Skip to main content
Log in

Precocious cleavage furrows simultaneously move and ingress when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A “precocious” cleavage furrow develops and ingresses during early prometaphase in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes (Forer and Pickett-Heaps Eur J Cell Biol 89:607-618, 2010). In response to chromosome movements which regularly occur during prometaphase and that alter the balance of chromosomes in the two half-spindles, the precocious furrow shifts its position along the cell, moving 2–3 μm towards the half cell with fewer chromosomes (Ferraro-Gideon et al. Cell Biol Int 37:892-898, 2013). This process continues until proper segregation is achieved and the cell enters anaphase with the cleavage furrow again in the middle of the cell. At anaphase, the furrow recommences ingression. Spindle microtubules (MTs) are implicated in various furrow positioning models, and our experiments studied the responses of the precocious furrows to the absence of spindle MTs. We depolymerized spindle MTs during prometaphase using various concentrations of nocodazole (NOC) and colcemid. The expected result is that the furrow should regress and chromosomes remain in the midzone of the cell (Cassimeris et al. J Cell Sci 96:9-15, 1990). Instead, the furrows commenced ingression and all three bivalent chromosomes moved to one pole while the univalent chromosomes, that usually reside at the two poles, either remained at their poles or moved to the opposite pole along with the bivalents, as described elsewhere (Fegaras and Forer 2018). The microtubules were completely depolymerized by the drugs, as indicated by immunofluorescence staining of treated cells (Fegaras and Forer 2018), and in the absence of microtubules, the furrows often ingressed (in 33/61 cells) at a rate similar to normal anaphase ingression (~ 1 μm/min), while often simultaneously moving toward one pole. Thus, these results indicate that in the absence of anaphase and of spindle microtubules, cleavage furrows resume ingression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsop GB, Zhang D (2003) Microtubules are the only structural constituent of the spindle apparatus required for induction of cell cleavage. J Cell Biol 162:383–390

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barr FA, Gruneberg U (2007) Cytokinesis: placing and making the final cut. Cell 131:847–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi S, Giansanti MG, Gatti M (1998) Spindle self-organization and cytokinesis during male meiosis in asterless mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 142:571–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capp A (1948) The life and times of the Shmoo. Pocket Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassimeris L, Rieder C, Rupp G, Salmon ED (1990) Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells. J Cell Sci 96:9–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi HJ, Fukui M, Zhu BT (2011) Role of cyclin B1/Cdc2 up-regulation in the development of mitotic prometaphase arrest in human breast cancer cells treated with nocodazole. PLoS One 6(8):e24312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cytrynbaum EN, Sommi P, Brust-Mascher I, Scholey JM, Mogilner A (2005) Early spindle assembly in Drosophila embryos: role of a force balance involving cytoskeletal dynamics and nuclear mechanics. Mol Biol Cell 16:4967–4981

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert US, Mitchison TJ, Field CM (2006) Animal cytokinesis: from parts list to mechanisms. Annu Rev Biochem 75:543–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian L, Xia X, Venkitaramani DV, Johansen KM, Johansen J, Andrew DJ, Forer A (2007) Titin in insect spermatocyte spindle fibers associates with microtubules, actin, myosin and the matrix proteins skeletor, megator and chromator. J Cell Sci 120:2190–2204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fegaras E, Forer A (2018) Chromosomes selectively detach at one pole and quickly move towards the opposite pole when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes. Protoplasma. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1214-4

  • Ferraro-Gideon J, Hoang C, Forer A (2014) Meiosis-I in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes includes distance segregation and inter-polar movements of univalent, and vigorous oscillations of bivalents. Protoplasma 251:127–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro-Gideon J, Hoang C, Forer A (2013) Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes–a unique and advantageous cell for studying meiosis. Cell Biol Int 37(9):892–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forer A, Spurck T, Pickett-Heaps J, Wilson P (2003) Structure of kinetochore fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes after irradiation with an ultraviolet microbeam: neither microtubules nor actin filaments remain in the irradiated region. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 56:173–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forer A, Pickett-Heaps J (2005) Fibrin clots keep non-adhering living cells in place on glass for perfusion or fixation. Cell Biol Int 29:721–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forer A, Pickett-Heaps J (2010) Precocious (pre-anaphase) cleavage furrows in Mesostoma spermatocytes. Eur J Cell Biol 89:607–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuge H (1989) Rapid kinetochore movements in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes: action of antagonistic chromosome fibres. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 13:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuge H (1987) Oscillatory movements of bipolar-oriented bivalent kinetochroes and spindle forces in male meiosis of Mesostoma ehrenbergii. Eur J Cell Biol 44:294–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Glotzer M (2004) Cleavage furrow positioning. J Cell Biol 164(3):347–351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonczy P (2008) Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: flies and worms pave the way. Nat Rev 9:355–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grill SW, Goènczy P, Stelzer EHK (2001) Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Nature 409:630–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiramoto Y (1975) Force exerted by the cleavage furrow of sea urchin eggs. Develop Growth Differ 17(1):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang C, Ferraro-Gideon J, Gauthier K, Forer A (2013) Methods for rearing Mesostoma ehrenbergii in the laboratory for cell biology experiments, including identification of factors that influence production of different egg types. Cell Biol Int 37(10):1089–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Husted L, Ruebush TK (1940) A comparative cytological and morphological study of Mesostoma ehrenbergii and Mesostoma ehrenbergii wardii. J Morphol 67:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingber DE (1991) Integrins as mechanochemical transducers. Curr Biol 3:841–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingber DE (1993) Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 104:613–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingber DE (2003a) Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116:1157–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingber DE (2003b) Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci 116:1397–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen KM, Johansen J (2007) Cell and molecular biology of the spindle matrix. Int Rev Cytol 263:155–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen KM, Forer A, Yao C, Girton J, Johansen J (2011) Do nuclear envelope and intranuclear proteins reorganize during mitosis to form an elastic hydrogel-like spindle matrix? Chromosom Res 19:345–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MA, Wilson L (2004) Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 4(4):253–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Post M (2000) Mechanochemical signal transduction in the fetal lung. J Appl Physiol 89:2078–2084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh K, Pickett-Heaps JD, Gunning BES (1995) Cytokinesis in Spirogyra: integration of cleavage and cell-plate formation. Int J Plant Sci 156:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogessie B, Schuh M (2017) Actin protects mammalian eggs against chromosome segregation errors. Science 357:eaal 1647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mollinedo F, Gajate C (2003) Microtubules, microtubule-interfering agents and apoptosis. Apoptosis 8(5):413–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy K, Wadsworth P (2008) Dual role for microtubules in regulating cortical contractility during cytokinesis. J Cell Sci 121:2350–2359

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley HA (1984) Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela). III. Univalent chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division in spermatocytes. Chromosoma 91(2):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps JD (1991) Post-mitotic cellular reorganisation in the diatom Cymatopleura solea: the role of microtubules and the microtubule Centre. Cell Motil Cytoskel 18:279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps JD, Tippit DH, Andreozzi A (1978) Cell division in the pennate diatom Pinnularia. II Later stages in mitosis. Biol Cell 33:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps JD, Tippit DH, Andreozzi A (1979) Cell division in the pennate diatom Pinnularia. V. Observations on living cells. Biol Cell 35:295–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps JD, Tippit DH, Leslie R (1980) Light and electron microscopic observations on cell division in two large pennate diatoms, Hantzschia and Nitzschia. I. Mitosis in vivo. Eur J Cell Biol 21:1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poxleitner MK, Dawson SC, Cande WZ (2008) Cell cycle synchrony in Giardia intestinalis cultures achieved by using nocodazole and aphidicolin. Eukaryot Cell 7(4):559–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan RA, Schwarz N, Windoffer R, Richardson C, Hawkins T, Broussard JA, Green KJ, Leube RE (2017) A rim-and-spoke hypothesis to explain the biochemical roles for cytoplasmic intermediate filament networks. J Cell Sci 130:3437–3445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport R (1985) Repeated furrow formation from a single mitotic apparatus in cylindrical sand dollar eggs. J Exp Zool 234:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport R (1981) Cytokinesis: cleavage furrow establishment in cylindrical sand dollar eggs. J Exp Zool 217:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport R, Ebstein RP (1965) Duration of stimulus and latent periods preceding furrow formation in sand dollar eggs. J Exp Zool 158:373–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport R (1961) Experiments concerning the cleavage stimulus in sand dollar eggs. J Exp Zool 148:81–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez R, Howell B, Yvon AC, Wadsworth P, Cassimeris L (1997) Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability in vivo and in vitro. Mol Biol Cell 8:973–985

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Dassow G, Verbrugghe KJC, Miller AL, Sider JR, Bement WM (2009) Action at a distance during cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 187(6):831–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White CR, Frangos JA (2007) The shear stress of it all: the cell membrane and mechanochemical transduction. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:1459–1467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong R, Forer A (2003) Signalling between chromosomes in crane fly spermatocytes studied using ultraviolet microbeam irradiation. Chromosom Res 11:771–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Ganguly A, Cabral F (2010) Inhibition of cell migration and cell division correlates with distinct effects of microtubule inhibiting drugs. J Biol Chem 285(42):32242–32250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao C, Rath U, Maiato H, Sharp D, Girton J, Johansen KM, Johansen J (2012) A nuclear-derived proteinaceous matrix embeds the microtubule spindle apparatus during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 23:3532–3541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants to AF from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Forer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Douglas Chandler

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary video 1

cell treated with 20 μM NOC between 1259:54 and 13:00:01, when the images become out of focus. The bivalents oscillated up and back to the two spindle poles initially. After NOC was added, the oscillations ceased as the bivalents stretched out. The bivalent kinetochores facing the upper pole detached at around 13:01:16 and moved into the bottom half-spindle, leaving the univalents behind at the top pole. After these movements the cleavage furrow slowly ingressed and simultaneously moved towards the upper pole, forming a cell with two unequal parts, that looks like a ‘shmoo’. (MOV 6899 kb)

Supplementary video 2

cell treated with 20 μM NOC between frames 91–95, when the image was out of focus. [The time between each frame is 2 s.] As in video 1, after NOC the chromosomes stretched out; all bivalent kinetochores detached from the upper pole, starting at about frame 115, and moved to the bottom half-spindle together with the univalent from the upper pole. Subsequent to the chromosome movements the cleavage furrow ingressed and moved towards the upper pole, ending up at the cell periphery. (MOV 5514 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fegaras, E., Forer, A. Precocious cleavage furrows simultaneously move and ingress when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes. Protoplasma 255, 1401–1411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1239-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1239-8

Keywords

Navigation