Abstract
Purpose
Cancer itself and its treatment have a multifaceted impact on patients’ daily lives. The aim of the study was to determine unmet non-medical needs among Polish cancer patients.
Methods
Survey research using a 23-item Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ) was carried out among 1062 cancer patients from different regions of Poland. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.
Results
The quantitative analysis showed that 48% of the NEQ items (11/23) were expressed as unmet needs by at least half of patients. Unmet information needs were indicated by patients most often: information about their diagnosis, exams, treatment, future condition, funding and economic support. Cancer patients would like to get more attention from medical staff. Unmet needs were most frequently expressed by respondents who were men, with a lower level of education, living in village, pensioners. Qualitative analysis showed that each need may be understood in a variety of different ways across the cohort. Some patients added comments that the completing NEQ helped them to notice their non-medical needs.
Conclusion
Polish cancer patients have some unmet non-medical needs, especially informative needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cancer diagnosis is a new and stressful situation for everyone and affects all aspects of life. Patients with a cancer diagnosis face multiple problems, not only medical, but also logistical, social, psychological, and spiritual. Patients have a number of questions, concerns and are uncertain about the future [1, 2]. Cancer treatment consists of variety of therapies (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biological therapy, hormonal therapy), takes a lot of time (stay at hospital after operation, multifractionated radiotherapy, systemic treatment administered in intervals), is received in a place often unfamiliar to the patient (oncological departments), and often requires frequent visits to the out-patients clinic, and potentially multiple hospitalizations. Moreover, oncological therapy is often associated with numerous stigmatizing side effects (for example hair loss, cachexia, amputations) [3]. Patients can feel tired and overwhelmed by the disease and its treatment. Cancer usually leads to changes in patients' daily lives [4]. They may be unable to adequately fulfill their usual roles and functions within family, social and professional life. This can lead to changes in their needs and priorities and for new ones to emerge. Therefore, a holistic approach to oncology health care should be provided. Needs other than those directly related to diagnosis and treatment (social, material, informative, emotional, spiritual, ect.) often seem to be unmet [5]. The physicians and nurses often do not have enough time and opportunity to respond to the patient's non-medical needs. On the other hand, not all patients are able to express their non-medical needs [6]. Non-medical needs may be defined as those that do not directly relate to the disease and treatment and have no clinical or other medical relevance. It is a challenge to introduce the routine assessment of unmet needs of all cancer patients into daily clinical practice. An appropriate tool is needed to help patients better identify their needs and medical staff to gain a better understanding of the non-medical needs of cancer patients. Better understanding of cancer patients’ needs could facilitate the patient-doctor relationship and could improve both patients’ quality of life and their satisfaction with health care [7,8,9]. Therefore, more attention should be paid to patients' non-medical needs.
It seems to be crucial to introduce an appropriate, simple and easy to use in daily practice tool to assess cancer patients’ unmet needs. There are however some existing instruments to assess cancer patients’ needs [7].
Wen and Gustafson [7] have done detail analysis of existing questionnaires. Among tools analyzed by them was the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ). The NEQ seems to be an appropriate, simple, comprehensive and easy to administer tool. The NEQ was created and validated by Tamburini et al. [10, 11] among Italian cancer patients. The NEQ has also been used in some other studies [12,13,14,15]. In Poland, the NEQ was used only once to assess the needs of hospice patients and their relatives [16].
The NEQ is a self-administered questionnaire and includes questions related to five areas of needs: informative needs, psycho-emotional needs, relational needs, material needs and needs related to assistance/care [17].
The aim of the study was to determine Polish cancer patients’ unmet non-medical needs using the NEQ.
Materials and methods
Participants
The study was carried out on a group of 1062 cancer patients treated in the period between June 2022 to May 2023 across seven oncological centers in Poland (University Hospital in Zielona Gora, n = 296; Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs with Warmia and Mazury Oncology Center in Olsztyn, n = 85; The Center for Pulmonary Diseases in Olsztyn, n = 74; Hospital in Prabuty, n = 47; NU-MED Radiotherapy Center in Elblag, n = 424; Oncology Center in Opole, n = 66; Zaglebiowskie Oncology Center in Dabrowa Gornicza, n = 70).
The inclusion criteria were: aged ≥ 18 years old, pathologically confirmed cancer diagnosis, oncology treatment ongoing or patient having finished treatment no longer than 3 months previously, current hospitalization for at least 3 days or at least one hospitalization due to oncological treatment within the previous 3 months. The criterion of current or past hospitalization was included so that participants have potentially experienced problems related to hospitalization. The exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years old, no pathological confirmation of cancer, patients having finished treatment longer than 3 months previously, no hospitalization due to oncological treatment within the previous 3 months.
The participation in the study was proposed to the patients in the out- and inpatient oncological departments personally by psychologists or nurses. The survey was carried out using paper form of questionnaire. A part of participants completed the questionnaire themselves. However some patients needed support from medical staff (individuals in worse general condition, problems with vision, problems with writing, preference for talking).
Questionnaire
The study was conducted using the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ). Permission for use of the NEQ to assess unmet needs of Polish cancer patients included in this study was obtained from the authors of original version of the NEQ [10, 11]. The Polish version of the NEQ was developed with a back-translation procedure. The psychometric properties of the Polish version of questionnaire were previously evaluated on a group of 121 cancer patients (K.O., A.D., M.S., E.D., J.N., M.R., unpublished). The pilot study to determine unmet non-medical needs was conducted among Polish male lung cancer patients [18].
The NEQ consists of 23 items with responses on a dichotomous scale (yes/no). The questionnaire was supplemented by 10 questions concerning demographic data (age, gender, education, place of residence, professional activity, marital status, living alone or with someone, having a doctor amongst family/friends) and clinical data (type of cancer and approximate date of cancer diagnosis).
Polish and English versions of the NEQ are presented in Supplementary Materials.
Quantitative analysis
The analysis was performed on a group of 1180 cancer patients, who met the inclusion criteria and decided to take part in the study. The response rate was 90%—1062 patients completed the NEQ. The percentages of answers “yes” and “no” for all individual items were calculated.
Qualitative analysis
Of the 1062 patients who completed the questionnaire by themselves, 71 patients from two centers (University Hospital in Zielona Gora and Zaglebiowskie Oncology Center in Dabrowa Gornicza) were randomly selected for semi-structured interview with a psychologist.
Understanding of the meaning of the unmet non-medical needs
Items which were expressed as unmet needs by half or more participants were included to qualitative analysis.
There were eleven such items: Q1-4, Q6, Q7, Q9, Q13-15, Q21. These questions were used for assessing patients' understanding of the items and determining exactly what they meant by answering "yes". Additional questions about these 11 items were asked by a psychologist during a semi-structured interview.
Evaluation of the questionnaire
Subjective evaluation of the questionnaire based on patients' opinions was made by a psychologist during interview.
The comprehensibility and acceptability of the NEQ for patients were evaluated using a validation procedure questionnaire (VPQ) designed for the study. Polish and English versions of the VPQ are presented in Supplementary Materials.
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (No. 30/2020). Participation in the study was voluntary. All study participants were informed about the aim of the study and gave their consent and signed it.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were performed. The distribution of cancer patients’ unmet non-medical needs was determined. The associations between unmet needs and demographics were determined using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test for continuous variable and the chi-square test for categorical variables. The normal distribution of continuous variable was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for expressing non-medical needs (Q1-23) according to demographic factors was estimated using logistic regression models. The variables with p ≤ 0.1 in univariate analysis were included to multivariate model. The data analysis was conducted using Statistica (data analysis software), version 13. http://statistica.io TIBCO Software Inc., Krakow, Poland (2017).
Results
Characteristics of patients
The study was conducted on a group of 1062 cancer patients with ages between 22 and 89 years old (median age 66 years). Patients were 48% women and 52% men. All participants were diagnosed with cancer. The most frequent cancers were lung cancer (28.2%), lower digestive system cancers (19.5%) and breast cancer (15.6%). Patients were 6 months from cancer diagnosis (median). All patients were under oncological treatment at the time of the study or finished treatment no longer than 3 months previously. The majority of patients had graduated from secondary school (68.1%), lived in cities (63.6%), were pensioners (73.4%), married (67.8%), living with partner (66.5%). Only 15.1% of participants had a physician in their close family or among friends (Table 1).
Needs prevalence – quantitative analysis
Eleven needs (48% of the 23 items assessed) were expressed as unmet by half or more cancer patients. Most of them were kind of informative needs (9/11 needs). The most frequently indicated needs related to information were: needs for more information about their future condition (68.7%; Q2) and their diagnosis (50%; Q1), need for more explanations about their treatments (59.9%; Q4) and the examinations they are undergoing (54.6%; Q3). Patients needed to be more reassured by clinicians (57.8%; Q13), had need for clinicians to be more sincere (57.3%; Q7) and for clinicians and nurses to give them more comprehensible information (52.3%; Q6). About half of respondents indicated the need for better control of their symptoms (51.3%; Q9) and for better services from the hospital (bathrooms, meals, cleaning) (55.6%; Q14. Most of participants expressed the need to have more information about economic insurance in relation to their illness (60.7%; Q15). Among relational needs about half of cancer patients (53.4%; Q21) indicated the need to feel more useful within their families (Table 2).
Needs prevalence by demographic factors
Age
Patients, who participated in the study expressed similar needs regardless of age. However, younger cancer patients more frequently had a need for better services from the hospital (Q14; p = 0.01), need to have more economic insurance information in relation to their illness (Q15; p = 0.01) and economic help (Q16; p < 0.001) in comparison to older cancer patients. Whereas older patients more frequently expressed the need to speak with a spiritual advisor (Q18; p < 0.001) than those who were younger (Table 3).
Gender
One third of the assessed needs were indicated as unmet more frequent by men. Men significantly more often than women needed more information about their diagnosis (Q1; respectively: 55% vs 44%; p < 0.001), to be more involved in the therapeutic choices (Q5; respectively: 50% vs 43%; p = 0.02), clinicians and nurses to give them more comprehensible information (Q6; respectively: 56% vs 49%; p = 0.02), to have a better dialogue with clinicians (Q8; respectively: 53% vs 42%; < 0.001). Male cancer patients were more likely than women to have the unmet need for symptoms (pain, nausea, insomnia, etc.) to be better controlled (Q9; respectively: 55% vs 47%; p = 0.009) and the need for more help with eating, dressing and going to the bathroom (Q10; respectively: 14% vs 10%; p = 0.04). Additionally, men more frequently needed to feel more useful within their family (Q21; respectively: 57% vs 50%; p = 0.03) (Table 3).
Education
Patients who graduated only from primary school more frequent reported an unmet need for better controlled symptoms of disease in comparison with patients who graduated from secondary school and high school (Q9; respectively: 59% vs 50% vs 45%; p = 0.02). The unmet need of help with eating, dressing and going to the bathroom was reported more often among patients who graduated from primary or high school than secondary school (Q10; respectively: 16% vs 18% vs 11%; p = 0.02). Patients with primary school as their highest level of formal education significantly more often than patients with secondary or high school education needed economic help (Q16; respectively: 36% vs 31% vs 23%; p = 0.02), to be more reassured by their relatives (Q20; respectively: 50% vs 35% vs 27%; p < 0.001), to feel more useful within their family (Q21; respectively: 60% vs 54% vs 42%; p < 0.001), to feel less abandoned (Q22; respectively: 44% vs 32% vs 33%; p = 0.003). Primary school patients were more likely than secondary or high school patients to express the need to speak with a spiritual advisor (Q18; respectively: 28% vs 18% vs 23%; p = 0.008) and with people who have had the same experience (Q19; respectively: 48% vs 38% vs 39%; p = 0.03) (Table 3).
Place of residence
Patients living in a village more frequently than patients living in cities indicated the need to be more involved in the therapeutic choices (Q5; respectively: 52% vs 44%; p = 0.03), need to have more economic insurance information in relation to their illness (Q15; respectively: 67% vs 57%; p = 0.002), need economic help (Q16; respectively: 37% vs 28%; p = 0.004), need to speak with a psychologist (Q17; respectively: 28% vs 22%; p = 0.03), need to be more reassured by their relatives (Q20; respectively: 42% vs 34%; p = 0.007) (Table 3).
Professional activity
There were no significant differences between informative or relational needs associated with professional activity. Pensioners more often expressed the unmet need for better attention from nurses in comparison with patients who were professionally active or unemployed (Q12; respectively: 31% vs 26% vs 12%; p = 0.009). Pensioners were also more likely than professionally active respondents and those who were unemployed to report the unmet need to speak with a spiritual advisor (Q18; respectively: 22% vs 15% vs 12%; p = 0.02) and to speak with people who have had the same experience (Q19; respectively: 42% vs 36% vs 27%; p = 0.04). Unemployed participants more often had the unmet need for economic help than professionally active patients and pensioners (Q16; respectively: 59% vs 31% vs 30%; p < 0.001) (Table 3).
Marital status
In general patients’ marital status did not correlate with different expressions of unmet needs. In the case of two items there were significant differences. Patients who were married/in a stable relationship were more likely than those who were single to report the unmet needs for more information about their future condition (Q2; respectively: 71% vs 64%; p = 0.01) and for being more involved in the therapeutic choices (Q5; respectively: 50% vs 40%; p = 0.002) (Table 3).
Household
Patients living with a partner or children/another family member were, in comparison with patients living alone, more likely to need to be reassured by their relatives (Q20; respectively: 38% vs 38% vs 26%; p = 0.02) and to be involved in therapeutic choices (Q5; respectively: 49% vs 45% vs 37%; p = 0.03) (Table 3).
Physician as a close family member/friend
Patients who did not have a physician as a close family member or friend more frequently expressed the need for clinicians and nurses to give them more comprehensible information (Q6; respectively: 54% vs 44%; p = 0.04), the need to be more reassured by their relatives (Q20; respectively: 38% vs 28%; p = 0.007), and the need to feel less abandoned (Q22; respectively: 35% vs 28%; p = 0.04) than those who did (Table 3).
Multivariate analysis
In multivariate analysis gender (male vs. female), odds ratio [OR]:1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.15–1.89), p = 0.002 significantly increased the need for more information about diagnosis (Q1). Level of education (low vs. high), OR:1.51 (95% CI:1.04–2.19), p = 0.03 and marital status (married vs. single), OR:1.38 (95% CI:1.04–1.83), p = 0.03 significantly increased the need for more information about future condition (Q2). Age, OR:0.99 (95% CI:0.98–1.00), p = 0.04 had significant impact on expressing the need to be more involved in the therapeutic choices (Q5). Gender (male vs. female), OR:1.51 (95% CI:1.16–1.95), p = 0.002 and level of education (low vs. high), OR:1.65 (95% CI:1.03–2.65), p = 0.04 significantly increased the need for better dialogue with clinicians (Q8). Gender (male vs. female), OR:1.37 (95% CI:1.07–1.76), p = 0.01 and level of education (low vs. high), OR:1.70 (95% CI:1.09–2.67), p = 0.02 significantly increased the need for better control of symptoms (Q9). Gender (male vs. female), OR:1.60 (95% CI:1.10–2.35), p = 0.02 and level of education (low vs. high), OR:0.49 (95% CI:0.30–0.80), p = 0.005 had significant impact on expressing the need for help in daily activities (Q10). Professional activity (unemployed vs. active), OR:0.35 (95% CI:0.13–0.95), p = 0.04 had significant impact on expressing the need for better attention from nurses (Q12). Age, OR:0.98 (95% CI:0.97–0.99), p = 0.02 and place of residence (village vs. city), OR:1.48 (95% CI:1.13–1.93), p = 0.005 had significant impact on expressing the need for more economic insurance information (Q15). Age, OR:0.97 (95% CI:0.96–0.99), p = 0.002; level of education (low vs. high), OR:1.99 (95% CI:1.17–3.39), p = 0.01; place of residence (village vs. city), OR:1.36 (95% CI:1.02–1.80), p = 0.03 and professional activity (unemployed vs. active), OR:2.52 (95% CI:1.26–5.06), p = 0.009 had significant impact on expressing the need for economic help (Q16). Place of residence (village vs. city), OR:1.42 (95% CI:1.05–1.92), p = 0.02 significantly increased the need to speak with a psychologist (Q17). Have a doctor as a close family member/friend (no vs. yes), OR:0.64 (95% CI:0.43–0.97), p = 0.03 had significant impact on expressing the need to speak with a spiritual advisor (Q18). Level of education (low vs. high), OR:3.02 (95% CI:1.81–5.03), p < 0.001 and household (living alone vs. living with partner), OR:0.57 (95% CI:0.38–0.84), p = 0.004 had significant impact on expressing the need to be more reassured by relatives (Q20). Level of education (low vs. high), OR:2.14 (95% CI:1.34–3.40), p = 0.001 significantly increased the need to feel more useful within family (Q21).
Qualitative analysis
An extra interview and VPQ were conducted on 71 patients (Table 4).
Understanding of the meaning of the unmet non-medical needs
Eleven items with the prevalence of need of at least 50% were analyzed. The NEQ questions are relatively simple. On the other hand, each need may be perceived differently by individual patients. In fact, the qualitative analysis showed the multiplicity of understanding (Table 5).
Evaluation of the questionnaire
The patients’ subjective evaluation of the survey was assessed during the interview with a psychologist. Patients considered that the NEQ is a good instrument to express their needs. Overall they were glad that someone was interested in their needs and discussing their problems. For 87% of patients, the questions were generally understandable, and 83% of them had no difficulty answering the questions. 80% of patients considered that completing the questionnaire may facilitate better contact with a physician/nurse/other professionals. In patients’ opinions, the results of the study using this questionnaire could improve patient-doctor relations.
Patients who completed the NEQ, declared that they are now more aware of their non-medical needs. They considered that developing informational brochures to help address the unmet needs included in the NEQ would be helpful.
Discussion
A key component of both high quality care for cancer patients and the satisfaction of patients and their families seems to be the complete assessment of patient needs. There are different areas of patients’ non-medical needs: needs related to information and communication with clinicians [10, 19,20,21,22,23,24], psycho-social support [19, 21, 23, 25], relationships [10], assistance/care [22, 26], economic support and insurance information [21, 22], spiritual issues [27] and sexual issues [28, 29].
Some needs of cancer patients seem to be unmet – a patient could experience a gap between what they need and what they actually receive. In a previous study [30] 384 Polish cancer patients were analyzed and it was discovered that only 21% of them received professional support from a psychologist and 4% of patients from a priest. In addition, only 7% of participants received help from social worker. Yet it is known that psychological, spiritual and social support has an important role in patients’ well-being during cancer care.
Most cancer patients reported at least one unmet need [31,32,33]. In the current study, only 6% of patients did not indicate any of 23 analyzed items. Eleven of 23 items were highlighted as unmet needs by at least 50% of participants. The unmet needs were mainly informative needs about the diagnosis, exams, treatment, prognosis, and about economic insurance. In a previous pilot study conducted among 160 male lung cancer patients, informative needs were the most frequently expressed [18]. More than half of Italian cancer patients expressed needs for more information about diagnosis, future conditions, exams and treatment [12, 13]. Geraldine et al. [34] carried out depth interview study of informative needs among English cancer patients and determined that patients wanted information about diagnosis, therapeutic options, and side effects of treatment. In a systemic review of cancer patients’ needs conducted by Webb et al. [5] almost all studies showed needs for information and these needs were the most commonly expressed. A systematic review of 30 studies of unmet needs in newly diagnosed older cancer patients [33] also noted that the most common needs were informative needs.
Bonacchi et al. [15] determined that informative unmet needs were changing significantly over time: informative needs for more information about diagnosis, future conditions or treatment were mostly expressed at cancer diagnosis and also at confirmation of progression [15]. Similarly, Hsieh et al. [35] found that lung cancer patients expressed the highest rate of information needs at the time of diagnosis. During the examinations and initial treatment, patients would often like to receive information to better understand and cope with cancer [35, 36]. Later, patients predominantly had information needs regarding the prognosis and how to identify possible cancer recurrence [37]. A systematic review of studies regarding unmet needs of older cancer patients [33] found that the level of unmet needs was the highest after diagnosis and at the beginning of the treatment, decreasing over time.
Cancer patients wanted to be well-informed about diagnosis, treatment options, possible side effects and prognosis, and most of them expressed the need for as much information as possible from their doctors, whether the update was bad or good [38]. Information about possible side effects, treatment, confirmation of cancer, likelihood of cure, whether all parts of the body are involved, the way treatment works and day-to-day progression were perceived as absolutely necessary by at least half of patients analyzed [24]. Mokhles et al. [39] demonstrated that most lung cancer patients received only general information and only 20% of them received information about prognosis. Some patients indicated that doctors do not always give them sufficient or understandable information [40, 41]. It is well known that the information provided for patients could have a beneficial impact on their feelings, reduce anxiety and allow them plan for the future [42,43,44]. Meeting the need for information, even if the new is bad, increases hope [24]. Adequate understanding of the disease could influence thoughts about the disease, the approach to treatment and improve quality of life [45,46,47,48,49]. Additionally, a correlation between unmet needs and distress was presented [12, 15]. Distressed patients had higher levels of unmet needs across all areas investigated [12]. A higher resilience has helped patients find satisfaction with care and staff and get their needs more comprehensively met [12].
Polish cancer patients seem to be dissatisfied with the patient-doctor communication [50, 51]. Physicians are often not familiar with standards for how to provide cancer patients with information about diagnosis, prognosis, etc. [50, 52, 53]. Although patients wanted simple, clear answers to their questions, Polish patients’ informative needs seem not to be met. In the current study patients indicated the need for more information about diagnosis (50%), exams (54.6%) and treatments (59.9%). In an Italian study using the same questionnaire only 30–40% of patients needed the information highlighted as required by this study [10, 13]. Only the informative need for future condition was similar among Polish and Italian cancer patients (respectively: 68.7% and 61/68%) [10, 13].
Clinical and demographic factors have an influence on the perception of disease and non-medical needs. The results from this study showed that subgroups of patients experience different needs. For example, although patients are seeking more information in general, individuals who have a physician in close family or friends expressed significantly less informative needs than those who do not. In the current study gender was associated with unmet needs. Men significantly more often than women needed additional information. Moreover, men significantly more frequent than women expressed a need for their symptoms to be better controlled and for support in daily life activities. Additionally men in particular would like to feel more useful within their family. In some other studies, the gender association was the opposite. Hsieh et al. [35] determined that female lung cancer patients had higher informative needs related to treatment than men. Bonacchi et al. [12] determined that women more frequently than men had material needs and needs for psycho-emotional support [12].
In this study patients, who graduated from primary school significantly more often than patients with secondary and high school education needed more economic help and psychological support (from their relatives, spiritual advisor or patients with the same experience). In an Italian study [12] using the NEQ, primary school patients more often needed support in daily life activities or better attention from nurses than patients with secondary and higher education. Bonacchi et al. [12] showed that high number of unmet needs was associated with a lower level of formal education. Lung cancer patients with a higher education level were more likely to express the informative needs than less educated participants [35]. In this study those associations were not observed.
Patients who live in a village were more likely to express the need to have more economic insurance information and more psychological support than those who live in cities. While pensioners in comparison with patients who were professionally active or unemployed would more frequently like to speak with a spiritual advisor and with people who have had the same experience. Pensioners more frequently than those patients who were professionally active expressed unmet needs for better attention from nurses. Unemployed participants more frequent had an unmet need for economic help than professionally active patients or pensioners.
Bonacchi et al. [12] did not confirm a relationship between informative needs and marital status, but single people were more likely to have needs for psycho-emotional support than those who were married. In the study conducted among lung cancer patients, participants who had children were more likely than those with no children to need information related to the disease [35]. In the current study married patients wanted to receive more information about their future condition more often than those who were single. Patients who did not have a doctor in close family or friends were more likely to express the need to be more reassured by their relatives.
Wang et al. [54] noted that qualitative study enables the identification of needs that would not have been recognized in a quantitative analysis. Additionally, patients can detail their unmet needs, therefore these needs could be more precisely identified. For better understanding the unmet needs of Polish cancer patients a qualitative analysis was provided in the current study. Individual items of the NEQ were defined in a simple way. This analysis showed that patients understood the items of this questionnaire. However, the meaning of individual needs as interpreted by patients is broad and not homogeneous. Therefore, patients' perceptions of a specific need may not be the same. Tamburini et al. [10] carried out a quantitative and qualitative analysis among Italian cancer patients using the same instrument as employed in current study. The most frequent indicated need, as in this study, was “I need more information about my future condition”. Both patients from Italy and Poland specifically wanted to know the probability of being cured, how their future life will be, how they will feel and what they will be able to do. Instead of generalized statistical prognoses, they wished to receive more personalized explanations based on an individual approach to each patient.
The current study showed wide range of non-medical needs among Polish cancer patients. These needs in general are not adequately met. The reason of that could be caused by medical staff priorities – cancer cure. The modern cancer care goes through the holistic approach. From patients’ site their well-being is not only good physical condition but also psychosocial and spiritual fulfilment. To ensure good quality of life of cancer patients, the recognizing the unmet needs is essential. Therefore some instruments to assess cancer patients’ needs are introduced [2]. The NEQ seems to be a good tool, also as it was showed in current study among Polish population. Using the NEQ in daily clinical practice could be very useful to identify non-medical needs of a particular cancer patient and could supplement the scope of medical care. Introduction of an instrument to estimate unmet needs could be a challenge in better, holistic and personalized cancer patients’ care. Unfortunately, so far there are no recommendations created by science societies or governments for identification of the non-medical needs of cancer patients.
Limitations
This study has some limitations. Participants were recruited from seven cancer centers in Poland, but numbers of individuals of each centers were different. Patients in qualitative analysis came from only two centers. The study did not analyze the differences in expression of unmet needs due to cancer type, time from diagnosis and intention of treatment. There were no measurements of mental status, anxiety and depression.
Conclusion
Most Polish cancer patients have some unmet non-medical needs, especially informative needs, material needs and needs for a psychoemotional support. More than half of patients (50–69%) expressed a lack of information: needs for more information about diagnosis, examinations and treatments, needs for information about their future condition. Most of participants (61%) expressed the need to have more information about economic insurance in relation to their illness. Therefore, the more attention should be paid for good communication between medical staff and patient and giving more sufficient information about diagnosis, treatment, future condition, etc. Unmet needs were more frequent among men, with lower level of formal education, those living in village and pensioners. This sociodemographic group of cancer patients requires a special assistance.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Butow Ph, Lebel S, Shaw J, Humphris G (2021) Uncertainty, anxiety, and fear of cancer recurrence. Front Psychol 12:811602
Brown ML, Lipscomb J, Snyder C (2001) The burden of illness of cancer: economic cost and quality of life. Annu Rev Public Health 22:91–113
Grassi L, Biancosino B, Marmai L, Rossi E, Sabato S (2007) Psychological factors affecting oncology conditions. Adv Psychosom Med 28:57–71
Wang Y, Feng W (2022) Cancer – related psychosocial challenges. Gen Psychiatr 35(5):E100871
Evans Webb M, Murray E, Younger ZW, Goodfellow H, Ross J (2021) The supportive care needs of cancer patients: a systematic review. J Cancer Educ 36:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01941-9
Gustafson DHP (2004) Needs assessment in cancer. Outcomes Assessment in Cancer. Cambridge University Press (CUP), Cambridge, pp 305–328
Wen KY, Gustafson DH (2004) Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Qual Life Outcome 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-11
Samuel CA, Mbah O, Schaal J, Eng E, Black KZ, Baker S et al (2020) The role of patient-physician relationship on health-related quality of life and pain in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 28:2615–2626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05070-y
Markides M (2011) The importance of good communication between patient and health professionals. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33:S123–S125. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0b013e318230e1e5
Tamburini M, Gangeri L, Brunelli C, Boeri P, Borreani C, Bosisio M et al (2003) Cancer patients’ needs during hospitalization: a quantitative and qualitative study. BMC Cancer 3:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-3-12
Tamburini M, Gangeri L, Brunelli C, Beltrami E, Boeri P, Borreani C et al (2000) Assessment of hospitalized cancer patients’ needs by the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire. Ann Oncol 11:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008396930832
Bonacchi A, Fazzini E, Messina S, Muraca MG, Pacetti P, Di Miceli S et al (2019) Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics identify groups of Italian cancer patients with high rates of unmet needs. Tumori 105:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891618792458
Bonacchi A, Miccinesi G, Galli S, Primi C, Chiesi F, Lippi D et al (2016) Use of the needs evaluation questionnaire with cancer outpatients. Support Care Cancer 24:3507–3515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3176-4
Chiesi F, Bonacchi A, Primi C, Miccinesi G (2017) Assessing unmet needs in patients with cancer: an investigation of differential item functioning of the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire across gender, age and phase of the disease. PLoS One 12:e0179765
Bonacchi A, Di Miceli S, Lippi D, Muraca MG, Miccinesi G (2018) Unmet needs of Italian cancer patients in different stages of the disease and care process. Tumori 104:285–291. https://doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000637
Włostowska K, Doboszynska A, Trylinska-Tekielska E (2018) Assessment of the needs of hospice patients and their relatives by the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire. Palliat Med Pract 12:186–192
Annunziata MA, Muzzatti B, Altoè G (2009) A contribution to the validation of the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ): a study in the Italian context. Psychooncology 18:549–553
Osowiecka K, Kurowicki M, Kołb-Sielecki J, Gwara A, Szwiec M, Nawrocki S et al (2023) Is it possible to notice the unmet non-medical needs among cancer patients? Application of the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire in men with lung cancer. Curr Oncol 30:3484–3493. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30030264
Willems RA, Bolman CAW, Mesters I, Kanera IM, Beaulen AAJM, Lechner L (2016) Cancer survivors in the first year after treatment: the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs in different domains. Psychooncology 25:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3870
Girgis A, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Burrows S (2000) Perceived needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: rural versus urban location. Aust N Z J Public Health 24:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00137.x
Sutherland G, Hill D, Morand M, Pruden M, McLachlan SA (2009) Assessing the unmet supportive care needs of newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 18:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.00932.x
Soothill K, Morris SM, Harman J, Francis B, Thomas C, McIllmurray MB (2001) The significant unmet needs of cancer patients: probing psychosocial concerns. Support Care Cancer 9:597–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200100278
Clavarino AM, Lowe JB, Carmont SA, Balanda K (2002) The needs of cancer patients and their families from rural and remote areas of Queensland. Aust J Rural Health 10:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1584.2002.00436.x
Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92:832–836. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832
Bonacchi A, Rossi A, Bellotti L, Franco S, Toccafondi A, Miccinesi G et al (2010) Assessment of psychological distress in cancer patients: a pivotal role for clinical interview. Psychooncology 19:1294–1302
Davis C, Williams P, Redman S, White K, King E (2003) Assessing the practical and psychosocial needs of rural women with early breast cancer in Australia. Soc Work Health Care 36:25–36
Nixon A, Narayanasamy A (2010) The spiritual needs of neurooncology patients from patients’ perspective. J Clin Nurs 19:2259–2370
Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, Norman A, Eeles R, Huddart R et al (2003) Prostate cancer patients’ support and psychological care needs: survey from a non-surgical oncology clinic. Psychooncology 12:769–783
Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA, Heathcote P, Yaxley J (2001) The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology 10:66–75
Osowiecka K, Środa R, Saied A, Szwiec M, Mangold S, Osuch D et al (2020) Patients’ non-medical and organizational needs during cancer diagnosis and treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:5841. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165841
Giuliani ME, Milne RA, Puts M, Sampson LR, Kwan JY, Le LW et al (2016) The prevalence and nature of supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Curr Oncol 23:258–265. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3012
Lewandowska A, Rudzki G, Lewandowski T, Rudzki S (2020) The problems and needs of patients diagnosed with cancer and their caregivers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:87. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010087
Puts MT, Papoutsis A, Springall E, Tourangeau AE (2012) A systematic review of unmet needs of newly diagnosed older cancer patients undergoing active cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer 20:1377–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1450-7
Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C, Jones A, Mossman J, Boudioni M et al (2000) Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. BMJ 320:909–913. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7239.909
Hsieh LY, Chou FJ, Guo SE (2018) Information needs of patients with lung cancer from diagnosis until first treatment follow-up. PLoS One 13:e0199515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199515
Lei CP, Har YC, Abdullah KL (2011) Informational needs of breast cancer patients on chemotherapy: differences between patients’ and nurses’ perceptions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 1:797–802
Mistry A, Wilson S, Priestman T, Damery S, Haque M (2010) How do the information needs of cancer patients differ at different stages of the cancer journey? Across sectional survey. JRSM Short Rep 1:30. https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2010.010032
Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S (1995) No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psychooncology 4:197–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2960040305
Mokhles S, Nuyttens JJME, de Mol M, Aerts JGJV, Maat APWM, Birim Ö et al (2018) Treatment selection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer: the role of the patient in clinical decision making. BMC Cancer 18:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-3986-5
Arora N (2003) Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 57:791–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00449-5
Neumann M, Wirtz M, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Längler A, Edelhäuser F et al (2011) Identifying and predicting subgroups of information needs among cancer patients: an initial study using latent class analysis. Support Care Cancer 19:1197–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0939-1
Sainio C, Eriksson E (2003) Keeping cancer patients informed: a challenge for nursing. Eur J Oncol Nurs 7:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1054/ejon.2002.0218
Epstein RM, Street RL (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care. Promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 07–6225. Bethesda, MD, [Monograph], pp 222. https://doi.org/10.1037/e481972008-001
Iconomou G, Viha A, Koutras A, Vagenakis AG, Kalofonos HP (2002) Information needs and awareness of diagnosis in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a report from Greece. Palliat Med 16:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216302pm574oa
Mickeviciene A, Vanagas G, Jievaltas M, Ulys A (2013) Does illness perception explain quality of life of patients with prostate cancer? Medicina (Kaunas) 49:235–241
Husson O, Thong MS, Mols F, Oerlemans S, Kaptein AA, van de Poll-Franse LV (2013) Illness perceptions in cancer survivors: what is the role of information provision? Psychooncology 22:490–498
Iskandarsyah A, de Klerk C, Suardi DR, Soemitro MP, Sadarjoen SS, Passchier J (2013) Satisfaction with information and its association with illness perception and quality of life in Indonesian breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 21:2999–3007
Pinto AC, Ferreira-Santos F, Lago LD, de Azambuja E, Pimentel FL, Piccart-Gebhart M et al (2014) Information perception, wishes, and satisfaction in ambulatory cancer patients under active treatment: patient reported outcomes with QLQ-INFO25. Ecancermedicalscience 8:425
McInnes DK, Cleary PD, Stein KD, Ding L, Mehta CC, Ayanian JZ (2008) Perceptions of cancer-related information among cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society’s Studies of Cancer Survivors. Cancer 113:1471–1479
Godlewski D, Adamczak M, Wojtyś P (2017) Experiences of cancer patients in Poland throughout diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Cancer Care 26:e12436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12436
Sobczak K, Leoniuk K, Janaszczyk A (2018) Delivering bad news: patient’s perspective and opinions. Patient Prefer Adherence 12:2397–2404
Rucińska M, Osowiecka K, Kocbach T, Środa R, Wilk O, Dusza M (2018) Studenci medycyny wobec informowania pacjentów o niekorzystnym rozpoznaniu i rokowaniu. Palliat Med Pract 12:1–7
Rucińska M, Osowiecka K, Mikulska M, Piesik T (2020) Postawy i priorytety przyszłych lekarzy a przekazywanie złych wiadomości. Med Paliat 12:122–130
Wang T, Molassiotis A, Chung BPM, Tan JY (2018) Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 17:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0346-9
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
The research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland. Grant number 2022/06/X/NZ7/00803.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Karolina Osowiecka and Monika Rucińska; methodology: Karolina Osowiecka and Monika Rucińska; validation: Karolina Osowiecka, Marek Szwiec, Anna Dolińska, Anna Gwara, Eliza Działach and Monika Rucińska; formal analysis: Karolina Osowiecka and Monika Rucińska; investigation: Karolina Osowiecka, Marek Szwiec, Anna Dolińska, Anna Gwara, Marcin Kurowicki, Jarosław Kołb-Sielecki, Eliza Działach, Weronika Radecka, Sergiusz Nawrocki and Monika Rucińska; data curation: Karolina Osowiecka and Monika Rucińska; writing—original draft preparation, Karolina Osowiecka and Monika Rucińska; writing—review and editing: Marek Szwiec, Anna Dolińska, Anna Gwara, Marcin Kurowicki, Jarosław Kołb-Sielecki, Eliza Działach, Weronika Radecka and Sergiusz Nawrocki; visualization: Karolina Osowiecka and Monika Rucińska. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (No. 30/2020; 1 June 2020).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Consent to publish
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper (a blank copy of the consent form is included in Supplementary Materials).
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Osowiecka, K., Szwiec, M., Dolińska, A. et al. Unmet non-medical needs of cancer patients in Poland: a quantitative and qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 32, 183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08387-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08387-5