Abstract
There is increasing interest in the role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment, particularly where measurements are in support of fair trade, health & safety and the environment. A lack of clarity, however, in treating measurement uncertainties and in setting specification limits for compliance may sometimes lead to drastic consequences. Examples concerning conformity assessment, particularly in the measurement of trace quantities (Cd in plastics and antibiotic trace residues in shrimps), are amongst cases identified in the ongoing EU project MetroTrade, which can be significant impediments to international trade. This paper considers the present status of the role of measurement uncertainty in conformity testing, covering both recent work in international standardisation and physical metrology (e.g. OIML recommendations on weighing). One conclusion is that, while much has been achieved, there still exists some work to be done in order to facilitate acceptance of conformity from both customer and supplier and avoid perceived barriers to trade and serious international trade disputes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
MetroTrade (2002) http://www.metrotrade.dk
Swedish law SFS 1985:839 About cadmium
Council of Europe Resolution AP (89) 1
European Standard EN 71 part 3
Swedish law SFS 1998:944 General document about chemical products and toxic metals and chlorinated hydrocarbons
EC Directive 2377/90
ISO Guide 2 (1996) Standardisation and related activities—general vocabulary
ISO/FDIS 10576-1 (2002) Statistical methods—Guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements Part 1: General principles, ISO/TC69/SC 6
Arnesen Y, Nilsson G, Pendrill LR, Sandström M, Svensson T (1998) Standards and statistics in measurement and testing. An internet handbook. http://www.nordtest.org/register/techn/tlibrary/t417/handbook/frame.htm
ISO Guide GUM (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 2nd edn. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
Giacomo P (1986) INC-1 1980 Recommendation: expression of experimental uncertainties, CIPM. Metrologia 24:49–50
EURACHEM 2000 Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, 2nd edn. ISBN 0 948926 15 5
EA-4/16 (2003) EA guidelines on the expression of uncertainty in quantitative testing. EA and Marc Priel, private communication, Dec 2002
Williams A (2003) Traceability in analytical chemistry. MetroTrade workshop on traceability and measurement uncertainty in testing, 30–31 January 2003, Berlin
Chrysler Corp, Ford Motor Co, General Motors Corp (1995) Measurement system analysis MSA. Reference manual, 2nd edn
Ramsey MH (2003) Estimation of uncertainty from sampling. MetroTrade workshop on traceability and measurement uncertainty in testing, 30–31 January 2003, Berlin
ISO 5725 (1991) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results
ISO 5725-1 (1994) General principles and definitions
ISO 5725-2 (1994) Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method
Ellison S (2003) Uncertainty evaluation: use of experimental data. MetroTrade workshop on traceability and measurement uncertainty in testing, 30–31 January 2003, Berlin
Källgren H, Pendrill LR (2003) Requirements on weighing in legal metrology. Metrologia (in press)
VIM (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
OIML R111 (1994) Weights of classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M2, M3
Sommer K-D, Kochsiek M (2002) Role of measurement uncertainty in deciding conformance in legal metrology. OIML Bulletin XLIII:19–24
FD X 07-021 (2001) Evaluation of measurement uncertainty. French standardisation, AFNOR
ISO 14253-1 (1998) Geometrical product specifications—inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment. Part 1: decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
OIML R111 (2003) Weights of classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1–2, M2, M2–3 and M3. Draft revision of international recommendation. Technical Subcommittee OIML TC 9/SC:3
ILAC Guide no. 8 (1996) Guidelines on assessment and reporting of compliance with specification (based on measurements and test in a laboratory). ILAC
Schulz W, Sommer K-D (1997) Messunsicherheiten im eichwesen. PTB-Mitt 107:335–343
Bennich P (2003) Geometrical measurements. MetroTrade workshop on traceability and measurement uncertainty in testing, 30–31 January 2003, Berlin
Nilsson G (2003) Private communication
ISO/FDIS 11843-3 (2003) Capability of detection. Part 3: methodology for determination of the critical value for the response variable when no calibration data are used. ISO/TC69/SC 6
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for useful discussions with Maurice Cox (NPL), Göran Nilsson, Marc Priel, the organisers of the MetroTrade workshop (BAM, Berlin, 30–31 January 2003) as well as all other members of the MetroTrade project (EU G7RT-CT-2000-05004, project coordinator DFM, other project members: BNM, NPL, EUROLAB, SP, MIRS, INMS and IRMM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at the MetroTrade Workshop on Traceability and Measurement Uncertainty in Testing, 30–31 January 2003, Berlin, Germany
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00769-004-0712-6
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Källgren, H., Lauwaars, M., Magnusson, B. et al. Role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment in legal metrology and trade. Accred Qual Assur 8, 541–547 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0707-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0707-8