Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Incentive Contracts in Multiple Penalty Systems with No-commitment to Tenure-track Auditing

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper generalizes Khalil's (1997) static model to a multiperiod one in the tenure-track auditing. Three penalty systems considered are full-transfer-dependent, partial-transfer-dependent, and transfer-independent ones. It is found that the equilibrium under the tenure-track auditing is also an equilibrium under the periodic auditing. The conditions under which the principal prefers the periodic auditing, or is indifferent between the two auditing schemes are derived. Incentive contracts may vary in different penalty systems. For instance, the equilibrium with principal’s sure ex post auditing exists only under the partial-transfer-dependent and transfer-independent penalty systems. And the equilibrium with the first-best contract as the first-period optimum appears merely under the transfer-independent penalty system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arguedas, C. (2005) “Pollution Standards, Costly Monitoring and Fines”. Working paper, Tilburg University.

  • Bar-llan, A., and Sacerdote, B. (2001): “The Response to Fines and Probability of Detection in a Series of Experiments”. NBER Working paper.

  • D.T. Barnum J.M. Gleason (1976) ArticleTitleA Penalty System to Discourage OSHA Violations Monthly Labor Review 99 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Baron R.B. Myerson (1982) ArticleTitleRegulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs Econometrica 50 911–930 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1912769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Baron D. D. Besanko (1984a) ArticleTitleRegulation and Information in a Continuing Relationship Information Economics and Policy 1 267–302 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-6245(84)90006-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Baron D. Besanko (1984b) ArticleTitleRegulation, Asymmetric Information, and Auditing RAND Journal of Economics 15 447–470 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Baron D. Besanko (1987) ArticleTitleCommitment and Fairness in a Dynamic Regulatory Relationship Review of Economic Studies 54 413–436 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2297567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Bester R. Strausz (2001) ArticleTitleContracting with Imperfect Commitment and the Revelation Principle: The Single Agent Case Econometrica 69 1077–1098 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0262.00231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Border J. Sobel (1987) ArticleTitleSamurai Accountant: A Theory of Auditing and Plunder Review of Economic Studies 54 525–540 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2297481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.C. Chen (2006) ArticleTitleDynamic Incentive Contracts Under No-Commitment to Periodic Auditing and a Retrospective Penalty System The Manchester School 74 190–213 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00488.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.C. Chen S.M. Liu (2005) ArticleTitleDynamic Incentive Contracts Under No-Commitment to Periodic Auditing and a Non-Retrospective Penalty System Journal of Economics 85 107–139 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00712-005-0128-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Demski D.E.M. Sappington P.T. Spiller (1987) ArticleTitleManaging Supplier Switching RAND Journal of Economics 18 77–97 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Dewatripont (1989) ArticleTitleRenegotiation and Information Revelation Over Time: The Case of Optimal Labor Contracts Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 589–619 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2937812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Garoupa (2001) ArticleTitleOptimal Magnitudes and Probability of Fines European Economic Review 45 1765–1771 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00084-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Graetz J.F. Reinganum L.L. Wilde (1986) ArticleTitleThe Tax Compliance Game: Toward an Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 2 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Greenberg (1984) ArticleTitleAvoiding Tax Avoidance: A (Repeated) Game-Theoretic Approach Journal of Economic Theory 32 1–13 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-0531(84)90071-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Khalil (1997) ArticleTitleAuditing Without Commitment RAND Journal of Economics 28 629–640 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Khalil J. Lawarrée (2001) ArticleTitleCatching the Agent on the Wrong Foot: Ex Post Choice of Monitoring Journal of Public Economics 82 327–347 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00148-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F, Kofman J. Lawarrée (1993) ArticleTitleCollusion in Hierarchical Agency Econometrica 61 629–656 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2951721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.-J. Laffont J. Tirole (1987) ArticleTitleComparative Statics of the Optimal Dynamic Incentives Contract European Economic Review 31 901–926 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-2921(87)90006-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.-J. Laffont J. Tirole (1988) ArticleTitleThe Dynamics of Incentives Contracts Econometrica 56 1153–1175 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1911362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Landsberger I. Meilijson (1982) ArticleTitleIncentive Generating State Dependent Penalty System Journal of Public Economics 19 333–352 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(82)90060-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.D. Melumad D. Mookherjee (1989) ArticleTitleDelegation as Commitment: The Case of Income Tax Audits RAND Journal of Economics 20 139–163 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Mookherjee I. Png (1989) ArticleTitleOptimal Auditing, Insurance and Redistribution Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 399–415 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2937855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, A.M. (2004): “Optimal Fines and Auditing when Wealth is Costly to Observe”. NBER Working Paper.

  • A.M. Polinsky S. Shavell (1992) ArticleTitleEnforcement Costs and the Optimal Magnitudes and Probability of Fines Journal of Law and Economics 35 133–148 Occurrence Handle10.1086/467247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Reinganum L.L. Wilde (1985) ArticleTitleIncome Tax Compliance in a Principal-agent Framework Journal of Public Economics 26 1–18 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(85)90035-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Reinganum L.L. Wilde (1986) ArticleTitleEquilibrium Verification and Reporting Policies in a Model of Tax Compliance International Economic Review 27 739–760 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2526692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1979): “An Optimal Conviction Policy for Offenses that May Have Been Committed by Accident”. Applied Game Theory: 406–413.

  • S. Souam (2001) ArticleTitleOptimal Antitrust Policy under Different Regimes of Fines International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 1–26 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Townsend (1979) ArticleTitleOptimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification Journal of Economic Theory 22 265–293 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-0531(79)90031-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiao-Chi Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, HC., Liu, SM. Dynamic Incentive Contracts in Multiple Penalty Systems with No-commitment to Tenure-track Auditing. J Econ 90, 255–294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0241-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0241-3

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation