Skip to main content
Log in

Patient and surgeon factors contributing to bailout cholecystectomies: a single-institutional retrospective analysis

  • 2021 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomies continue to pose trouble for surgeons in the face of severe inflammation. In the advent of inability to perform an adequate dissection, a “bailout cholecystectomy” is advocated. Conversion to open or subtotal cholecystectomy is among the standard bailout procedures in such instances.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single institution review from January 2016 to August 2019. All patients who underwent a cholecystectomy were included, while those with a concurrent operation, malignancy, planned as an open cholecystectomy, or performed by a low volume surgeon were excluded. Patient characteristics, operative reports, and outcomes were collected, as were surgeon characteristics such as years of experience, case volume, and bailout rate. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed.

Results

2458 (92.6%) underwent laparoscopic total cholecystectomy (LTC) and 196 (7.4%) underwent a bailout cholecystectomy (BOC). BOC patients tended to be older (p < 0.001), male (p < 0.001), have a longer duration of symptoms (p < 0.001), and higher ASA class (p < 0.001). They also had more signs of biliary inflammation, as evidenced by increased leukocytosis (p < 0.001), tachycardia (p < 0.001), bilirubinemia (p = 0.003), common bile duct dilation (p < 0.001), and gallbladder wall thickening (p < 0.001). The BOC cohort also had increased rates of complications, including bile leak (16%, p < 0.001), retained stone (5.1%, p = 0.005), operative time (114 min vs 79 min, p < 0.001), and secondary interventions (22.7%, p < 0.001). Male gender (aOR = 2.8, p < 0.001), preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (aOR = 2.2, p = 0.032), right upper quadrant tenderness (aOR = 3.0, p = 0.008), Asian race (aOR = 2.7, p = 0.014), and intraoperative adhesions (aOR = 13.0, p < 0.001) were found to carry independent risk for BOC. Surgeon bailout rate ≥ 7% was also found to be an independent risk factor for conversion to BOC.

Conclusions

Male gender, signs of biliary inflammation (tachycardia, leukocytosis, dilated CBD, and diagnosis of acute cholecystitis), as well as surgeon bailout rate of 7% were independent risk factors for BOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 55:2398–2405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabour AF, Matsushima K, Love BE, Alicuben ET, Schellenberg MA, Inaba K, Demetriades D (2020) Nationwide trends in the use of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surgery 167:569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, Deziel DJ (2016) Subtotal cholecystectomy-"Fenestrating" vs “Reconstituting” subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg 222:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanford DE (2019) An update on technical aspects of cholecystectomy. Surg Clin N Am 99:245–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lidsky ME, Speicher PJ, Ezekian B, Holt EW, Nussbaum DP, Castleberry AW, Perez A, Pappas TN (2017) Subtotal cholecystectomy for the hostile gallbladder: failure to control the cystic duct results in significant morbidity. HPB 19:547–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H (2015) Subtotal cholecystectomy for “difficult gallbladders”: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 150:159–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henneman D, da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, van Wagensveld BA, Lagarde SM (2013) Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Booij KA, de Reuver PR, van Delden OM, Gouma DJ (2009) Conversion has to be learned: bile duct injury following conversion to open cholecystectomy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 153:A296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197:781–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Miller P, Kermani R, Dao H, O’Donnell K (2012) Gallbladder damage control: compromised procedure for compromised patients. Surg Endosc 26:2779–2783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strasberg SM (2013) A teaching program for the “culture of safety in cholecystectomy” and avoidance of bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 217:751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Bergman JJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ (2001) Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg 234:750–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Halle-Smith JM, Hodson J, Stevens LG, Dasari B, Marudanayagam R, Perera T, Sutcliffe RP, Muiesan P, Isaac J, Mirza DF, Roberts KJ (2020) A comprehensive evaluation of the long-term clinical and economic impact of minor bile duct injury. Surgery 167:942–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manatakis DK, Papageorgiou D, Antonopoulou MI, Stamos N, Agalianos C, Ivros N, Davides D, Pechlivanides G, Kyriazanos I (2019) Ten-year audit of safe bail-out alternatives to the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 43:2728–2733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gelman A (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 235–299

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B (2005) Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J 47:458–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wand M (1995) KernSmooth: functions for kernel smoothing supporting Wand & Jones

  18. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45:1–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Team RC (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  20. Kim Y, Wima K, Jung AD, Martin GE, Dhar VK, Shah SA (2017) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy compared to total cholecystectomy: a matched national analysis. J Surg Res 218:316–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang A, Cohan CM, Beattie G, Mooney CM, Chiang A, Keeley JA (2020) Factors that predict the need for subtotal cholecystectomy. Am Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820979783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadad SM, Vaidya JS, Baker L, Koh HC, Heron TP, Hussain K, Thompson AM (2007) Delay from symptom onset increases the conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 31:1298–1201 (discussion 1302-1293)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Büchler MW (2001) Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 182:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadakis M, Ambe PC, Zirngibl H (2015) Critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis are at increased risk for extensive gallbladder inflammation. World J Emerg Surg 10:59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Endo I, Takada T, Hwang TL, Akazawa K, Mori R, Miura F, Yokoe M, Itoi T, Gomi H, Chen MF, Jan YY, Ker CG, Wang HP, Kiriyama S, Wada K, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Yamamoto M (2017) Optimal treatment strategy for acute cholecystitis based on predictive factors: Japan-Taiwan multicenter cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:346–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Panni RZ, Strasberg SM (2018) Preoperative predictors of conversion as indicators of local inflammation in acute cholecystitis: strategies for future studies to develop quantitative predictors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gregory GC, Kuzman M, Sivaraj J, Navarro AP, Cameron IC, Irving G, Gomez D (2019) C-reactive protein is an independent predictor of difficult emergency cholecystectomy. Cureus 11:e4573

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, Kozaka K, Endo I, Deziel DJ, Miura F, Okamoto K, Hwang TL, Huang WS, Ker CG, Chen MF, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Noguchi Y, Shikata S, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Gabata T, Mori Y, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Jagannath P, Jonas E, Liau KH, Dervenis C, Gouma DJ, Cherqui D, Belli G, Garden OJ, Giménez ME, de Santibañes E, Suzuki K, Umezawa A, Supe AN, Pitt HA, Singh H, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Teoh AYB, Honda G, Sugioka A, Asai K, Gomi H, Itoi T, Kiriyama S, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Matsumura N, Tokumura H, Kitano S, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:41–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Paul Wright G, Stilwell K, Johnson J, Hefty MT, Chung MH (2015) Predicting length of stay and conversion to open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis using the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines in a US population. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:795–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Asai K, Watanabe M, Kusachi S, Matsukiyo H, Saito T, Kodama H, Kiribayashi T, Enomoto T, Nakamura Y, Okamoto Y, Saida Y, Nagao J (2014) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery associated with the severity characteristics according to the Tokyo guidelines. Surg Today 44:2300–2304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ambe PC, Christ H, Wassenberg D (2015) Does the Tokyo guidelines predict the extent of gallbladder inflammation in patients with acute cholecystitis? A single center retrospective analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 15:142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Pitt HA, Umezawa A, Asai K, Han HS, Hwang TL, Mori Y, Yoon YS, Huang WS, Belli G, Dervenis C, Yokoe M, Kiriyama S, Itoi T, Jagannath P, Garden OJ, Miura F, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, de Santibañes E, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Wada K, Honda G, Supe AN, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Gouma DJ, Deziel DJ, Liau KH, Chen MF, Shibao K, Liu KH, Su CH, Chan ACW, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Jonas E, Chen XP, Fan ST, Ker CG, Giménez ME, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Inui K, Sumiyama Y, Yamamoto M (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:55–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR (2013) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gutt CN, Encke J, Köninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmüller K, Schunter O, Götze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Zoller WG, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schön MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Büchler MW (2013) Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 258:385–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Siddiqui MA, Rizvi SAA, Sartaj S, Ahmad I, Rizvi SWA (2017) A standardized ultrasound scoring system for preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Med Ultrasound 25:227–231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Nassar AHM, Hodson J, Ng HJ, Vohra RS, Katbeh T, Zino S, Griffiths EA (2020) Predicting the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and validation of a pre-operative risk score using an objective operative difficulty grading system. Surg Endosc 34:4549–4561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Daradkeh SS, Suwan Z, Abu-Khalaf M (1998) Preoperative ultrasonography and prediction of technical difficulties during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 22:75–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gholipour C, Fakhree MB, Shalchi RA, Abbasi M (2009) Prediction of conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery with artificial neural networks. BMC Surg 9:13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Tripsianis G, Karayiannakis AJ (2005) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:905–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Amin A, Haider MI, Aamir IS, Khan MS, Khalid Choudry U, Amir M, Sadiq A (2019) Preoperative and operative risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in Pakistan. Cureus 11:e5446

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M, Martin MD, Yao DC, Grimes KL, Malangoni MA (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142:556–563 (discussion 563-555)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ishizaki Y, Miwa K, Yoshimoto J, Sugo H, Kawasaki S (2006) Conversion of elective laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy between 1993 and 2004. Br J Surg 93:987–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. da Costa DW, Schepers NJ, Bouwense SA, Hollemans RA, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL, Consten EC, van Goor H, Hofker S, Gooszen HG, Boerma D, Besselink MG (2019) Predicting a “difficult cholecystectomy” after mild gallstone pancreatitis. HPB 21:827–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Reinders JS, Gouma DJ, Heisterkamp J, Tromp E, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D (2013) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more difficult after a previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. HPB 15:230–234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, Zielinski MD (2015) Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system. World J Emerg Surg 10:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Nassar AHM, Ashkar KA, Mohamed AY, Hafiz AA (1995) Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy possible without video technology? Minim Invasive Ther 4:63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S, Botaitis S, Simopoulos C (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. van Dijk AH, Donkervoort SC, Lameris W, de Vries E, Eijsbouts QAJ, Vrouenraets BC, Busch OR, Boermeester MA, de Reuver PR (2017) Short- and long-term outcomes after a reconstituting and fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 225:371–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. LeCompte MT, Robbins KJ, Williams GA, Sanford DE, Hammill CW, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM (2021) Less is more in the difficult gallbladder: recent evolution of subtotal cholecystectomy in a single HPB unit. Surg Endosc 35:3249–3257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Purzner RH, Ho KB, Al-Sukhni E, Jayaraman S (2019) Safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the face of severe inflammation in the cystohepatic triangle: a retrospective review and proposed management strategy for the difficult gallbladder. Can J Surg J 62:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ibrahim S, Hean TK, Ho LS, Ravintharan T, Chye TN, Chee CH (2006) Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 30:1698–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nassar AHM, Zanati HE, Ng HJ, Khan KS, Wood C (2021) Open conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration: subspecialisation safely reduces the conversion rates. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08316-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ábrahám S, Németh T, Benkő R, Matuz M, Váczi D, Tóth I, Ottlakán A, Andrási L, Tajti J, Kovács V, Pieler J, Libor L, Paszt A, Simonka Z, Lázár G (2021) Evaluation of the conversion rate as it relates to preoperative risk factors and surgeon experience: a retrospective study of 4013 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMC Surg 21:151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Donkervoort SC, Dijksman LM, Versluis PG, Clous EA, Vahl AC (2014) Surgeon’s volume is not associated with complication outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 59:39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ken Hine MD, Timothy Park MD, and Eduardo Morales-Vicente MD assisted in data collection and chart review.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miya C. Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Miya C. Yoshida, Takuya Ogami, Kaylee Ho, Eileen X. Bui, Shahenda Khedr, and Chun-Cheng Chen have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, M.C., Ogami, T., Ho, K. et al. Patient and surgeon factors contributing to bailout cholecystectomies: a single-institutional retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 36, 6696–6704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08942-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08942-9

Keywords

Navigation