Skip to main content
Log in

Morphology, development and homologies of the perianth and floral nectaries in Croton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae-Malpighiales)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New observations are presented on the ontogeny, vasculature and morphology of both staminate and pistillate flowers of Croton and Astraea. These data support earlier hypotheses that the filamentous structures in pistillate flowers represent reduced and transformed petals. Staminate flowers of both genera possess five free nectaries, which are vascularised by divergences of the sepal traces in Croton and unvascularised in Astraea. In pistillate flowers, there are five separate non-vascularised nectaries in Astraea, but in Croton there is a single nectariferous disk that is vascularised by divergences of the sepal traces. The nectaries are initiated late in floral development, but their location indicates that they could represent the outer stamen whorl transformed into secretory staminodes. Other glandular structures occur in pistillate flowers of most Croton species, resulting in flowers with two secretory organ whorls. In these cases, the inner whorl is formed by modified staminodes. Our observations support the recent segregation of Astraea species from the larger genus Croton. Despite strong similarities between the two genera, there are clear structural differences, including the presence of colleters in Astraea (absent in Croton), moniliform trichomes on petals (rather than simple trichomes in Croton), non-vascularised nectaries (vascularised in Croton) and reduced, non-secretory filamentous structures (well developed and secretory in Croton).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baillon H (1858) Étude générale du groupe des Euphorbiacées. V. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardello G (2007) A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 19–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard A (1999) Flower structure, development, and systematics in Passifloraceae and in Abatia (Flacourtiaceae). Int J Pl Sci 160:135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PE, Hipp AL, Wurdack KJ, van Ee BW, Riina R (2005) Molecular phylogenetics of the giant genus Croton and tribe Crotoneae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using ITS and trnL-trnF DNA sequence data. Amer J Bot 92:1520–1534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (1938) The bearing of nectaries on the phylogeny of flowering plants. Proc Amer Phil Soc 79:549–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruzo MBR, Cordeiro I (2007) Sinopse da tribo Crotoneae Dumort. (Euphorbiaceae s.s.) no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Hoehnea 34:571–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis CC, Latvis M, Nickrent DL, Wurdack KJ, Baum DA (2007) Floral gigantism in Rafflesiaceae. Science 315:1812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson WC (1990) A study of the floral morphology and anatomy of the Caryocaraceae. Bull Torrey Bot Club 117:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson WC, Weitzman AL (1998) Floral morphology and anatomy of Bonnetiaceae. J Torrey Bot Soc 125:268–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez CA, Bullock SH (1989) La reproducción de Croton suberosus (Euphorbiaceae) en luz y sombra. Rev Biol Tropical 37:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress PK (2008) The whole and the parts: relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils. Ann Mo Bot Gard 95:101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas L, Sazima M (2003) Floral biology and pollination mechanisms in two Viola species—from nectar to pollen flowers? Ann Bot 91:311–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas L, Bernardello G, Galetto L, Paoli AAS (2001) Nectaries and reproductive biology of Croton sarcopetalus (Euphorbiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 136:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts R, Frodin DG, Radcliffe-Smith A (2000) World checklist of Euphorbiaceae (and Pandaceae). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews ML, Endress PK (2008) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Chrysobalanaceae s.l. (Chrysobalanaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Euphroniaceae, and Trigoniaceae; Malpighiales). Bot J Linn Soc 157:249–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis P (1924) Blütenmorphologische Untersuchungen an den Euphorbiaceen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Phylogenie der Angiospermenblüte. Bot Abh 3:1–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller KI, Webster GL (1966) Chromosome numbers in the Euphorbiaceae. Brittonia 18:372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair NC, Abraham V (1962) Floral morphology of a few species of Euphorbiaceae. Proc Ind Acad Sci B 56:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien TP, Feder N, McCully ME (1964) Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma 59:368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT, Freitas da Silva MF (1973) Caryocaraceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 12. The New York Botanical Garden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenner G, Rudall PJ (2007) Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ–flower–inflorescence boundary. Amer J Bot 94:1612–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenner G, Hopper S, Rudall PJ (2008) Pseudanthium formation in Calycopeplus paucifolius with particular reference to the evolution of the cyathium in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae–Malpighiales). Aust Syst Bot 21:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenner G, Bateman RM, Rudall PJ (2010) Floral formulae updated for routine inclusion in formal taxonomic descriptions. Taxon 59:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri V (1951) The role of floral anatomy in the solution of morphological problems. Bot Rev 17:471–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Smith A (2001) Genera Euphorbiacearum. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  • Riina R, Berry PE, van Ee BW (2009) Molecular phylogenetics of the Dragon’s Blood Croton section Cyclostigma (Euphorbiaceae): a polyphyletic assemblage unraveled. Syst Bot 42:360–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson NKB (1961) Guttiferae. In: Exel AW, Will H (eds) Flora Zambesiaca 1. Crown Agents for Overseas Governments and Administrations, London, pp 371–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF (1991) Androecium and floral nectaries of Harungana madagascariensis (Clusiaceae). Plant Syst Evol 178:179–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets EF (1986) Localization and systematic importance of the floral nectaries in the Magnoliatae (Dicotyledons). Bull Jard Bot Natl Belg 56:51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuoka T (2007) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences and ovule and seed character evolution. J Pl Res 120:511–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuoka T, Tobe H (2006) Phylogenetic analyses of Malpighiales using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, with particular reference to the embryology of Euphorbiaceae sens. str. J Pl Res 119:599–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Ee BW, Berry PE, Riina R, Amaro JEG (2008) Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of the Caribbean-Centered Croton subgenus Moacroton (Euphorbiaceae s.s.). Bot Rev 74:132–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkata-Rao C, Ramalakshmi T (1968) Floral anatomy of the Euphorbiaceae–I. Some non-cyathium taxa. J Ind Bot 47:278–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (1998) Remarkable nectaries: structure, ecology, organophyletic perspectives: III. Nectar ducts. Flora 193:113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling F (1989) Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster GL (1993) A provisional synopsis of the sections of the genus Croton (Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 42:793–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster GL (1994) Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81:33–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurdack KJ, Davis CC (2009) Malpighiales phylogenetics: gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life. Amer J Bot 96:1551–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurdack KJ, Hoffmann P, Chase MW (2005) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid rbcL and trnL-trnF sequences. Amer J Bot 92:1397–1420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank J. Marzinek, C.J. Campos, J. Lombardi and L.C. Bernacci for their help with field work. O.C. De-Paula acknowledges financial support (2006/61641-0) from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and the Kew Latin American Research Fellowship scheme. We thank Peter Endress and an anonymous reviewer for their critical and helpful reviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orlando Cavalari De-Paula.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De-Paula, O.C., das Graças Sajo, M., Prenner, G. et al. Morphology, development and homologies of the perianth and floral nectaries in Croton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae-Malpighiales). Plant Syst Evol 292, 1–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0388-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0388-9

Keywords

Navigation