Skip to main content
Log in

What are the risk factors of conversion from total cholecystectomy to bailout surgery?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is regarded as the first choice for patients with gallbladder diseases, but biliary injury (BDI) still poses serious risks upon implementation of LC. Recently, bailout surgery (BOS; partial cholecystectomy or subtotal cholecystectomy) has been proposed to avoid not only BDI but also major vessels injuries. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the preoperative and perioperative risk factors regarding conversion from total cholecystectomy (TC) to BOS.

Methods

A total of 584 patients who underwent elective LC for gallbladder diseases between January 2006 and April 2018 were analyzed. The patients were divided into the TC group (including conversion open TC) and the BOS group. Univariate and multivariate analyses using preoperative and perioperative clinicolaboratory characteristics were performed to investigate the most significant risk factors associated with conversion to BOS.

Results

There were a total of 33 patients in the BOS group (35 men and 18 women), with 19 patients who underwent open BOS and 14 patients who underwent laparoscopic BOS. From the univariate analyses, age, albumin level, CRP level, WBC, lymph. ratio, neutro. ratio, platelet count (PLt), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, CRP-to-alb ratio, intercurrent acute cholecystitis (AC), and previous biliary tract drainage (PBTD) were considered as risk factors for the conversion to BOS. Multivariate analysis using the 13 parameters selected from the univariate analyses demonstrated that AC (p = 0.04), albumin level (p = 0.01) and age (p = 0.04) were significant risk factors.

Conclusion

Patients with PBTD and AC have a high risk upon conversion from LTC to BOS, and for such patients, LC should be performed cautiously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus conference (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 269:1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleisher LA, Yee K, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Heath R, Bass E, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care. Anesthesiology 90:1746–1755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Umezawa A, Asai K, Suzuki K, Mori Y, Okamoto K, Pitt HA, Han HS, Hwang TL, Yoon YS, Yoon DS, Choi IS, Huang WS, Gimenez ME, Garden OJ, Gouma DJ, Belli G, Dervenis C, Jagannath P, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Liu KH, Su CH, Misawa T, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Tagaya N, Fujioka S, Higuchi R, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Yokoe M, Cherqui D, Honda G, Sugioka A, de Santibanes E, Supe AN, Tokumura H, Kimura T, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Sumiyama Y, Inui K, Yamamoto M (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, Deziel DJ (2016) Subtotal cholecystectomy-"fenestrating" vs "reconstituting" subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg 222:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim Y, Wima K, Jung AD, Martin GE, Dhar VK, Shah SA (2017) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy compared to total cholecystectomy: a matched national analysis. J Surg Res 218:316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, Pitt HA, Garden OJ, Kiriyama S, Hata J, Gabata T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Okamoto K, Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Yamashita Y, Dervenis C, Chan AC, Lau WY, Supe AN, Belli G, Hilvano SC, Liau KH, Kim MH, Kim SW, Ker CG, Tokyo Guidelines Revision C (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta V, Jain G (2019) Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 11:62–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manatakis DK, Papageorgiou D, Antonopoulou MI, Stamos N, Agalianos C, Ivros N, Davides D, Pechlivanides G, Kyriazanos I (2019) Ten-year audit of safe bail-out alternatives to the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 43:2728–2733

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsugi Shimoda.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Mitsugi Shimoda, Ryutaro Udo, Ryousuke Imasato, Oshiro Yukio, and Shuji Suzuki have no conflicts of interest or financial ties associated with this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimoda, M., Udo, R., Imasato, R. et al. What are the risk factors of conversion from total cholecystectomy to bailout surgery?. Surg Endosc 35, 2206–2210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07626-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07626-0

Keywords

Navigation