Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although patients with previous upper abdominal surgery are no longer considered as a contraindication in laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for these patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LCBDE for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery.

Methods

Two hundred and seventeen patients with common bile duct stones who underwent LCBDE in our institution from January 2010 to September 2017 were enrolled in the retrospective study. They were divided into two groups: group A, with previous upper abdominal surgery (n = 50) and group B, without previous upper abdominal surgery (n = 167). Patients’ demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Group A exhibited a longer operative time compared to group B (179.7 ± 61.5 vs. 156.0 ± 46.8 min, p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (123.9 ± 99.5 vs. 99.5 ± 84.7 mL, p = 0.087), postoperative hospital stay (7.4 ± 2.6 vs. 6.8 ± 2.3 d, p = 0.193), and overall complication rate (8.0 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.732) between the two groups. There was no mortality in both groups. The initial stone clearance rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (98.0 vs. 98.2%, p = 1.000), and the final stone clearance rate was 100% in both groups (p = 1.000). The stone recurrence rate had no significant difference between the two groups (2.0 vs. 2.4%, p = 1.000). The conversion rate was comparable between group A and group B (6.0 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.718).

Conclusions

LCBDE is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. The keys of this procedure are carefully separating the adhesions and clearly exposing the common bile duct, and using a variety of methods to remove the stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res 86:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou Y, Wu XD, Fan RG, Zhou GJ, Mu XM, Zha WZ, Jia J (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure of choledochotomy after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy. Int J Surg 12:645–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Darkahi B, Liljeholm H, Sandblom G (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 9 years experience from a single center. Front Surg 3:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aawsaj Y, Light D, Horgan L (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 15-year experience in a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 30:2563–2566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seetahal S, Obirieze A, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum T, Tran D (2015) Open abdominal surgery: a risk factor for future laparoscopic surgery? Am J Surg 209:623–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn KS, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Kim JH (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. World J Surg 35:1333–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Asai K, Kayano H, Masubuchi S, Uchiyama K (2013) Effect of previous abdominal surgery on outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56:336–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi SB, Han HJ, Kim WB, Song TJ, Choi SY (2014) The efficacy of subcostal-approach laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous midline incisions: comparative analysis with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:842–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai LX, Tong YF, Yu H, Liang X, Liang YL, Cai XJ (2016) Is laparoscopic hepatectomy a safe, feasible procedure in patients with a previous upper abdominal surgery? Chin Med J (Engl) 129:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li LB, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Wei Q (2008) Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases. World J Gastroenterol 14:3081–3084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiappetta Porras LT, Nápoli ED, Canullán CM, Quesada BM, Petracchi JE, Oría AS (2008) Laparoscopic bile duct reexploration for retained duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1518–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yun KW, Ahn YJ, Lee HW, Jung IM, Chung JK, Heo SC, Hwang KT, Ahn HS (2012) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations. Korean J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg 16:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang K, Zhan F, Zhang Y, Jiang C, Zhang M, Yu X, Ma T, Wu H (2016) Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration for the patients who underwent prior biliary operation. Indian J Surg 78:364–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu JG, Wang YJ, Shu GM, Lou C, Zhang J, Du Z (2014) Laparoscopic versus endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao YC, Chen J, Qin Q, Chen H, Wang W, Zhao J, Miao F, Shi X (2017) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bile duct exploration versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suslavich FJ, Turner NA, King PS, Brown HK (1989) Intraabdominal adhesions: intraoperative US. Radiology 172:387–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hua J, Meng H, Yao L, Gong J, Xu B, Yang T, Sun W, Wang Y, Mao Y, Zhang T, Zhou B, Song Z (2017) Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc 1:3581–3589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Podda M, Polignano FM, Luhmann A, Wilson MS, Kulli C, Tait IS (2016) Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30:845–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong ZT, Wu GZ, Luo KL, Li JM (2014) Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube. J Surg Res 189:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Quaresima S, Balla A, Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E, Paganini AM (2017) A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. HPB (Oxford) 19:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Jisheng Zhu, Gen Sun, Le Hong, Xiaohua Li, Yong Li, and Weidong Xiao have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Sun, G., Hong, L. et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 32, 4893–4899 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6248-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6248-3

Keywords

Navigation