanism seems to fail, probably because of the substantial increase in Fe–Se/S bond length and/or the unfavorable acid/base properties of the selenol moieties.

The Hox and Hred states

The maturation with [2Fe]-PDSe and the charge distribution of the two main states Hox and Hred from HydA1-PDT and -PDSe were studied with FTIR spectroscopy using the CO and CN vibrations as probes.

FTIR spectroscopy

The incorporation of the [2Fe]-PDSe precursor into apo-HydA1 was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy showing narrow CO and CN bands as compared to those of the free synthetic precursor in solution (see fig. S2A).

As shown in Fig. 2, the signal pattern for CN and CO bands of the Hox state of HydA1-PDSe is redshifted by 3–8 cm−1 compared to HydA1-PDT, which is in good agreement with the redshifts found for the [2Fe]–ADSe complex incorporated into HydA1 from Clostridium pasteurianum (Cp) by Kertess et al. [22] compared to HydA1-ADT. This can be explained by the donation from the Se lone pair to the Fe σ*-orbital that enhances π-back-donation from Fe to CO/CN and weakens the CO/CN internal ligand bond strength.
Fig. 2

Comparison of the Hox (gray/blue) and Hred (dark gray/red) states of [4Fe–4S]H HydA1-PDT/-PDSe in FTIR spectroscopy. The smaller contribution at 2005 cm−1 in the spectrum of HydA1-PDSe Hox originates from the oxidized CO inhibited state (see Fig. 5). Spectra are taken at 288 K with a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1

Reduction with 5 mM NaDT results in HydA1-PDSe Hred with small redshifts in the FTIR spectrum compared to the oxidized state (see Table 1) similar to the ones observed for HydA1-PDT upon reduction (see Fig. 2). Both terminal COs are redshifted by 9 cm−1, whereas the bridging µCO is redshifted by 7 cm−1 compared to HydA1-PDT Hred (see Table 1). The cyanide ligand vibration frequencies are lowered by 3–4 cm−1. The small redshifts in HydA1-PDSe from the oxidized to the reduced state indicate that the reduction takes place at the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster leading to [4Fe–4S] H + HydA1-PDSe with a [Fep(I)Fed(II)] configuration. A reduction at the [2Fe]H subsite would lead to larger shifts, e.g., as can be observed in the sensing hydrogenase HydS-ADT from Thermotoga maritima upon conversion from the Hox into the Hred* state [39].
Table 1

FTIR vibrations in cm−1 of HydA1-PDT and -PDSe in their oxidized and reduced states











PDSe Hox





PDT Hred





PDSe Hred





These observations indicate that the two enzyme variants have a similar charge distribution with only minor effects caused by the larger mass of selenium as compared to sulfur.

EPR spectroscopy

The singly reduced states Hred in HydA1-PDT and -PDSe are EPR silent, although both the reduced [4Fe–4S]H and mixed valence [2Fe]H subclusters formally carry unpaired spin density. The anti-ferromagnetic intercluster spin coupling, however, leads to an Stotal = 0 ground state.

The oxidized HydA1-PDSe was also analyzed with EPR spectroscopy. The Hox state is expected to have an electronic configuration [4Fe–4S] H 2+ -[Fep(I)Fed(II)] which has an S = 1/2 ground state. It indeed shows a rhombic EPR spectrum very similar to that of HydA1-PDT Hox (see Fig. 3). The g values of HydA1-PDSe are, however, significantly shifted toward higher values (in particular gy) which can be explained by the larger spin–orbit contribution of selenium as compared to sulfur.
Fig. 3

EPR spectra of HydA1-PDT Hox (gray) and HydA1-PDSe Hox (blue). Simulation for HydA1-PDSe Hox is shown in red. The small additional signals between g = 2.01 and g = 2.03 in HydA1-PDSe Hox originate from a contribution of Hox–CO (see table S2). Spectra are taken at 20 K

1H NMR spectroscopy

1H NMR spectroscopy can provide information about the electron spin density delocalization of the H-cluster in two otherwise structurally similar enzymatic states. For the measurements, usually performed at room temperature, a stable redox state of the sample is required as was shown for Hox and Hox–CO state of the native HydA1 [26]. In contrast to HydA1-ADSe, HydA1-PDSe is very stable in the Hox state and can be used for 1H NMR solution studies at room temperature to investigate the effect of selenium substitution. Figure 4 shows the 1H NMR spectra of the oxidized states of HydA1-PDT and HydA1-PDSe in comparison. The characteristic contact-shifted signals originate from the methylene protons of the PDT/PDSe bridge and the β-CH2 protons of the cysteines ligating the [4Fe–4S]H cluster (see fig. S3) as recently described by Rumpel et al. [26].
Fig. 4

Solution state 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra for HydA1-PDT (gray)/-PDSe (blue) in the Hox state at room temperature. Nomenclature used is based on Rumpel et al. [26]. Resonances a–f/a′–f′ originate from the methylene protons of the cysteines coordinating the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster, while resonances 1–4/1′–4′ are associated with the methylene protons of the PDT/PDSe bridging ligand as indicated in the scheme (top)

Both spectra show a very similar pattern with four downfield and two upfield shifted resonances (see Fig. 4). The two upfield (negative shift) resonances 3 + 4, and also 3 + 4′, originate, based on the earlier assignment achieved for HydA1-ADT Hox [26], from the methylene protons of the PDT/PDSe bridge pointing away from the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster (Hequatorial, see fig. S3). The downfield shifted resonances (af) and (a′–f′) can be assigned to the methylene protons of the β-CH2 protons of the cysteines coordinating the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster [26].

In comparison to HydA1-PDT Hox, the equatorial methylene protons 3 + 4′ of HydA1-PDSe Hox are shifted by approximately + 4.5 ppm. The axial protons 1 + 2 pointing toward the [4Fe–4S]H cluster resonate around + 11.2 ppm in HydA1-PDT [26], overlapping with the peak of the β-CH2 pair e + f resulting in an increased signal width of 400 Hz (see also table S1). The smaller linewidth of the e + f′ feature (200 Hz) suggests that the 1 + 2′ feature (originating from the axial PDSe methylene protons) is no longer overlapping and probably located within the diamagnetic envelope, i.e., the region between − 1 and + 10 ppm (not shown) where the protons of the diamagnetic part of the protein resonate. The smaller shifts in HydA1-PDSe show that the protons experience a reduced spin density at the [2Fe]H subsite as well as in the [4Fe–4S]H cluster. The downfield resonances af from HydA1-PDT Hox are assigned to the β-methylene protons of the cysteine side chains coordinating the [4Fe–4S]H cluster. In HydA1-PDSe Hox, the β–CH2 protons (a′–f′) are only slightly shifted by approximately − 0.5 to − 1 ppm compared to HydA1-PDT Hox.

The electron spin state and the distance of the observed nucleus to the iron in combination with the spin density at the nucleus is correlated with the broadening of its magnetic resonance signal [40]. The similarity in signal width between HydA1-PDT Hox and HydA1-PDSe Hox (see table S1) indicates that there is no difference in spin state and spin density distribution.

For the reduced proteins, the obtained 1H NMR spectra in solution show more proton signals over an extended chemical shift range (80 to − 25 ppm) with broader line widths due to a reduced cubane cluster with S = 1/2 (see fig. S4). Although the [4Fe–4S]H cluster is coupled with the [2Fe]H subsite to an EPR silent Hred state at low temperatures, at room temperature higher spin states are populated that induce the large chemical shifts. The data are collected and compared in table S1.

FTIR spectroelectrochemistry

As inferred from the magnetic resonance and FTIR experiments, the substitution of sulfur to selenium in the bridging position slightly changes the electronic structure of the altered active site bringing more charge density to the [2Fe]H subsite. The small redshift of the FTIR pattern indicates that the redox reaction takes place at the [4Fe–4S]H cluster.

To analyze the redox properties of the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster in HydA1-PDSe in detail, FTIR spectroelectrochemistry was performed to determine the midpoint potential of the ox/red transition (see Fig. 5). The redox titration of HydA1-PDSe shows the main transition from Hox to Hred. The plotted absorbance of the two chosen marker bands 1934 and 1926 cm−1 against the applied potential are fitted with one electron Nernstian curves. They give a midpoint potential of − 367 ± 20 mV vs SHE, which is 22 mV lower than that of HydA1-PDT [23]. Although this difference is small, a slightly more negative redox potential is consistent with the increased electron density at the [2Fe]H core [19] which is coupled to the cubane cluster.
Fig. 5

Reductive titration of HydA1-PDSe monitored by FTIR spectroelectrochemistry with selected FTIR spectra. Blue squares represent the intensities of the marker band for the Hox state and red squares for the Hred state (see inset). Data are collected at 278 K with 2 cm−1 resolution. Solid lines correspond to Nernstian fits with n = 1 and give a midpoint potential of Eox/red = − 367 ± 20 mV vs SHE; the arrow indicates the titration direction

The Hox–CO state

In contrast to HydA1-PDT, a CO inhibited state is formed under CO gas exposure in HydA1-PDSe. While in HydA1-ADT, the CO inhibited state occurs both in oxidized (Hox–CO) and reduced form (Hred–CO), the CO bound state in HydA1-PDSe can only be stabilized in the oxidized state (see fig. S2A) and will therefore be compared to HydA1-ADT Hox–CO.

FTIR spectroscopy and FTIR spectroelectrochemistry

The FTIR spectra of the two Hox–CO states show the same peak pattern (see Fig. 6). In comparison to HydA1-ADT Hox–CO (2012, 1972, 1964 cm−1), the FTIR vibrations of the CO ligands in HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO state (2006, 1964, 1958 cm−1) are slightly red shifted as for the Hox state.
Fig. 6

Comparison of the FTIR spectra for the Hox–CO states of HydA1-ADT and HydA1-PDSe. The asterisks indicate minor contributions from the Hox state in the samples. Spectra are taken at 288 K with 2 cm−1 resolution

Reductive treatment (2 mM NaDT) of HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO partly converts it into the Hred state with simultaneous FTIR band broadening from ≈ 6 to ≈ 15 cm−1 (FWHM) indicating a partial detachment from the protein scaffold (see fig. S1 A1–A4). Due to the lack of a reduced product from the Hox–CO state, the corresponding FTIR spectroelectrochemistry (see fig. S6) shows only vibrational peaks decreasing in intensity during reduction. This behavior was also observed for the native [FeFe] hydrogenase from D. desulfuricans [41].

In native HydA1 from C. reinhardtii, however, the Hox–CO state is readily reduced to a pure Hred–CO state at − 470 mV (pH 8.0) [23]. Since the apparent midpoint potential for HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO reduction (approximately, − 337 mV, see fig. S6) is even more positive than Eox/red (corresponding to the Hox/Hred transition) for HydA1-PDSe − 367 mV, see Fig. 5, we must conclude that the CO inhibited state of HydA1-PDSe is much less stable than that in the native enzyme.

EPR spectroscopy

Since HydA1-PDT is not inhibited by CO, the native enzyme is again used for comparison. HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO gives a rhombic EPR spectrum with rather broad lines, whereas the known HydA1-ADT Hox–CO state is characterized by an axial EPR spectrum with narrower lines [42] (see Fig. 7). Two of the g-values are significantly shifted toward higher values which, as for the HydA1-PDSe Hox state, can be explained by the larger spin–orbit contribution of selenium compared to sulfur. Thus, the EPR spectrum suggests that the electronic structure of the iron core in HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO deviates significantly from that in the native Hox–CO state.
Fig. 7

Superimposed CW X-band EPR spectra of HydA1-ADT Hox–CO and HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO. Spectra are recorded from samples with 1 mM protein concentration at 20 K

Reconstitution of apo-HydA1 with [4Fe–4Se]H

Owing to the possibility of heterologous expression, the cubane cluster of apo-HydA1 could also be reconstituted with selenium (see “Materials and methods”) leading to a stable [4Fe–4Se]H hydrogenase which was analyzed with EPR and NMR spectroscopy.

1H NMR spectroscopy

The 1H NMR spectra of apo-HydA1 containing either the native [4Fe–4S]H or the [4Fe–4Se]H subcluster in their oxidized (2 +) state show a similar pattern of the contact-shifted β-CH2 proton resonances (ad and a′–e′) in the downfield region. They originate from the Fe coordinating cysteines confirming a successful reconstitution with no significant difference between the two structures (see Fig. 8). In the oxidized state of apo-HydA1 with the [4Fe–4S]H cluster, the two S = 9/2 Fe(II)Fe(III) pairs in the cubane cluster are antiferromagnetically coupled to form a diamagnetic S = 0 ground state. At room temperature, paramagnetism arises from population of the excited states [43], explaining the anti-Curie temperature dependence of the 1H chemical shifts [26]. Sulfur-to-selenium exchange in the cubane cluster increases the chemical shift of the hyperfine shifted proton resonances in the range from 2.8 to 5.2 ppm, being indicative of a stronger magnetic interaction. The overall larger chemical shifts in the [4Fe–4Se]H substituted enzyme uncover an additional proton signal at 11.6 ppm, labeled e′.
Fig. 8

Scaled 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of apo-HydA1 comparing the native [4Fe–4S]H with the reconstituted [4Fe–4Se]H cluster. Protein concentrations were 1.7 mM and 0.8 mM, respectively. For the apo-HydA1 with the [4Fe–4S]H cluster, only the oxidized state (black) and for the selenium substituted enzyme the oxidized (red) and reduced state (gray) are shown in the 34–10 ppm range. Spectra are recorded at 298 K

For the dithionite reduced cubane cluster, the effect of Se substitution is dramatic. Whereas the \(\left[ { 4 {\text{Fe}} - 4 {\text{S}}} \right]_{\text{H}}^{ + }\) cluster shows a classical S = 1/2 ground state with broad resonances occurring over a more extended field range (down to 55 ppm) [26], the \(\left[ { 4 {\text{Fe}} - 4 {\text{Se}}} \right]_{\text{H}}^{ + }\) apo-HydA1 seems to be in a high spin state with 1H NMR features that are broadened beyond detection (see gray trace Fig. 8). For small bacterial ferredoxins (≈ 6 kDa), selenium substitution also results in high electron spin states. But here, paramagnetically shifted resonances in the range from − 45 to + 160 ppm could be observed without extreme broadening. This can be explained by taking into account the eight times smaller size of the ferredoxins as compared to apo-HydA1 [27].

EPR spectroscopy on reduced [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1

EPR spectroscopy can contribute to understanding the lack of 1H NMR signals introduced by high electron spin states in combination with the large size (≈ 50 kDa) of [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1.

The EPR spectra of the reduced [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1shown in Fig. 9a with EPR features at g = 5.17 and g = 5.6 are indicative of a mixed high spin state. These high spin states have been described earlier for Se-substituted ferredoxins [30, 32, 33]. The derivative feature at g = 5.17 is assigned to the excited S = 3/2 Kramers doublet of the S = 7/2 ground state assuming a rhombicity of E/D = 0.117 [44]. The temperature dependence of the amplitude of this feature is consistent with a D = − 1.07 cm−1 (see Fig. 9b). The absorptive feature at g = 5.63 is assigned to anisotropic components of both S = 1/2 and S = 3/2 Kramers doublets of an S = 3/2 ground state [33]. It is assumed that the occurrence of high spin components of the Se-substituted cubane cluster is related to its coordination environment which is modulating the intra-cluster exchange coupling(s).
Fig. 9

CW X-band and Q-band EPR of reduced [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1. a CW X- and Q-band EPR spectra recorded at 10 K (black) with corresponding simulations (red) showing S = 3/2 and S = 7/2 species. b Temperature dependence of the signal at g = 5.17; amplitudes were recorded at X-band frequency with corresponding fit to determine the zero field splitting parameter D

Subtle changes of the protein coordination to the [4Fe–4Se] cluster as affected by protein–protein binding interactions in photosystem I (PSI) have led to a spin crossover [33]. We observed a similar effect when the [4Fe–4Se]H apo-HydA1 enzyme was maturated with [2Fe]–ADT/–PDT/–PDSe. The familiar S = 1/2 species of the Hox state can be identified (see fig. S6). At minimum, this shows that the oxidized [4Fe–4Se]2+ cluster is in a low spin configuration. The 1H NMR spectrum of the [4Fe–4Se]H HydA1-PDT Hred state in figure S4 shows paramagnetic shifts very similar to the [4Fe–4S]H HydA1-PDT Hred state. This indicates that the reduced \(\left[ { 4 {\text{Fe}} - 4 {\text{Se}}} \right]_{\text{H}}^{ + }\) cluster in HydA1-PDT Hred is also in a low spin state (formally, S = 1/2) and couples antiferromagnetically to the S = 1/2 state of the [2Fe]H binuclear subcluster to generate a diamagnetic ground state. Further changes are not observed for the [4Fe–4Se]H HydA1 maturated samples as expected from the previous results of Noth et al. [7]. (see fig. S6 and S7).

Summary and conclusions

In this work, we have shown that S-to-Se substitution in the bridging ligand of the binuclear subsite in the H-cluster of the [FeFe] hydrogenase from C. reinhardtii induces distinct changes in the electronic structure of the enzyme’s active site. According to the FTIR signatures of the Hox and Hred states, the charge density on the [2Fe]H site in HydA1-PDSe is increased. Part of the charge density is transported onto the [4Fe–4S]H subcluster explaining the slightly lower midpoint potential of the Hox/Hred transition. The increased charge density lowers the reduction potential and may also contribute to the increased oxygen sensitivity of the active CpHydA1-ADSe observed in an earlier study [22].

The observed reduced paramagnetic shift of the methylene protons in the bridging ligand in 1H NMR spectroscopy shows that less spin density remains on the PDSe ligand than on the PDT ligand. The increased size of selenium with respect to sulfur causes the Fe–Se bond to be somewhat longer than the corresponding Fe–S bond. This reduces the steric bulk of the CH2 bridgehead at the open coordination site and may be a contributing factor allowing an external CO to bind at Fed in HydA1-PDSe in contrast to the situation in HydA1-PDT. The extraneous CO ligand significantly affects the electronic structure of the [2Fe]H subcluster as is apparent from the rhombic EPR spectrum of HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO that strongly deviates from that of HydA1-ADT Hox–CO. Although the reduced steric bulk of the –CH2 bridgehead allows formation of the Hox–CO state, it still destabilizes this state sufficiently such that the HydA1-PDSe Hox–CO state cannot be reduced without detaching the extraneous CO or the [2Fe]H subsite as a whole from the H-cluster [41].

The effect of substituting selenium for the inorganic sulfides in the [4Fe–4S]H cluster is different from the effect of PDT to PDSe substitution in the [2Fe]H subsite. In the oxidized [4Fe–4Se]2+ protein, more spin density is transported to the Fe ions leading to large chemical shifts in the NMR spectrum. In the reduced [4Fe–4Se]+ protein, the spin coupling between the iron ions becomes critically dependent on the first coordination sphere and leads to a mixed spin state of S = 3/2 and S = 7/2. Maturation of the [4Fe–4Se]2+ apoprotein, however, restores the coordination environment to that of the native enzyme resulting in a low spin configuration with S = 1/2. The FTIR patterns of the [4Fe–4Se]H HydA1-PDT/-PDSe samples do not differ from the [4Fe–4S]H cluster-containing samples.

The discussed effects of S → Se substitution on spectroscopy and activity of the [FeFe] hydrogenase HydA1 illustrate the intricate balance of spin interactions and charge density distributions within the H-cluster governing the electronic structure and catalytic behavior of the enzyme’s active site.



The Max Planck Society is gratefully acknowledged for financial support. The French State Program ‘Investissements d’Avenir (Grants “LABEX DYNAMO”, ANR-11-LABX-0011, and “LABEX ARCANE”, ANR-11-LABX-0003-01) supported this work. Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society.

Supplementary material

775_2018_1558_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1215 kb)


  1. 1.
    Lubitz W, Ogata H, Rüdiger O, Reijerse E (2014) Chem Rev 114:4081–4148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vignais PM, Billoud B (2007) Chem Rev 107:4206–4272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glick BR, Martin WG, Martin SM (1980) Can J Microbiol 26:1214–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madden C, Vaughn MD, Díez-Pérez I, Brown KA, King PW, Gust D, Moore AL, Moore TA (2012) J Am Chem Soc 134:1577–1582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cornish AJ, Gärtner K, Yang H, Peters JW, Hegg EL (2011) J Biol Chem 286:38341–38347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuchenreuther JM, George SJ, Grady-Smith CS, Cramer SP, Swartz JR (2011) PLoS One 6:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noth J, Esselborn J, Güldenhaupt J, Brünje A, Sawyer A, Apfel UP, Gerwert K, Hofmann E, Winkler M, Happe T (2016) Angew Chem Int Ed 55:8396–8400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berggren G, Adamska A, Lambertz C, Simmons TR, Esselborn J, Atta M, Mouesca JMF, Reijerse E, Lubitz W, Happe T, Artero V, Fontecave M (2013) Nature 499:66–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esselborn J, Lambertz C, Adamska-Venkatesh A, Simmons T, Berggren G, Noth J, Siebel JF, Hemschemeier A, Artero V, Reijerse E, Fontecave M, Fontecave M, Lubitz W, Happe T (2013) Nat Chem Biol 9:607–610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barth A (2007) Biochem Biophys Acta 1767:1073–1101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li H, Rauchfuss TB (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:726–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilbert-Wilson R, Siebel JF, Adamska-Venkatesh A, Pham CC, Reijerse E, Wang H, Cramer SP, Lubitz W (2015) J Am Chem Soc 137:8998–9005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adamska-Venkatesh A, Simmons TR, Siebel JF, Artero V, Fontecave M, Reijerse E, Lubitz W (2015) Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:5421–5430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meyer J, Moulis JM (1981) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 103:667–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sommer C, Adamska-Venkatesh A, Pawlak K, Birrell JA, Rüdiger O, Reijerse EJ, Lubitz W (2017) J Am Chem Soc 139:1440–1443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reijerse EJ, Pham CC, Pelmenschikov V, Gilbert-Wilson R, Adamska-Venkatesh A, Siebel JF, Gee LB, Yoda Y, Tamasaka K, Lubitz W, Rauchfuss TB, Cramer SP (2017) J Am Chem Soc 139:4306–4309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winkler M, Senger M, Duan J, Esselborn J, Wittkamp F, Hofmann E, Apfel UP, Stripp ST, Happe T (2017) Nat Commun 8:16115CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pelmenschikov V, Birrell JA, Pham CC, Mishra N, Wang H, Sommer C, Reijerse E, Richers CP, Tamasaku K, Yoda Y, Rauchfuss TB, Lubitz W, Cramer SP (2017) J Am Chem Soc 139:16894–16902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silakov A, Wenk B, Reijerse E, Albracht SPJ, Lubitz W (2009) J Biol Inorg Chem 14:301–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodriguez-Maciá P, Pawlak K, Rüdiger O, Reijerse E, Lubitz W, Birrell JA (2017) JACS 139:15122–15134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siebel JF, Adamska-Venkatesh A, Reijerse E, Lubitz W (2015) Biochemistry 54:1474–1483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kertess L, Wittkamp F, Sommer C, Esselborn J, Rüdiger O, Reijerse EJ, Hofmann E, Lubitz W, Winkler M, Happe T, Apfel UP (2017) Dalton Trans 46:16947–16958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adamska-Venkatesh A, Krawietz D, Siebel JF, Weber K, Happe T, Reijerse E, Lubitz W (2014) J Am Chem Soc 136:11339–11346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Esselborn J, Muraki N, Klein K, Engelbrecht V, Metzler-Nolte N, Apfel UP, Hofmann E, Kurisu G, Happe T (2016) Chem Sci 7:959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marques MC, Tapia C, Gutièrrez-Sanz O, Ramos AR, Keller KL, Wall JD, De Lacey AL, Matias PM, Pereira IAC (2017) Nat Chem Biol 13:544–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rumpel S, Ravera E, Sommer C, Reijerse E, Farés C, Luchinat C, Lubitz W (2018) J Am Chem Soc 140(1):131–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gaillard J, Moulis JM, Meyer J (1987) Inorg Chem 26:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Banci L , Bertini I, Briganti F, Luchinat C, Scozzafava A (1991) Iron-sulfur proteins: an insight into their electronic structure through 1H NMR spectroscopy. In: Rizzarelli E, Theophanides T (eds) Chemistry and properties of biomolecular systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 73-90Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nagayama K, Ozaki Y, Kyojoku Y, Hase T, Matsubara H (1983) J Biol Chem 94:893–902Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gaillard J, Moulis JM, Auric P, Meyer J (1986) Biochemistry 25:464–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moulis JM, Meyer J (1982) Biochemistry 21:4762–4771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moulis JM, Auric P, Meyer J (1984) J Biol Chem 259:11396–11402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jung YS, Vassiliev IR, Golbeck JH (1997) J Biol Inorg Chem 2:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Harb MK, Niksch T, Windhager J, Görls H, Holze R, Lockett LT, Okumura N, Evans DH, Glass RS, Lichtenberger DL, El-khateeb M, Weigand W (2009) Organometallics 28:1039–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuchenreuther JM, Grady-Smith CS, Bingham AS, George SJ, Cramer SP, Swartz JR (2010) PLoS One 5:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Winkler M, Hemschemeier A, Gotor C, Melis A, Happe T (2002) Int J Hydrogen Energy 27:1431–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reijerse E, Lendzian F, Isaacson R, Lubitz W (2012) J Magn Reson 214:237–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reijerse E, Savitsky A (2017) eMagRes 6:187–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chongdar N, Birrell JA, Pawlak K, Sommer C, Reijerse EJ, Rüdiger O, Lubitz W, Ogata H (2018) J Am Chem Soc 140:1057–1068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bertini I, Luchinat C, Parigi G (2002) Concepts Magn Reson 14:259–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rodriguez-Maciá P, Reijerse E, Lubitz W, Birrell JA, Rdiger O (2017) J Phys Chem Lett 8:3834–3839CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kamp C, Silakov A, Winkler M, Reijerse EJ, Lubitz W, Happe T (2008) Biochim Biophys Acta 1777:410–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Poe M, Phillips WD, McDonald CC, Lovenberg W (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci 65:797–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hagen WR (2009) Biomolecular EPR spectroscopy. CRC Press Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Sommer
    • 1
  • S. Rumpel
    • 1
  • S. Roy
    • 2
  • C. Farès
    • 3
  • V. Artero
    • 2
  • M. Fontecave
    • 4
  • E. Reijerse
    • 1
  • W. Lubitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische EnergiekonversionMülheim an der RuhrGermany
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Chimie et Biologie des MétauxUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CEA/BIG, CNRSGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.Max-Planck-Institut für KohlenforschungMülheim an der RuhrGermany
  4. 4.Laboratoire de Chimie des Processus Biologiques, Collège de France, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS, UMR 8229PSL Research UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations