Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To translate the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into Simplified Chinese and then validate it for Mainland Chinese patients with low back pain (LBP).

Methods

A total of 120 consecutive patients with LBP >3 months who visited our outpatient clinic from December 2011 to March 2012 were asked to complete a questionnaire booklet including the following: (1) the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMQ) (Fan et al. in Spine 37(10):875–880, 2012), (2) the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Zhang et al. in Int J Med Sci 9(7):521–526, 2012), (3) the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (Liu et al. in Spine 34(11):1211–1216, 2009), (4) visual analogue scale (VAS) measure of pain, and (5) COMI. These patients were also asked to complete a second COMI questionnaire and a transition questionnaire (5-point Likert scale: better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse) and to return the second COMI questionnaire via mail within 1 month.

Results

The floor effects for the COMI items ranged from 5.8 to 12.5 %. High values (28.3, 27.5, and 25.8 %, respectively) were found for symptom-specific quality of life, social disability, and work disability. Regarding the ceiling effects, the social and work disabilities were relatively high at 17.5 and 24.2 %, respectively. For other items, the values ranged from 0 to 14.2 %. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were found for the COMI summary score. Excellent correlations were found between the COMI pain scores and VAS scores (Rho = 0.89) and between the COMI pain and the SF-36 bodily pain domain (Rho = 0.84). Other individual items and summary scores showed a very good correlation (Rho = 0.54–0.72) with the corresponding questionnaires except for “symptom-specific well-being” (0.31–0.45). One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC for the entire COMI score was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.85–0.94) and 0.81–0.86 for the two pain scores (back and leg). The “minimum detectable change’’ (MDC 95 %) for the COMI summary score was 1.91 points. No significant difference in the mean values was found for the repeated scores of individual items or the summary score.

Conclusion

The Simplified Chinese version of COMI showed satisfactory reliability and good psychometric properties. This concise questionnaire is suitable for widespread use in Mainland China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fan S, Hu Z, Hong H et al (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine 37(10):875–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Qu B, Lun SS et al (2012) The 36-item short form health survey: reliability and validity in Chinese medical students. Int J Med Sci 9(7):521–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z (2009) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 34(11):1211–1216 (discussion 1217)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81(9):646–656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrero LH, Hsu YH, Terwedow H et al (2006) Prevalence and physical determinants of low back pain in a rural Chinese population. Spine 31(23):2728–2734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersson GB, Mekhail NA, Block JE (2006) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 31(14):1637–1638 (author reply 1638)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapural L, Mekhail N (2006) A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 31(14):1636 (author reply 1636–1637)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F et al (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(11):610–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Resnik L, Dobrykowski E (2005) Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain. Orthop Nurs 24(1):14–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Resnik L, Dobrzykowski E (2003) Guide to outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain syndromes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33(6):307–316 (discussion 308–317)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS et al (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R et al (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O et al (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31(12):1372–1379 (discussion 1380)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737–S749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF et al (2005) SSE Spine Tango–content, workflow, set-up. http://www.eurospine.org-Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 14(10):920–924

  19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu J, Coons SJ, Draugalis JR et al (2003) Equivalence of Chinese and US-English versions of the SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res 12(4):449–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D et al (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M et al (1995) The Quebec back pain disability scale. Measurement properties. Spine 20(3):341–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M et al (2011) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21:S737–S749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu G, Qiu Y, Zhu Z et al (2011) Re-evaluation of reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of SRS-22 patient questionnaire: a multicenter study of 333 cases. Spine 36(8):E545–E550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Public Health Benefit Research Foundation, China (Grant No. 201002018).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Jun Qiao, Feng Zhu, Zezhang Zhu, Leilei Xu, Bin Wang, Yang Yu, Bang-Ping Qian & Yong Qiu

  2. Department of Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China

    Yitao Ding

Authors
  1. Jun Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zezhang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leilei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bang-Ping Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yitao Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Qiu.

Additional information

J. Qiao and F. Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 162 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiao, J., Zhu, F., Zhu, Z. et al. Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Eur Spine J 22, 2821–2826 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation