Skip to main content
Log in

Calculation of the best estimates for measurements of radioactive substances when the presence of the analyte is not assured

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The best estimate and its standard deviation are calculated for the case when the a priori probability that the analyte is absent from the test sample is not zero. In the calculation, a generalization of the Bayesian prior that is used in the ISO 11929 standard is applied. The posterior probability density distribution of the true values, given the observed value and its uncertainty, is a linear combination of the Dirac delta function and the normalized, truncated, normal probability density distribution defined by the observed value and its uncertainty. The coefficients of this linear combination depend on the observed value and its uncertainty, as well as on the a priori probability. It is shown that for a priori probabilities larger than zero the lower level of the uncertainty interval of the best estimate reaches the unfeasible range (i.e., negative activities). However, for a priori probabilities in excess of 0.26 it reaches the unfeasible range even for positive observed values. The upper limit of the confidence interval covering a predefined fraction of the posterior is derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO 11929 (2010) Determination of characteristic limits (decision threshold, detection limit and limits of the confidence interval) for measurements of ionizing radiation—fundamentals and application, International Organization for Standardization

  2. Weise K et al (2013) Characteristic values in measurements of ionizing radiation—material for a critical discussion on fundamentals and alternatives, Fachferband für Strahlenschutz e.V

  3. Wilrich P-Th (2014) Note on the correction of negative measured values if the measurand is nonnegative. Accred Qual Assur 19:81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allenby GM, Rossi PE, McCulloch RE (2005) Hierarchical Bayes models: a practitioners guide. http://faculty.washington.edu/bajari/iosp07/rossi1.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016

  5. Hopke PK (1989) Target transformation factor analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 6:7–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox MG, Harris PM (2006) Software support for metrology best-practice guide No. 6, uncertainty evaluation, NPL report DEM-ES-011

  7. Rivals I et al (2012) A Bayesian method with empirically fitted priors for the evaluation of environmental radioactivity: application to low-level radioxenon measurements. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:141–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Korun M, Zorko B (2013) Reporting measurement results of activities near the natural limit: note and extension of the article ‘‘Interpretation of measurement results near the detection limit in gamma-ray spectrometry using Bayesian statistic’’. Accred Qual Assur 18:175–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Korun.

Appendix: Derivation of the posterior

Appendix: Derivation of the posterior

The prior, given in Eq. (1), yields with the likelihood function defined with the measurement result x ± σ x , the posterior

$$p^{\prime} (a\left| x \right.) = C \, \left[ {p_{0}\, \delta (a/\sigma_{x} ) + (1 - p_{0} )\, \text{H}(a/\sigma_{x} )} \right] \, \varphi \left( {(a - x)/\sigma_{x} } \right),$$
(10)

where φ((a − x)/σ x ) denotes the normal distribution described by the measurement result

$$\varphi \left( {(a - x)/\sigma_{x} } \right) = \frac{{\text{exp}\left( {{ - \frac{{(a - x)^{2} }}{{2\sigma_{x}^{2} }}}}\right) }}{{\sqrt {2\pi } \sigma_{x} }}.$$
(11)

It should be observed that the arguments in the prior were rescaled by σ −1 x because the Dirac delta function and the Heaviside function are functions of a dimensionless parameter. Whereas the rescaling has no effect on the Heaviside function since H(a) = H(a/σ x ), the Dirac delta function is normalized to unity, i.e., ∫δ(x)dx = 1, from where it follows ∫δ(a/σ x )da = σ x .

The constant C follows from the normalization condition for the posterior

$$\int\limits_{0}^{\infty } {p^{\prime} (a\left| x \right.) \, {\text{d}}a = C\int\limits_{0}^{\infty } {\left[ {p_{0} \, \delta (a/\sigma_{x} ) + (1 - p_{0} ) \, \text{H}(a/\sigma_{x} )} \right]} \, \varphi \left( {(a - x)/\sigma_{x} } \right) \, {\text{d}}a = 1.}$$
(12)

Since f(x,a) δ(a) = f(x,0) δ(a) for the normalization constant follows

$$C = \frac{1}{{p_{0}\, \sigma_{x} \, \varphi (x/\sigma_{x} ) + (1 - p_{0} ) \, \Phi (x/\sigma_{x} )}},$$
(13)

where Φ(x/σ x ) denotes the cumulative function of the standardized normal distribution. Then it is easy to see that the posterior is also a linear combination of the Dirac delta function and a normal distribution truncated at zero. The coefficients of this linear combination are

$$\alpha = \frac{{p_{0} \;\varphi (x/\sigma_{x} )}}{{p_{0} \;\sigma_{x} \;\varphi (x/\sigma_{x} ) + (1 - p_{0} )\;\Phi (x/\sigma_{x} )}}$$
(14)

and

$$\beta = \frac{{(1 - p_{0} ) \, \Phi (x/\sigma_{x} )}}{{p_{0} \, \sigma_{x} \, \varphi (x/\sigma_{x} ) + (1 - p_{0} ) \, \Phi (x/\sigma_{x} )}}$$
(15)

for the Dirac delta function and the truncated normal distribution, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korun, M., Vodenik, B. & Zorko, B. Calculation of the best estimates for measurements of radioactive substances when the presence of the analyte is not assured. Accred Qual Assur 21, 191–195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1198-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1198-8

Keywords

Navigation