Skip to main content
Log in

Metrology and protometrology: the ordinal question

  • Discussion Forum
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory medicine provides results for quantities as well as for properties having no magnitude. The terminology of the latter is less well established and sources are contradictory. Two recent papers on “protometrology” published in this journal offer an opportunity to discuss the necessary concept systems. The delineations of “metrology” versus “protometrology”, “observation” versus “measurement”, and the generic division of “property” are examined with emphasis on avoiding conflict with the International Vocabulary of Metrology. It is suggested that having “examination” as a top generic concept coupled with systematic modifiers for division, especially ‘nominal’ and ‘ordinal’, is a preferable terminological solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Concepts are indicated by double quotation marks when necessary, terms and quotes by single.

References

  1. Dybkær R, Jørgensen K (1967) Quantities and units in clinical chemistry, including Recommendation 1966 of the Commission on Clinical Chemistry of the IUPAC and of the IFCC. Munksgaard, Copenhagen

  2. Lowe DA (1975) A guide to international recommendations on names and symbols for quantities and on units of measurement. WHO, Geneva

  3. Rigg JC, Brown SS, Dybkær R, Olesen H (1995) IUPAC, IFCC compendium of terminology and nomenclature of properties in clinical laboratory sciences, Recommendations 1995 (The Silver Book). Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Olesen H (1995) Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 33:627–636

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. IFCC-IUPAC C-NPU database on properties and units in the clinical laboratory sciences <http://www.dior.imt.liu.se/cnpu/>

  6. BIPM (2006) Le Système international d’unités. The international system of units, 8th edn. BIPM, Sèvres

  7. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. Vocabulaire international des termes fondamentaux et généraux de métrologie, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva (abbreviated VIM2)

  8. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, ILAC, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2007) International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms. Vocabulaire international de métrologie—Concepts fondamentaux et généraux et termes associés, 3rd edn. Draft JCGM, Sèvres (abbreviated VIM3)

  9. ISO (1993) Quantities and units. ISO standards handbook, containing ISO 31 and ISO 1000, 3rd edn. ISO, Geneva

  10. ISO (2000) Terminology work—Vocabulary—part 1: Theory and application. Travaux terminologiques—Vocabulaire—Partie 1: Théorie et application. ISO 1087–1, ISO, Geneva

  11. CEN (2006) Health informatics—representation of dedicated kinds of property in laboratory medicine. EN 1614, CEN, Brussels

  12. CEN (2006) Health informatics—Expression of results of measurements in health sciences. EN 12435, CEN, Brussels

  13. ISO (2006) Statistics—Vocabulary and symbols—part 2: Applied statistics. Statistique—Vocabulaire et symbols—Partie 2: Statistique appliquée. ISO 3534–2, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva

  14. CEN (2003) Medical laboratories—Particular requirements for quality and competence. EN ISO 15189

  15. ISO (2004) Clinical laboratory medicine—In vitro diagnostic medical devices—Validation of user quality control procedures by the manufacturer. ISO 15198, ISO, Geneva

  16. Dybkaer R (2004) An ontology on property for physical, chemical, and biological systems. Thesis, APMIS (Acta Path Microbiol Immunol Scand) 112(Suppl 117):1–210

  17. Fuentes-Arderiu X (2004) Accred Qual Assur 9:644–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuentes-Arderiu X (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:640–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zender R (1992) J Int Fed Clin Chem 4:115–116, 118–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dybkaer, R. Metrology and protometrology: the ordinal question. Accred Qual Assur 12, 553–557 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-007-0266-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-007-0266-5

Keywords

Navigation