Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis

Outcome and costs

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis.

Methods

Fourteen consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (LSC) for diverticulitis were evaluated. Medical records from a control group of 14 matched patients undergoing traditional open sigmoid colectomy (OSC) for diverticulitis were reviewed for comparison.

Results

Mean age, operative time, morbidity, and mortality of the LSC and OSC groups were not significantly different. However, the mean estimated blood loss (171cc vs 321cc), days to p.o. liquids (2.9 vs 6.1), and postoperative stay (6.3 vs 9.2 days) were all significantly less in the LSC patients. Although the mean operating room charges were greater in the LSC patients ($10,589 vs $8,207) the mean total hospital charges ($29,981 vs $36,745) and costs ($11,528 vs $13,426) were markedly less.

Conclusions

Compared with OSC for diverticulitis, LSC results in a more rapid return of bowel function and shortened hospital stay. Despite the greater operating room charges of LSC, the total hospital charges and costs are lessened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroll BJ, Phillips EH (1994) Nomenclature in laparoscopic colectomy. In Lezoche E (ed) Documento editoriale sir Milano. Scientific presentation at workshop on advanced laparoscopic surgery, L’Aquila, Italy, June

    Google Scholar 

  2. Homer JL (1958) Natural history of diverticulosis of the colon. Dig Dis Sci 3: 343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franklin ME Jr, Ramos R, Rosenthal D, Schuessler W (1993) Laparoscopic colon procedures. World J Surg 17: 51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guilloua PJ. (1992) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340: 831–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Ramos R, Rosenthal D (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216: 703–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Welch CE, Allen AW, Donaldson GA (1953) An appraisal of resection of the colon for diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Ann Surg 138: 332–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 80: 1602–1605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1992) Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 651–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liberman, M.A., Phillips, E.H., Carroll, B.J. et al. Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 10, 15–18 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910002

Key words

Navigation