Structural changes of HSA with the progression of liver disease
There was a significant decrease in the amount of total HSA with the progression of liver disease (controls, 4.38 ± 0.27 g/dl; chronic hepatitis patients, 3.99 ± 0.37 g/dl; cirrhotic patients, 3.10 ± 0.55 g/dl) (Fig. 2a). In contrast, there was a significant increase in the ratio of oxidized HSA to total HSA (controls, 24.8 ± 3.5%; chronic hepatitis patients, 27.9 ± 3.9%; cirrhotic patients, 37.3 ± 7.9%) (Fig. 2b).
When the Child–Pugh classification was applied to cirrhotic patients, a similar tendency was also observed (Fig. 2c), with a significant difference in the amount of total HSA observed for CP-A cirrhosis patients (3.65 ± 0.46 g/dl), CP-B cirrhosis patients (3.00 ± 0.35 g/dl), and CP-C cirrhosis patients (2.70 ± 0.42 g/dl). A significant increase was also seen for the ratio of oxidized HSA to total HSA when it was analyzed with regard to the Child-Pugh classification (CP-A cirrhosis patients, 34.3 ± 5.1%; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 36.6 ± 8.5%; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 41.3 ± 8.0%) (Fig. 2d). We additionally determined the amounts of oxidized and reduced HSA. Although there was no difference in the amount of oxidized HSA (chronic hepatitis patients, 1.11 ± 0.18 g/dl; CP-A cirrhosis patients, 1.24 ± 0.19 g/dl; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 1.11 ± 0.33 g/dl; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 1.10 ± 0.22 g/dl) (Fig. 2e), there was a significant decrease in the amount of reduced HSA with the progression of liver disease (chronic hepatitis patients, 2.87 ± 0.32 g/dl; CP-A cirrhosis patients, 2.40 ± 0.43 g/dl; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 1.90 ± 0.29 g/dl; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 1.60 ± 0.36 g/dl) (Fig. 2f).
Although there was only a weak correlation between the amount of total HSA and the amount of oxidized HSA in patients with chronic liver disease (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.291) (Fig. S1A), there was a very strong correlation between the amount of total HSA and the amount of reduced HSA (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.930) (Fig. S1B). These findings indicate that the reduction in the total HSA amount could be accounted for by the decrease in the amount of reduced HSA.
ROC analysis showed that the levels of reduced HSA associated with disease progression exhibited the highest areas under the ROC curves (AUROC curves) for all parameters (concentration of total HSA, concentration of reduced HSA, concentration of oxidized HSA, and the ratio of the concentration of oxidized HSA to the concentration of total HSA) (Table 2). For the levels of reduced HSA, the optimum cutoff values used to distinguish chronic hepatitis patients from healthy controls was 3.11 g/dl (AUROC curve 0.903; P < 0.001, sensitivity 75%, specificity 100%), and 2.67 g/dl (AUROC curve 0.931; P < 0.001, sensitivity 93%, specificity 85%) for separating cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis. The optimum cutoff values for the levels of reduced HSA to distinguish CP-A cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis, CP-B cirrhosis from CP-A cirrhosis, and CP-B cirrhosis from CP-C cirrhosis were 2.65 g/dl (AUROC curve 0.813; P < 0.001, sensitivity 77%, specificity 90%), 2.11 g/dl (AUROC curve 0.837; P < 0.001, sensitivity 78%, specificity 70%), and 1.71 g/dl (AUROC curve 0.740; P < 0.001, sensitivity 63%, specificity 73%) respectively (Table S2). Since the AUROC curve of the asparate aminotranferase to platelet ratio index is known to be a hepatic fibrosis marker [28], this parameter could be used to largely discriminate cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis (AUROC curve 0.760; P < 0.001, sensitivity 79%, specificity 63%). However, it should be noted that the discriminating abilities of the levels of reduced HSA were higher than those of the asparate aminotranferase to platelet ratio index, especially for distinguishing the different Child–Pugh cirrhosis classes (AUROC curve ranging from 0.51 to 0.52).
Table 2 Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for each parameter with chronic liver disease progression
Functional changes of HSA with the progression of liver disease
The DPPH radical scavenging ability of HSA purified from the patients was significantly disturbed in the CP-A cirrhosis, CP-B cirrhosis, and CP-C cirrhosis patients as compared with the healthy controls and chronic hepatitis patients (controls, 25.7 ± 4.4%; chronic hepatitis patients, 22.1 ± 3.7%; CP-A cirrhosis patients, 15.9 ± 4.7%; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 13.8 ± 3.2%; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 10.4 ± 2.6%). The radical scavenging ability in the CP-C cirrhosis patients as compared with the CP-A cirrhosis and CP-B cirrhosis patients was also significantly disturbed (Fig. 3a).
The antioxidant potential of the cirrhotic patients were also shown to be significantly disturbed (controls, 2639.5 ± 255.9 μM; chronic hepatitis patients, 2494.6 ± 197.6 μM; CP-A cirrhosis patients, 1976.2 ± 251.6 μM; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 1833.1 ± 261.7 μM; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 1645.6 ± 210.3 μM) (Fig. 3b). The antioxidant potential in CP-C cirrhosis patients was also significantly lower than that in CP-A cirrhosis and CP-B cirrhosis patients (Fig. 3b). The levels of the oxidative stress metabolites (reactive oxygen metabolites) in the cirrhotic patients as compared with the healthy controls and chronic hepatitis patients were significantly elevated [controls, 159.6 ± 21.6 Carratelli units (U.CARR); chronic hepatitis patients, 161.5 ± 11.6 U.CARR; CP-A cirrhosis patients, 228.3 ± 136.0 U.CARR; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 279.7 ± 109.7 U.CARR; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 319.7 ± 104.7 U.CARR] (Fig. 3c).
There was also a significant increase in the unbound fraction of ketoprofen in the chronic liver disease patients compared with the healthy controls. This increase occurred in association with liver disease progression (controls, 9.1 ± 1.0%; chronic hepatitis patients, 10.8 ± 1.6%; CP-A cirrhosis patients, 12.6 ± 3.0%; CP-B cirrhosis patients, 13.4 ± 2.8%; CP-C cirrhosis patients, 15.8 ± 2.3%) (Fig. 3d).
Each of the functional properties exhibited a moderate to strongly significant correlation with the amounts of reduced HSA (Fig. S2): strong positive correlations were especially observed between the amount of reduced HSA and the DPPH radical scavenging activity (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.734) (Fig. S2A) or antioxidant potential (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.736) (Fig. S2B).
The effects of BCAA supplementation on HSA
BCAA supplementation significantly increased the amount of total HSA (Fig. 4a). Although there was a significant decrease in the ratio of oxidized HSA to total HSA, there was little difference in the amount of oxidized HSA (Fig. 4b, c). By contrast, there was a significant increase in the amount of reduced HSA after BCAA supplementation (Fig. 4d).
DPPH radical scavenging ability after 3 months of treatment (14.0 ± 2.1%) and after 5 months of treatment (14.0 ± 2.0%) was significantly increased as compared with the pretreatment levels (11.3 ± 2.1%) (Fig. 5a). In addition, there was a significant increase of the antioxidant potential between the pretreatment level (1724.5 ± 173.9 μM) and levels at 3 months (1903.3 ± 172.9 μM) and 5 months (1918.1 ± 177.0 μM) (Fig. 5b). A significant decrease in the levels of oxidative stress metabolites was observed after 3 months (316.9 ± 53.9 U.CARR) and 5 months (322.7 ± 53.4 U.CARR) of treatment as compared with the pretreatment levels (383.2 ± 69.1 U.CARR) (Fig. 5c).
The ketoprofen unbound fraction decreased significantly after 3 months (11.9 ± 2.0%) and 5 months (11.8 ± 1.8%) of treatment as compared with the pretreatment levels (14.6 ± 2.7%) (Fig. 5d). However, the antioxidant and binding functions in the cirrhotic patients were never able to recover to control levels, even after 5 months of BCAA supplementation (Figs. 3a, b, d, 5a, b, d).
No significant changes were noted in the clinical parameters such as the prothrombin time (Fig. S3A), serum total bilirubin concentration (Fig. S3B), and Child–Pugh scores (Fig. S3C) after the BCAA supplementation. Change in homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was also analyzed in 10 of 29 patients (2 patients with CP-A cirrhosis, 6 patients with CP-B cirrhosis, and 2 patients with CP-C cirrhosis). The HOMA-IR tended to decrease after 3 months (7.0 ± 4.6) and 5 months (10.5 ± 9.2) of treatment as compared with the pretreatment levels (12.4 ± 14.1), but there was no significant difference.