Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of Flexural Dynamics of a Slender Ship undergoing Heave and Pitch

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simulation model for the flexural dynamics of a slender ship undergoing heave and pitch in regular waves is presented. The heave and pitch motions are found from the strip theory of Gerritsma and Beukelman [1] which is known to be experimentally validated. It is assumed that the ship structure is sufficiently stiff so that bending deformations do not significantly alter the wave field and hence the hydrodynamic loads determined from the strip theory may be used as inputs to the flexural model. The flexural dynamics is modeled by applying the hydrodynamic loads to a lumped-mass beam model and the equations of motion are formulated using the methods of Kane and Levinson [2]. The flexural model can capture large deformation behavior and is tested by demonstrating convergence to a known analytic solution. The model is easily implemented and may be used to evaluate time histories of bending moment responses to waves as well as to slamming events if the slamming load is known or estimated. Some typical results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerritsma, J., Beukelman, W.: Analysis of the modified strip theory for the calculation of ship motions and wave bending moments. Int. Shipbuil. Prog. 14(156), 319–337 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kane, T.R., Levinson, D.: Dynamics. Theory and Applications, Mc-Graw-Hill Book Company (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hirdaris, S.E., Temarel, P.: Hydroelasticity of ships: recent advances and future trends,Proc. IMechE Vol. 223 Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment, (2009)

  4. Chen, X.J., Wu, Y.S., Cui, W.C., Jensen, J.J.: Review of hydroelasticity theories for global response of marine structures. Ocean Engineering 33, 439–457 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajendran, S., Guedes-Soares, C.: Numerical investigation of the vertical response of a containership in large amplitude waves. Ocean Eng. 123, 440–451 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kara, F.: Time domain prediction of hydroelasticity of floating bodies. Appl. Ocean Res. 51, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blok, J., Beukelman, W.:The High-Speed Displacement Ship Systematic Series Hull Forms-Seakeeping Characteristics, Report No. 675-P, Ship Hydromechanics Laboratory,Delft,SNAME Annual Meeting,New York, (1984)

  8. Veen, D.J., Gourlay, T.P.: A combined strip theory and smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach for estimating slamming loads on a ship in head seas. Ocean Eng. 43, 64–71 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MATLAB, R.: MathWorks Inc.,Natick,MA,USA (2017b)

  10. Banerjee, A.K.: Dynamics and control of the wisp shuttle-antennae system, the journal of the astronautical sciences, vol. 41, no. 1. Jan.Mar. 1993, 73–90 (1993)

  11. Banerjee, A.K., Nagarajan, S.: Efficient simulation of large overall motion of beams undergoing large deflection. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1(1), 113–126 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bisshopp, K.E., Drucker, D.C.: Large deflection of cantilever beams. Quart. Appl. Mat. 3, 272–275 (1945)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the National Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne Raman-Nair.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A : steady state heave and pitch computation from Gerritsma and Beukelman strip theory [1]

The hydrodynamic forces on a strip at position s are given by Eq. (1). Summation of forces and moments over the length of the ship gives the equations of motions for heave and pitch in the form

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \left( M_{0}+M_{A}\right) \overset{\cdot \cdot }{z}+B_{z}\overset{\cdot }{z} +C_{z}z+D_{z}\overset{\cdot \cdot }{\theta }+E_{z}\overset{\cdot }{\theta } +H_{z}\theta =\overline{F}e^{-i\omega _{e}t}, \\ \left( I_{G}+I_{A}\right) \overset{\cdot \cdot }{\theta }+B_{\theta }\overset{\cdot }{\theta }+C_{\theta }\theta +D_{\theta }\overset{\cdot \cdot }{z} +E_{\theta }\overset{\cdot }{z}+H_{\theta }z=\overline{M}e^{-i\omega _{e}t}, \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

where

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} M_{0}=\text {mass of ship}, \\ M_{A}=\int _{L}m_{a}\left( s\right) ds\ =\text {heave added mass}, \\ B_{z}=\int _{L}\left[ c\left( s\right) -V\frac{dm_{a}}{ds}\right] ds, \\ C_{z}=\rho g\int _{L}b\left( s\right) ds, \\ D_{z}=-\int _{L}sm_{a}\left( s\right) ds, \\ E_{z}=\int _{L}\left[ -sc\left( s\right) +2Vm_{a}\left( s\right) +Vs\frac{ dm_{a}}{ds}\right] ds, \\ H_{z}=-\rho g\int _{L}sb\left( s\right) \ ds+VB_{z}, \\ \overline{F}=\eta _{a}e^{-k_{e}T^{*}}\int _{L},\left[ \rho gb\left( s\right) -\omega ^{2}m_{a}\left( s\right) +i\omega \left( V\frac{dm_{a}}{ds} -c\left( s\right) \right) \right] e^{ik_{e}s}\ ds, \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} I_{G}=\text {pitch moment of inertia of ship about axis through }G, \\ I_{A}=\int _{L}s^{2}m_{a}\left( s\right) ds\ =\text {pitch added moment of inertia}, \\ B_{\theta }=\int _{L}\left[ s^{2}c\left( s\right) -2Vsm_{a}\left( s\right) -Vs^{2}\frac{dm_{a}}{ds}\right] ds, \\ C_{\theta }=\int _{L}\left[ \rho gs^{2}b\left( s\right) -Vsc\left( s\right) +V^{2}s\frac{dm_{a}}{ds}\right] ds, \\ D_{\theta }=-\int _{L}sm_{a}\left( s\right) ds, \\ E_{\theta }=\int _{L}\left[ -sc\left( s\right) +Vs\frac{dm_{a}}{ds}\right] ds, \\ H_{\theta }=-\rho g\int _{L}sb\left( s\right) \ ds, \\ \overline{M}=\eta _{a}e^{-k_{e}T^{*}}\int _{L}\left[ -\rho gsb\left( s\right) +\omega ^{2}sm_{a}\left( s\right) -i\omega s\left( V\frac{dm_{a}}{ds }-c\left( s\right) \right) \right] e^{ik_{e}s}\ ds. \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

Substituting \(z=\overline{z}e^{-i\omega _{e}t}\ ,\ \theta =\overline{\theta } e^{-i\omega _{e}t}\) into equation (A.1) gives

$$\begin{aligned} R\left( \begin{array}{l} \overline{z} \\ \overline{\theta } \end{array} \right) =\left( \begin{array}{l} \overline{F} \\ \overline{M} \end{array} \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

where the entries of matrix R are

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} R_{11}=-\omega _{e}^{2}\left( M_{0}+M_{A}\right) -i\omega _{e}B_{z}+C_{z}, \\ R_{12}=-\omega _{e}^{2}D_{z}-i\omega _{e}E_{z}+H_{z}, \\ R_{21}=-\omega _{e}^{2}D_{\theta }-i\omega _{e}E_{\theta }+H_{\theta }, \\ R_{22}=-\omega _{e}^{2}\left( I_{G}+I_{A}\right) -i\omega _{e}B_{\theta }+C_{\theta }. \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

Equation (A.2) is solved for \(\overline{z}\), \(\overline{\theta }\). The steady state solutions for heave and pitch are found as the real parts of \( \overline{z}e^{-i\omega _{e}t},\ \overline{\theta }e^{-i\omega _{e}t}\) and are given by

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} z\left( t\right) =\alpha _{z}\cos \left( \omega _{e}t\right) +\beta _{z}\left( t\right) \sin \left( \omega _{e}t\right) , \\ \theta \left( t\right) =\alpha _{\theta }\cos \left( \omega _{e}t\right) +\beta _{\theta }\left( t\right) \sin \left( \omega _{e}t\right) , \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

where \(\alpha _{z}=\hbox {Re}\left( \overline{z}\right) ,\ \beta _{z}=\hbox {Im }\left( \overline{z}\right) ,\ \alpha _{\theta }=\hbox {Re}\left( \overline{ \theta }\right) ,\ \beta _{\theta }=\hbox {Im}\left( \overline{\theta } \right) \).

Appendix B : determination of rotational spring constants

A non-uniform beam of length \(L_{0}\) is cantilevered at end \(C_{0}\) and subjected to a vertical load F at its free end. The beam is divided into n segments \(S_{1},\ldots ,S_{n}\) by points \(C_{0},C_{1},\ldots ,C_{n}\) and the length of segment \(S_{k}\) is \(\ell _{k}\). The segments are connected by rotational springs \(\sigma _{1},\ldots ,\sigma _{n}\) as in Fig. 2. The spring \( \sigma _{1}\) is located at \(C_{0}\) and resists the rotation \(\phi _{1}\) of segment \(S_{1}\) relative to the horizontal. spring \(\sigma _{k}\) is located at \(C_{k-1}\) and resists the rotation \(\phi _{k}\ \)of segment \(S_{k}\) relative to segment \(S_{k-1},\ k=2,\ldots ,n\). The vertical deflection at \( C_{k}\) is \(d_{k}\ \left( k-1,\ldots ,n\right) \) and may be computed by a standard finite element analysis. It is easy to show that

$$\begin{aligned} d_{k}=\sum _{r=1}^{k}\ell _{r}\mu _{r}, \end{aligned}$$
(B.1)

where

$$\begin{aligned} \mu _{r}=\sum _{i=1}^{r}\phi _{i}. \end{aligned}$$
(B.2)

Equation (B.1) may be written in the form of a lower triangular matrix and solved for \(\mu _{1},\ldots ,\mu _{n}\). The segment rotations are then found from (B.2) as \(\phi _{1}=\mu _{1},\ \phi _{k}=\mu _{k}-\mu _{k-1}\) for \(k=2,\ldots ,n\). The spring constants are found from the relations \( \sigma _{k}\phi _{k}=\) bending moment at \(C_{k-1}\) \(\left( k=1,\ldots ,n\right) \) . This gives

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{1}=\frac{FL_{0}}{\phi _{1}}\ \ ;\ \ \sigma _{k}=\frac{F}{\phi _{k}} \left( L_{0}-\sum _{r=1}^{k-1}\ell _{r}\right) \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raman-Nair, W., Chin, S.N. Simulation of Flexural Dynamics of a Slender Ship undergoing Heave and Pitch. Acta Mech 232, 2443–2453 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-02950-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-02950-5

Navigation