Abstract
Purity assessment for high-purity organic substances is regarded as one of the core competences of national metrology institutes. For this reason, Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance—Metrology in Chemistry (CCQM) regularly organized intercomparison studies to compare and demonstrate the degree of equivalence of national measurement capabilities for purity determination. This paper reports the method development work for the participation in a recent CCQM key comparison on purity assessment for estradiol. An indirect consecutive estimation approach was adopted to determine the purity of the estradiol sample, i.e., through the identification and quantification of all possible impurities present in the sample. In the course of assessment, a variety of analytical techniques were applied. The most challenging part was to identify and estimate the amount of unknown organic-related substance present in the testing material. For the moisture determination, a gas chromatography with thermal conductivity detection (GC–TCD) method was employed to supplement the results obtained using coulometric Karl Fischer titration technique. Inorganic impurities and volatile organic compounds residual were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) techniques, respectively, and their contributions were found to be comparatively insignificant.
References
Zhang H, Henion J (1999) Anal Chem 71:3955–3964
Gatti R, Gioia MG, Di Pietra AM, Cavrini V (1998) J Pharm Biomed Anal 18:187–192
Yasui T, Yamada M, Kinoshita H, Uemura H, Yoneda N, Irahara M, Aono T, Sunahara S, Mito Y, Kurimoto F, Hata K (1999) J Clin Lab Anal 13:266–272
Nováková L, Solich P, Matysová L, Šícha J (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 379:781–787
Bravo JC, Fernández P, Durand JS (2005) Analyst 130:1404–1409
Ferguson PL, Iden CR, McElroy AE, Brownawell BJ (2001) Anal Chem 73:3890–3895
An approach to the metrological sound traceable assessment of the chemical purity of organic reference materials, NIST Special Publication 1012, 2004, NIST, Gaithersburg
Skotnicka-Pitak J, Garcia EM, Pitak M, Aga DS (2008) Trends Anal Chem 27:1036–1052
Sun Y, Gu C, Liu X, Liang W, Yao P, Bolton JL, van Breemen RB (2005) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 16:271–279
Görög S, Herényi B (1987) J Chromatogr A 400:177–186
Nygaard L, Kilde HD, Andersen SG, Henriksen L, Overby V (2004) J Pharm Biomed Anal 34:265–276
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2007) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol 91. WHO, pp 384–385
Havlíková L, Nováková L, Matysová L, Šícha J, Solich P (2006) J Chromatogr A 1119:216–223
British Pharmacopoeia (2004), British Pharmacopoeia Commission, UK
Mazellier P, Méité L, De Laat J (2008) Chemosphere 73:1216–1223
Kocovsky P, Baines RS (1994) J Org Chem 59:5439–5444
Segmuller BE, Armstrong BL, Dunphy R, Oyler AR (2000) J Pharm Biomed Anal 23:927–937
Fried J, Abraham NA (1964) Tetrahedron Lett 5:1879–1885
MJ Wheeler, JS (2006) Morley Hutchinson, “Hormone assays in biological fluids”, Humana Press, pp 30–31
Horiuchi CA, Haga A, Satoh JY (1986) Bull Chem Soc Jpn 59:2459–2462
Tsukamoto T, Yada Y (1987) J Agric Chem Soc Jpn 51:2025–2027
“Validation of the 774 oven sample processor in combination with a KF coulometer by using standard operating procedures”, Application Bulletin 281/1 e, Metrohm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, Sk., Law, Ty. & Wong, YL. Purity assessment for 17β-estradiol. Accred Qual Assur 16, 245–252 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0762-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0762-5