Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing directly measured versus mathematically calculated free serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

25-Hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. The majority of serum 25(OH)D is bound to vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) (~ 85%) and to albumin (~ 15%), with only a miniscule amount circulating as free 25(OH)D. Free 25(OH)D can be calculated mathematically by Bikle method from the concentrations of total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin or measured directly by ELISA. A direct head-to-head comparison between the two methods has not been done in children.

Materials and methods

The objective of the study was to compare the mathematically calculated versus directly measured free 25(OH) vitamin D in children. Serum samples from 74 children (ages 1–19 years) were simultaneously analyzed for total 25(OH)D, serum albumin, VDBP, and free 25(OH)D. Pearson correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plot were used to evaluate agreement between the two methods.

Results

The mean age was 9.1 ± 5.1 years, with 61% boys, 76% Caucasians, and 24% African-Americans. The mean ± SD for total 25(OH)D was 38.7 ± 12.8 ng/mL, bioavailable 25(OH)D 3.1 ± 1.1 ng/mL, mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D 8.4 ± 3.2 pg/mL, and directly measured free 25(OH)D 8.9 ± 3.6 pg/mL. Pearson correlation reflected a significant correlation between mathematically calculated and directly measured free 25(OH)D (r = 0.66, p < 0.0005). Bland–Altman plot reflected a tight agreement within a 95% limit of agreement (mean = − 0.026 ± 2SD).

Conclusions

The directly measured and mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D are in close agreement and are interchangeable. Depending on the local availability of instruments and methods, free 25(OH)D can be either directly measured or mathematically calculated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holick MF (2004) Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1678S–1688S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1678S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tietz N (1976) Fundamentals of chemistry. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 335–337

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cauley JA, Danielson ME, Boudreau R, Barbour KE, Horwitz MJ, Bauer DC, Ensrud KE, Manson JE, Wactawski-Wende J, Shikany JM, Jackson RD (2011) Serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D and clinical fracture risk in a multiethnic cohort of women: the women’s health initiative (WHI). J Bone Miner Res 26:2378–2388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Powe CE, Ricciardi C, Berg AH, Erdenesanaa D, Collerone G, Ankers E, Wenger J, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani R, Bhan I (2011) Vitamin D-binding protein modifies the vitamin D-bone mineral density relationship. J Bone Miner Res. 26:1609–1616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Denburg MR, Kalkwarf HJ, de Boer IH, Hewison M, Shults J, Zemel BS, Stokes D, Foerster D, Laskin B, Ramirez A, Leonard MB (2013) Vitamin bioavailability and catabolism in pediatric chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 28:1843–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM (1999) “A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3666–3672. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.10.6079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bikle Daniel, Bouillon Roger, Thadhani Ravi, Schoenmakers Inez (2017) Vitamin D metabolites in captivity? Should we measure free or total 25(OH)D to assess vitamin D status? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 173:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.01.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Srivastava T, Garg U, Ruiz M, Dai H, Alon US (2013) Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D level in children: is there a need to change the reference range based on 2011 institute of medicine report? Clin Pediatr 52:178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922811425954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Sheng Z, Meng L, Su C, Trooskin S, Shapses SA (2019) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D binding protein levels in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroidectomy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 10:171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00171(Published 2019 Mar 27)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz JB, Lai J, Lizaola B, Kane L, Markova S, Weyland P, Terrault NA, Stotland N, Bikle D (2014) A comparison of measured and calculated free 25(OH) vitamin D levels in clinical populations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:1631–1637. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez-Molina M, Santillan C, Murillo M, Valls AM, Bosch L, Bel J, Granada ML (2018) Measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in healthy children and relationship to total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, calculated free 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D binding protein. Clin Biochem 61:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.08.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Sebestyen VanSickle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sebestyen VanSickle, J., Srivastava, T., Garg, U. et al. Comparing directly measured versus mathematically calculated free serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level in children. J Bone Miner Metab 38, 271–274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-019-01054-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-019-01054-4

Keywords

Navigation