Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional cultivation methods for detection of carriers of Salmonella spp. in cattle and buffalo

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative Clinical Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and culturing strategies were used to detect carriers of Salmonella spp. in cattle and buffalo. In order to perform the assay, 100 faecal samples were obtained from both buffalo and cattle in Urmia, Iran, in July 2008. Samples were tested for Salmonella isolation by culturing techniques and biochemical testes. Faecal samples were enriched in enrichment broth and DNA was extracted and amplified by PCR using specific primers of Salmonella invasion gene (invA). PCR products were visualised using 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The bacterial culturing results were negative for all samples, whilst results from the PCR method and electrophoresis confirmed the presence of Salmonella in one cattle faecal sample (1%) and three buffalo faecal samples (3%). These results indicate that the PCR method is highly sensitive and rapid for Salmonella detection in faeces compared to other routine methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chiu CH, Ou JT (1996) Rapid identification of Salmonella serovars in faeces by specific detection of virulence genes, invA and spvC, by an enrichment broth culture–multiplex PCR combination assay. J Clin Microbiol 34:2619–2622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocolin L, Manzano M, Cantoni C et al (1998) Use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis to directly detect and identify Salmonella typhimurium in food. J Appl Microbiol 85:673–677. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.00575.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen ND, Neibergs HL, McGruder ED et al (1993) Genus-specific detection of Salmonellae using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). J Vet Diagn Invest 5:368–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen ND, Wallis DE, Neibergs HL et al (1995) Detection of Salmonella enteritidis equine faeces using the polymerase chain reaction and genus-specific oligonucleotide primers. J Vet Diagn Invest 7:219–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen HJ, Mechanda SM, Lin W (1996) PCR amplification of the fimA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium, a specific method for detection of Salmonella spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4303–4308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dombek PE, Johnson LK, Zimmerely ST et al (2000) Use of repetitive DNA sequences and the PCR to differentiate Escherichia coli isolates from human and animal sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2572–2577. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.6.2572-2577.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duguid JP, Campbell I (1967) Antigens of type 1 fimbriae of Salmonellae and other Enterobacteriaceae. J Med Microbiol 2:535–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguid JP, Anderson S, Campbell I (1966) Fimbriae and adhesive properties of Salmonellae. J Pathol Bacteriol 92:107–138. doi:10.1002/path.1700920113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fadl AA, Nguyen AV, Khan MI (1995) Analysis of Salmonella enteritidis isolates by arbitrarily primed PCR. J Clin Microbiol 33:987–989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feder I, Nietfeld JC, Gallant J et al (2001) Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection Salmonella in porcine faecal and water samples. J Clin Microbiol 39:2477–2484. doi:10.1128/JCM.39.7.2477-2484.2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freschi CR, Carvalho LFOS, Oliveira CJB (2005) Comparison of DNA-extraction methods and selective enrichment broths on the detection of Salmonella typhimurium in swine faeces by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Brasil J Microbiol 36:363–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatta M, Smits HL (2007) Detection of Salmonella typhi by nested polymerase chain reaction in blood, urine and stool samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76:139–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi S, Ignagaki Y, Okamura N et al (1992) Type pili enhance the invasion of Salmonella braenderup and Salmonella typhimurium to Hela cell. Microbiol Immunol 36:352–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysinski EP, Heimsch RC (1977) Use of enzyme-labeled antibodies to detect Salmonella in foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:947–954

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Balakrishna K, Singh GP et al (2005) Rapid detection of Salmonella typhi in foods by combination of immunomagnetic separation and polymerase chain reaction. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:625–628. doi:10.1007/s11274-004-3553-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel KA, Orlandi PA, Kornegay L (2000) Improved template preparation for PCR-based assay for detection of food-borne bacterial pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4539–4542. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.10.4539-4542.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malorney B, Hoorfar J, Hugas M et al (2003) Interlaboratory diagnostic accuracy of Salmonella specific PCR-based method. Int J Food Microbiol 89:241–249. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00154-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly JA (1984) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of all Salmonella using a combination of myeloma protein and hybridoma antibody. J Immunol Methods 73:147–156. doi:10.1016/0022-1759(84)90040-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muganedi KLM, Goyvaerts EMA, Venter SN et al (2007) Optimisation of the PCR-invA primers for the detection of Salmonella in drinking and surface waters following a pre-cultivation step. Water SA 33:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Myint MS, Jonson YJ, Tablante NL et al (2006) The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture. Food Microbiol 23:599–604. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2005.09.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahn K, Grandis SA, Clarke RC et al (1992) Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as specific method for detection of Salmonella. Mol Cell Probes 6:271–279. doi:10.1016/0890-8508(92)90002-F

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer RS, Cooke CL, Maddox CW et al (2006) Use of pooled samples for the detection of Salmonella in faeces by polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest 18:319–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wray C, Wray A (2000) Salmonella in domestic animals. CABI, London, pp 171–172

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt GM, Langley MN, Lee HA et al (1993) Further studies on the feasibility of one-day Salmonella detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1383–1390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahraei TS, Mahzounieh M, Saeedzadeh A (2005) Detection of invA gene in isolated Salmonella from broilers by PCR method. Int J Poult Sci 4:557–559. doi:10.3923/ijps.2005.557.559

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malahat Ahmadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadi, M., Dalirnaghadeh, B., Shirzad Aski, H. et al. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional cultivation methods for detection of carriers of Salmonella spp. in cattle and buffalo. Comp Clin Pathol 19, 251–255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-009-0867-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-009-0867-y

Keywords

Navigation