Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcome of the delineation-without-negative-biopsy strategy in magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy for identifying the extent of differentiated-type early gastric cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The histologic evaluation of biopsy samples collected from the surrounding mucosa has conventionally been used to determine the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer. Recently, optical delineation using magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) has been considered an alternative method to histologic evaluation. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and efficacy of this method in identifying cancer margins.

Methods

Overall, 921 patients with 1018 differentiated-type early gastric tumors who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were examined. Before ESD, the lesions were classified based on whether they have clear or unclear margins on magnifying IEE. When the lesions had clear margins, the marking dots were placed outside the margins without a negative biopsy. Successful delineation was defined as lesions with clear margins and accurate delineation based on histopathological examination. The primary outcome was the accuracy of optical delineation without a negative biopsy compared with histopathological diagnosis. Moreover, the clinicopathological factors associated with an unsuccessful delineation were assessed.

Results

Of 1018 lesions, 820 had a clear margin and 198 an unclear margin. Of 820 lesions with a clear margin, 817 and 3 had an accurate and inaccurate delineation, respectively, according to the histological examination. Accordingly, the accuracy rate of optical delineation was 99.6% (817/820). The significant independent factors associated with an unsuccessful delineation were absence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication, tumor size > 20 mm, and moderate differentiation.

Conclusions

Optical delineation may be an alternative method to histological evaluation in lesions with a clear margin on magnifying IEE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T et al (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2018) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Isobe Y et al (2013) Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 16:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagahama T, Yao K, Maki S et al (2011) Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for determining the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer when there is an unclear margin by chromoendoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 74:1259–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Suzuki H, Oda I, Sekiguchi M et al (2016) Factors associated with incomplete gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection due to misdiagnosis. Endosc Int Open 4:E788-793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K (2009) Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 41:462–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohi O, Yagi N, Majima A et al (2017) Diagnostic ability of magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging for early gastric cancer: a prospective study. Gastric Cancer 20:297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ezoe Y, Muto M, Uedo N et al (2011) Magnifying narrowband imaging is more accurate than conventional white-light imaging in diagnosis of gastric mucosal cancer. Gastroenterology 141:2017–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiyotoki S, Nishikawa J, Satake M et al (2010) Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for determining gastric tumor margin. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:1636–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uedo N, Fujishiro M, Goda K et al (2011) Role of narrow band imaging for diagnosis of early-stage esophagogastric cancer: current consensus of experienced endoscopists in Asia-Pacific region. Dig Endosc 23:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nonaka K, Namoto M, Kitada H et al (2012) Usefulness of the DL in ME with NBI for determining the expanded area of early-stage differentiated gastric carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4:362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horii Y, Dohi O, Naito Y et al (2019) Efficacy of magnifying narrow band imaging for delineating horizontal margins of early gastric cancer. Digestion 100:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakano T, Dohi O, Naito Y et al (2020) Efficacy and feasibility of magnifying blue laser imaging without biopsy confirmation for the diagnosis of the demarcation of gastric tumors: a randomized controlled study. Dig Dis. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagahama T, Yao K, Uedo N et al (2018) Delineation of the extent of early gastric cancer by magnifying narrow-band imaging and chromoendoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 50:566–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitamura Y, Ito M, Matsuo T et al (2014) Characteristic epithelium with low-grade atypia appears on the surface of gastric cancer after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Helicobacter 19:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 47,045 gastric ESDs were performed in Japan (2014) (K→K653→150323010). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000139390.html

  18. Asada-Hirayama I, Kodashima S, Sakaguchi Y et al (2016) Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is more accurate for determination of horizontal extent of early gastric cancers than chromoendoscopy. Endosc Int Open 4:E690-698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Okamoto N, Kawachi H, Yoshida T et al (2013) “Crawling-type” adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a distinct entity preceding poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer 16:220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asada-Hirayama I, Kodashima S, Goto O et al (2013) Factors predictive of inaccurate determination of horizontal extent of intestinal-type early gastric cancers during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective analysis. Dig Endosc 25:593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi M, Hashimoto S, Nishikura K et al (2013) Magnifying narrow-band imaging of surface maturation in early differentiated-type gastric cancers after Helicobacter pylori eradication. J Gastroenterol 48:1332–1342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saka A, Yagi K, Nimura S (2016) Endoscopic and histological features of gastric cancers after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Gastric Cancer 19:524–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiyasu Kitagawa.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Yoshiyasu Kitagawa, Asuka Ishigaki, Rino Nishii, Osamu Sugita, Taro Hara, and Takuto Suzuki have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitagawa, Y., Ishigaki, A., Nishii, R. et al. Clinical outcome of the delineation-without-negative-biopsy strategy in magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy for identifying the extent of differentiated-type early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 36, 6576–6585 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09053-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09053-9

Keywords

Navigation