Skip to main content
Log in

Floral functional structure, sexual phases, flower visitors and aspects of breeding system in Roella ciliata (Campanulaceae) in a fragmented habitat

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continued habitat destruction in lowland areas of the Western Cape, South Africa, due to urbanization has reduced Roella ciliata to a few isolated populations and it is unknown whether this endemic shrublet will persist. Here, we examine the reproductive biology of a small population of R. ciliata occurring in a residential nature reserve 30 km east of Cape Town to provide baseline information for future studies. Data were recorded on the functional structure of the flower, duration of the morphological gender phases, floral visitor profile and the relationship between breeding system and habitat. Observations revealed that this species possesses reproductive characteristics typical of Campanulaceae such as dichogamy, protandry and secondary pollen presentation via pollen collecting hairs. Floral longevity ranges between 1 and 3 days. Anthesis occurs in synchronicity at 0700 hours and individual flowers close between 0930 and 1500 hours daily. The staminate phase lasts between 2 and 29 h and is significantly influenced by the removal of pollen by floral visitors, while the pistillate phase lasts between 21 and 69 h. R. ciliata maintains a generalized, entomophilous pollination system although floral visitors are generally scarce. Despite some intraspecific variation, the pollen/ovule ratio indicates that R. ciliata has a facultatively autogamous breeding system, in contrast to its floral attributes which might favour xenogamy. This reproductive mechanism may ensure survival under these habitat conditions and could represent a shift from outcrossing to selfing at the cost of reducing genetic variation over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams R (2010) An evaluation of the distribution and status of Roella ciliata (Blue-eyed Roella) within the central district of the City of Cape Town. Report to the Cape Peninsula University of Technology

  • Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators and feral honey bees in Argentine “Chaco Serrano”. Ecol Appl 4:378–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Lopez P, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF (2000) Reproductive biology of Wahlenbergia (Campanulaceae) endemic to Robinson Crusoe Island. Plant Syst Evol 223:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Stuessy TF, Grawford DJ (2001) Breeding system and pollination of selected plants endemic to Juan Fernández Islands. Am J Bot 88:220–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold RM (1982) Pollination, predation, and seed set in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Am Midl Nat 107:360–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böcher J, Phillips M (1985) Aspects of the reproductive ecology of Mimulus repens (Scrophulariaceae) at Lake Ellesmere, Canterbury, New Zealand. N Z J Bot 23:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond W (1994) Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philos Trans Biol Sci 344:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden RW (1977) Pollen ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden RW (2000) Pollen grains: why so many? Plant Syst Evol 222:143–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SA (2000) Depressed pollination in habitat fragments causes low fruit set. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:1149–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cupido CN (2009) Systematic studies of the South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto with an emphasis on generic delimitation. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town

  • Cupido CN (2010) A new species of Roella (Campanulaceae) from Western Cape, South Africa. Edinb J Bot 67:425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B, Stephenson AG (1984) Factors that influence the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases of Lobelia cardinalis flowers. Bot Gaz 145:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson J, Nänni I, Zachariades C, Kemper J (2002) Effects of habitat fragmentation on pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in Renosterveld shrublands of South Africa. Conserv Biol 16:1267–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanhoe L, Galloway LF (2002) Floral longevity in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae): a comparison of morphological and functional gender phases. Am J Bot 89:587–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin DE (2005) Variation in floral longevity between populations of Campanula rotundifolia (Campanulaceae) in response to fitness accrual rate manipulation. Am J Bot 92:1714–1722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt P, Manning JC (2000) Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical Institute, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennerston O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lammers TG (2007) World checklist and bibliography of Campanulaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Yates JM (1982) Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigma in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36:903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord EL (1980) Intra-inflorescence variability in pollen/ovule ratios in the cleistogamous species Lamium amplexicaule (Labiatae). Am J Bot 67:529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab (2010) Statistical software, version 16. State College, PA. http://www.minitab.com

  • Nyman Y (1992) Reproduction in Campanula afra (Campanulaceae): mating system and the role of the pollen collecting hairs. Plant Syst Evol 183:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman Y (1993) The pollen-collecting hairs of Campanula (Campanulaceae). II. Function and adaptive significance in relation to pollination. Am J Bot 80:1437–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston RE (1986) Pollen-ovule ratios in the Cruciferae. Am J Bot 73:1732–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M, Yeo P (1972) The pollination of flowers. Taplinger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG, Boucher C, Helme N, Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) Fynbos biome. In: Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, vol 19. Strelitzia. South African National Biodivesity Institute, Pretoria, pp 53–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson TE, Stephenson AG (1989) Pollen removal and pollen deposition affect the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases in Campanula rapunculoides. Am J Bot 76:532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleunen M, Nänni I, Donaldson JS, Manning JC (2007) The role of beetle marks and flower colour on visitation by monkey beetles (Hopliini) in the Greater Cape Floral Region, South Africa. Ann Bot 100:1483–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welman WG, Cupido CN (2003) Campanulaceae. In: Germishuizen G, Meyer NL (eds) Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist, vol 14. Strelitzia. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, pp 336–346

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the following individuals for contributing to the study. Tshepo Mamabolo, Manager of Bracken Nature Reserve, for the research permit and assistance locating the plant population, Prof. Jeremy Klaasen and Danielle Cupido, Medical Bioscience Department at the University of the Western Cape, for assistance in the pollen counting, Dr Jonathan Collville, Applied Biodiversity Research Division at the South African National Biodiversity Institute, who kindly identified the insects, and Ursula Cupido for general field assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher N. Cupido.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cupido, C.N., Nelson, L.J. Floral functional structure, sexual phases, flower visitors and aspects of breeding system in Roella ciliata (Campanulaceae) in a fragmented habitat. Plant Syst Evol 298, 931–936 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0602-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0602-z

Keywords

Navigation