Skip to main content
Log in

Reproduction inCampanula afra (Campanulaceae): Mating system and the role of the pollen collecting hairs

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation is to compare two geographically well separated populations ofC. afra with different mating systems with emphasis on (1) factors controlling the length of the male phase with special attention paid on the pollen collecting hairs, (2) crossing ability among populations with different mating systems; shouldC. afra be regarded as one or several species?, and (3) correlations between pollen germinability and mating system; how does pollen germinability vary with anthesis and stigma development? From the results it can be concluded that the length of the male phase and the development of the stigma depend on the stimulation of the pollen collecting hairs rather than on the amount of pollen removed. Furthermore, the length of the male phase was found to be correlated with the mating system, i.e., in the population with a mixed mating system, the differences between treated and untreated flowers were less pronounced than in the population being obligately outcrossing. I also found correlations between mating system and pollen germinability, where the population with a mixed mating system had a high germinability at stigma receptivity, whereas for the xenogamous population, the germinability approached zero at stigma development. No crossing incompatibility was found between the two populations ofCampanula afra in any of the combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brogniart, A., 1839: Note sur poils collecteurs des Campanules et sur le mode de fécondation de ces plantes. — Ann. Sci. Nat., ser. 2,12: 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassini, H., 1818: Sur une anomalie remarquable du mode de fécondation dans la Campanule a feuilles rondes. — Bull. Sci. Soc. Philomat: 106–107. — Paris.

  • Dahl, Å., 1989: Taxonomic and morphological studies inHypecoum sect.Hypecoum (Papaveraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.163: 227–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, B., Stephenson, A. G., 1984: Factors that influence the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases ofLobelia cardinalis flowers. — Bot. Gaz.145: 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., 1842: Neue Theorie der Befruchtung der Pflanzen. — Braunschweig.

  • Hassall, A. H., 1842: Observations on the functions performed by the hairs on the stigma inCampanulaceae, Compositae, and other plants. — Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.8: 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. G., Yates, J. M. A., 1982: Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen by stigmas in hermaphroditic plants, exemplified byWahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). — Evolution36: 903–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Webb, C. J., 1986: The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. — New Zealand J. Bot.24: 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyen, F. J. F., 1839: Neues System der Pflanzenphysiologie. 3, p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molau, U., 1988:Scrophulariaceae. Part I.Calceolarieae. — Flora Neotropica, Monograph47: 1–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, Y., 1991: Crossing experiments within theCampanula dichotoma group (Campanulaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.177: 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Factors influencing pollen germination in sixCampanula species (Campanulaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.181: 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oschwald, M., 1919: Observations sur la biologie florale des campanules. — Bull. Soc. Bot. Geneve11: 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. E., Stephenson, A. G., 1989: Pollen removal and pollen deposition affect the duration of the staminate and pistillate phases inCampanula rapunculoides. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 532–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetler, S. G., 1979: Pollen-collecting hairs ofCampanula (Campanulaceae). I. Historical review. — Taxon28: 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprengel, C. K., 1793: Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Blumen. — Berlin.

  • Strandhede, S.-O., 1966: Morphologic variation and taxonomy in EuropeanEleocharis, subser.Palustres. — Opera Bot.10: 1–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. J., Lloyd, D. G., 1986: The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. — New Zealand J. Bot.24: 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W., 1842: On the hair-collectors ofCampanula, and the mode of its fecundation. — London J. Bot.1: 601–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1847: Note on DrHartig's new theory of the fertilization of plants. — The Phytologist2: 965–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1848: Further remarks on the pollen-collectors ofCampanula, and on the mode of fecundation. — London J. Bot.7: 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R., 1984: The evolution of self-pollination in granite outcrop species ofArenaria (Caryophyllaceae). I. Morphological correlates. — Evolution38: 804–816.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nyman, Y. Reproduction inCampanula afra (Campanulaceae): Mating system and the role of the pollen collecting hairs. Pl Syst Evol 183, 33–41 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937733

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937733

Key words

Navigation