Skip to main content
Log in

The variance of a consensus

  • Discussion Forum
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In proficiency tests the consensus of the participants' results is often used as the assigned value to calculate z-scores. Where the consensus is quantified as the robust mean \(\hat\mu_{{\rm rob}}\) of n results, the standard error of the assigned value is often taken to be \({{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}\mathord{\left/{\vphantom{{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}{\sqrt n}}}\right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}{\sqrt n}}\), where \(\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}\) is the robust standard deviation estimated from the same data 1 . As some of the results are downweighted in robust estimation, \(\sqrt n\) is too large a denominator, so that \({{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}\mathord{\left/{\vphantom{{\hat\sigma_{{\rm rob}}}{\sqrt n}}}\right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace}{\sqrt n}}\) tends to have a somewhat low bias. This bias is shown to be inconsequential for proficiency testing purposes. However, an unbiased estimate can be obtained by using the bootstrap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The issue of whether the standard error of an assigned value can be regarded as an estimate of its “uncertainty” is, in the author's opinion, not resolved at this time and is not addressed in this paper.

References

  1. ISO 13528 (2003) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International Standards Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson M, Wood R (1993) Pure Appl Chem 65:2123–2144. (A revised version of the Harmonised Protocol is in print)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Analytical Methods Committee (1989) Analyst 114:1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Analytical Methods Committee (2001) AMC technical brief, no. 6. www.rsc.org/amc/

  5. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Analytical Methods Committee (2001) AMC technical brief, no. 8. www.rsc.org/amc/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, M. The variance of a consensus. Accred Qual Assur 10, 574–575 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0037-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0037-0

Keywords

Navigation