Abstract
We present a new computational framework to simulate the multi-phase convective conjugate heat transfer (CHT) problems emanating from realistic manufacturing processes. The paper aims to address the challenges of boundary-fitted and immersed boundary approaches, which cannot simultaneously achieve fluid-solid interface accuracy and geometry-flexibility in simulating this class of multi-physics systems. The method development is built on a stabilized Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE)-based finite element thermal multi-phase formulation, which is discretized by overlapping one boundary-fitted mesh and non-boundary-fitted mesh with a quasi-direct coupling approach via Schwarz alternating method. The framework utilizes a volume-of-fluid (VoF)-based multi-phase flow model coupled with a thermodynamics model with phase transitions to capture the conjugate heat transfer between the solid and multi-phase flows and the multi-stage boiling and condensation phenomena. The quasi-direct coupling approach allows the exact and automatic enforcement of temperature and heat-flux compatibility at the fluid-solid interface with large property discontinuities. From the perspective of method development, the proposed framework fully exploits boundary-fitted approach’s strength in resolving fluid-solid interface and boundary layers and immersed boundary approach’s geometry flexibility in handling moving objects while circumventing each individual’s limitations. From the perspective of industry applications, such as water quenching processes, the resulting model can enable accurate temperature prediction directly from process parameters without invoking the conventional empirical heat transfer coefficient (HTC)-based approach that requires intensive calibration. We present the mathematical formulation and numerical implementation in detail and demonstrate the claimed features of the proposed framework through a set of benchmark problems and real-world water quenching processes. The accuracy of the proposed framework is carefully assessed by comparing the prediction with other computational results and experimental measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Luikov A, Perelman T, Levitin R, Gdalevich L (1970) Heat transfer from a plate in a compressible gas flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 13(8):1261–1270
Xiao B, Wang Q, Jadhav P, Li K (2010) An experimental study of heat transfer in aluminum castings during water quenching. J Mater Process Technol 210(14):2023–2028
Lua J, Yan J, Li P, Zhao Z, Karuppiah A, Stuebner M (2021) Novel multi-physics-based modeling of a quenching process with thermal-metallurgical-mechanical interactions in aluminum components, in: 77th Annual Vertical Flight Society Forum and Technology Display: The Future of Vertical Flight, FORUM 2021, Vertical Flight Society
Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar T (2012) Space-time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid-structure interaction modeling. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 19(2):171–225
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M, Takizawa K, Tezduyar T (2012) ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(supp02):1230002
Calderer R, Zhu L, Gibson R, Masud A (2015) Residual-based turbulence models and arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian framework for free surface flows. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25(12):2287–2317
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid-structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0261-7
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(94)00077-8
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0772-0
Peskin CS (1972) Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10(2):252–271
Parvizian J, Düster A, Rank E (2007) Finite cell method: h- and p- extension for embedded domain methods in solid mechanics. Comput Mech 41:122–133
Düster A, Parvizian J, Yang Z, Rank E (2008) The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(45–48):3768–3782
Xu F, Schillinger D, Kamensky D, Varduhn V, Wang C, Hsu M (2016) The tetrahedral finite cell method for fluids: Immersogeometric analysis of turbulent flow around complex geometries. Computers & Fluids 141:135–154
Main A, Scovazzi G (2018) The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. part i: Poisson and stokes problems,. J Comput Phys 372:972–995
Main A, Scovazzi G (2018) The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. part ii: Linear advection–diffusion and incompressible navier–stokes equations,. J Comput Phys 372:996–1026
Song T, Main A, Scovazzi G, Ricchiuto M (2018) The shifted boundary method for hyperbolic systems: Embedded domain computations of linear waves and shallow water flows. J Comput Phys 369:45–79
Li K, Atallah N, Main A, Scovazzi G (2020) The shifted interface method: A flexible approach to embedded interface computations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 121(3):492–518
Colomés O, Main A, Nouveau L, Scovazzi G (2021) A weighted shifted boundary method for free surface flow problems. J Comput Phys 424:109837
Hansbo A, Hansbo P (2002) An unfitted finite element method, based on nitsche’s method, for elliptic interface problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(47–48):5537–5552
Bazilevs Y, Kamran K, Moutsanidis G, Benson DJ, Oñate E (2017) A new formulation for air-blast fluid-structure interaction using an immersed approach. Part I: basic methodology and FEM-based simulations, Computational Mechanics 60(1):83–100
Bazilevs Y, Moutsanidis G, Bueno J, Kamran K, Kamensky D, Hillman MC, Gomez H, Chen JS (2017) A new formulation for air-blast fluid-structure interaction using an immersed approach: Part II–coupling of IGA and meshfree discretizations. Comput Mech 60(1):101–116
Behzadinasab M, Moutsanidis G, Trask N, Foster J, Bazilevs Y (2021) Coupling of iga and peridynamics for air-blast fluid-structure interaction using an immersed approach. Forces in Mechanics 4:100045
Moutsanidis G, Koester J, Tupek M, Chen J, Bazilevs Y (2020) Treatment of near-incompressibility in meshfree and immersed-particle methods. Computational particle mechanics 7(2):309–327
Moutsanidis G, Kamensky D, Chen J, Bazilevs Y (2018) Hyperbolic phase field modeling of brittle fracture: Part ii-immersed iga-rkpm coupling for air-blast-structure interaction. J Mech Phys Solids 121:114–132
Liu WK, Liu Y, Farrell D, Zhang L, Wang XS, Fukui Y, Patankar N, Zhang Y, Bajaj C, Lee J et al (2006) Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(13–16):1722–1749
Zhang L, Gerstenberger A, Wang X, Liu W (2004) Immersed finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(21–22):2051–2067
Zhang LT, j. v. n. p. y. p. Gay M Immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interactions
Wang X, Zhang L (2010) Interpolation functions in the immersed boundary and finite element methods. Comput Mech 45(4):321–334
Wang X, Zhang L, Liu W (2009) On computational issues of immersed finite element methods. J Comput Phys 228(7):2535–2551
Wang X, Zhang L (2013) Modified immersed finite element method for fully-coupled fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 267:150–169
Schillinger D, Dede L, Scott MA, Evans J, Borden M, Rank E, Hughes T (2012) An isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of nurbs, immersed boundary methods, and t-spline cad surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249:116–150
Hsu M-C, Kamensky D, Xu F, Kiendl J, Wang C, Wu MCH, Mineroff J, Reali A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS (2015) Dynamic and fluid-structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models. Comput Mech 55:1211–1225
Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Schillinger D, Evans JA, Aggarwal A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2015) An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284:1005–1053
Zhu Q, Xu F, Xu S, Hsu M, Yan J (2020) An immersogeometric formulation for free-surface flows with application to marine engineering problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:112748
Volkov E (1968) The method of composite meshes for finite and infinite regions with piecewise smooth boundary. Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni VA Steklova 96:117–148
Henshaw W (1994) A fourth-order accurate method for the incompressible navier-stokes equations on overlapping grids. J Comput Phys 113(1):13–25
Henshaw W, Chand K (2009) A composite grid solver for conjugate heat transfer in fluid-structure systems. J Comput Phys 228(10):3708–3741
Appelö D, Banks J, Henshaw W, Schwendeman D (2012) Numerical methods for solid mechanics on overlapping grids: Linear elasticity. J Comput Phys 231(18):6012–6050
Koblitz A, Lovett S, Nikiforakis N, Henshaw W (2017) Direct numerical simulation of particulate flows with an overset grid method. J Comput Phys 343:414–431
Meng F, Banks J, Henshaw W, Schwendeman D (2020) Fourth-order accurate fractional-step imex schemes for the incompressible navier-stokes equations on moving overlapping grids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 366:113040
MEAKIN R (1993) Moving body overset grid methods for complete aircraft tiltrotor simulations, in: 11th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, p. 3350
Chan W (2009) Overset grid technology development at nasa ames research center. Computers & Fluids 38(3):496–503
Chandar D, Damodaran M (2010) Numerical study of the free flight characteristics of a flapping wing in low reynolds numbers. AIAA J. Aircraft 47(1):141–150
Lani A, Sjögreen B, Yee H, Henshaw W (2013) Variable high-order multiblock overlapping grid methods for mixed steady and unsteady multiscale viscous flows, part ii: hypersonic nonequilibrium flows. Communications in Computational Physics 13(2):583–602
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, Hoboken
De Schepper S, Heynderickx G, Marin G (2009) Modeling the evaporation of a hydrocarbon feedstock in the convection section of a steam cracker. Computers & Chemical Engineering 33(1):122–132
De Schepper S, Heynderickx G, Marin G (2008) Cfd modeling of all gas-liquid and vapor-liquid flow regimes predicted by the baker chart. Chem Eng J 138(1–3):349–357
Hughes T, Mallet M (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: Iv. a discontinuity-capturing operator for multidimensional advective-diffusive systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 58(3):329–336
Tezduyar TE, Senga M (2006) Stabilization and shock-capturing parameters in supg formulation of compressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(13–16):1621–1632
Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Computers & Fluids 36:12–26
Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259
Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44
Hughes T, Franca L, Hulbert G (1989) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics : Viii. the galerkin/least-squares method for advective-diffusive equations,. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 73(2):173–189
Harari I, Hughes T (1992) What are c and h?: Inequalities for the analysis and design of finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 97(2):157–192
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid-structure interaction modeling. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 19:171–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9071-3
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(supp02):1230002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512300025
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118483565
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Challenges and directions in computational fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202513400010
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2015) New directions and challenging computations in fluid dynamics modeling with stabilized and multiscale methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25:2217–2226. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515020029
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Computational analysis methods for complex unsteady flow problems. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 29:825–838. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519020020
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Computational methods for parachute fluid-structure interactions. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 19:125–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9070-4
Takizawa K, Fritze M, Montes D, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 50:835–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0761-3
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52:1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0880-5
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boswell C, Tsutsui Y, Montel K (2015) Special methods for aerodynamic-moment calculations from parachute FSI modeling. Comput Mech 55:1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1074-5
Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid-structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00204-8
Zhu Q, Yan J, Tejada-Martínez A, Bazilevs Y (2020) Variational multiscale modeling of langmuir turbulent boundary layers in shallow water using isogeometric analysis. Mech Res Commun 108:103570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103570
Ravensbergen M, Helgedagsrud TA, Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A (2020) A variational multiscale framework for atmospheric turbulent flows over complex environmental terrains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 368:113182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113182
Yan J, Korobenko A, Tejada-Martinez AE, Golshan R, Bazilevs Y (2017) A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids 158:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.12.004
Cen H, Zhou Q, Korobenko A (2022) Wall-function-based weak imposition of dirichlet boundary condition for stratified turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids 234:105257
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Wright S, Takizawa K, Henicke B, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: Geometry modeling and aerodynamics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 65:207–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2400
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Stabilized space-time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:333–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0589-2
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Montes D, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space-time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:647–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0614-5
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014) Space-time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0888-x
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Øiseth O, Mathisen KM, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Engineering analysis and design with ALE-VMS and space-time methods. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 21:481–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9113-0
Takizawa K (2014) Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space-time methods. Comput Mech 54:193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0999-z
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines with the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 21:359–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9119-7
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Mochizuki H, Hattori H, Mei S, Pan L, Montel K (2015) Space-time VMS method for flow computations with slip interfaces (ST-SI). Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25:2377–2406. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400126
Otoguro Y, Mochizuki H, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2020) Space-time variational multiscale isogeometric analysis of a tsunami-shelter vertical-axis wind turbine. Comput Mech 66:1443–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01910-5
Ravensbergen M, Bayram AM, Korobenko A (2020) The actuator line method for wind turbine modelling applied in a variational multiscale framework. Comput Fluids 201:104465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104465
Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2013) Aerodynamic simulation of vertical-axis wind turbines. J Appl Mech 81:021011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024415
Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Deng X, Yan J, Kinzel M, Dabiri JO (2014) FSI modeling of vertical-axis wind turbines. J Appl Mech 81:081006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027466
Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) Recent advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS computational aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: Research from Lead Investigators under Forty – 2018, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_7
Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Computer modeling of wind turbines: 1. ALE-VMS and ST-VMS aerodynamic and FSI analysis, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 26:1059–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9292-1
Bayram AM, Bear C, Bear M, Korobenko A (2020) Performance analysis of two vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbines using variational multiscale method. Comput Fluids 200:104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104432
Yan J, Korobenko A, Deng X, Bazilevs Y (2016) Computational free-surface fluid-structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines. Comput Fluids 141:155–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.03.008
Yan J, Deng X, Xu F, Xu S, Zhu Q (2020) Numerical simulations of two back-to-back horizontal axis tidal stream turbines in free-surface flows. Journal of Applied Mechanics 87(6). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046317
Kuraishi T, Zhang F, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2021) Wind turbine wake computation with the st-vms method, isogeometric discretization and multidomain method: I. computational framework. Comput Mech 68(1):113–130
Kuraishi T, Zhang F, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2021) Wind turbine wake computation with the st-vms method, isogeometric discretization and multidomain method: Ii. spatial and temporal resolution,. Comput Mech 68(1):175–184
Ravensbergen M, Mohamed A, Korobenko A (2020) The actuator line method for wind turbine modelling applied in a variational multiscale framework. Computers & Fluids 201:104465
Mohamed A, Bear C, Bear M, Korobenko A (2020) Performance analysis of two vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbines using variational multiscale method. Computers & Fluids 200:104432
Bayram A, Korobenko A (2020) Variational multiscale framework for cavitating flows, Computational Mechanics 1–19
Yan J, Deng X, Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y (2017) Free-surface flow modeling and simulation of horizontal-axis tidal-stream turbines. Comput Fluids 158:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.06.016
Zhu Q, Yan J (2021) A moving-domain CFD solver in FEniCS with applications to tidal turbine simulations in turbulent flows. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 81:532–546
Bayram AM, Korobenko A (2020) Variational multiscale framework for cavitating flows. Comput Mech 66:49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01840-2
Cen H, Zhou Q, Korobenko A (2021) Variational multiscale framework for cavitating flows. Computers & Fluids 214:104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104765
Codoni D, Moutsanidis G, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y, Johansen C, Korobenko A (2021) Stabilized methods for high-speed compressible flows: toward hypersonic simulations. Comput Mech 67:785–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01963-6
Terahara T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C (2020) Heart valve isogeometric sequentially-coupled FSI analysis with the space-time topology change method. Comput Mech 65:1167–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01813-0
Hsu M-C, Kamensky D, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2014) Fluid-structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation. Comput Mech 54:1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1059-4
Johnson EL, Wu MCH, Xu F, Wiese NM, Rajanna MR, Herrema AJ, Ganapathysubramanian B, Hughes TJR, Sacks MS, Hsu M-C (2020) Thinner biological tissues induce leaflet flutter in aortic heart valve replacements. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:19007–19016
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C (2019) Computational cardiovascular flow analysis with the variational multiscale methods. Journal of Advanced Engineering and Computation 3:366–405. https://doi.org/10.25073/jaec.201932.245
Kuraishi T, Terahara T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar T (2022) Computational flow analysis with boundary layer and contact representation: I. tire aerodynamics with road contact. J Mech 38:77–87
Terahara T, Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar T (2022) Computational flow analysis with boundary layer and contact representation: Ii. heart valve flow with leaflet contact,. J Mech 38:185–194
Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Nagaoka K, Avsar R, Zhang Y (2019) Space-time VMS flow analysis of a turbocharger turbine with isogeometric discretization: Computations with time-dependent and steady-inflow representations of the intake/exhaust cycle. Comput Mech 64:1403–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01722-2
Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Nagaoka K, Mei S (2019) Turbocharger turbine and exhaust manifold flow computation with the Space-Time Variational Multiscale Method and Isogeometric Analysis. Computers & Fluids 179:764–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.019
Xu F, Moutsanidis G, Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Murugan M, Ghoshal A, Bazilevs Y (2017) Compressible flows on moving domains: Stabilized methods, weakly enforced essential boundary conditions, sliding interfaces, and application to gas-turbine modeling. Computers & Fluids 158:201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.02.006
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kuraishi T (2015) Multiscale ST methods for thermo-fluid analysis of a ground vehicle and its tires. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25:2227–2255. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400072
Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tabata S, Asada S, Tezduyar TE (2014) Multiscale thermo-fluid analysis of a tire. In: Proceedings of the 19th Japan Society of Computational Engineering and Science Conference, Hiroshima, Japan
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kuraishi T (2016) Flow analysis around a tire with actual geometry, road contact and deformation, in preparation
Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) Space–time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact and tire deformation. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: Research from Lead Investigators under Forty – 2018, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_8
Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Tire aerodynamics with actual tire geometry, road contact and tire deformation. Comput Mech 63:1165–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1642-1
Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Space-time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact, tire deformation, road roughness and fluid film. Comput Mech 64:1699–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01746-8
Yan J, Korobenko A, Deng X, Bazilevs Y (2016) Computational free-surface fluid-structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines. Computers & Fluids 141:155–174
Hsu M, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: Validation and the role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech 50(4):499–511
Zhu Q, Yan J (2021) A mixed interface-capturing/interface-tracking formulation for thermal multi-phase flows with emphasis on metal additive manufacturing processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 383:113910
Liu J, Lan I, Tikenogullari O, Marsden A (2021) A note on the accuracy of the generalized-\(\alpha \) scheme for the incompressible navier-stokes equations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 122(2):638–651
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the U.S. Navy through the contract of N68335-21-C-0057. J. Yan also wants to acknowledge the support of computational facilities from Texas Advanced Computing Center through the allocation of CTS20014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Z., Zhu, Q., Karuppiah, A. et al. Computational multi-phase convective conjugate heat transfer on overlapping meshes: a quasi-direct coupling approach via Schwarz alternating method. Comput Mech 71, 71–88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02217-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02217-3