Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agent–cellular automata model for the dynamic fluctuation of EV traffic and charging demands based on machine learning algorithm

  • Emergence in Human-like Intelligence towards Cyber-Physical Systems
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EV) comprise one of the foremost components of the smart grid and tightly link the power system with the road network. Spatial and temporal randomness in electric charging distribution will exert negative impacts on power grid dispatch. Existing research focuses mainly on mathematical inferences from statistical data, and the dynamic movement of an individual vehicle traveling in a traffic system is rarely taken into account. Machine learning algorithm can take the EV dynamic condition into consideration. Based on machine learning algorithm, this paper proposes a charging demand simulation method based on the Agent–cellular automata model to describe the changes in location and the state of charge of a moving EV. CRUISE software is used to analyze power consumption in different scenarios. Then, the Monte Carlo algorithm models the dynamic fluctuation of EV traffic and charging demands. Case studies are conducted on a typical composite system consisting of a 54-node distribution system and a 25-node traffic network, and the simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greene DL, Boudreaux PR, Dean DJ et al (2010) The importance of advancing technology to America‘s energy goals. Energy Policy 38(8):3886–3890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gong H, Wang M, Wang H (2013) New energy vehicles in China: policies, demonstration, and progress. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 18(2):207–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Lopes JAP, Soares FJ, Almeida PMR (2011) Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system. Proc IEEE 99(1):168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schroeder A (2011) Modeling storage and demand management in power distribution grids. Appl Energy 88(12):4700–4712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong X, Mu Y, Jia H, Wu J, Yu X (2016) Planning of fast EV charging stations on a round freeway. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 7(4):1452–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shun T, Kunyu L, Xiangning X et al (2016) Charging demand for electric vehicle based on stochastic analysis of trip chain. IET Gen Transm Distrib 10(11):2689–2698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guibin W, Zhao X, Fushuan W, Kit PW (2013) Traffic-constrained multi objective planning of electric-vehicle charging stations. IEEE Trans Power Del. 28(4):2363–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shahidinejad S, Filizadeh S, Bibeau EL (2012) Profile of charging load on the grid due to plug-in vehicles. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(1):135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bae S, Kwasinski A (2012) Spatial and temporal model of electric vehicle charging demand. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(1):394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghiasnezhad Omran N, Filizadeh S (2014) Location-based forecasting of vehicular charging load on the distribution system. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(2):632–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang D, Wang P (2016) Probabilistic modeling of nodal charging demand based on spatial-temporal dynamics of moving electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(2):627–636

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmud K, Town GE (2016) A review of computer tools for modeling electric vehicle energy requirements and their impact on power distribution networks. Appl Energy 172(15):337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Waraich RA, Rashid MD, Galus MD, Dobler C et al (2013) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and smart grids: investigations based on a microsimulation. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 28:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Soares J, Canizes B, Lobo C et al (2012) Electric vehicle scenario simulator tool for smart grid operators. Energies 5(6):1881–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AVL LIST GmbH (2010) AVL CRUISE user’s guide. AVL, Austria, pp 1–82

    Google Scholar 

  16. AVL LIST GmbH (2008) AVL CRUISE interfaces. AVL, Austria, pp 13–47

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adamatzky AI (1996) Computation of shortest path in cellular automata. Math Comput Model 23(4):105–113

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Batty M (2007) Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models and fractals, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao Y, Wei HL, Billings SA (2012) A new adaptive fast cellular automaton neighborhood detection and rule identification algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 42(4):1283–1287

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maignan L, Yunes J-B (2013) Moore and von Neumann neighborhood n-dimensional generalized firing squad solutions using fields. In: 2013 first international symposium on computing and networking—across practical development and theoretical research (CANDAR), pp 552–558

  21. Hayes JG, Davis K (2014) Simplified electric vehicle powertrain model for range and energy consumption based on epa coast-down parameters and test validation by argonne national lab data on the nissan leaf. Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC) 2014, pp 1–6

  22. Gennaro MD, Paffumi E, Martini G et al (2014) Experimental investigation of the energy efficiency of an electric vehicle in different driving conditions. SAE Technical Paper. SAE International

  23. Nagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J Phys I France 2(1):2221–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker T, Al-Dawsari B, Tawfik H et al (2015) GreeDi: an energy efficient routing algorithm for big data on cloud. Ad Hoc Netw 35:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simchi-Levi D, Berman O (1988) A heuristic algorithm for the traveling salesman location problem on networks. Oper Res 36(3):478–484

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaaban MF, Atwa YM, Saadany EF (2011) PEVs modeling and impacts mitigation in distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(2):1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boriboonsomsin K, Barth M (2011) Impacts of road grade on fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions evidenced by use of advanced navigation systems. Transp Res Rec 2139:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miranda V, Ranito JV, Proenca LM (1994) Genetic algorithms in optimal multistage distribution network planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(4):1927–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hodgson MJ (1990) A flow-capturing location-allocation model. Geograph Anal 22(3):270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kerner BS (1998) Experimental features of self-organization in traffic flow. Phys Rev Lett 1(17):3797–3800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nissa (2017) How far does the nissan leaf go? http://www.nissanusa.com/electric-cars/leaf/

  32. EPA (2017) Urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS). https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/emission-standards-reference-guide/epa-urban-dynamometerdriving-schedule-udds_.html

  33. Xiang Yue, Liu Junyong, Li Ran et al (2016) Economic planning of electric vehicle charging stations considering traffic constraints and load profile templates. Appl Energy 178(15):647–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71320107001).

Funding

Funding was provided by Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (Grant No. 2018M631939).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Liu.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

Table 3 Peak load data of the 54-node distribution system
Table 4 Load rates of substations
Table 5 Energy losses of the distribution system
Table 6 Branch data of the 54-node distribution system
Table 7 Weights of nodes in the 25-node traffic system

Appendix B: Calculation of the charging load in a charging station

When applying the method in this paper to predict the charging load of EVs at a given charging station, the location selections made by EV users should be taken into account.

By considering charging time and charging cost, we can predict the charging decision for each vehicle agent once the demand occurs. The charging power and the maximum charging capacity for each time period can be determined using the formula below, and this method can be applied in the multiobjective optimization model for coordinated planning of the power distribution system and EV charging network.

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} {P_{k,t}^{\text{FCS}} = \rho_{k,t} z_{k} p^{\text{FCS}} } \hfill & {\quad \forall k \in \varOmega^{K} ,\forall t \in T} \hfill \\ {P_{k}^{\text{FCS,max}} = z_{k} p^{FCS} } \hfill & {\quad \forall k \in \varOmega^{K} } \hfill \\ {\rho_{k,t} = \frac{{\lambda_{k,t} }}{{z_{k} \mu }}} \hfill & {\quad \forall k \in \varOmega^{K} ,\forall t \in T} \hfill \\ \end{array}$$

where \(\lambda_{k,t}\) is the average arrival rate (the number of vehicles arriving at a charging station for charge per unit time) of vehicles waiting for charge at charging station k in time period t. \(z_{k}\) is the number of charging service devices at charging station k. \(P_{k,t}^{\text{FCS}}\) and \(P_{k}^{\text{FCS,max}}\) are the charging power and maximum charging capacity of charging station k in time period t, respectively. \(p^{\text{FCS}}\) is the nominal charging power. \(\rho_{k,t}\) is the average equipment usage rate of charging station k during time period t.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, Z., Su, S., Liu, R. et al. Agent–cellular automata model for the dynamic fluctuation of EV traffic and charging demands based on machine learning algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 4639–4652 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3841-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3841-2

Keywords

Navigation