Abstract
In this paper, we will study the strongly nonlinear parabolic problems of the type
where \(b(u_{0})\) belongs to \(L^{1}(\Omega )\), and the behavior of \(H(x,t,\xi )\) satisfies the growth conditions. Our work focuses on establishing the existence and uniqueness of a renormalized solution for this quasilinear parabolic equation. Furthermore, we conclude some regularity results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Blanchard, D., Murat, F.: Renormalised solutions of nonlinear parabolic problems with L1 data: existence and uniqueness. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 127(6), 1137–1152 (1997)
Prignet, A.: Existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions of parabolic problems with L1 data. Nonlinear Anal. 28, 1943–1954 (1997)
Carrillo, J., Wittbold, P.: Uniqueness of renormalized solutions of degenerate elliptic-parabolic problems. J. Differ. Equ. 156(1), 93–121 (1999)
Droniou, J., Prignet, A.: Equivalence between entropy and renormalized solutions for parabolic equations with smooth measure data. NoDEA Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 14(1–2), 181–205 (2007)
Petitta, F.: Renormalized solutions of nonlinear parabolic equations with general measure data. Annali di Matematica 187, 563–604 (2008)
Blanchard, D., Murat, F., Redwane, H.: Existence and uniqueness of a renormalized solution for a fairly general class of nonlinear parabolic problems. J. Differ. Equ. 177, 331–374 (2001)
Blanchard, D., Guibé, O., Redwane, H.: Existence and uniqueness of a solution for a class of parabolic equations with two unbounded nonlinearities. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 15(1), 197–217 (2016)
Blanchard, D., Redwane, H.: Renormalized solutions for a class of nonlinear parabolic evolution problems. J. Math. Pures Appl 77, 117–151 (1998)
Aberqi, A., Bennouna, J., Hammoumi, M.: Uniqueness of renormalized solutions for a class of parabolic equations. Ric. Mat. 66(2), 629–644 (2017)
Akdim, Y., Benkirane, A., El Moumni, M., Redwane, H.: Existence of renormalized solutions for strongly nonlinear parabolic problems with measure data. Georgian Math. J. 23(3), 303–321 (2016)
Benkirane, A., El Hadfi, Y., El Moumni, M.: Existence results for doubly nonlinear parabolic equations with two lower order terms and L1 -data. Ukrainian Math. J. 71(5), 692–717 (2019)
Ahmedatt, T., Hajji, Y., Hjiaj, H.: Entropy solutions for some non-coercive quasilinear p(x)-parabolic equations with L1-data. J. Elliptic. Parabol. Equ. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41808-023-00255-3
Bouzelmate, A., Hajji, Y., Hjiaj, H.: Entropy solutions for some nonlinear p(x)-parabolic problems with degenerate coercivity. Rend. Mat. Appl. 44(34), 237–266 (2023)
Salmani, A., Akdim, Y., Mekkour, M.: Renormalized solutions for nonlinear anisotropic parabolic equations. In: 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Advanced Computing Sciences (ISACS), Taza, Morocco, pp. 1-8 (2019)
Weilin, Z., Yuanchun, R., Wei, W.: Existence and regularity results for anisotropic parabolic equations with degenerate coercivity. arXiv:2303.09386v1
Abdou, M.H., Chrif, M., El Manouni, S., Hjiaj, H.: On a class of nonlinear anisotropic parabolic problems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 146A, 1–21 (2016)
Antontsev, S., Shmarev, S.: Localization of solutions of anisotropic parabolic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 725–737 (2009)
Chrif, M., El Manouni, S., Hjiaj, H.: On the study of strongly parabolic problems involving anisotropic operators in \(L^{1}\). Monatsh. Math. 195(4), 611–647 (2021)
Feo, F., Vázquez, J.L., Volzone, B.: Anisotropic p-Laplacian Evolution of Fast Diffusion Type. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 21, 523–555 (2021)
Li, F., Zhao, H.: Anisotropic parabolic equations with measure data. J. Partial Differ. Equ. 14, 21–30 (2001)
Zhan, H., Feng, Z.: Existence and stability of the doubly nonlinear anisotropic parabolic equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 497, 1–22 (2020)
Nardo, R., Feo, F., Guibé, O.: Existence result for nonlinear parabolic equations with lower order terms. Anal. Appl. (Singap.) 2(2), 161–1866 (2011)
Nardo, R., Feo, F., Guibé, O.: Uniqueness of renormalized solutions to nonlinear parabolic problems with lower order terms. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A: Math. 143(6), 1185–1208 (2013)
Boccardo, L., Gallouët, T.: On some nonlinear elliptic and parabolic equations involving measure data. J. Funct. Anal. 87, 149–169 (1989)
Porzio, M.M.: Existence of solutions for some “noncoercive’’ parabolic equations. Discrete Contin. Dynam. Systems 5(3), 553–568 (1999)
Mihailescu, M., Pucci, P., Radulescu, V.: Eigenvalue problems for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations with variable exponent. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 340, 687–698 (2008)
Fragalá, I., Gazzola, F., Kawohl, B.: Existence and nonexistence results for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 21, 715–734 (2004)
Troisi, M.: Teoremi di inclusione per spazi di Sobolev non isotropi. Ricerche mat. 18, 3–24 (1969)
Simon, J.: Compact set in the space \(L^p(0, T, B)\). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 146, 65–96 (1987)
Bendahmane, M., Wittbold, P., Zimmermann, A.: Renormalized solutions for a nonlinear parabolic equation with variable exponents and L1-data. J. Differ. Equ. 249(6), 1483–1515 (2010)
Lorentz, G.G.: Some new functional spaces. Ann. of Math. 2(51), 37–55 (1950)
O’Neil, R.: Integral transforms and tensor products on Orlicz space and L(p, q) spaces. J. Analyse Math. 21, 1–276 (1968)
Lions, J.L.: Quelques methodes de résolution des problèmes aux limites non linéaires. Dunod et Gauthiers-Villars, Paris (1969)
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no Conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Lemma 6
Let \(\displaystyle \psi _{h}(s)=1-\frac{\left| T_{2\,h}(s)- T_{h}(s)\right| }{h}\), then for any \(h\ge 1\) we have
1.1 Proof of Lemma 6
Let \(h\ge 1\), we define
In view of (57), we have
On the other hand, it’s easy to see that \(0\le \overline{\Psi }_{h,k}(r)\le B_{n,k}(r)\) and thanks to (32), then
Since \(\displaystyle \overline{\Psi }_{h,k}(u_{n}(T))\rightarrow \overline{\Psi }_{h,k}(u(T))\) a.e. in \(\Omega \), thanks to the Fatou’s lemma we obtain
Hence
Lemma 7
Let \(u\in L^{\infty }(0,T,L^{2}(\Omega ))\cap L^{{\textbf {p}}}(0,T,W^{1,{\textbf {p}}}_{0}(\Omega )),\) then there exists a constant \(C>0\) such that
1.1.1 Proof of Lemma 7
Let \(t\in [0,T],\) by using Hölder’s and Sobolev inequalities together, we have
On the other hand, we set \(\displaystyle f_{0}(t)=\int _{\Omega }|u(x,t)|^{2}dx,\) and \( r_{0}=\frac{{\overline{p}}}{N},\) and for \(i=1,\cdots ,N \)
We integrate in (126) on (0, T) and using Hölder’s inequality, we get
Consequently (125) is hold.
Lemma 8
Assume that \(Q_{T}=\Omega \times (0,T)\) with \(\Omega \) is an open bounded subset of \(I\!\!R^{N}\) and \(p_{i}>1\) for \(i=1,\cdots , N\). Let u be a measurable function satisfying
for every \(k>0\) and such that
where M is constant, then \(|u|^{\frac{N({\overline{p}}-1)+{\overline{p}}}{N+{\overline{p}}}}\in L^{\frac{N+{\overline{p}}}{N},\infty }(Q_{T})\), and \(|D^{i}u|^{\lambda _{i}}\in L^{\frac{N+2}{N+1},\infty }(Q_{T}),\) with
Moreover
and
1.1.2 Proof of Lemma 8
Firstly, we prove (129). Thanks to Lemma7 we have
Let \(k>0\), we have
By taking \(\displaystyle k=h^{\frac{N+{\overline{p}}}{N({\overline{p}}-1)+{\overline{p}}}}\), we get
Hence
We obtain
Thus
Now, we prove that (130). First case \(p_{i}<{\overline{p}}\), let \(\gamma >1\) and using (128), we have
According to (132) and taking \(\displaystyle \gamma =\mu ^{\frac{N+2}{N(p_{i}-1)+p_{i}}}\), since \(\displaystyle \gamma >1\) then \( \mu >1\). Moreover we can see \( \mu ^{\frac{p_{i}(N+2)}{N(p_{i}-1)+p_{i}}}\ge \mu ^{ \frac{{\overline{p}}(N+2)}{N({\overline{p}}-1)+{\overline{p}}}}\), therefore
Taking \(\displaystyle k=M^{\frac{1}{N+1}}\mu ^{\frac{N+2}{N+1}\frac{N}{N({\overline{p}}-1)+{\overline{p}}}}\), we conclude that
It follows that
For the second case of \(p_{i}>{\overline{p}}\): Let \(\gamma >1\), we have
By taking \(\gamma = \mu ^{\frac{N+2}{N({\overline{p}}-1)+{\overline{p}}}}\), we obtain
Similarly as in the first case, we deduce that
Lemma 9
Assume that \(Q_{T}=\Omega \times (0,T)\) with \(\Omega \) open subset of \(I\!\!R^{N}\) of finite measure and \(p_{i}>1\), for \(i=1,\cdots , N\). Let u be a measurable function satisfying
for every \(k>0\) and \(\frac{2(N+1)}{N+2}<\alpha \le {\underline{p}}\) such that
where M and \(C_{0}\) is constant, then
and
where C is a constant depending only on N and \(C_{0}\).
1.1.3 Proof of Lemma 9
since \(\alpha <{\underline{p}}\), we have \(\displaystyle L^{\textbf{p}}(0,T,W_{0}^{1,\textbf{p}}(\Omega )))\hookrightarrow L^{\alpha }(0,T,W_{0}^{1,\alpha }(\Omega )))\) is a continous embedding. By applying Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Höder inequality we get
It follows that: for every \(k>0\) we have
Hence the estimation (145) hold true.
Now, we will prove (146). Using (147), we have
By taking \(k=\gamma ^{\frac{N}{N+1}}M^{\frac{1}{N+1}}\), we can conclude for any \(\gamma >0\)
It follows that
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hajji, Y., Hjiaj, H. Existence and Uniqueness Solutions for Some Strongly Quasilinear Parabolic Problems in Anisotropic Sobolev Spaces. Results Math 79, 175 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-024-02191-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-024-02191-7
Keywords
- Quasilinear parabolic equations
- uniqueness of solution
- anisotropic Sobolev spaces
- renormalized solutions