Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is beneficial for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) is considered a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. Whether LCBDE-PC is feasible and beneficial for patients with PUAS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of LCBDE-PC for patients with PUAS.

Methods

From June 2011 to September 2019, 1167 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures for choledocholithiasis were reviewed retrospectively. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without PUAS in un-matched and matched cohorts.

Results

LCBDE-PC was performed successfully in 88.3% of patients with PUAS, and 92.5% of patients without PUAS (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that PUAS was not a risk factor that affected successful performance of LCBDE-PC. Although a higher rate of conversion to open surgery and longer operative time were observed in patients with PUAS, no significant differences were found between patients with and without PUAS in multivariate and propensity score analysis (P > 0.05). A predictive nomogram for LCBDE-PC failure was developed based on potential predictors from the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Successful performance of LCBDE-PC was associated with operative time. A linear regression model for operative time showed impacted stone in the CBD and intraoperative laser use was the most important factor in determining the operative time.

Conclusion

LCBDE-PC is feasible and beneficial for patients with PUAS. However, patients with PUAS with a high possibility of LCBDE-PC failure from the nomogram and a longer operative time from the linear regression model should be cautious when undergoing LCBDE-PC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CBD:

Common bile duct

LCBDE:

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

PC:

Primary closure

LCBDE-PC:

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure

LCBDE-T:

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with T tube drainage

LC:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OCBDE:

Open common bile duct exploration

OCBDE-PC:

Open common bile duct exploration with primary closure

OCBDE-T:

Open common bile duct exploration with T tube drainage

PS:

Propensity score

PUAS:

Previous upper abdominal surgery

PLAS:

Previous lower abdominal surgery

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

EST:

Endoscopic sphincterotomy

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

MD:

Mean difference

References

  1. Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR (2014) Gallstones. BMJ 348:g2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nzenza TC, Al-Habbal Y, Guerra GR, Manolas S, Yong T, McQuillan T (2018) Recurrent common bile duct stones as a late complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 18

  3. Yoo ES, Yoo BM, Kim JH et al (2018) Evaluation of risk factors for recurrent primary common bile duct stone in patients with cholecystectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 53(4):466–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Costantini R, Caldaralo F, Palmieri C et al (2012) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Ital Chir 83(3):245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G et al (2017) Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 66(5):765–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu HY, Xu M, Shen HJ et al (2015) A meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 39(5):584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gholipour C, Shalchi RA, Abassi M (2007) Efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as primary procedure in acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(5):634–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mattila A, Mrena J, Kellokumpu I (2017) Cost-analysis and effectiveness of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endolaparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surgery 17(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang HW, Chen YJ, Wu CH, Li WD (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage. Am Surg 80(2):178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Podda M, Polignano FM, Luhmann A, Wilson MS, Kulli C, Tait IS (2016) Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30(3):845–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan L, Chen MY, Ji L et al (2018) The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis an up-to-date meta-analysis. Ann Surg 268(2):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasson P, Bai XL, Zhang Q, Liang TB (2016) One-stage laproendoscopic procedure versus two-stage procedure in the management for gallstone disease and biliary duct calculi: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc Other Intervent Tech 30(8):3582–3590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yun KW, Ahn YJ, Lee HW et al (2012) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations. Korean J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 16(4):154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang K, Zhan F, Zhang Y et al (2016) primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration for the patients who underwent prior biliary operation. Surg Endosc 78(5):364–370

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng C, Huang Y, Xie E, Xie D, Peng Y, Wang X (2017) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a safe and definitive treatment for elderly patients. Surg Endosc 31(6):2541–2547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hua J, Meng H, Yao L, et al. (2016) Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc

  17. Burkhart RA, Relles D, Pineda DM et al (2013) Defining treatment and outcomes of hepaticojejunostomy failure following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surgery 17(3):451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sagara Y, Freedman RA, Vaz-Luis I et al (2016) Patient prognostic score and associations with survival improvement offered by radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. J Clin Oncol 34(11):1190–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hua J, Lin S, Qian D, He Z, Zhang T, Song Z (2015) Primary closure and rate of bile leak following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. Digest Surg 32(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hua J, Meng HB, Yao L et al (2017) Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc Other Intervent Tech 31(9):3581–3589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Darkahi B, Liljeholm H, Sandblom G (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 9 years experience from a single center. Front Surgery 3:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Decker G, Borie F, Millat B et al (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17(1):12–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yi HJ, Hong G, Min SK, Lee HK (2015) Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 25(3):250–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, Li JM, Dong ZT, Mo XD (2009) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 157(1):e1-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL (2008) Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(1):29–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee W, Kwon J (2013) Ten-year experience on common bile duct exploration without T-tube insertion. Korean J Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery 17(2):70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S, Botaitis S, Simopoulos C (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 18(1):97–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu JM, Lin HF, Chen KH, Tseng LM, Tsai MS, Huang SH (2007) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 21(4):570–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Nunobe S, Ohyama S, Yamaguchi T (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for patients with earlier upper abdominal open surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 20(1):16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Diez J, Delbene R, Ferreres A (1998) The feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. HPB Surg 10(6):353–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahn KS, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Kim JH (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. World J Surg 35(6):1333–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Law WL, Lee YM, Chu KW (2005) Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical Endosc Other Intervent Tech 19(3):326–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee A, Min SK, Park JJ, Lee HK (2011) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients: as a first treatment strategy for common bile duct stones. J Korean Surg Soc 81(2):128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Akyurek N, Salman B, Irkorucu O et al (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. JSLS 9(2):178–183

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (18ZR1429600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Xu, Wenyan Zheng or Zhenshun Song.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Bin Xu, Tingyi Luo, Tingsong Yang, Shilin Wang, Hongbo Meng, Jian Gong, Bo Zhou, Wenyan Zheng, and Zhenshun Song have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, B., Luo, T., Yang, T. et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is beneficial for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 36, 1053–1063 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08371-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08371-8

Keywords

Navigation