Abstract
The earth’s surface is characterized by small-scale heterogeneity attributable to variability in land cover, soil characteristics and orography. In atmospheric models, this small-scale variability can be partially accounted for by the so-called mosaic approach, i.e., by computing the land-surface processes on a grid with an explicit higher horizontal resolution than the atmosphere. The mosaic approach does, however, not account for the subgrid-scale variability in the screen-level atmospheric parameters, part of which might be related to land-surface heterogeneity itself. In this study, simulations with the numerical weather prediction model COSMO are shown, employing the mosaic approach together with a spatial disaggregation of the atmospheric forcing by the screen-level variables to the subgrid-scale. The atmospheric model is run with a 2.8 km horizontal grid resolution while the land surface processes are computed on a 400-m horizontal grid. The disaggregation of the driving atmospheric variables at screen-level is achieved by a three-step statistical downscaling with rules learnt from high-resolution fully coupled COSMO simulations, where both, atmosphere and surface, were simulated on a 400-m grid. The steps encompass spline interpolation of the grid scale variables, conditional regression based on the high-resolution runs, and an optional stochastic noise generator which restores the variability of the downscaled variables. Simulations for a number of case studies have been carried out, with or without mosaic surface representation and with or without atmospheric disaggregation, and evaluated with respect to the surface state variables and the turbulent surface exchange fluxes of sensible and latent heat. The results are compared with the high-resolution fully coupled COSMO simulations. The results clearly demonstrate the high importance of accounting for subgrid-scale surface heterogeneity. It is shown that the atmospheric disaggregation leads to clear additional improvements in the structures of the two-dimensional surface state variable fields, but to only marginally impacts on the simulation of the turbulent surface exchange fluxes. A detailed analysis of these results identifies strongly correlated errors in atmospheric and surface variables in the mosaic approach as the main reason for the latter. The effects of these errors largely cancel out in the flux parameterization, and thus explain the comparably good results for the fluxes in the mosaic approach without atmospheric disaggregation despite inferior performance for the surface state variables themselves. Inserting noise in the disaggregation scheme leads to a deterioration of the results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Lindenberg Inhomogeneous Terrain—fluxes between atmosphere and surface—a long-term study.
References
Abramowitz G, Leung R, Clark M, Pitman A (2008) Evaluating the performance of land surface models. J Climate 21: 5468–5480
Ament F, Simmer C (2006) Improved representation of land-surface heterogeneity in a non-hydrostatic numerical weather prediction model. Bound Layer Meteorol 121(1):153–174
Arola A (1999) Parameterization of turbulent and mesoscale fluxes for heterogeneous surfaces. J Atmos Sci 56:584–598
Avissar R (1991) A statistical-dynamical approach to parameterize subgrid-scale land-surface heterogeneity in climate models. Surv Geophys 12:155–178
Avissar R (1992) Conceptual aspects of a statistical-dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid-scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models. J Geophys Res 97:2729–2741
Avissar R (1998) Which type of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer scheme is needed for general circulation models: a proposal for a higher-order scheme. J Hydrology 212–213:136–154
Avissar R, Pielke RA (1989) A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon Wea Rev 117:2113–2136
Avissar R, Schmidt T (1998) An evaluation of the scale at which ground-surface heat flux patchiness affects the convective boundary layer using large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 55:2666–2689
Baldauf M, Förstner J, Klink S, Reinhardt T, Schraff C, Seifert A, Stephan K (2011) Kurze Beschreibung des Lokal-Modells Kürzestfrist COSMO-DE (LMK) und seiner Datenbanken auf dem Datenserver des DWD, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Geschäftsbereich Forschung und Entwicklung, Offenbach, Germany, http://www.dwd.de
Belušić D, Güttler I (2010) Can mesoscale models reproduce meandering motions?. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136:553–565
Beyrich F, Mengelkamp HT (2006) Evaporation over a heterogeneous land surface: EVA_GRIPS and the LITFASS-experiment: an overview. Bound Layer Meteorol 121:5–32
Beyrich F, Leps J, Mauder M, Bange J, Foken T, Huneke S, Lohse H, Lüdi A, Meijninger W, Mironov D, Wesensee U, Zittel P (2006) Area-averaged surface fluxes over the LITFASS region based on eddy-coveriance measurements. Bound Layer Meteorol 121:33–65
Bonan GB, Pollard D, Thompson SL (1993) Influence of subgrid-scale heterogeneity in leaf area index, stomatal resistance, and soil moisture on grid-scale land-atmosphere interactions. J Climate 6:1882–1896
Chow FK, Weigel AP, Street R, Rotach MW, Xue M (2006) High-resolution large-eddy simulations of flow in a steep Alpine valley. part I: Methodology, verification, and sensitivity experiments. J Appl Meteor Climatol 45:63–86
Dimri A (2009) Impact of subgrid scale scheme on topography and landuse for better regional scale simulation of meteorological variables over the western Himalayas. Clim Dyn 32:565–574
Doms G, Förstner J, Heise E, Herzog HJ, Mironov D, Raschendorfer M, Reinhardt T, Ritter B, Schrodin R, Schulz JP, Vogel G (2011) A description of the nonhydrostatic regional model LM, Part II: Physical parameterization. Deutscher Wetterdienst, http://www.cosmo-model.org
EEA (2000) Corine land cover (CLC90). European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, http://dataservice.eea.eu.int/dataservice/
Essery R, Best M, Betts R, Cox P (2003) Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme. J Hydrometeorol 4:530–543
Foken T (2008) The energy balance closure problem: an overview. Ecol Appl 18:1351–1367 doi:10.1890/06-0922.1
Gao Y, Chen F, Barlage M, Liu W, Cheng G, Li X, Yu Y, Ran Y, Li H, Peng H, Ma M (2008) Enhancement of land surface information and its impact on atmospheric modeling in the Heihe River Basin, northwest China. J Geophys Res 113: D20S90
Giorgi F, Francisco R, Pal J (2003) Effects of a subgrid-scale topography and land use scheme on the simulation of surface climate and hydrology. Part I: Effects of temperature and water vapor disaggregation. J Hydrology 4(2):317–333
Górska M, de Arellano JVG, LeMone MA, van Heerwaarden C (2008) Mean and flux horizontal variability of virtual potential temperature, moisture, and carbon dioxide: aircraft observations and LES study. Mon Wea Rev 136:4435–4451. doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2230.1
Heinemann G, Kerschgens M (2005) Comparison of methods for area-averaging surface energy fluxes over heterogeneous land surfaces using high-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations. Int J Clim 25:379–403
Heinemann G, Kerschgens M (2006) Simulation of surface energy fluxes using high-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations and comparisons with measurements for the LITFASS-2003 experiment. Bound Layer Meteorol 121:195–220
Henderson-Sellers A, Pitman AJ (1992) Land-surface schemes for future climate models: specification, aggregation, and heterogeneity. J Geophys Res 97:2687–2696
Hendricks Franssen H, Stöckli R, Lehner I, Rotenberg E, Seneviratne S (2010) Energy balance closure of eddy-covariance data: a multisite analysis for European FLUXNET stations. Agr Forest Meteorol 150:1553–1567. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.005
Klemp JB, Wilhelmson RB (1978) The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J Atmos Sci 35:1070–1096
Kollet S, Maxwell R (2008) Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model. Water Resour Res 44:W02,402. doi:10.1029/2007WR006004
Koster RD, Suarez MJ (1992) Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. J Geophys Res 97:2697–2715
Lengfeld K, Ament F (2011) Observing local scale variability of near surface temperature and humidity using a wireless sensor network. J Appl Meteor Climatol. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-11-025.1
Maxwell RM, Chow FK, Kollet SJ (2007) The groundwater-land-surface-atmosphere connection: soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations. Adv Water Resour 30:2447–2466
Mengelkamp HT, Beyrich F, Heinemann G, Ament F, Bange J, Berger F, B senberg J, Foken T, Hennemuth B, Heret C, Huneke S, Johnsen KP, Kohsiek W, Leps JP, Liebethal C, Lohse H, Mauder M, Meijninger W, Raasch S, Simmer C, Spiess T, Tittebrand A, Uhlenbrock J, Zittel P (2006) Evaporation over a heterogeneous land surface: the EVA_GRIPS project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:775–786. doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-6-775
Molod A, Salmun H, Waugh DW (2003) A new look at modeling surface heterogeneity: extending its influence in the vertical. J Hydrology 4:810–825
Myoung B, Choi YS, Park SK (2011) A review on vegetation models and applicability to climate simulations at regional scale. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 47(5):463–475. doi:10.1007/s13143-011-0031-x
Rihani J, Maxwell R, Chow F (2010) Coupling groundwater and land surface processes: Idealized simulations to identify effects of terrain and subsurface heterogeneity on land surface energy fluxes. Water Resour Res 46:W1252. doi:10.1029/2010WR009111
Ritter B, Geleyn JF (1992) A comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations. Mon Wea Rev 120:303–325
Schlünzen KH, Katzfey JJ (2003) Relevance of sub-grid-scale land-use effects for mesoscale models. Tellus 55(3): 232–246
Schmidli J, Poulus G, Daniels M, Chow F (2009) External influences on nocturnal thermally driven flows in a deep valley. J Appl Meteor Climatol 48:3–23
Schomburg A, Venema V, Lindau R, Ament F, Simmer C (2010) A downscaling scheme for atmospheric variables to drive soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer models. Tellus 62B:242–258
Schomburg A, Venema V, Ament F, Simmer C (2012) Application of an adaptive radiative transfer parameterisation in a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:91–102. doi:10.1002/qj.890
Seifert A, Beheng KD (2001) A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection. Atmos Res 59-60:265–281
Seth A, Giorgi F, Dickinson R (1994) Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS). J Geophys Res 99(D9): 18,651–18,667
Seuffert G, Gross P, an EF Wood CS (2002) The influence of hydrologic modeling on the predicted local weather: two-way coupling of a mesoscale weather prediction model and a land surface hydrologic model. J Hydrometeo 3(5):505–523
Steppeler J, Doms G, Schättler U, Bitzer H, Gassmann A, Damrath U (2003) Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM. Meteor Atmos Phys 82: 75–96. doi:10.1007/s00703-001-0592-9
Stull RB (1988) An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterisation in large-scale models. Mon Wea Rev 117:1779–1799
Vereecken H, Kollet S, Simmer C (2010) Patterns in soil-vegetation-atmosphere systems: Monitoring, modeling, and data assimilation. Vadose Zone J 9 (4):821–827. doi:10.2136/vzj2010.0122
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the SFB/TR 32 “Pattern in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Systems: Monitoring, Modelling, and Data Assimilation” funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), in which framework this work has been carried out. Moreover, the authors thank the German Meteorological Service (DWD) for the access to the COSMO-analyses data archive and the COSMO model code.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: S. Hong.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schomburg, A., Venema, V., Ament, F. et al. Disaggregation of screen-level variables in a numerical weather prediction model with an explicit simulation of subgrid-scale land-surface heterogeneity. Meteorol Atmos Phys 116, 81–94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-012-0183-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-012-0183-y