Abstract
We study the null controllability of Kolmogorov-type equations \(\partial _t f + v^\gamma \partial _x f - \partial _v^2 f = u(t,x,v) 1_{\omega }(x,v)\) in a rectangle \(\Omega \), under an additive control supported in an open subset \(\omega \) of \(\Omega \). For \(\gamma =1\), with periodic-type boundary conditions, we prove that null controllability holds in any positive time, with any control support \(\omega \). This improves the previous result by Beauchard and Zuazua (Ann Ins H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire 26:1793–1815, 2009), in which the control support was a horizontal strip. With Dirichlet boundary conditions and a horizontal strip as control support, we prove that null controllability holds in any positive time if \(\gamma =1\) or if \(\gamma =2\) and \(\omega \) contains the segment \(\{v=0\}\), and only in large time if \(\gamma =2\) and \(\omega \) does not contain the segment \(\{v=0\}\). Our approach, inspired from Benabdallah et al. (C R Math Acad Sci Paris 344(6):357–362, 2007), Lebeau and Robbiano (Commun Partial Differ Equ 20:335–356, 1995), is based on two key ingredients: the observability of the Fourier components of the solution of the adjoint system, uniformly with respect to the frequency, and the explicit exponential decay rate of these Fourier components.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabau-Boussouira F, Cannarsa P, Fragnelli G (2006) Carleman estimates for degenerate parabolic operators with applications to null controllability. J Evol Equ 6(2):161–204
Alinhac S, Zuily C (1981) Uniqueness and nonuniqueness of the cauchy problem for hyperbolic operators with double characteristics. Commun Partial Differ Equ 6(7):799–828
Almog Y (2008) The stability of the normal state of superconductors in the presence of electric currents. SIAM J Math Anal 40(2):824–850
Beauchard K, Cannarsa P, Guglielmi R (2012) Null controllability of Grushin-type operators in dimension two. J Eur Math Soc (to appear)
Beauchard K, Zuazua E (2009) Some controllability results for the 2D Kolmogorov equation. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire 26:1793–1815
Benabdallah A, Dermenjian Y, Le Rousseau J (2007) Carleman estimates for the one-dimensional heat equation with a discontinuous coefficient and applications to controllability and an inverse problem. J Math Anal Appl 336(2):865–887
Benabdallah A, Dermenjian Y, Le Rousseau J (2007) On the controllability of linear parabolic equations with an arbitrary control location for stratified media. C R Math Acad Sci Paris 344(6):357–362
Br Tzis H (1983) Analyse fonctionnelle, theorie et applications. Masson, Paris
Cannarsa P, de Teresa L (2009) Controllability of 1-d coupled degenerate parabolic equations. Electron J Differ Equ Paper No. 73:21
Cannarsa P, Fragnelli G, Rocchetti D (2007) Null controllability of degenerate parabolic operators with drift. Netw Heterog Media 2(4):695–715 (electronic)
Cannarsa P, Fragnelli G, Rocchetti D (2008) Controllability results for a class of one-dimensional degenerate parabolic problems in nondivergence form. J Evol Equ 8:583–616
Cannarsa P, Martinez P, Vancostenoble J (2004) Persistent regional null controllability for a class of degenerate parabolic equations. Commun Pure Appl Anal 3(4):607–635
Cannarsa P, Martinez P, Vancostenoble J (2005) Null controllability of degenerate heat equations. Adv Differ Equ 10(2):153–190
Cannarsa P, Martinez P, Vancostenoble J (2008) Carleman estimates for a class of degenerate parabolic operators. SIAM J Control Optim 47(1):1–19
Cannarsa P, Martinez P, Vancostenoble J (2009) Carleman estimates and null controllability for boundary-degenerate parabolic operators. C R Math Acad Sci Paris 347(3–4):147–152
Doubova A, Fernández-Cara E, Zuazua E (2002) On the controllability of parabolic systems with a nonlinear term involving the state and the gradient. SIAM J Control Optim 42(3):798–819
Doubova A, Osses A, Puel J-P (2002) Exact controllability to trajectories for semilinear heat equations with discontinuous diffusion coefficients. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var 8:621–661
Ervedoza S (2008) Control and stabilization properties for a singular heat equation with an inverse-square potential. Commun Partial Differ Equ 33(10–12):1996–2019
Fabre C, Puel JP, Zuazua E (1995) Approximate controllability of the semilinear heat equation. Proc Roy Soc Edinb 125A:31–61
Fattorini HO, Russel D (1971) Exact controllability theorems for linear parabolic equations in one space dimension. Arch Ration Mech Anal 43:272–292
Fernández-Cara E, Zuazua E (2000) Null and approximate controllability for weakly blowing up semilinear heat equations. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire 17:583–616
Fernández-Cara E, Zuazua E (2000) The cost of approximate controllability for heat equations: the linear case. Adv Differ Equ 5(4–6):465–514
Fernández-Cara E, Zuazua E (2002) On the null controllability of the one-dimensional heat equation with BV coefficients. Comput Appl Math 12:167–190
Flores C, de Teresa L (2010) Carleman estimates for degenerate parabolic equations with first order terms and applications. C R Math Acad Sci Paris 348(7–8):391–396
Fursikov AV, Imanuvilov OY (1994) Controllability of evolution equations. Lecture notes series, Seoul National University Research Institute of Mathematics Global Analysis Research Center, Seoul, 34
González-Burgos M, de Teresa L (2007) Some results on controllability for linear and nonlinear heat equations in unbounded domains. Adv Diff Equ 12(11):1201–1240
Hörmander L (1967) Hypoelliptic second order differential equations. Acta Math 119:147–171
Imanuvilov OY (1993) Boundary controllability of parabolic equations. Uspekhi Mat Nauk 48(3(291)):211–212
Imanuvilov OY (1995) Controllability of parabolic equations. Math Sb 186(6):109–132
Imanuvilov OY, Yamamoto M (2000) Carleman estimate for a parabolic equation in sobolev spaces of negative order and its applications. In: Chen G et al (eds) Control of nonlinear distributed parameter systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 113–137
Lebeau G, Robbiano L (1995) Contrôle exact de l’équation de la chaleur. Commun Partial Differ Equ 20:335–356
Lebeau G, Le Rousseau J (2012) On Carleman estimates for elliptic and parabolic operators. Applications to unique continuation and control of parabolic equations. ESAIM:COCV 18:712–747
Lopez A, Zuazua E (2002) Uniform null controllability for the one dimensional heat equation with rapidly oscillating periodic density. Ann IHP Anal Non linéaire 19(5):543–580
Martinez P, Vancostenoble J (2006) Carleman estimates for one-dimensional degenerate heat equations. J Evol Equ 6(2):325–362
Martinez P, Vancostonoble J, Raymond J-P (2003) Regional null controllability of a linearized Crocco type equation. SIAM J Control Optim 42(2):709–728
Miller L (2005) On the null-controllability of the heat equation in unbounded domains. Bull Des Sci Math 129(2):175–185
Miller L (2006) On exponential observability estimates for the heat semigroup with explicit rates. Rendiconti Lincei: Matematica e Applicazioni 17(4):351–366
Pazy A (1983) Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 44. Springer, New York
Le Rousseau J (2007) Carleman estimates and controllability results for the one-dimensional heat equation with bv coefficients. J Differ Equ 233(2):417–447
Vancostenoble J, Zuazua E (2008) Null controllability for the heat equation with singular inverse-square potentials. J Funct Anal 254(7):1864–1902
Villani C (2009) Hypocoercivity. Mem Am Math Soc 202(950)
Zuazua E (1997) Approximate controllability of the semilinear heat equation: boundary control. In: Bristeau MO et al (eds) International conference in honour of Prof. R. Glowinski, computational sciences for the 21st century. Wiley, pp 738–747
Zuazua E (1997) Finite dimensional null-controllability of the semilinear heat equation. J Math Pures et Appl 76:237–264
Acknowledgments
The author warmly thanks Philippe Gravejat, Franois Golse and Thierry Paul for stimulating discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author was partially supported by the “Agence Nationale de la Recherche” (ANR), Projet Blanc EMAQS number ANR-2011-BS01-017-01.
Appendix: Proof of Proposition 1
Appendix: Proof of Proposition 1
Let \(a^{\prime }, b^{\prime }\) be such that \(-1<a<a^{\prime }<b^{\prime }<b<1\). All the computations of the proof will be made assuming, first, \(g \in H^1(0,T;L^2(-1,1)) \cap L^2(0,T;H^2 \cap H^1_0(-1,1))\). Then, the conclusion of Proposition 1 will follow by a density argument.
Consider the weight function
where \(\beta \in C^2([-1,1])\) satisfies
and \(M = M(T,n,\beta )>0\) will be chosen later on. We also introduce the function
that satisfies
where
We develop the classical proof (see [25]), taking the \(L^{2}(Q)\)-norm in the identity (41), then developing the double product which leads to
where \(Q:=(0,T) \times (-1,1)\). After computations (see [5] for details, we get
Now, in the left hand side of (44), we separate the terms on \((0,T) \times (a^{\prime },b^{\prime })\) and those on \((0,T)\times [(-1,a^{\prime }) \cup (b^{\prime },1)]\). One has
where \(C_{1}=C_1(\beta ):=\min \{ -\beta ^{\prime \prime }(x) ; x \in [-1,a^{\prime }] \cup [b^{\prime },1] \}\) is positive thanks to the assumption (39) and \(C_{2}=C_2(\beta ):=\sup \{ |\beta ^{\prime \prime }(x)| ; x \in [a^{\prime },b^{\prime }] \}\). Moreover,
Hence, owing to (37) and (39), there exist \(m_1=m_1(\beta )>0\,C_{3}=C_{3}(\beta )>0\) and \(C_{4}=C_{4}(\beta )>0\) such that for every \(M \geqslant M_1\) and \(t \in (0,T)\),
where
Using (44), (45) and (46), we deduce, for every \(M \geqslant M_{1}\),
Let
When \(M \geqslant M_2\), we have
because
From now on, we take
where
so that \(M \geqslant M_1\) and \(M_2\) (see (47) and (49)). We have
where \(C_6=C_6(\beta ):=C_4+C_3/2,\,C_2^{\prime }=C_2(\beta )=C_2+C_1/2\). Since for every \(\epsilon >0\)
and choosing
from (52), (53) and (40) we deduce that
where \(C_7=C_7(\beta ):=[1-1/(1+\epsilon )]C_1/2,\,C_{8}=C_{8}(\beta ):=2C_{2}^{\prime }\) and \(C_{9}=C_{9}(\beta ):=C_{6}+2C_{2}^{\prime } \sup \{ \beta ^{\prime }(x)^{2} ; x \in [a^{\prime },b^{\prime }] \}\). Adding the same quantity in both sides, we get
where \(C_{10}=C_{10}(\beta ):=C_{8}+C_7\) and \(C_{11}=C_{11}(\beta ):=C_{9}+C_3/4\). Thanks to a cut-off function \(\rho \) such that
it is classic to get
for some constant \(C_{12}=C_{12}(\beta )>0\). Combining (55) with the previous inequality, we get
where \(C_{13}=C_{13}(\beta ,\rho ):=C_{11}+C_{12}\). Then, the global Carleman estimates (10) holds with
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beauchard, K. Null controllability of Kolmogorov-type equations. Math. Control Signals Syst. 26, 145–176 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-013-0110-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-013-0110-x