Abstract
In proficiency tests the consensus of the participants' results is often used as the assigned value to calculate z-scores. Where the consensus is quantified as the robust mean \(\hat\mu_{{\rm rob}}\) of n results, the standard error of the assigned value is often taken to be \({{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}\mathord{\left/{\vphantom{{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}{\sqrt n}}}\right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}{\sqrt n}}\), where \(\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}\) is the robust standard deviation estimated from the same data 1 . As some of the results are downweighted in robust estimation, \(\sqrt n\) is too large a denominator, so that \({{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}\mathord{\left/{\vphantom{{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}{\sqrt n}}}\right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}{\sqrt n}}\) tends to have a somewhat low bias. This bias is shown to be inconsequential for proficiency testing purposes. However, an unbiased estimate can be obtained by using the bootstrap.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The issue of whether the standard error of an assigned value can be regarded as an estimate of its “uncertainty” is, in the author's opinion, not resolved at this time and is not addressed in this paper.
References
ISO 13528 (2003) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International Standards Organisation, Geneva
Thompson M, Wood R (1993) Pure Appl Chem 65:2123–2144. (A revised version of the Harmonised Protocol is in print)
Analytical Methods Committee (1989) Analyst 114:1693
Analytical Methods Committee (2001) AMC technical brief, no. 6. www.rsc.org/amc/
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York
Analytical Methods Committee (2001) AMC technical brief, no. 8. www.rsc.org/amc/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, M. The variance of a consensus. Accred Qual Assur 10, 574–575 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0037-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0037-0