Skip to main content
Log in

Ad hoc material for proficiency testing: freeze-dried liver

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the tasks of European Union Reference Laboratories (EURLs) for feed and food is the organization of proficiency testing (PTs) for the network of National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) of EU member states according to the area of competence. This crucial assignment leads the EURL for Chemical Elements in Food of Animal Origin (EURL-CEFAO) to plan PTs that include various chemical element/matrix/concentration combinations in order to organize a profitable exercise for its network. The purpose of this paper was to describe the “step-by-step” preparation of a PT material and the efforts of an EURL to provide proper test items to national laboratories (NRLs). The exercise was tailored to train participants and give them the opportunity to practice around the maximum levels (MLs) set in EU legislation, values at which sample acceptance is the critical issue. The EURL strategy has been chosen considering the role of the NRLs that could be summoned as third party in legal controversies. A PT on the determination of cadmium and lead in freeze-dried liver was then scheduled. The goal was to achieve a sample with a mass fraction (w) of the elements around the ML (0.50 mg/kg for both). Preliminary studies allowed the EURL to calculate the amount of spike to reach the target mass fractions. The target Cd and Pb mass fractions were in good agreement with the contents found in the frame of the homogeneity test as well as with the consensus values derived from the results reported by the PT participants. This proved the suitability of the production procedures and the quality of the delivered PT test items.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. White paper on food safety, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 12 January 2000 COM (1999) 719 final

  2. Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules. OJ L 165: 1–141

  3. Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC. OJ L 125:10–32

  4. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. OJ L 364:5–24

  5. Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 of 28 March 2007 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs. OJ L 88:29–38

  6. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. OJ L 139:55–205

  7. Technical Report of EFSA. Report for 2010 on the results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

  8. Ihedioha JN, Okoye COB (2012) Cadmium and lead levels in muscle and edible offal of cow reared in Nigeria. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 88:422–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.afsca.be/sp/pa-pa/_documents/2006-02-21_notaaanslachthuizenafkeuringnieren16-02-2006_fr.pdf

  10. Scientific Opinion Cadmium in food (2009) Scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain. EFSA J 980:1–139

    Google Scholar 

  11. Commission Decision of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. OJ L 221:8–36

  12. ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson Michael (2000) Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing. Analyst 125:385–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson M, Ellison SRL, Wood R (2006) International harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. Pure Appl Chem 78:145–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorbo A, Colabucci A, Ciaralli L (2013) Control charts to evaluate long-term performance in proficiency tests. Accred Qual Assur 18(4):291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ISO/IEC Guide 43–1 (1997) Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons—Part 1: development and operation of proficiency testing schemes. International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO/IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessment-general requirements for proficiency testing. International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out with the financial support of the SANCO 2005/Food SAFETY/003-Residues Program of the European Commission. The contents of this manuscript are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. Authors thank Daniela Pino for editorial assistance on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Colabucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colabucci, A., Sepe, A., Ciprotti, M. et al. Ad hoc material for proficiency testing: freeze-dried liver. Accred Qual Assur 20, 367–372 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1153-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1153-0

Keywords

Navigation