Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous abdominal surgery has been regarded as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. However, studies on laparoscopic cholecystectomy have showed that the presence of prior abdominal procedures does not affect the outcomes of surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

This study enrolled 295 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery from May 2000 to May 2003. The patients were divided into two groups: those with previous abdominal surgery (n = 84) and those without a prior operation (n = 211). The outcomes of surgery for the two groups were compared with respect to the duration of surgery, blood loss, conversion rate, time to return of bowel function, resumption of diet, complications, and the hospital stay.

Results

The study included 158 men and 137 women. The median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 33-91 years). Significantly more female patients and patients with benign diseases had prior abdominal surgery. Conversion was required for 17.8% of the patients with and 11.4% of the patients without previous surgery (p = 0.181). There were no differences in the operating time or blood loss between the two groups. The time to bowel movement and resumption of diet were similar in the two groups. The median hospital stay was 7 days for both groups. Of the 39 conversions, 28.2% were necessitated mainly by the presence of adhesions. In the patients who underwent conversion because of adhesions (n = 11), nine had prior surgery and two did not (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The presence of prior surgery does not affect the operating time or blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The conversion rate is not increased for patients with prior surgery. The postoperative outcomes in terms of ileus, complication rate, and hospital stay are not worse for patients with prior surgery. Previous abdominal surgery should not be considered as a contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. InstitutionalAuthorNameClinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) ArticleTitleA comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050–2059

    Google Scholar 

  2. DE Beck MA Ferguson FG Opelka JW Fleshman P Gervaz SD Wexner (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time Dis Colon Rectum 43 1749–1753 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpvFKjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11156462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MG Coleman AD McLain BJ Moran (2000) ArticleTitleImpact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomy Dis Colon Rectum 43 1297–1299 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVGitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11005501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J Diez R Delbene A Ferreres (1998) ArticleTitleThe feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery HPB Surg 10 353–356 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ns1ajtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9515231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. A Dwivedi F Chahin S Agrawal WY Chau A Tootla F Tootla YJ Silva (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease Dis Colon Rectum 45 1309–1314 Occurrence Handle12394427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. H Ellis (1997) ArticleTitleThe clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction Eur J Surg Suppl 577 5–9 Occurrence Handle9076446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. H Ellis BJ Moran JN Thompson MC Parker MS Wilson D Menzies A McGuire AM Lower RJ Hawthorn F O’Brien S Buchan AM Crowe (1999) ArticleTitleAdhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study Lancet 353 1476–1480 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3kslaksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10232313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CT Hamel AJ Pikarsky E Weiss J Nogueras SD Wexner (2000) ArticleTitleDo prior abdominal operations alter the outcome of laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy? Surg Endosc 14 853–857 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000218 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvkvFKjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11000368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado A Castells P Taura JM Pique J Visa (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial Lancet 359 2224–2229 Occurrence Handle12103285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. WL Law KW Chu PH Tung (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients J Am Coll Surg 195 768–773 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01483-7 Occurrence Handle12495308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. WL Law CY Lo KW Chu (2001) ArticleTitleEmergency surgery for colonic diverticulitis: differences between right-sided and left-sided lesions Int J Colorectal Dis 16 280–284 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840100339 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnhtFymtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11686524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J Lumley R Stitz A Stevenson G Fielding A Luck (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes Dis Colon Rectum 45 867–872 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6318-6 Occurrence Handle12130871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D Menzies H Ellis (1990) ArticleTitleIntestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72 60–63 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC2cngsVc%3D Occurrence Handle2301905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. K Miller N Holbling J Hutter W Junger E Moritz T Speil (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who have had previous abdominal surgery Surg Endosc 7 400–403 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00311729 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD38vkvVc%3D Occurrence Handle8211616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. JW Milsom B Bohm KA Hammerhofer V Fazio E Steiger P Elson (1998) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report J Am Coll Surg 187 46–54 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czitFClsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9660024

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. JK Parsons TJ Jarrett GK Chow LR Kavoussi (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of previous abdominal surgery on urological laparoscopy J Urol 168 2387–2390 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005392-200212000-00009 Occurrence Handle12441923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. TH Schiedeck O Schwandner I Baca E Baehrlehner J Konradt F Kockerling A Kuthe C Buerk A Herold HP Bruch (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center study Dis Colon Rectum 43 1–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ntFahtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10813116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. BD Schirmer J Dix RE Schmieg SuffixJr M Aguilar S Urch (1995) ArticleTitleThe impact of previous abdominal surgery on outcome following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 9 1085–1089 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00188992 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC3MfgvFw%3D Occurrence Handle8553208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. G Shore QH Gonzalez A Bondora SM Vickers (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn disease Arch Surg 138 76–79 Occurrence Handle12511156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. AA Krabben Particlevan der FR Dijkstra M Nieuwenhuijzen MM Reijnen M Schaapveld H Goor ParticleVan (2000) ArticleTitleMorbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy Br J Surg 87 467–471 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01394.x Occurrence Handle10759744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MA Weibel G Majno (1973) ArticleTitlePeritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem study Am J Surg 126 345–353 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSyB2cjpsFI%3D Occurrence Handle4580750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. SD Wexner ID Moscovitz (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s disease Surg Clin North Am 80 1299–1319 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70226-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmtVOitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10987037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MD Wongworawat DR Aitken AE Robles C Garberoglio (1994) ArticleTitleThe impact of prior intraabdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am Surg 60 763–766 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD3s%2FmsVI%3D Occurrence Handle7944039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. TM Young-Fadok K HallLong EJ McConnell RG Gomez RL Cabanela (2001) ArticleTitleAdvantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costs Surg Endosc 15 450–454 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mtl2gsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11353959

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. SC Yu SC Chen SM Wang TC Wei (1994) ArticleTitleIs previous abdominal surgery a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Surg 4 31–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB38jislw%3D Occurrence Handle8173109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

    W. L. Law, Y. M. Lee & K. W. Chu

Authors
  1. W. L. Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. M. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. W. Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. L. Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Law, W.L., Lee, Y.M. & Chu, K.W. Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 19, 326–330 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8114-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8114-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation