Abstract
In a typical cell division, chromosomes align at the metaphase plate before anaphase commences. This is not the case in Mesostoma spermatocytes. Throughout prometaphase, the three bivalents persistently oscillate towards and away from either pole, at average speeds of 5–6 μm/min, without ever aligning at a metaphase plate. In our experiments, nocodazole (NOC) was added to prometaphase spermatocytes to depolymerize the microtubules. Traditional theories state that microtubules are the producers of force in the spindle, either by tubulin depolymerizing at the kinetochore (PacMan) or at the pole (Flux). Accordingly, if microtubules are quickly depolymerized, the chromosomes should arrest at the metaphase plate and not move. However, in 57/59 cells, at least one chromosome moved to a pole after NOC treatment, and in 52 of these cells, all three bivalents moved to the same pole. Thus, the movements are not random to one pole or other. After treatment with NOC, chromosome movement followed a consistent pattern. Bivalents stretched out towards both poles, paused, detached at one pole, and then the detached kinetochores quickly moved towards the other pole, reaching initial speeds up to more than 200 μm/min, much greater than anything previously recorded in this cell. As the NOC concentration increased, the average speeds increased and the microtubules disappeared faster. As the kinetochores approached the pole, they slowed down and eventually stopped. Similar results were obtained with colcemid treatment. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy confirms that microtubules are not associated with moving chromosomes. Thus, these rapid chromosome movements may be due to non-microtubule spindle components such as actin-myosin or the spindle matrix.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander SP, Reider CL (1991) Chromosome motion during attachment to the vertebrate spindle: initial salutatory-like behavior of chromosomes and quantitative analysis of force production by nascent kinetochore fibers. J Cell Biol 113(4):805–815. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.113.4.805
Brady M, Paliulis LV (2015) Chromosome interaction over a distance in meiosis. R Soc Open Sci 2:1–10
Camenzind R, Nicklas BR (1968) The non-random chromosome segregation in spermatocytes of Gryllotalpa hexadactyla. A micromanipulation analysis. Chromosoma 24(3):324–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336200
Cameron LA, Yang G, Cimini D, Canman JC, Kisurina-Evgenieva O, Khodjakov A, Danuser G, Salmon ED (2006) Kinesin 5-independent poleward flux of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J Cell Biol 173(2):173–179. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200601075
Capp A (1948) The life and times of the Shmoo. Pocket Books, New York
Cassimeris L, Rieder C, Rupp G, Salmon ED (1990) Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells. J Cell Sci 96:9–15
DeLuca JG, Newton CN, Himes RH, Jordan MA, Wilson L (2001) Purification and characterization of native conventional kinesin, HSET, and CENP-E from mitotic HeLa cells. J Biol Chem 276(30):28014–28021. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M102801200
Fabian L, Forer A (2005) Redundant mechanisms for anaphase chromosome movements: crane-fly spermatocyte spindles use actin filaments but also can function without them. Protoplasma 225(3-4):169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-005-0094-6
Fabian L, Xia X, Venkitaramani DV, Johansen KM, Johansen J, Andrew DJ, Forer A (2007) Titin in insect spermatocyte spindle fobers associates with microtubules, actin, myosin and the matrix proteins skeletor, megator and chromator. J Cell Sci 120(13):2190–2204. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03465
Ferraro-Gideon J (2013) Rearing Mesostoma ehrenbergii and studying chromosome movements during meiosis in their spermatocytes. Ph D thesis, York University, Toronto
Ferraro-Gideon J, Hoang C, Forer A (2013) Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes—a unique and advantageous cell for studying meiosis. Cell Biol Int 37(9):892–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.10130
Ferraro-Gideon J, Hoang C, Forer A (2014) Meiosis-I in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes includes distance segregation and inter-polar movements of the univalents, and vigorous oscillations of bivalents. Protoplasma 251(1):127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0532-9
Forer A, Pickett-Heaps J (2005) Fibrin clots keep non-adhering living cells in place on glass for perfusion or fixation. Cell Biol Int 29(9):721–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.04.010
Forer A, Pickett-Heaps J (2010) Precocious (pre-anaphase) cleavage furrows in Mesostoma spermatocytes. Eur J Cell Biol 89(8):607–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.03.001
Forer A, Spurck T, Pickett-Heaps J, Wilson P (2003) Structure of kinetochore fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes after irradiation with an ultraviolet microbeam: neither microtubules nor actin filaments remain in the irradiated region. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 56(3):173–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.10144
Forer A, Johansen K, Johansen J (2015) Movement of chromosomes with severed kinetochore microtubules. Protoplasma 252(3):775–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0752-7
Forer A, Duquette M, Paliulis L, Fegaras E, Ono M, Preece D, Berns MB (2017) Elastic 'tethers' connect separating anaphase chromosomes in a broad range of animal cells. Eur J Cell Biol 96(6):504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.07.001
Fuge H (1987) Oscillatory movements of bipolar-oriented bivalent kinetochores and spindle forces in male meiosis of Mesostoma ehrenbergii. Eur J Cell Biol 44:294–298
Fuge H (1989) Rapid kinetochore movements in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes: action of antagonistic chromosome fibres. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 13(3):212–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.970130308
Fuge H (1994) Unorthodox male meiosis in Trochosia pubescence (Sciaridae). Chromosome elimination involves polar organelle degeneration and monocentric spindles in first and second division. J Cell Sci 107:299–312
Fuge H (1997) Nonrandom chromosome segregation in male meiosis of a sciarid fly: elimination of paternal chromosomes in first division is mediated by non-kinetochore microtubules. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 36(1):84–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)36:1<84::AID-CM8>3.0.CO;2-H
Fuge H, Falke D (1991) Morphological aspects of chromosome spindle fibres in Mesostoma: “microtubular fir-tree” structures and microtubule association with kinetochores and chromatin. Protoplasma 160(2-3):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539955
Gasic I, Nerurkar P, Meraldi P (2015) Centrosome age regulates kinetochore-microtubule stability and biases chromosome mis-segregation. elife 19:1–15
Gordon GW (1980) The control of mitotic motility as influenced by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of kinetochore fibers: a dissertation in biology. Ph D Thesis University of Pennsylvania
Gordon GW, Inoué S (1979) Unexpected increase in poleward velocities of mitotic chromosomes after UV irradiation of their kinetochore fibers. J Cell Biol 83(2 part 2):376
Hoang C (2013) Mesostoma ehrenbergii as a model organism for studying meiosis: a description on how to rear these animals in the lab, highlights of their unique chromosome behaviour and using them to study the spindle matrix model of chromosome movements. M Sc thesis, York University, Toronto
Hoang C, Ferraro-Gideon J, Gauthier K, Forer A (2013) Methods for rearing Mesostoma ehrenbergii in the laboratory for cell biology experiments, including identification of factors that influence production of different egg types. Cell Biol Int 10:1089–1105
Husted L, Ruebush TK (1940) A comparative cytological and morphological study of Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii and Mesostoma ehrenbergii wardii. J Morphol 67(3):387–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1050670302
Johansen KM, Johansen J (2007) Cell and molecular biology of the spindle matrix. Int Rev Cytol 263:155–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(07)63004-6
Johansen KM, Forer A, Yao C, Girton J, Johansen J (2011) Do nuclear envelope and intranuclear proteins reorganize during mitosis to form an elastic hydrogel-like spindle matrix? Chromosom Res 19(3):345–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-011-9187-6
Jordan MA, Wilson L (2004) Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 4(4):253–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1317
Jordan MA, Thrower D, Wilson L (1992) Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. J Cell Sci 102:401–416
LaFountain JR, Cole RW, Reider CL (2002) Partner telomeres during anaphase in crane fly spermatocytes are connected by an elastic tether that exerts a backward force and resists poleward movement. J Cell Sci 115:1541–1549
Lorbeer G (1934) Die Zytologie der Lebermoose mit besonderer Berücksichtigung allgemeiner Chromosomenfragen. Jb Wiss Bot 80:567–818
Metz CW (1938) Chromosome behavior, inheritance and sex determination in Sciara. Am Nat 72(743):485–520. https://doi.org/10.1086/280803
Metz CW, Moses MS, Hoppe EN (1926) Chromosome behavior and genetic behavior in Sciara (Diptera). Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl 42:237–270
Mogessie B, Schuh M (2017) Actin protects mammalian eggs against chromosome segregation errors. Science 357(6353):eaal 1647. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1647
Nur U (1982) Destruction of specific heterochromatic chromosomes during spermatogenesis in the Comstockiella chromosome system (Coccoidea: Homoptera). Chromosoma 85(4):519–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327347
Oakley HA (1983) Male meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii. Kew Chromosome Conference II Editors PE Brandham, MD Bennett. George Allen and Unwin, London (Boston, Sydney) 195–199
Oakley HA (1985) Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria,Rhabdocoela). III. Univalent chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division in spermatocytes. Chromosoma 91(2):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294051
Osborn M, Weber K (1982) Intermediate filaments: cell-type-specific markers in differentiation and pathology. Cell 31(2 Pt 1):303–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90122-2
Paliulis LV, Forer A (2017) A review of “tethers”: elastic connections between separating partner chromosomes in anaphase. Protoplasma. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1201-1
Payne F (1912) The chromosomes of Gryllotalpa borealis. Burm Arch Zellforsch 9:141–148
Pickett-Heaps J, Forer A (2009) Mitosis: spindle evolution and the matrix model. Protoplasma 235(1-4):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-009-0030-2
Pickett-Heaps J, Spurck T (1982) Studies on kinetochore function in mitosis. I. The effects of colchicine and cytochalasin on mitosis in the diatom Hantzschia amphioxys. Eur J Cell Biol 28(1):77–82
Pickett-Heaps J, Forer A, Spurck T (1996) Rethinking anaphase: where “Pac-man” fails and why a role for the spindle matrix is likely. Protoplasma 192(1-2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273239
Rieder CL, Alexander SP (1990) Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol 110(1):81–95. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.110.1.81
Rieder CL, Salmon ED (1994) Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 124(3):223–233. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.124.3.223
Schrader F (1921) The chromosomes of Pseudococcus nipae. Biol Bull 40(5):259–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1536736
Schrader F (1923) A study of the chromosomes in three species of Pseudococcus. Arch Zellforsch 17:45–62
Sheykhani R, Baker N, Gomez-Godinez V, Liaw LH, Shah J, Berns MW, Forer A (2013a) The role of actin and myosin in PtK2 spindle length changes induced by laser microbeam irradiations across the spindle. Cytoskeleton 70(5):241–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21104
Sheykhani R, Shirodkar PV, Forer A (2013b) The role of myosin phosphorylation in anaphase chromosome movement. Eur J Cell Biol 92(4-5):175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2013.02.002
Sheykhani R, Berns MW, Forer A (2017) Elastic tethers between separating anaphase chromosomes coordinate chromosome movements to the two poles. Cytoskeleton. 74(2):91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21347
Spurck T, Forer A, Pickett-Heaps J (1997) Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of epithelial and spermatocyte spindles suggest that forces act on the kinetochore fibre and are not generated by its disassembly. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 36(2):136–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)36:2<136::AID-CM4>3.0.CO;2-7
Stevens NM (1905) Studies in spermatogenesis with especial reference to the “accessory chromosome”. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C.
Stevens NM (1906) Studies in spermatogenesis. II. A comparative study of the heterochromosomes in certain species of Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Lepidoptera, with especial reference to sex determination. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C.
Vasquez R, Howell B, Yvon AC, Wadsworth P, Cassimeris L (1997) Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability in vivo and in vitro. Mol Biol Cell 8(6):973–985. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.8.6.973
Wang H, Brust-Mascher I, Cheerambathur D, Scholey JM (2010) Coupling between microtubule sliding, plus-end growth and spindle length revealed by kinesin-8 depletion. Cytoskeleton 67(11):715–728. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20482
Wilson PJ, Forer A, Wise D (2003) Microtubule distribution during meiosis I in flea-beetle [Alagoasa (Oedionychus)] spermatocytes: evidence for direct connections between unpaired sex chromosomes. J Cell Sci 116(7):1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00296
Wong R, Forer A (2003) Signalling between chromosomes in crane fly spermatocytes studied using ultraviolet microbeam irradiation. Chromosom Res 11(8):771–786. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000005753.97458.20
Yamashita YM (2009) The centrosome and asymmetric cell division. Prion 3(2):84–88. https://doi.org/10.4161/pri.3.2.8821
Yang H, Ganguly A, Cabral F (2010) Inhibition of cell migration and cell division correlates with distinct effects of microtubule inhibiting drugs. J Biol Chem 285(42):32242–32250. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.160820
Yao C, Rath U, Maiato H, Sharp D, Girton J, Johansen KM, Johansen J (2012) A nuclear-derived proteinaceous matrix embeds the microtubule spindle apparatus during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 23(18):3532–3541. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0429
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Council to A.F.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Pavel Dráber
Electronic supplementary material
Supplemental Video 1
(MOV 3382 kb)
Supplemental Video 2
(MOV 1725 kb)
Supplemental Video 3
(MOV 3294 kb)
Supplemental Video 4
(MOV 2242 kb)
Supplemental Video 5
(MOV 3887 kb) {{ I haven't been able to correct references or add to the reference list in the proper position. The reference to Fegaras and Forer is submitted to Protoplasma, and not to European Journal of Cell Biology. We expect a decision any day now.}}
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fegaras, E., Forer, A. Chromosomes selectively detach at one pole and quickly move towards the opposite pole when kinetochore microtubules are depolymerized in Mesostoma ehrenbergii spermatocytes. Protoplasma 255, 1205–1224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1214-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1214-4